WVM2005-23S+A
SMarr
Ev Dr
July 11th Agenda
Calendar July 17th
by
Carolanne Reynolds, Editor
www.WestVan.org
*** NEWS POINTS
* ~$25m Cmnty Ctr model at
DAC -- Ccl hasn't seen it yet; no public mtg planned! [See
Calendar]
* South Marr Devt back Mon July 11
[see July 4 notes; BPP withdrew $$$ before mtg!]
*** RESPECTS: Chuck Cadman, 1948 - 2005, "homo
politicus rara avis": down to earth, honest, sincere, dedicated,
selfless, without pretence or pomp, WYSIWYG, strength of conviction,
independent of party [see Qtn]
*** SNOWBIRDS -- Happy 35th Birthday! [see INFObit]
*** THEATRE -- Bard's Hamlet
opened July 6th and it's yet another hit! Ben Frazer's a
romantic, dreamy, mad hunk; David Marr's Polonius plays with
language amusingly. It's theatre in the round, well, really
square. One warning: don't sit facing south. Visit
www.bardonthebeach.org or call 739 0559 for tix.
*** TALL SHIPS -- incredible sight in English Bay over the
weekend, graceful by day and beautiful forms outlined in lights at
night. (The private yacht with a helicopter on board was
mind-boggling as well.)
*** CUISINE -- Creme brulee is one of my favourite desserts
so I've tasted all sorts: classic, fruit, lavender, chocolate,
even recently black sesame wch I thought surely was one of the most
unusual. Nope. That was topped the other evening at
Moorings in Horseshoe Bay where the Thai Curry Creme Brulee tickled my
tongue tantalizingly.......
*** THIS ISSUE
***
July 11th Main Items; Calendar to July 17th
(DAC note); Highlights of July 4th Ccl mtg (and proposed South Marr
devt) with SMarr submission at end; Another Ev Dr submission;
Abbreviated July 11th Agenda; Monkey Business (Language); INFObit --
Snowbirds; Quotation
*** MAIN ITEMS
July 11th *** A
Supplemental Info Package/Agenda May be Issued [or
on-table]
+ Again Minutes (for June 27) not in
package, to be part of supplemental. This used to happen if
needed within a week, now the minutes are not even ready for the
meeting two weeks earlier!
+ DELEGATION re a "By-Pass Road" connecting [Lions'] Gate Bridge
and Highway #1
+ REPORTS
- Community
Arts Council Service Agreement and Licence to Occupy
($25K)
- Devt
Variance Permit App (5771 Cranley) a
single-storey addition on rear of house [public input]
- Lower
Mainland Treaty Advisory Committee (LMTAC) First
Principles
-
Devt Permit App (South Marr Creek - 24.23 acres) (to be provided in Supplemental Agenda);
[solicitor's report; public input permitted]
-
Watercourse Protection Bylaw No. 4364, 2005 (to be provided in Supplemental
Agenda)
+ BYLAWS [for Adoption; Third Readings
passed July 4]
- Lane Paving
1300 Block Mathers and Lawson and 1480 - 14th; 1500 Block Jefferson
and Kings and 1285 - 15th; 1000 Block Esplanade and Keith
Road
- Fees and
Charges Amendment Bylaw (Cemetery Tariffs, Ice Arena and Aquatic
Centre fees)
+ CORRESPONDENCE: Minutes from
PEAC (March 9!), PAC, HAC, and Sports/Rec Fac
Planning; New Riparian Areas
Regulation - Extension Granted; WV Streamkeepers' clarification with
respect to creek priorities (misstated by BPP during public mtg re
South Marr)
>>> CALENDAR to July 17th
<<<
=== Thursday, July 7
~ 4:30pm ~ Special DAC mtg: design of new cmnty ctr
[Presentation with model]
{Fascinating! Good recommendations for Ccl to
consider however disappointment expressed may not see it again before
finalized (told probably wdn't come back). One mbr said ~25m too
uncertain b/c not in enough detail. In this crazy haste, Ccl
hasn't even seen the model yet, let alone referred it!}
=== Saturday, July 9
~ 6am ~ 17th Annual Knee Knackering Run
(Baden Powell Trail)
~ 9am - 4pm ~ Dundarave Farmers'
Market
~ 10am - 5pm ~ North Shore Antiques Fair
(WV Arena)
~ 2pm - Artists' Talk at FERRY BUILDING GALLERY --
"NATURE STORIES" [Exhibit to July 24]
Mixed Media by Karen Bagawaya, Rolf Brandvold, Karen Cain,
Samantha Sanderson, and Marion Webbe
=== Sunday July
10
~ 10am - 5pm ~ North Shore Antiques Fair
(WV Arena)
~ 11am - 4pm ~ NEW HOURS for Ambleside
Farmers' Market (Parking Area in 1300 Block of
Bellevue)
~ 7pm ~ Concerts by the Sea (Ambleside
Pier)
=== OUR LIBRARY IN THE SUMMER
Regular hours: M - Th, 10 - 9pm; Fri 10 - 6pm; Sat 10 - 5pm;
Sunday closed from July 3rd to Sept 11th.
