WVM2006-35
Ccl NOTES Nov 27
PUBLIC HEARING Dec 4
Calendar to Dec 15th
by
Carolanne Reynolds, Editor
www.WestVan.org
LATE-BREAKING NEWS: CBC has just announced WV Police Chief
Scott Armstrong will step down in January.
How well DWV staff are holding up with one emergency after
another! Our heartfelt thanks!
Congratulations to Stephane Dion, the new leader of the federal
Liberal party.
Let the games begin! Come to think of it, whether Liberals
or Conservatives win, we'll have a Steve for PM!
*** THIS ISSUE:
= PUBLIC HEARING DEC 4th at KAY MEEK CTR 7pm re
EVELYN DRIVE REZONING (see end)
NB: once the PH starts you are not allowed to speak to a
member of Ccl outside of the PH; and not at all even at a ccl mtg
after it is closed.
= gRUMBLEs (Ev Dr; Email); UPDATES (Prov, WV
websites, Opera, Theatre, Belly-Robbing, Trees); Calendar to Dec 15th;
Nov 27th Ccl NOTES (Fiscal Task Force; Base Budget 2007;
Eagle Lake Filtration $$$); Nov 6 and 14 Minutes (eg Ev Dr, minutes
pretty well useless b/c says X commented on Y -- so no info, no idea
if person supported or didn't or provided more to consider); Group
Daycare Report; decision re resident letters on website
deferred; Correspondence (no links; NOTE: Bd of Variance
minutes in this section so also not accessible) mostly
Clovelly-Caulfeild nbrhd but who knows what the residents
thought/wrote b/c no link!; Public Hearing Agenda with INFObits
(EV DR: Uplift and Cmnty Benefits -- your choices! -- speak at
PH!); Haiku; Quotation
=== gRUMBLES ===
WRT last issue's gRUMBLE about the lot being sold to Millennium
as part of the Ev Dr devt: yes, it was part of the previous bylaws
too; with the rise in real estate prices Millennium is paying
more.
As for the Evelyn Drive area itself, it looks as if it
will be Option C as the bylaws propose even though many have told me
they'd prefer something between B and C -- it's really hard to change
Council's mind when they've asked for and accepted proposed
bylaws
HOWEVER
where residents DO have a say and CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE wrt
the Cmnty Benefits. Examine the uplift calculations
(appended to Dec 4th Agenda), then from there look at what staff
suggests our cmnty gets in return for giving this substantial increase
in value. Staff lists the benefits (appended to Dec 4th Agenda)
and this is where you, the residents, can make Ccl aware of your
preferences: these benefits, more amenities, different benefits, more
case (and what for), etc.
TELL CCL WHAT YOU WANT MONDAY NIGHT Dec 4th at 7pm at the
Kay Meek Ctr at the Public Hearing.
=
COMPUTER PROBLEMS: Well, hope you all have recovered from
our windstorms and snowstorms, lack of power, etc. Your Editor
has many problems and challenges to deal with over the month or so,
from G's car accident (car totalled), to moving offices before new
office ready (we're still not entirely moved in, but it's one of our
satellite offices so all our addresses of record remain) and losing
power both at the office as well as at home (two days!). This
has resulted in not being able to access the Internet for a while,
losing some email. and minor changes (see Updates re websites).
Then this past weekend a DOS attack resulted in no email for a
while but it's been sorted out now. If ever you get a
bounce, try again; if any problems, pls do call 922 4400.
=== UPDATES ====
=A7 PROVINCE/SULTANWATCH
Read MLA Ralph Sultan's newsletter -- www.ralphsultan.com -- find
out about his fifth grandchild, first grandson, the eagles' nest
outside his home, and other news about our prov govt and its
plans.
=A7 WEBWATCH
To read past issues of West Van Matters, visit
www.westvan.org
To write to the Editor of WVM, editorWVM@westvan.org
To learn about other groups, just go to www.westvan.org
for:
->
www.heritage.westvan.org (formerly www.northshore.heritagebc.org,
write to heritage@westvan.org); 2007 Heritage Award Nomination
forms now available.
->
www.streamkeepers.westvan.org (write to
streamkeepers@westvan.org)
->
www.shoreline.westvan.org
->
www.library.westvan.org
->
www.chamber.westvan.org
-> www.agenda.westvan.org
(for the WV Ccl Mtg agenda)
=A7 OPERAWATCH
= Verdi's Macbeth at the QE is three hours
packed with the drama of Shakespeare, striking sets, the soaring voice
of soprano Jane Eaglen as well as the stirring bass-baritone of Greer
Grimsley, the bass Burak Bilgili, and the tenor John Bellemer.
Our own West Van Florist is sponsor for the Dec 2 performance.
= Also, did you know? We have an opera composer right
in our very own midst! Lloyd Burritt presented a peek at his
work in progress, The Dream Healer, at a WV residence
last weekend. What a privilege and delight! If interested
(there will be a workshop at UBC in Oct 2007 and a performance at The
Chan in March 2008), visit www.thedreamhealer.com to find out more.
On the website you can hear audio samples recorded at
the KMC in June. Take advantage of the opportunity to get
involved and support this exciting artistic creation. WV is so
full of talent.
SO LUCKY TO LIVE HERE!
