WVM2005-14N+A:
Agenda Apr 11th; Calendar to 14th
by
Carolanne Reynolds, Editor
www.WestVan.org
.............................. celebrating ten years
of West Van on the Web
........................................
Herewith:
INFObits (FSR/FAR); Apr 11th MAIN
ITEMS (EVELYN DRIVE; Letters re cmty ctr, devt damaging creek?,
no resident notice re street changes); RUMBLING (cmnty ctr);
Calendar to Apr 14th; Apr 4th Ccl Mtg Notes; Abbreviated Ccl
Agenda Apr 11th; a bit on C3 from Apr 7; Traffic
Fine Revenue; LGB traffic study; Theatre: Quotation
+++ INFObits -- FAR/FSR
+++
Several have asked me what a FAR or FSR is -- and that's to be
expected from the public who normally just go about their busy happy
days in this beautiful municipality. Zoning sets density.
BPP's property in the Upper Lands is 2.5upa, units per acre.
DWV's permitted density for single-family homes/lots is .35, that's
.35 Floor Area Ratio, sometimes known as Floor Space Ratio.
What's that? I hear some still ask.
For the sake of making the math easy. let's say a lot is 10,000
square feet.
At .35, the maximum square footage of the structure allowed on
that lot is 3500. It can take up just over a third of the lot,
or it can be two or three floors (as long as it is not higher than the
maximum height allowed, 25 or 35ft?
A 1.0FAR that the OCP says the Evelyn Drive 'study' area can be
means 10,000sf structure/s.
That means a one-storey building wd cover the entire lot and
there'd be no green.
Amica nearby was allowed 1.75 so that wd be 17,500sf. B/c
it is a five-storey building, it does not take up much of the lot it
is on.
It then becomes clear that the density, the FAR, allowed on a
piece of property is not as important as a design if one wishes to
optimize green space and attractiveness.
See items 5.6 and 5.7 in Apr 11th's agenda with proposals from
.5FAR to 1.9FAR for Evelyn Drive.
=== MAIN ITEMS APR 11th
===
= Delegation from Scouts wanting bonfire on Ambleside Beach
Apr 25
= Noise Control Bylaw
= Pressure-treated wood in playground structures
= Water's Edge (Pk Royal Hotel site): revised Devt
Permit
= Recreation Tenancy Agreement with Hollyburn Sailing
Club
= 5.6 Draft Bylaws for Evelyn Dr Area (Staff
recommend receipt only; since the motion included description of the
process, wonder if that will be later; and who knows what Ccl will
do!)
The agenda went up Apr 6; they go up on Wednesdays, always noted
that a supplemental may be issued. This was 5.6 however sure
enough over the weekend I discovered item 5.7 had been
added. In any case if you're interested in this area,
it's a must read. It has part with .5FAR but it also has
1.2 and 1.9 FAR (the OCP says up to a maximum of 1.0).
Furthermore, under cmnty benefits it has $500K noted specifically for
the Kay Meek Ctr. I support the arts however cmnty benefit shd
be cmnty benefit and if $500K is being donated to DWV for cmnty
benefit, Ccl (with public input and suggestions of course) shd decide
to what to apply the money. To do otherwise, wd look like someone
either demanded that or maybe made it a condition for favourable
consideration.......
= CORRESPONDENCE: Minutes: Library Bd,
Sports/RecFacPlanning (Mar 16 about Cmnty Ctr discussions); Police
Bd, 2010 Olympic/Paralympic (Oct 14, Jan 20); Bears; SPARC; Cmnty
Ctr; Ambleside Fields; Aid on NShore; 2100blk Argyle; Perry/Green
Party Invitation; Teaching Awards; Evelyn Drive; Streamkeepers
re (destruction in) Lower Marr devt; BPAHA rightfully
upset not contacted re Engg/Transportation changes in their
area (WVM's Editor has been constantly urging that there be a
policy guaranteeing resident awareness: if not by having ratepayer
representation on every adv cmte -- someone has to be the voice of the
folk who pay the bills -- at least ratepayer/resident representation
during deliberations wrt decisions concerning their neighbourhood;
residents shd be included, informed, and invited to provide any
special knowledge they have of their area and character)
+++ RUMBLING +++
CENTRAL COMMUNITY CENTRE (C3) UPDATE
+++
It's a pity Ccl (or the
cmte) did not insist on more public information or input before now on
C3 but on the bright side, the Open House Apr 7th was a good start.
There were a series of boards depicting the devt to date and forms for
feedback. Staff thought more than 300 attended. The
architect and project manager were also on hand to answer questions.
Anyone who wd like to comment is invited to contact Ralph Ferstay
at 925 7207 (email rferstay@westvancouver.ca) or his assistant Stacie
Graham at 925 7125 (segraham@westvancouver.ca), or see
www.westvancouver.ca/
During the displacement
after the 47-yr-old rec ctr seismically upgraded about 1996 is
demolished and before the new building is finished, a shuttlebus to
Gleneagles is being considered (as well as other venues).
Again, for those not
following this, the structure is proposed to be about 60,000sf with
20,000 leased to the Vancouver Coastal Health Authority. C3,
Srs' Ctr, and the Aquatic Ctr will be joined and have an atrium.
Although the principle has
been stated as flexibility, some groups have been surprised to learn
that they may not be able to have their sports in the new facility.
Now is the time for residents and groups to let staff know their
preferences. Even once the number of participants in each sport
or activity is known, it will then be a great task to match that with
space and cost. Timing is also still under discussion.
Can't be too cautious planning a cmnty building at the heart of WV,
not just for recreation, music, sports, but a magnet for gatherings
and celebration.
At a recent ccl mtg, the
Dir/Finance said $16m was available.
If we're not presented next
time with options, perhaps a modular approach cd be designed so we
build the sections we want as we go along and can pay for them.
=== CALENDAR to APR 14th
===
= TUESDAY 5th evening had: ~ 7 - 9pm ~ Authors' Visit to
Library: Join culinary historian Elizabeth Driver, former VSun
food editor, and former 'Edith' Eve Johnson, and former Woodward's
Food Floor consultant Mona Brun, as they celebrate the launch of
the Edith Adams Omnibus.
= WEDNESDAY, 6th =
~ 8:30am ~ Sports/Rec Fac Planning
~ 4 - 6pm ~ DWV"s OPEN HOUSE on Ambleside Redevelopment at
the Chamber's offices. Residents and businesses in the Ambleside
area will receive more information from the District via mail in the
coming weeks.