=== Tuesday, July 12
~ 5pm ~ HAC [CANCELLED]
=== Wednesday, July 13
~ 8:30am ~ Sports/Rec Fac. Plan. Comm. (MFCR)
{~ 6pm? Since PEAC was cancelled last week, check to see if on
this week}
=== Saturday, July 16
~ 7am - 9am ~ Bay Challenge Swim Race (Sandy Cove Beach)
~ 9am - 4pm ~ Dundarave Farmers' Market
=== Sunday, July 17th
~ 11am - 4pm ~ Ambleside Farmers' Market (Parking Area in the
1300 Block of Bellevue Avenue)
~ 7pm ~ (Concerts by the Sea)
>>> CCL MTG
SUMMARY -- July 4th <<<
=== Delegation on tourism (coordinated project for North Shore)
said will cost $83K, wants $20K from DWV; planning for 2010 and
beyond.
=== Delegation wrt Adults at Risk
Support Network project. Examples given of a problem hidden in
all Ms -- neglect, abuse, and self abuse of seniors. Looking for
$750 annually from DWV.
=== South Marr started at 7:56 -- interestingly
controversial -- still no DFO approval, still "imminent".
{My submission follows}
Two hours before the public meeting staff received a letter from
BPP withdrawing the offer of 'cmnty benefit' of many thousands of
dollars. VD asked why but got no answer. Here's a partial
transcript as I heard it:
"good plan
but they have missed one piece
Planning is standing their ground we want to know why you
offered and then withdrew it
let's be clear
someone offered something and then withdrew it
staff saying once you do that it'll be gone
sometime in future
like fresh air -- no figure to it, difficult to work
out"
There were some bleatings about there not being any Cmnty
Benefits policy yet (the draft has been sent out for comment).
In my submission [below] I said they (Ccl) all have good ideas and am
sure they can agree on something even without the policy passed (staff
have done all the negotiating in past so why stop now?).
G-J came up with a sort of 'compromise' several-part
motion:
"That Council authorize issuance of the draft development
permit, subject to provision of the security required under Section 2
and Schedule A of the permit and signed acknowledgement of the permit,
and subject to:
i) DFO approval
ii) an indication, in writing, by BPP of its contribution to
public amenities in recognition of the South Marr neighbourhood as
integral to the Rodgers Area Development Plan."
but the recommended motion was for deferral and it wd have failed
(and DP approved maybe) had the MMgr not said they needed a legal
opinion, the vote was tied, so the Mayor broke the tie to send it to
the solicitor. As VD pointed out, why approve without
benefits or without a commitment to have the benefits and integration
with the (much larger) Rodgers Creek area plan (wch the OCP called for
having been accepted before parts developed, and South Marr is a
part).
In any case, putting in tennis courts, etc is a benefit for the
subdivision itself making it more attractive for sale, ie a benefit to
the dvpr in a way, not really for the cmnty. BPP is asking for
variances.
There is no doubt the abysmal traffic congestion with the schools
and highway as a result of previous devt needs to be rectified
asap. As one supporter said, it's a traffic nightmare; and
another warned of the likelihood of an accident.
{thought balloon: who approved the earlier devt,
hm?}
Looks like the beginning of this area had problems -- even DFO
slapped a stop order on BPP b/c of their (damaging) treatment of
ephemerals. BPP explained, unbelievably? ingenuously?, that DFO
asked them "not to go into the creeks but didn't ask them not to
go into ephemeral[ creek]s. They did. They got
caught.
BPP also cleverly claimed no accidents with their trucks --
and it was explained that the trucks were hired by the construction
companies. C'mon. We know what accidents. We
know what subdivisions and devts were having work done.
Another supporter also agreed that it had been a flawed
process.
(PEAC, Streamkeepers, and others, besides making good
suggestions, pointed out that they were being asked to comment not
only before seeing the plans for the whole area that the OCP
envisaged, but also after some damage had already been done so their
recommendations too late.)
JF was concerned about the OCP obligations (understandable, since
she chaired the process for the new one); Sop just advocated
acceptance/approval as he generally does if it's BPP; his words and
agreed: "BPP not bandits riding into the sunset" and he
counted on DFO approval.
RD said this is 24 acres while Rodgers Creek is 250.
Public Mtg was closed (but this means little since it doesn't
have the restrictions of a Public Hearing and speaking to Ccl and dvpr
is permitted); item deferred one week on split vote with Mayor
breaking the tie. Good to see he's on the side of legal
protection of the District and took the MMgr's sage advice.
Last words to VD around 9:30 before vote:
"reason I made motion
staff is saying 'hold this' in middle of negotiations and we're
about to cut them off
I'll reiterate, an offer was made and it was
withdrawn
why did the dvpr decide that he didn't need cmnty benefit? he
thought he did up until today!
...explain why changed his motion"
{My take -- see transcript below -- is to work with BPP's
expressed goodwill and truly make this devt much better than Whitby
(as they say it will be), and set a sensitive, sustainable, beautiful
example that we'll be only too happy to have creeping along the
mountainside, little havens of hillside heavenly habitations.
:-) }
=== DPA for ten-storey (not the 20 allowed), nine-unit
multifamily on one of the last apt-zoned properties in WV (2100 block
Argyle). As one cd expect, complaints about views being cut off
(and wanting them to be more in line with other bldgs nearby), less
understandable complaints about the water feature (waterfall? down
from original 100ft to 45ft? trickle? art? white noise? traffic
better? or sound of sea and seawall?), but devt ~40ft lower than 180ft
permitted.
Public Mtg adjourned to July 25th with staff report.
=== Report on Popn by Age and Gender and School Enrolment
in WV. VD pointed out that 27.4% aged 1 - 24; about the same,
27.9%, over 60; 25-40 only 11% (off at uni, travelling, can't afford
to buy here); and greatest group is 40 to 60, 40% -- they're paying
all the bills. The Mayor commented that's the way it shd
be.
=== Ferry Building Gallery -
Architecture Project, "The Poetics
of West Coast Modernism"; title came from Gordon Smith at last
year's civic dinner; will be presented in
fall of 2005 through to 2006; will be at
various sites, travelling; $24K project,
majority from donations. As RD
said: "WV does contain some of the best architecture in
Canada; some hidden behind
trees; we're in process of updating our
heritage inventory; looking for ways to
protect them; most built between 1940s to
1960s; next fall through spring; FBG,
Silk Purse, Lib, M&A." [Look forward to seeing
this.]
=== Dir/Parks gave some explanation
wrt Fees and Charges increases for cemetery, ice arena, and aquatic
ctr; G-J queried filming in the cemetery and that will be
reviewed.
=== Three readings passed re Lane Paving; residents pay 70%; see
adoption July 11th ccl mtg.