~ 5pm ~ PEAC at Hall: Draft Env'tal Strategy; Idling in WV
School Areas; Opportunities to Recycle Building Materials
= THURSDAY, 7th =
~ 8:30am ~ Arts & Culture Strategy Implementation Cmte at
Hall
~ 4 - 8pm ~ (New) Cmnty Ctr Open House and Public Mtg at the WV
Cmnty Ctr in the Cypress Room
Pls give input (see contact details in C3 section)
~ 7 - 8:30pm ~ FREE PUBLIC
LECTURE - Green Tea Ice Cream: Exploring Consumer
Response to Green Buildings (at SFU Harbour Ctr); details in
previous issue.
~ 7pm ~ Inaugural mtg of North Shore Transportation Adv
Cmte at Lions Bay M Hall, finalizing Terms of Reference
= FRIDAY, 8th ~ 9am to 5pm ~ Economics of Green Buildings Part
IV: The Business
Opportunities of Green Buildings; PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT COURSE; (at SFU Harbour Ctr); details in previous
issue.
= SATURDAY, 9th =
~ 9am - 1pm ~ WV Cmnty Ctr Garage Sale
= SUNDAY, 10th =
~ 10am - 4pm ~ 14th Annual Walk/Run
for MS (Seawalk - Ambleside to Dundarave)
= TUESDAY, 12th =
~ 5 - 7pm ~ HAC at the
Hall: Hodgson House - update;
2607 Nelson; Arts & Culture Strategy; Hollyburn
Lodge
= WEDNESDAY, 13th =
~ 7:30am ~ WV Ch of Commerce hosts the Coho Society AGM at the
Hollyburn Country Club
Speaker: Dr John Nightingale of the Vancouver Aquarium;
pls call 926 6614 to reserve.
~ 8:30am ~ Sports/Rec Fac Planning Cmte at Hall -- Cmty
Ctr! what else?
~ 4pm ~ The WV Ch of Commerce has also
arranged, for members, a one-hour session with Gene Quan, a member
of the Citizens' Assembly, wrt the Electoral Reform referendum
question on the May 17th ballot. Mr Quan will provide
information on the Assembly's final recommendation. Please
book.
~ 5pm ~ PAC in Ccl
Chambers: AMBLESIDE TOWN STRATEGY
=== CCL MTG NOTES APR 4th
======================
2. APPROVAL OF
AGENDA -- letters added re Evelyn Dr, Clovelly Walk Heritage Area,
Cmnty Ctr; LMTAC item moved, then
the Mayor announced that the Evelyn Dr item had been
deferred to Apr 11.
The MMgr said the report (staff re zoning approaches?) had just
arrived at 4pm in the afternoon so staff's opinion premature to
consider at this point since both Ccl and the public wd need the week
to review the material, and even then it might just be receipt.
Moreover the solicitors still had not provided their report.
{As it turned out an 'alternate' draft bylaw report from staff
did not appear until the supplemental agenda around the
9th.}
3. ADOPTION OF
MINUTES: March 14 and 21, 2005
4.
DELEGATIONS
4.1 A. R. Rickman
regarding safety matters pertaining to truck traffic on Chartwell
Drive and Cross Creek Road
ARR: thank you allowing me to talk to you about truck safety on
Chartwell Drive
you have our letter? concerned about heavy volume of heavy
trucks
don't want to shut down, but to disperse to where work being
done
research 93 trucks in front of home in one day; constant
consistent
area no 1 is Chartwell, no 2 Canterbury, no 3 Whitby
Estates
whether exit 20 or 11 coming from east
police have reported rearends/pile-ups on 15th b/c short merge
lane
10 safer than 11 or 15
advise trucking companies, suppliers, to follow procedures we've
outlined in this paper called "Areas"
feel then problems wd cease to exist
problems worsened by an 'improvement' finished yesterday on
Chartwell Dr
in morning pleasant to see no truck; improvement worked well,
outstanding
good work by Engg Company; wonder who's going to mow the
lawn
learned that WV doesn't really approve of speed bumps
Mayor: calmers
ARR: told b/c of problems with snowplows; wonder how you're going
to get them up and down with 2/3ft of snow
danger to children; cd get by b/c three lanes but now two lanes
and no place for trucks to go
paramount to take trucks not doing deliveries to us, to take
another route
unfortunately Chartwell has become the route, and we think this
is wrong
found an article Mar 25 in NSNews that majority of trucks don't
meet safety standards
at top of Whitby Estates, big sign saying follow safety or $10K
fine
one street we're concerned about is Highland Dr on downhill
route
simply: we want your help
I have photographs of trucks passing in front of my home, have
list of trucking companies, etc
believe if
Sop: BPP has rules their trucks not to travel during school
traffic times
12 projects other than BPP
maybe have
companies often just pass on info
have to go up, no sideways; when Chippendale through might
lessen
still maintain we have to have something attached to the bldg
bylaw attached re times of delivery and removal
maybe a no-go at certain times
ARR: maybe I didn't make it as clearly as I cd
three streets approved as arterial routes: Chartwell, Westhill,
and Folkestone, and we suggest Folkestone be the route of demand for
the Whitby Estates area, we call that Area no 3
same thing applies to Canterbury, pple shd use Westhill for
those
no objection at all to trucks going into Area no 1, the Chartwell
District, object to trucks departing the hwy at exit no 11, spewing,
....all the way through Chartwell, Chippendale, past Folkestone, a
distance of 3.9km through residential terrain
Folkestone shorter and safer
MMgr: we revisit our rerouting strategy
EB: we've had BPP develop a truck strategy
deployment of trucks spread out through the cmnty so don't hear
90 trucks a day
asked them also to deal with material as much as possible on
site
adjacent to school, is not part of the routing plans so we'll
check to see they are adhering to the plan
will see what they're doing
see about trucking spread; wd be concerned about limited to
Westhill and Folkestone???// impact on them
ARR: in our backyard, fine but don't go through my backyard if
it's for a nbr
REFERRED TO DIR/ENGG (EB)
7;25
5. REPORTS
5.1 Development Variance
Permit No. 05-002 (8540 Citrus Wynd)
(File: 1010?20?05?002)
Designated Presenter: Director of Planning, Lands &
Permits
SJN; wrt new sewer plant; remote area
b/c of delay permit expired so have to reapprove
slight increase in sq footage at entrance otherwise same.
Sop; req for subdivision to be finalized -- is that 2A in permit
draft? to written satisfaction of engineer?
SJN; yes; driveway to be paved
Sop; completion of work
SJN: from point of view of circumference
JC: did we initiate this delay?