=== At last motion to have a FAC rep at EAC mtgs. FAC
passed motion in February but when rep showed up not been allowed to
join EAC b/c no formal motion/approval -- IMO, needless delay and
embarrassment/frustration caused by staff not forwarding to Ccl in
timely manner. Why did it take about five months?
Forcing them (at least two tried to attend/speak) to sit in audience.
As Sop pointed out, the FAC rep had had to sit in audience (and not
speak?!). Oh well. Resolved now.
=== REPORTS: Many congratulations (well deserved) to JC for
a most successful and enjoyable Canada Day celebration with fireworks;
Productive mtg with Westport Nbrhd Assn; More congratulations to JC
invested as fellow of Rotary Int'l
=== Only a question re golf course in Correspondence (will
be looked into)
=== PQ&C had praise for response team re ferry accident
in HBay and the modelling of the official t-shirt of the red-legged
frog we can kiss goodbye on sea-to-sky if overland instead of
tunnel
------- SUBMISSION re South Marr Proposed Devt
------ Transcript from 2005 July 4 ------
Good evening, Mayor and Council
Carolanne Reynolds, Editor, WVMatters
Unfortunately, I have not yet had time to read the new
information released with the supplemental package.
It is my hope however that you will recognize the damage already
done to the streams and in particular to the important but sensitive
ephemerals and with the development permit, insist on measures to
rehabilitate them as much as possible as well as to enhance those that
are left.
Please also pay close attention to the geotechnical studies to
make sure clearcutting as done in Whitby will not speed up erosion and
even cause slides or floods. I viewed Whitby on the weekend and
noted that one can see in some spots where the soil has fallen away,
even under retention walls. Measures must be taken to ensure no
residents below will suffer any risks as has happened in some other
parts of WV.
BPP wants South Marr to be better than Whitby. Before
approving this permit, please make sure this will be so.
Please do what you can to prevent clearcutting as they said they
will do.
Please see the survey with any significant or rare trees/plants
identified so they can be protected.
Please find out what the tree height restriction is and at least
allow some tall trees, perhaps with windowing -- remember the view is
through and framed by the trees.
No one is advocating a wall of trees, but nor are a series of
monopoly trees desirable either.
And please make these clear conditions so that your intentions
are understood and an accommodation for a park leaving some trees does
not result in a measly four trees left as they did on the school
site.
Let us appeal to BPP's stated commitment of being better and
sensitive. Why not have much wider setbacks from streams and
allow clumps of trees likely to survive rather subject to blowdown so
the excuse given they must all be removed.
The one line of small houses, addresses somewhat the need for
variety in housing. As I think both Planning and Design advisory
cmtes said, the variances requested make them too close.
In exchange for larger setbacks and groups of trees, pls
ask BPP to consider changing the line of sgl-fam houses, to maybe ten
or 12 units in duplexes or a multifamily, or maybe half and half -- a
few small houses on lots not cheek by jowl, and one multifamily or a
couple of duplexes. Vary it more.
IOW, they can keep their zoned density even with the wider
setbacks and small woodsy areas, even if it requires some
multifamily. If they come forth with a comprehensive
extremely environmentally sensitive plan, maybe consider a bit of a
higher density in appreciation.
Council, before approving this please:
= make sure DFO authorization has been received (to
avoid the misunderstanding in the earlier stage that caused damage and
resulted in a stop work)
= ensure that all the Watercourse Protection bylaws and
provisions/requirements (even those intended/anticipated) are adhered
to
= try to meet all the concerns raised by the Parks and
Env Adv Comte as well as those issues identified by the WV
Streamkeepers
= rather than scouring the Rain Garden, make it more
attractive, meaningful, and effective -- perhaps invite suggestions
from the Parks Dept, cmtes, or residents -- it is a concept that has
potential but is a farce of a term as it stands now -- it shd be more
than a highway for bears to nearby fruit trees and garbage
bins.
BPP want to do better. Let's work with this goodwill to
develop something much better than Whitby.
This devt can be a showcase and example of how sustainable,
sensitive, and beautiful new devts as they creep across our
mountainside can be.
Start today with real environmental and creek protection and
enhancement.
As for cmnty benefits, my recommendation to adv cmtes and various
groups is to give Ccl a list of their 'top ten' so that Ccl has a
selection of various projects and amenities of varied costs and
value so that suitable benefits can be asked for, for the benefit of
the whole community.
Please differentiate between amenities for the subdivision itself
making the lots higher priced, more desirable, and easier to sell[,
and cmnty benefits to residents of WV].
A great plan can be had {I think I meant 'made'} for this Rodgers
area total plan, and this can be part of it, if you have an idea and
sort of sketch in some of the parks, and the wider areas for linear
parks and whatever
[Make this an integral part of the larger Rodgers Creek area
plan.]
As for the comment {earlier} to wait until there's a Cmnty
Benefit policy, there's no need to wait for a cmnty benefit policy.
You on Council know and can ask what the cmnty wants. You have
some great ideas yourselves.
You can ask for some cmnty benefits now, you don't have to
wait.
Thank you.
>>> MORE COMMENTS from EVELYN
DRIVE PUBLIC HEARING <<<
TO: Mayor & Council of WV
-- Public Meeting on Evelyn Drive
Proposal; June 28,
2005
BY:
Candace Lundy 103-29th Street, West Vancouver
I would ask that you evaluate this proposed
project in the context of the following:
FIRST -
Topography
West Vancouver is made up of some 27 individual and distinct
character neighbourhoods of which the combined Evelyn Drive and
Sentinel Hill areas are one. All 27 of our neighbourhoods are
primarily shaped by topography. This project because of [its]
density and parkade podium structures beneath the
towers, will virtually deny the role
of topography and this in turn will result in a total devastation of
the current environment of these 21 acres.
SECOND
A basic principle to the long-term development of a more
complete community is that every incremental
addition to established neighbourhoods ought to enhance
and increase the wholeness and completeness of that
[neighbourhood]. A part of this principle is that existing
residents in that neighbourhood ought to be supportive of the
project.
I believe in this case, that the majority of the existing
residents in this area do not consider this project to
be a positive addition, and, just for clarity, the opinions
of those selling their lands to the applicant should be
considered on a different basis [from] those staying on in the
neighbourhood.
THIRD
Over [six] years and enormous citizen input, it
was decided that the Evelyn
Drive Area would be
subject to a comprehensive area plan study including analysis of
traffic, access, visual impact, topography, and housing
forms.
NO SUCH study was prepared and the recent Spaxman study of
this specific proposal does not do away with the O.C.P. study
requirement. If we don't evaluate development proposals around
some formal community principles we are left with chaos, fear, anger,
and neighbour and against neighbour.
Clearly, the basic principles of a good governance model have
been ignored in this case. And quite frankly, this is the most
disturbing element of this application and
process.
It is not the developer's fault for trying to get this past
us, it is our fault collectively, to allow it to get to this
point.
FOURTH
The specifics of this proposal
are:
57 lots with a total area of 640,000
sq/ft
Existing allowable density on these 57 lots
is 224,000 sq. ft
This proposal has a density of
714,000 sq. ft. which results in a density increase of
490,000 sq. ft. - A very conservative value of this up-zoning is
$100/sq.ft. which provides the developer with an increased site value
of
$49
MILLION DOLLARS.
This is a Community benefit reality to which you need to give
specific attention to in your evaluation of this
proposal.
FIFTH
So, [let's] step back and look at a density of 1.0 as set out
in the O.C.P. This results in a density of 640,000 sq.ft. which
can be achieved with a series of [two-, three-, and four-]storey
buildings. With an average of [three] storeys, this low-rise
solution would be much less destructive to the environment, be more
easily phased over a longer period, provide the developer with
attractive economics and would in EVERY WAY, be a more
appropriate solution to this difficult situation.
>>>
ABBREVIATED CCL AGENDA July 11th <<<
3.