SJN: wanted to time this with new sewer treatment plant
JC: will there be an extra cost
SJN: has had to pay for application
JC: cost?
SJN: old fee, probably about $500?
JC: is that fair?
SJN: we may have been involved in some of the delay but not all
of the delays
RECOMMENDED:
THAT the Development Variance Permit Application No. 05-002
(8540 Citrus Wynd), which would provide for a new house with variances
to highest building face, height, setbacks and in-law suite location
be approved.
PASSED
5.2
Ambleside-Dundarave Long Term Shoreline Planning Framework
Appendix "B" to above-noted report
Designated Presenter: Director of Engineering and
Transportation
EB: extensive report from adv cmte wrt storm protection etc; save
$
Adrian Rowland in gallery, want to thank him and the cmte
AR [slide presentation]:
from Ambleside to Dundarave
public waterfront
value
Goals: consolidate, ....
shoreline mark from Ambleside Park to Dundarave Pier
years ago recommendations in studies re monitoring, and worth
pursuing
Shoreline: barrier or connection?
awareness of ongoing impacts (photo 1954 and 1994)
infrastructure plans?
near-shore environment and processes? -- what do we know what cd
we know?
shoreline awareness
Shoreline Investment and Returns
Reduce costs / improve benefits
shoreline -- sea level will rise over next century
get ahead of events = payback
hardwall against nature or work with it?
50 - 100 yr view
biophysical, env'mt, prop value
never anticipated such a long report
highlights
WV does not have a coastal planner on staff; no allotment for
shoreline issues
no assignation of accountability for shoreline integrity and
values
maybe reason why recommendations not implemented
natural low-gradient erosion as .......
....
Action List Recommendations:
30!
eg aerial photography from time to time, maybe low tide May 23rd
each year
re-energize
1991 Waterfront Study done with a lot of public consultation, had
a 15-yr plan; time to dust it off and have this 15-yr plan
start with three-yr plan, invest in knowledge and implement pilot
projects
try to create a shoreline team
performance review at end of three years
review and prioritize potential immediate or short term
actions
staff to dev a three-yr shoreline plan
Need to bring detail mapping to shoreline to understand nearshore
dynamics
[slide of area a govt agency wants to try out a project -- opp to
save money]
RECOMMENDED:
1. THAT Council
receive the Engineering Advisory Committee report titled
"Ambleside-Dundarave Long Term Shoreline Planning Framework"
(attached as Appendix A) for information.
2. Council direct
staff to review the Ambleside-Dundarave Long Term Shoreline Planning
Framework study in conjunction with the Engineering Advisory Committee
and report back, within six months, on the development of a three-year
plan to begin implementation of the recommendations in this
report.
Sop: you have a background in this? an engr?
AR: yes, I'm an engr in shoreline
Sop: wonderful to have volunteers
you allude to elimination of sealife b/c of tidal moments and rec
boulders to guide
isn't that one of the areas to prevent this shifting?
14th/16th wrt higher tides, we shd look at .......
AR: re the Stanley Park seawall, drive up Cypress and see sign
and says you can see change in sea levels; 2m wave impact
suspected over long term shoreline will narrow and lower with
loss of habitat value
major storm, sand pumps out; you can see it in photos
near 15th, see seawall loss of foreshore; DWV owns some of those
seawalls and at this time no plan -- where is it going?
quite a few issues; there are 30 issues, pick; some
low-cost
Sop: EAC said they wd accept info from citizens who have info
from living along the waterfront and wd look to incorporating it
in their study
RD: was on EAC, was pleasure working with Mr Rowland;
extraordinary report, 60 pages
{this is the fantastic report I said a while ago was coming
to Ccl; it's incredible!}
Mr Rowland is being modest about his background
he's Harbour Master, I think, for 120 small craft harbours
in BC for DFO
unique experience, brings special expertise, thank you
extraordinary study, best I've ever seen
by a volunteer cmte, done at no cost for the municipality
hope we will begin to implement our reports; had reports, not
implemented and key now is to set up this interdeptal cmte; look for
this to be done as expeditiously as possible
G-J: outstanding
is it fair to say although what's to be done, critical?
AR: try not to be
shoreline unique; understandable you can't have someone on staff
all the time
the motive of the cmte is to move ahead and to be proud of our
waterfront
to identify procedural, or structures, that may be holding back
momentum
we do call us the waterfront cmnty
if you look at the GIS system of the M, it goes black at the edge
of the land
technology is there to include shoreline, accessible
G-J: service; note we have lost some of our public seawalk
not to mention loss of habitat
role of EAC, see us as supporting your leadership
moving beyond advisory, that's exciting
AR: as much as you want us to be
JF: thank you, amazing piece of work
not an engr but the photos helpful: before and after
either what we did or did not do
wd like to suggest EAC and staff report back but plan shd contain
a structure so ongoing monitoring and steering, and your suggestion as
to makeup of that cmte
Sop: advantage to help us w/ Burrard -- took six months to remove
a log
did you approach some re boulder gardens?
AR: really up to proponent, the District, to come up with soundly
researched proposals, biology, etc
present it to regulators and also present it in terms rather than
having one boulder or log as the issue, have the health of the whole
waterfront
a long-term plan is a net gain
goal is net habitat gain
onus is on District and us to get our act together, put forward
solid proposals, so the regulators can not be in a negative mode but a
supportive one.
5.3 Heritage Strategic
Plan (File: 0115-20-HAC)
Designated Presenter: Director of Planning, Lands &
Permits
Tom Wardell, Chair of HAC:
speaking to you about the long-needed plan
as result of tireless efforts on behalf of cmte, on Mar 24th, govt of Canada designated the Lions' Gate
Bridge as a national historic site
outstanding landmark with important symbolic value to
Canadians
features an elegant design complemented by a spectacular
setting
remarkable engg feat
decisive and undeniable influence on Vancouver's devt
design of bridge in perfect harmony magnificent
outstanding example of structural engg and a recognized
landmark
contributed to devt of north shore, esp WV
we applaud the govt of Canada for this designation
Jacqueline Gijssen and Michael Evison will describe the benefits
of a heritage strategic plan
JG: [listed some bldgs] some successes, opportunities re OCP,
Arts & Culture Strategy, Cmnty Benefits, Amb Revitalization
our bldgs may not be 100 years old but some most important in
country
[slide of Porter House]
[named other bldgs]
Objectives: shared vision; strategies for H conservation; update
policies and regulations; encourage heritage preservation
two parts:
articulate goals, implementation;
workshops; course over one year
Heritage Branch staff will be av
Michael Evison (MEv): and I think I can speak for the
hundreds in heritage in this cmnty
flavour and character
tools, updated inventory, home-owner incentives, etc
alternatives to demolition; sympathetic design
Benefits: sometimes can be seen as restrictive but we in heritage
[cmnty], 100s of volunteers, see it differently
contributes to flavour and character, anchors our memories gives
meaning to place
timely worthwhile critical actvity for this activity
livability and beauty, enhances social and wellbeing
hope you will agree timely
thank you for opp
if we can add, wd be pleased to do so
Sop: if H cmte determined on A list, if the owner doesn't want to
be, are they forced to be?
JG: match of what District wants it to be, its voluntary; up to
cmnty, to say
how we want to manage
it is possible that there are some bldgs so imp they shd be on a
registry
but it's only that
Ccl cd say voluntary activity; up to you to decide that
want to make a rec what the cmnty's values are
Sop: in past an old bldg, and over years, only a part is
left; hope that's not something we're not going to say -- by time
redeveloped all lost
point to the old YMCA -- bank is there now and a few bricks but
you can't recognize it as the old YMCA
JF: compliment; timely, will complement the Arts & Culture
Strategy
true we don't think of preserving what we have now so we will
have a heritage
thank you for taking opp for some cmnty workshops
education in cmnty missing to a large degree
most of us out there getting on with our lives
time to take stock of what there is in our cmnty and have it
preserved
hope we can access this funding, matching, but if not will cmte
come back?
MEv: we have been in contact with prov govt; ev confidence
funding will be forthcoming
Cclr JF referred to bldgs but heritage is more than that
often we punch it down and destroy the reason we came here
JC: led straight into q I was going to ask, I was wondering about
other aspects
approached recently by a man recently, in telecommunications and
did a study over five years, gave it to museum and
history of telephone and communication in WV and we're doing
nothing with it
JG: the plan can include what we feel it shd include: landscapes,
.....archaeology sites, all of those things
we do want it to be focused so there's a tangible outcome
the Museum and Archives operates under a different dept
the workshops we'll hear what is important to the cmnty
JC: you have not yet decided what aspect
G-J: we really heard that during the Arts & Culture Strategy
mtgs
maybe preservation of our natural heritage can fall into that,
lighthouse park, shoreline
sense of place is huge
can be done in many ways
identify what heritage means to them; to show
in the strategy, we say heritage can be a catalyst for
change
see you want another cclr, I may have some competition but I'd
like to
RD: foreshore, not done enough to protect
this cmte become energetic
first to update our heritage register wch has gotten out of
date
goes back 15 years, some bldgs no longer here
second is to find incentive and tools, eg tax breaks and
others
we're not alone in our H strategic plan -- Vanc, NV, others have
done this
can assimilate those plans and take what's good in them for
ourselves
RECOMMENDED:
THAT
1. The
preparation of a Heritage Strategic Plan (Phase I) and Implementation
Plan (Phase II), with a total estimated budget of $55,000 be
approved. The proposed budget would include consultant fees and
costs associated with public consultation.
2. Staff submit
funding applications to BC Heritage (Ministry of Community, Aboriginal
& Women's Services) for matching grants of $7,500 for Phase I
and $15,000 for Phase II of this project, to reduce the amount of
required District funding.
JC: identify source of funds
SJN: from operating reserves
RD: may I add re telecommunications, that book, I'll check into
it
shame it hasn't been recognized
suspect we were understaffed until recently when we hired a
full-time archivist
in the meantime we'll find this book and see author--
JC: we shd never be too understaffed not to say thank you.
RD: exactly, seeking trying to give a reason
5.4 Evelyn Drive - Draft
Amendment Bylaws/Approval Process
******* POSTPONED TO APR 11 ********
~8:20
5.5 Arts & Culture
Grant Recommendations 2005 [* indicates three-year program]
Designated Presenter: Director of Parks and Community
Services
KP introduced Rick Ryan, Chair of CSAC:
RR: some mbrs of the cmte here tonight.
wrestled with various views
...
extremely small part of budget but grants heart of WV
keeps people focused on the human side of the ledger beyond
sewers and bylaws
....
many stories
reminds us of what many have done
permits us to dream -- theatre, arts, etc
with more funds they wd hv recommended more for some
we're in the second year of a three-year cycle
cmte collaborated with other two Ms; will depend on report to be
released later this year
recommended according to policies approved by you
G-J: you make the statement about the three-year, can you give an
example
RR: the JP Fell Band is able to look ahead as to attending not
only Remembrance Day but others as well; another group can go to Kay
Meek; some info on funds av for 2006 and 2007
Family Services know where they'll be for next year
G-J: wrt Arts Ccl grant not funded; can the cmte say no/not
perhaps Ccl cd support in another way
Oksana: cmte felt that the arts ccl project was very worthwhile,
they were interviewed; strong feeling they'd probably be able to find
sponsors for some of the events; within service agreement and cd find
add'l
JF: 20 groups you're providing funding -- out of how many?
Oksana: all applicants listed and only one denied funding
VD; congratulate the cmte; so much work in previous years,
confident well-documented process that wd guide cmte
Finance Cmte of GVRD is bound to give out funds and cmte has
equally diverse views and unfortunately not the same policy structure
so much more of a regional problem. One mbr from City of
Vancouver and wd like ev to go to Vancouver
RECOMMENDED:
THAT
1. The Community
Services Advisory Committee grant recommendations for arts and culture
grants, be approved as follows:
British Columbia [Boys']
Choir 2,000
Summer Pops
Orchestra 1,250
West Vancouver Youth Band
Society 5,000
Hollyburn Heritage
Society 750
West Vancouver Historical
Society 1,500
Ambleside
Orchestra 1,000
Pro Nova Chamber Players (DC Chamber Soloists
Society) 1,000
North Shore Chorus
Society
500
North Shore Light Opera
Society
2,000
O'Shihan Cultural
Organization 500
Theatre West Van (West Van Little Theatre
Guild) 2,250
West Vancouver Adult Community Band
Association 500
J. P. Fell Pipe Band
Society
500
British Columbia Photography and Media Arts
Society 3,000
Chor Leoni Men's
Choir 1,000
Laudate Singers
Society 1,000
Pacific Baroque
Orchestra
1,500
Pandora's
Vox 3,000
Presentation House Cultural
Society/Theatre 1,000
Sinfonia Orchestra of the North
Shore 3,000
PASSED
5.6 Social Services Grants
Recommendations 2005
Designated Presenter: Director of Parks and Community
Services
KP: will call RR back
Mayor: we have two who wish to speak to this
Laurel [didn't catch name]: Pres of NSh Family Services
and Barb McClelland [sp?] Mgr of Info Services
Wish to thank you; three-year funding helps; first stop; support
other non-profits; daily calls from people in crisis; publish green
book and a directory for seniors as well as one for young
children
Partnership with SFU, "Staying Power"
volunteer program, over 100 in WV
work more closely with Multicultural Society
promote volunteering among ESL and new Cdns
placement of directories on-line
researching possibility est'mt of charitable donation; affordable
housing
8:36
small stock of housing
submitted grant application to three Ms for projects
[including] UBC pilot project
lack of affordable housing; assisted by student
one-to-one advisory approach
WV, a govt with a conscience
Sop: wd you happen to know total amount in grants for all funds
received for whole NShore
Ans: know for our agency but not whole North Shore
[RR didn't know, nor did MMgr]
Sop: reason I ask, this $80K, these problems will grow more and
more, need, will show up; know Mr Stuart you looked to
supplying money on equal funding basis
MMgr: tri-M review, we'll get a better picture and the impact of
any cutbacks
Sop: $1m figure out there but don't know
as outlined here, starting to diversify
umbrella over other orgs; important we share more
MMgr: tri-M; we'll look at and alternatives
VD: note from your report, two worrying items
Suicide and Crisis Intervention -- small increase, and says large
number of WV youth served, workshops, 1200
RR: in this area I was in a conflict so moved out
Richard Wagner (Social Planner): workshops through schools,
sideline; primary runs a hot-line for Lower Mainland
VD: do we keep records?