ADOPTION OF MINUTES
3.1 Council Meeting Minutes, June 27,
2005 (to be provided in
Supplemental Agenda)
4.
DELEGATIONS
4.1 J. Winkler and S. Schemmer, West Vancouver residents,
regarding a "By-Pass Road" connecting [Lions'] Gate Bridge and
Highway #1
5.
REPORTS
5.1 West Vancouver Community Arts Council Service
Agreement and Licence to Occupy
Designated Presenter: Director of Parks and Community
Services
RECOMMENDED: THAT
1. The
West Vancouver Community Arts Council Service Agreement be approved
with a service fee of $25,000.00 paid by the District in two
[instalments] commensurate with satisfactory service
delivery.
2. The
proposed Licence to Occupy to the West Vancouver Community Arts
Council for the Silk Purse Arts Centre be approved and the Mayor and
Municipal Clerk be authorized to execute the document.
5.2 Development Variance Permit Application
No. 05?004 (5771 Cranley Drive)
Designated Presenter: Director of
Planning, Lands & Permits
At the June 06 meeting, Council received
the report dated May 27, 2005 from the Assistant
Planner.
Request staff report OR give approval to
provide for a single-storey addition on the rear of the
house.
5.3 Lower Mainland Treaty Advisory Committee (LMTAC)
First Principles
Designated Presenter: Director of
Administrative Services
... be received and the information be made
available for review and comment back to Staff by July 18 for
forwarding to the LMTAC.
5.4 Development Permit Application No. 04?017 (South Marr
Creek - 24.23 acres bounded by Marr Creek, Collingwood School, the
Chairlift Road Subdivision, and the westerly extension of Chippendale
Road)
At the July 04, 2005 meeting, Council
deferred consideration of this DP Application until July 11, 2005.
The Public Meeting input closed on July 04, 2005.
(to be provided in Supplemental Agenda)
5.5 Watercourse Protection Bylaw No. 4364,
2005 (to be provided in
Supplemental Agenda)
6.
BYLAWS [for Adoption; Third Readings passed July 4]
6.1 Lane Paving 1300 Block Mathers and Lawson Avenue and
1480 - 14th Street
6.2 Lane Paving 1500 Block Jefferson and Kings Avenue and
1285 - 15th Street
6.3 Lane Paving 1000 Block Esplanade Avenue and Keith
Road
6.4 Fees and Charges Amendment Bylaw No. 4441, 2005
(Cemetery Tariffs, Ice Arena and Aquatic Centre fees)
7.
REPORTS FROM MAYOR AND COUNCILLORS
8.1
Correspondence
=== No Action Required (receipt
only)
8.1.1
Committee and Board Meeting Minutes
(a)
Parks and Environment Advisory Committee, March 09,
2005
(b) Planning Advisory Committee, May 25,
2005
(c) Heritage Advisory Committee, May 10,
2005
(d) Sports and Recreation Facilities Planning Select
Committee of Council, June 08, 2005
8.1.2 K. Vance, Senior Policy Analyst and J. Wright,
Policy Analyst, Union of British Columbia Municipalities,
June 30, 2005, regarding New Riparian Areas Regulation -
Extension Granted to March 31, 2006
8.1.3 D. B. Pink, June 24, 2005, regarding
"Ultimate Tribute Show" Fundraiser
Previously distributed
due to timing of event.
8.1.4 West Vancouver Streamkeeper Society, June 22,
2005, regarding clarification with respect to creek priorities of West
Vancouver Streamkeepers
8.1.5 C. Wood, Treasurer, Pro Nova Ensemble,
regarding Arts & Culture Grant
8.1.6 C. Loat, Centennial President (2004 - 2005),
Rotary Club of West Vancouver, June 27, 2005, regarding Rotary's
Centennial Year
=== Action
Required
8.1.7 B. Brill, undated, regarding recent "No Dog"
Policy in Tantalus Park near Horseshoe Bay
Referred to Director of
Parks and Community Services for consideration and
response.
8.1.8 L. Munroe, June 21, 2005, regarding Train
Whistle Bylaw
Referred to Director of
Engineering and Transportation for consideration and
response.
8.1.9 D. R. Corrigan, Mayor, City of Burnaby, June
14, 2005, regarding Agricultural Land Reserve
Referred to Mayor and
Council for consideration and response.
9.
PUBLIC QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS / 10.
ADJOURNMENT
>>> MONKEY
BUSINESS <<<
* Monkey Business on a Keyboard * by Norm
Storer
Statisticians have argued that if 50 million monkeys typed
furiously on 50 million typewriters for some incredibly long period,
one of them would eventually produce a letter-perfect copy of
Shakespeare's complete works -- and never mind that Will himself never
accomplished this.
By the same reasoning, we can assume that all of humankind's
other significant linguistic achievements would also be found in
typographical perfection among the other marvellous monkeys'
outpourings.
Our concern, however, is with the monkey who simply came close --
whose work in small chunks is perfect except for one letter.
Let us call this charming chimp Mickey. (Mickey Monkey --
now why didn't Disney think of that?)
Inspecting Mickey's near-triumphs affords an occasional smile,
once in a while a real snicker, and serves also as a salutory antidote
to every author's dream of technical perfection.
The author in our original example, whom Mickey is sure to call
the Barf of Avon, provides a number of examples:
Al, the world's a stage
A nose by any other name would smell the same
Let us sit upon the ground and tell Dad stories of the death of
kings
Out, out damned snot
Death, where is thy stink?
Similarly, our struggling simian would wreak havoc on certain
basic religious precepts:
Our father sho art in heaven
give us this day our daily break
God helps those who heap themselves
Rock of apes, cleft for me
To erp is human
Nobody knows the trouble I've been
Durn the other cheek
Certainly, Broadway would suffer terrific typographical
terrorism:
Kuss me Kate
Fats
The Kink and I
The Icepan Cometh
Desire Under the Elfs
Couth Pacific
Memorable lines from political figures and famous authors form
political figures and famous authors, as well as hoary adages, offer
Mickey multiple opportunities for distortion:
Life, liberty, and the pursuit of sappiness
Ask not what your country can do for Lou
I am not a crock
A fool and his honey are soon parted
A poet lovely as a tree
'Twas the fight before Christmas
A rolling stone gathers no Miss
One if by land and two if by sex
And on the opposite whore shall be
There is no free punch
Try and cry alone
I pandered lonely as a cloud
And just before carpal tunnel syndrome set in for good, Mickey
would undoubtedly type:
LET BLEEPING DOGS LIE.
>>> INFObit -
The Snowbirds
<<<
Snowbird Team History
Motto: THE
HATITEN RONTERIIOS (Warriors of the air) /
Badge: An Iroquois Indian's head
Battle
Honours: English Channel and North Sea 1943-1944, Baltic
1943-1944, Fortress Europe 1943-1944, France and Germany
1944-1945, Biscay Ports 1943-1944, Ruhr 1943-1945, Berlin
1943-1944, German Ports 1943-1945, Normandy 1944, Rhine, Biscay
1943-1944
Quick
History: On 11 November 1942, 431 Bomber Squadron formed at
Burn, England. They were in England for the duration of the war
and moved to RCAF Station Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, after V-E Day,
disbanding there on 5 September 1945. 431 Fighter Squadron
formed at RCAF Station Bagotville on 18 January 1954 in order to
display the Sabre to the public at airshows. They were disbanded on 1
October 1954. They were re-activated on 1 April 1978 as 431 Air
Demonstration Squadron, more commonly known as the Snowbirds, flying
the CT-114 Tutor. On 15 October 1999, 431 Sqn was presented
their Squadron Colours, for 25 years of service.
>>>
QUOTATION
<<<
Thinking of Chuck Cadman, who will be remembered with
admiration.....
"Ninety per cent of the politicians give the other ten
per cent a bad reputation.
--
Henry Kissinger