RW: try to but cdn't give us a breakdown by M, a lot are
confidential
volume from N Sh quite high, WV considerable
VD: St James re safe house and you recommend some tripartite
process
think an important group; providing a youth safe house for kids
in our area
can't be funded through your operation, is this going to be
separate?
MMgr: my understanding
G-J: mtg Monday and will have a report
RECOMMENDED: THAT
1. The Community
Services Advisory Committee grant recommendations for social services,
be approved as follows:
Big Sisters of BC Lower
Mainland
400
Boys & Girls Club (Parents Together -
WV) 200
Family Services of the North
Shore 19,500
*NS Community Resources
Society 9,050
NS Community Resources Society (Advocacy
Project)
500
NS Multicultural Society (includes Bridging
Program)
1,250
NS Neighbourhood House (Pregnant & Parenting Teen
Program)
3,000
NS Neighbourhood House (Learning
Together)
1,000
*NS Women's Centre (includes Single Mom's Support
Group) 1,500
West Coast Violence Prevention
Society
500
*West Vancouver Family Place
Society
2,500
Autism Society of British
Columbia 1,000
Autism Society of British Columbia (Community
Library) 250
Avalon Recovery
Society 500
BC Paraplegic
Association 400
BC Schizophrenia Society NS
Branch 1,500
Canadian Hard of Hearing NS
Branch 400
Canadian Mental Health Association -
Operating 1,000
Canadian Mental Health Association - Consumer Support
Network
250
Canadian Mental Health Association - Volunteers in
Partnership 250
Canadian Red Cross Society -
RespectED 750
Crisis Intervention & Suicide Prevention Centre of
BC
750
Friend 2 Friend Social Learning
Society
500
Harvest
Project 2,000
Lookout North Shore Emergency Aid
Shelter 2,000
NS Association for the Mentally Handicapped (ECA
Program) 1,000
NS Crisis Services
Society 10,500
NS Disability Resource
Centre 1,400
NS Project Society for Low Income and
Handicapped
5,000
West Coast Alternatives Society -
Operating 4,500
West Coast Alternatives Society - Kids First
Program
500
*Lionsview Seniors Planning Society -
Operating 2,000
Lionsview Seniors Planning Society - Services to Seniors
Coalition 1,000
*NS Keep Well
Society 1,000
NS Meals on Wheels
Society
700
NS Stroke Recovery Centre - Operating costs & Safety
Education
750
*NS Volunteers for
Seniors
3,000
2. Consideration
be given to the St. James Society (Youth Safe House) funding request
under a separate service agreement that is coordinated in a
tri-municipal approach with the City and District of North
Vancouver.
RD: $83,300, largest portion; real cmnty benefit
JC: q for info -- we're handling all three categories en
bloc
what if one or more of Ccl do not support one of these
groups
Mayor: express displeasure
JC: that's it?
MMgr: cd have it divided
JC: just a burning q.
8:47
5.7 Community Services
Grants Recommendations 2005
Designated Presenter: Director of Parks and Community
Services
RECOMMENDED: THAT
1. The Community
Services Advisory Committee grant recommendations for community
services grants, be approved as follows:
Coho
Society
5,000
Coho Society Transit
Costs
1,250
525 Pathfinder Squadron (granted funds to be used for program
costs) 600
B.C. Special Olympics North
Shore
500
Kidsport NS Community Fund (granted funds contingent
on
1) City and District of North Vancouver minimally to match
funding
2) encouraging more West Vancouver awareness and
participation
3) to target 25% of funds for West Vancouver youth and
organizations)
500
North Shore Lifeboat
Society 1,000
North Shore Lifeboat Society (Safety
equipment)
500
NS Mountain Bike Events Society (granted funds contingent
on
matching amounts from the City and District of North
Vancouver.) 5,000
North Shore Safety
Council
1,000
St. John
Ambulance 800
Third West Vancouver Scout
Group
600
West Vancouver Track &
Field 2,000
West Vancouver Streamkeeper Society (granted funds and
strongly
encouraged to seek matching funds from school
-
Westcot Parent Advisory committee and School
District) 1,250
2. the West
Vancouver Rotary Club application be considered separately from the
community services grants.
JF: wrt Streamkeepers, can't speak to cmte process but unless sch
bd regulations hv been changed, they are not allowed to provide
grants
RR: my understanding is that it's going to the Parents' Adv
Cmte
Mayor: change that
MMgr: not a condition, just a suggestion
8:50
5.8 Controlled Substance
Nuisance Bylaw No. 4417, 2005
Designated Presenter: Director of Administrative
Services
RB: as a result of illegal pot-growing
abandon, new bylaw
Ms Gillespie brief slide presentation
re aftermath of a grow operation
cost recovery to property owner such as police, inspection, fire,
etc so not burden on taxpayers
able to go on property
special inspection fees will be waived if owner requests go onto
property
other cmtnies: Coq, Surrey, Chilliwack, Maple Ridge
[slide of damage to property, holes punched, unauthorized wiring,
reflectors, propane for power]
VD: tremendous idea, good to see it so well-documented in your
report and the bylaw
inspect once in every three consecutive months
how are you informing?
Ans: notices with tax notices, informing by mail bylaw being
brought in, to nonresident landlords
VD: at a mtg recently and they're now doing it inside concrete
highrise bldgs
laying soil on floors!
have seen in lowrise in West End but not highrises as well; quite
the issue back east
not just absentee landlords but prop mgrs as well
does this apply to any resident?
Ans: yes but dealing with absentee landlords to start with b/c
tend to be rentals
VD: now been told it's a mortgage helper!
shd put in Tidings
huge problem if you get caught
Ans: will notify the real estate board
branching out from there
VD: owner will have to inform next purchaser
all good points
heard Surrey working with BC Hydro, looking for higher than usual
meter readings
are we?
Ans: yes, looking into that
Mayor: understand they're limited
VD: have some way of doing within their laws
Mayor: makes sense
RD: I have a friend who moved to NV and rented their house in WV
to what appeared to be a cleancut couple
ended up running a growop
damage to house was tremendous
in a way this penalizes the victim
trashed house, shdn't the criminal pay?
shdn't violator?
get agency if owner travels?
Ans: if the owner has nothing to do with the illegal operation,
any inspection fees or fines are waived but any repairs are always
paid by the prop owner
RD: just laying out reconstruction
Ans: yes
RD: even if they don't know?
suppose person away?
owner has to be vigilant, part of onus on owner
problem is, some of these people quite cleancut, don't look like
gangsters; certainly happened to a friend of mine, seems harsh subject
to all these penalties as well
MMgr: brings to attention of homeowner add'l
responsibilities
Sop: absentee or not, makes them aware we're not going to
tolerate this in our cmnty
from what I understand is slap on wrist and they're back at it
again
costs are significant; maybe some format in bylaw that owner must
at least through the course of the year attend the premises; that wd
be a safeguard to some degree
Ans: there is a requirement, once within ev three consec
months
owner or his agent
Sop: these restrictions will go some way
hope we won't have any grow ops in WV
Mayor: reported to be a bigger industry than the forest
industry!
Former bylaw abandoned then motion:
RECOMMENDED: THAT
1. Controlled
Substance Nuisance Bylaw No. 4417, 2005 be introduced and read a
first, second and third time.
2. The intentions of
Controlled Substance Nuisance Bylaw No. 4417, 2005 be posted and
advertised in accordance with the Community Charter.
3. Nuisance, Noxious
or Offensive Trades, Health and Safety Bylaw No. 4382, 2004 be
abandoned.
9:07
6. BYLAWS
6.1 "5 Year Financial
Plan Bylaw No. 4415, 2005"
Designated Presenter: Director of Finance
This Bylaw received third reading at the March 21, 2005 Council
Meeting.
RECOMMENDED: THAT "5 Year Financial Plan Bylaw
No. 4415, 2005" be adopted.
RL: prior to adoption
wd like to give Ccl further information, specifically changes to
capital prog made late in process
to clarify some changes
incorporated two kinds
number of signif items outside of envelopes, previously
identified in November at start of process, in material distributed at
that time
specific amounts have not changed
secondly a number of projects started in 2004 not completed so
required rebudgeting; happens every year
some rebudgeted into 2005 include vehicles ordered but not
purchased
elements of technology plan; including documentation of a new
plan
unexpended funds for C3
and smaller for two artificial turf fields
recommend
[VD made motion]
Sop: capital facilities reserve and above threshold endowment
fund will supply considerable monies we'll be building
do you know what the endowment fund above threshold sits at
now?
RL: balance of now--
Sop: above threshold?
RL can't tell you off top of my head
Sop: significant?
RL: yes
Sop: $10m?
RL: not quite that amount
Sop: capital reserve?
RL: again, can't tell you off top of my head
I believe in nbrhd of around $2m
Sop: have had interest from 320 Taylor Way, provided
significantly for some of our facilities
NV has a staggering cost to look at their recreation and will
have to find ways and we have accumulated or done quite a bit
if we have a budget out there for finalizing the Facilities
Master Plan and we run into a shortfall, where will money come
from?
RL: five-yr capital plan, the comprehensive plan tabled,
discussed with Ccl, discussions, the remaining project from RFMP is
C3, at budget $16m is affordable within that five-yr period within
resources of Endowment Fund and Capital Reserves
Sop: five years, Endowment Fund will grow again?
RL: yes
Sop: gather then section under revenue sources p 143
above threshold Cmnty facilities reserve in 2005, $1.2m, $5m,
and then $10m -- wd be close to the $16m we need for the
facilities?
RL: the amount Cclr Sop is referring to will be drawn from to
fund this capital program
PASSED
9:13
7. REPORTS FROM
MAYOR AND COUNCILLORS
VD: very positive mtg Sports/Rec on Wed
met with schedulers, field hockey/soccer/baseball have worked out
difficulties re baseballs flying
rescheduling able to preserve for the season
cmte and groups agreed to meet again in June to talk about the
long-term solution re flying baseballs and that the 90ft diamond seem
to be in a confined area; able to hit ball further, particularly with
technology
letters from field hockey
think we left on positive note
Open House on April 7th -- review plans and meet architect;
public come and give views
GVRD Bd Mtg I attended last Friday, if anyone wants to put name
forward for board re YVR (airport) to be GVRD's rep; mbr didn't
reapply and felt bigger choice needed
considerable discussion re governance WV raised, said there shd
be a cmte and I immediately put my hand up, volunteered my time
support for YVR, for Richmond to get rent reduced; paying $72-80m
just goes straight into federal coffers; Vancouver only one without
cap; cdn't understand one hour debate for that
lengthy discussion on twinning of Port Mann Bridge; on how to
deal with the Ministry/Minster of Highways; some felt politely, move
slowly, nice good feeling; my view was that was a total waste of time,
and much better to start a publicity program, hit Min of Hwys hard and
fast and regularly b/c our experience of nice and polite, failed us
bitterly; didn't work
Mayor: good
VD: amazing, got Vancouver
Mayor: maybe even cut and cover
VD: maybe
8. OTHER
ITEMS
9:20
8.1 Correspondence [full list
in previous issue]
...
8.1.6 J. R. Rudd,
March 08, 2005, regarding rain barrels in West Vancouver
(File: 1815-01)
G-J: I raised that at the Water Cmte mtg and will bring back
here
concern that standing water increases risk but technology has
addressed that
...
9:21
9. PUBLIC
QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS
= Hugh Knight: NV is restricting dog-walking so likely
they'll come here
suggest WV restrict dog-walking to WV residents
MMgr: will recollect we made some changes; met staff from NV;
will review our regulations
anticipate will be some impact
VD: we only allow commercial dog-walking above Upper Levels
HK: I do understand that, I am a dogwalker
a licence wd say resident or non-resident
a tradesman gets one b/c benefiting residents
a dog-walker only intends to use property, not benefit
residents
it's numbers using the trails that is the problem
NV is experiencing; way to solve without becoming draconian as NV
has become
been walking six or eight dogs for five or six years
been talking and accommodating -- when are you coming
when hundreds of dogs from other Ms
Sop: as long as you're walking the dogs it's okay!
HK: you got it
people in WV want dogs walked, hire WV residents to do it
not talking about stopping WV residents from walking
not open up our trails to rest of mainland
Sop: stop walking dogs down at Amb
HK: this is commercial
MMgr: as I mentioned, have asked staff to look at this
9:26
Fulvio Verdicchio: Pres of Sentinel South Slope Homeowners
Assn
understand Evelyn Dr's been put over to next week
Mayor: MMgr
MMgr: at last meeting
if Ccl wished to have a debate on zoning alone what dcd they
do
staff, what bylaws wd look like for zoning alone
time it took
only av at 4pm this afternoon, I didn't feel it wd be long
enough
it has been deferred to next week when Ccl cd further defer,
further report from Ccl......ask for changes or set a date for
formal
what we're doing right now
FV: thought you were dealing with density
VD: density is zoning
FV: staff not talking about density
OCP says study area
MMgr: study involves a wide variety of issues
suggests give Ccl and public opportunity to look at the
report
Mayor: I'll be back next week
FV: need direction from you
Mayor: we'll read
FV: nothing to do wrt Millennium
Mayor: --
MMgr: Cclr VD suggested it might be helpful to discuss zoning
irrespective of proposal
cd determine
cd direct staff to come back with something more generic
Ccl hasn't had time to review that report so that's the
reason
Sop: next week just received?
MMgr: report asks for receipt but Ccl cd ask for further
information or take other action
kind of speculative at this point
report this evening just for receipt.
Sop: why do any more?
surely not do anything more wrt any projects?
MMgr: Ccl's not in any position to make a decision next
week
approach suggested in the report
10. ADJOURNMENT
=== ABBREVIATED AGENDA APR 11th
===
3. ADOPTION OF
MINUTES -- No items presented.
4.
DELEGATIONS
4.1 M. Matheusik, Scouts
Canada West Vancouver 3rd Division Cubs, regarding request for fire
permit for bonfire at Ambleside Beach on April 25, 2005
5. REPORTS
5.1 Fire & Rescue
Reciprocal Aid - North Shore
(to be provided in Supplemental Agenda)
5.2 Proposed Noise Control
Bylaw No. 4404, 2005
Designated Presenter: Director of Administrative
Services
RECOMMENDED: THAT
1. Noise Control
Bylaw No. 4404, 2005 be introduced and read a first, second and third
time.
2. Council
endorse the Administrative Municipal Policy No. 02?10?278 for
Private Special Events Exemption From the Noise Bylaw.
5.3 Pressure-Treated Wood
in Playground Structures
Designated Presenter: Director of Parks and Community
Services
RECOMMENDED:
THAT the information report dated March 31, 2005 from the
Director of Parks and Community Services re Pressure-Treated Wood in
Playground Structures be received for information.
5.4 Confirmation of
Development Permit Drawings - Waters [sic] Edge, 540 Clyde Avenue
(formerly Park Royal Hotel site)
Designated Presenter: Director of Planning, Lands &
Permits
RECOMMENDED: THAT
1. The
revised building plans for Development Permit 03-009, 540 Clyde Avenue
attached as Schedule B and as modified by plan elevation drawings
Schedule A (A.5.1, dated March 24, 2005) be approved including:
(a) Re-introduction of the glass
window walls in four bays on the crescent side of the building;
(b) Removal of the columns to open
up the balconies and decrease building mass;
(c) Increase in the loggia
areas at the base of the building as proposed by the architect;
(d) Elimination of the stairs from
the terraces to the riparian area with the exception of the northern
most terrace and maximization of the natural riparian area by bringing
it up to the wall of the terraces on the riverfront edge.
5.5 Recreation Tenancy -
Agreement with Hollyburn Sailing Club
Designated Presenter: Director of Parks and Community
Services
RECOMMENDED:
THAT the draft lease/licence agreement between the District and
the Hollyburn Sailing Club be approved.
5.6 Draft Bylaws for the
Redevelopment of the Evelyn Drive Planning Area
This item was deferred from the April 04, 2005 Council
Meeting.
Designated Presenter: Director of Planning, Lands &
Permits
RECOMMENDED:
THAT the report dated March 31, 2005 from the Manager of
Community Planning regarding draft bylaws for the redevelopment of the
Evelyn Drive Planning Area be received.
SUPPLEMENTAL ITEM ADDED as you can see by date of report::
5.7 Evelyn Drive Planning
Area: Alternative Bylaw Approaches
Designated
Presenter: Director of Planning, Lands &
Permits
RECOMMENDED:
THAT the report
dated April 7, 2005 from the Manager of Community Planning regarding
draft bylaws for the redevelopment of the Evelyn Drive Planning Area
be received.
6. REPORTS FROM
MAYOR AND COUNCILLORS
7. OTHER
ITEMS
7.1 Cancellation of May
02, 2005 Council Meeting
Designated Presenter: Director of Administrative
Services
RECOMMENDATION: THAT the May 02, 2004 Council Meeting be
cancelled.
7.2
Correspondence
>>> No Action Required (receipt only)
7.2.1 Committee
and Board Meeting Minutes
(a)
West Vancouver Memorial Library Board, February 16, 2005
(File: 1905-01)
(b)
Sports and Recreation Facilities Planning Select Committee of Council,
March 16, 2005
(c) West Vancouver Police Board, February 24, 2005
(File: 2905-03)
(d)
2010 Olympic/Paralympic Committee Select Committee of Council, October
14, 2004
(e)
2010 Olympic/Paralympic Committee Select Committee of Council, January
20, 2005
7.2.2 A. J. E.
Snowden, March 28, 2005, regarding "Friends of the Bear" Day -
Klahanie Park
Previously distributed
due to timing of event.
7.2.3 N.
Henderson, Executive Director, Social Planning and Research Council of
British Columbia (SPARC BC), March 23, 2005, regarding the Community
Social Planning Network of BC (CSPN BC)
7.2.4 J. Sikes,
March 29, 2005, regarding Provincial Health Centre Relocation to
Community Centre
7.2.5 B. Clark,
March 30, 2005, regarding Community Centre Plans
7.2.6 T. Smith,
March 20, 2005, regarding Ambleside "D" field
7.2.7 L. White,
March 26, 2005, regarding Ambleside "D" field
7.2.8 D. & D.
Lund, March 29, 2005, regarding Ambleside "D" field
7.2.9 A. S.
Hilsen, Municipal Clerk, District of North Vancouver, March 23,
2005 regarding Corporate Policy 14-7130-1 "Mutual Aid - Joint
North Shore"
7.2.10 B. Bagley, March 23,
2005, regarding proposed hi-rise 2100 block Argyle Avenue
7.2.11 D. Perry, March 31,
2005, regarding BC Election - D. Perry Message and Invitation
7.2.12 L. Rattray, March 31,
2005, regarding 2nd Annual Excellence in Teaching Awards
Previously distributed
due to timing of event.
7.2.13 Two (2) letters, dated
as indicated, regarding Evelyn Drive Development
>>> Action Required
<<<
7.2.14 R. Lee, March 25,
2005, regarding Ambleside Sea Walk for hosting "Dog
Walk-a-Thon"
Referred to Director of
Parks and Community Services for consideration and response.
7.2.15 R. Richards, March
24, 2005, regarding Proposed New Community Centre
Referred to Director of
Parks and Community Services for consideration and response.
7.2.16 H. Hamilton,
President, West Vancouver Streamkeeper Society, March 31, 2005,
regarding Lower Marr Development
Referred to Director of Planning, Lands & Permits for
consideration and response.
7.2.17 J. W. Cryer,
President, British Properties Area Homeowners Association, March 26,
2005, regarding Chartwell Drive Curbs
Referred to Director of Engineering and Transportation for
consideration and response.
7.2.18 A. Kshatriya, March
24, 2005, regarding Deadline for the Payment of Utilities Bill
Referred to Director
of Finance for consideration and response.
8. PUBLIC
QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS
9. ADJOURNMENT
=== CMNTY CTR [C3] APR 7th, a bit
of background...... ===
Can't wait for the next chapter in the Central Cmnty Ctr (C3)
saga. Nov's information flyer said court sports in, March said
out; last week JF said in, then backtracked to 'time for public input
and ccl decision'. Don't forget public input after Thursday's
Open House is still welcome; get a questionnaire/feedback form and
send it in!. Unbelievably, rumblings to me are that badminton,
volleyball, basketball, keep fit, fit fellows (today?), floor hockey,
and so on successively keep finding out they won't be able to use the
big new gym wch will have heavy equipment for gymnastics (wch also
requires special flooring unsuitable for other activities). The
rumbling is growing and a petition is now circulating.
It is only natural and reasonable for all those using the main
gym at the central rec ctr wd assume that they'd be there in the new
one and not displaced out west -- especially when the Gleneagles Cmnty
Ctr was not designed for badminton, volleyball, basketball, etc
(reflection, too small, maybe only one court possible).
Hear GCC underused so why not put immovable gymnastics there and
keep the main sports here in the civic ctr, especially since 70% of
the population live in the east!
Maybe go back to square one and brainstorm on what we want to
have and include at the heart of our cmnty. The rec ctr is not
about to collapse and maybe even more money will be available by next
year to build an even bigger facility to accommodate more --
construction costs can't overtake taxpayers' money available
especially if construction has been slowing down in the US, and maybe
M land can be sold, leased, upzoned to provide even more moolah to
play with and address residents' wishes.
===== PRESS RELEASES courtesy of Ralph
Sultan, MLA ======
Traffic Fine
Revenues
From the North Shore
News, referring to disposition of traffic fine revenue transferred
from the provincial treasury, to municipalities:
Pearce (Cpl. Ed Pearce,
president of the West Vancouver Police Association) said that West
Vancouve-Capilano MLA Ralph Sultan has been supportive of the police
association.
Sultan said, "I have
every confidence that West Vancouver will use the traffic fine revenue
sent to them to fight crime in the municipality as the premier and the
solicitor general intended."
Sultan said he was
confident that the money will be used to fight crime. If not, he would
not be confident that funds would be available in later years, he
said.
------------------------------------
For immediate
release April 5,
2005 Traffic study announced for Lions Gate
Bridge
North Vancouver -- A
major study will take place to solve traffic congestion problems
between the north end of Lions Gate Bridge and the Taylor Way/Capilano
interchanges, announced West Vancouver-Capilano MLA Ralph Sultan and
North Vancouver-Lonsdale MLA Katherine Whittred.
"We are aware of the
problems created by growing commuter traffic in North and West
Vancouver," said Sultan. "Congestion made by through traffic en
route to Squamish and Whistler and from other avenues creates
congestion and safety issues for motorists. This study will bring us
one step closer to identifying a way to making this segment of the
road network operate more efficiently and safely."
Growing volumes of
traffic are presenting challenges to highway users, emergency
vehicles, shopping areas, planned and existing residential development
as well as commuters and other citizens of the North
Shore.
"We took our concerns
about this area to the Minister of Transportation and added our voices
to those of residents," said Whittred. "Something has to be done,
particularly in view of the 2010 Olympic Games which will impose even
greater burdens on this vital transportation link."
This new study will draw
on past evaluations, and develop an improvement strategy for the
network in general. Partnership opportunities and staging
possibilities will be studied out to the year 2021 with strategic
level analysis to 2030.
Work will commence on
the study immediately and should wrap up in early 2006. Community
consultation of the study findings will ensue.
-30-
Sarah
Reeves, Communications
Officer, BC Government
Caucus
Ph. 250.356.0389
// Mb. 250.413.7471
// Fx.
250.387.7957
sarah.reeves@leg.bc.ca www.governmentcaucus.bc.ca
=== THEATRE ===
Beirut was one of the most fascinating cities I've ever lived in;
just a note to say really enjoyed opening night and the desperate
message in "Helen's Necklace" by Carole Frechette at VECC;
Elizabeth McLaughlin is very good as Helen and Sanjay Talwar is
incredible as a whole host of other characters; decorated by live
music on several different instruments by Boris Sichon. Closes
this weekend.
=== QUOTATION
===============
The days come and go like muffled and veiled figures sent from a
distant friendly party, but they say nothing, and if we do not use the
gifts they bring, they carry them as silently away.
--
Ralph Waldo Emerson, writer and philosopher (1803-1882)