=A7 THEATREWATCH
The little theatre that could. The Jericho Arts Ctr has a
wide range of plays from downright amateur to polished (as was
Frayn's Democracy wch will be at the QE in February --
highly recommended). Friel's Aristocrats is on
until the 10th with overtones of Chekhov re families but the
sociological study as a framework is reminiscent of Tolstoy's families
(unhappy each in its own way) -- the acting the night we went was
flawless and we sat in the front row. It is rare, and I take
notes naturally, that pronunciation is correct but glad leisure did
rhyme with pleasure (one exception: Turgenev was said with a soft G
when it shd be hard). Later, reading Dec/Jan Playboard, saw that
United Players is called "The Little Company That
Could".
The Jericho Arts Ctr will have the Comedy Company's
Christmas Nuts (The Sequel) from Wed Dec 13 to Saturday Dec
16th.
=A7
SALMONWATCH
= Fish have returned to Eagle Creek!
= To participate in spawner surveys, report return of fish,
volunteer, or join, write to streamkeepers@westvan.org or pls
call WV Streamkeepers at 628 1123.
= It was reported that some fish had been found at the mouth of a
creek with the belly slashed and eggs taken, not sure if by predator
or illegally by someone using as bait to fish. If you see any
fishing or habitat violations, Rob Bell-Irving of DFO advises the
public can call 1 877 952 7277, or the ORR (Observe, Record, Report)
line at 1 800 465 4336. Both numbers will contact the
appropriate Staff, covering any given area. But again -- it would be
wrong to report any belly-robbing, until it's actually proven
and verified. Unless the belly cuts are "surgically" cut,
and most of belly exposed; it still could be bears ripping post-spawn
adults, or even, the odd ripe salmon being pulled out by bears -- and
other animals, tearing at carcasses, trying to get at eggs, etc.
With small runs and considering all the work of WV Streamkeepers to
restore runs, this is a serious violation with critically damaging
results for us.
=A7 TREEWATCH
Reports are that we lost about 400 trees during the windstorm and
as many during the snowstorm and we don't know how many yet in the
parks!
=== CALENDAR to Dec 14th
===
Christmas Trees on sale by Scouts from Dec 1st at Clyde and
Marine Drive
AT THE
WV MEMORIAL LIBRARY:
In The Gallery - December 1 - 31
-- The Art of Books and
Printing
What better place to appreciate the beauty
of the book? This month we celebrate The Art of Books and
Printing with a special exhibition of works from local book
designers, binders, artists, and illustrators. Opening
Reception: Dec.1, 6:30 - 8pm.
*** Festival of Lights
*** December 2 to January 2 in =
;
Dundarave Park - Beach House Rest
~ Dec 3rd and 6th ~ 7 - 8:30pm ~ Carol Ships pass by
Ambleside and Dundarave. Bonfires too.
~ Dec 4th, Christmas trees light up 4:30pm at Dundarave
Pier
=== Tuesday Dec 5th
~ 3:45 - 5pm ~ Civic Youth Strategy Working Group, YAC at Srs'
Activity Ctr
=== Thursday Dec 7th
~ 4 - 6pm ~ Police Board mtg at Police Station's
boardroom (postponed from Nov 23)
~ 4:30 - 7:30pm ~ DAC in Ccl Chambers
~ 6:30 - 7:30pm ~ "Honour a Life" - Srs' Ctr - Tree at
foot of 19th St
~ 7:30pm ~ "Gifts From the Heart" - Join
well-known gospel singers Marcus Mosely and Gail Suderman in a concert
of gospel and traditional Christmas songs. From the first song to the
last shout, these gifted performers reach the unreachable with a soul
stirring and uplifting message. A concert that will touch the heart
and raise the roof! Tickets: $10 at Silk Purse
=== Friday Dec 8th at 8pm at the Kay Meek Ctr
Universal Gospel Choir presents "YULE"
The Universal Gospel Choir is an eighty-member non-denominational
community choir based in Vancouver . This exciting ensemble sings
songs of healing, praise, prayer, and peace from a wide variety of
cultures. The choir is known for its passion, versatility, exciting
soloists, and love of singing and performing. Its diverse and eclectic
repertoire reflects African-American, African, Middle Eastern, and
Aboriginal influences.
The Universal Gospel Choir's current director, Brian Tate, has
conducted community choirs for many years, and is acclaimed for both
his sense of musicality and his rapport with audiences. He is an
award-winning composer and arranger, his works are published and
performed worldwide.
The choir's resident band features three of Vancouver's finest
musicians: Diane Lines on piano, Phil Belanger on drums, and Danny
Parker on bass. Diane Lines is also the resident accompanist for the
choir, and sings in the tenor section.
=== Sunday Dec 10th
~ 7:30pm ~ WV Youth Band at Kay Meek Ctr
~ 7:30pm ~ The Jubilate! Chamber Choir conducted by Scott Goble
and accompanied by Ya-Wen Wang will present "Joyeux Noel", a
programme of French and French-Canadian Christmas Music at the WV
Presbyterian Church. Tix available at the door: $15;
Srs/students $10.
=== Monday Dec 11th
~ 4pm ~ Cmnty Engagement Cmte at M Hall
=== Tuesday Dec 12th
~ noon deadline to reserve for Chamber Christmas Party on
15th.
~ 7pm ~ The Magic of Christmas at KMC. Featuring:
Danny Balkwill, Jasmine Bharucha, Lauren Bowler, Joani Bye, Monique
Creber, Steve Maddock, David Steele, Edith Wallace, with The Michael
Creber Band, Vanleena Dance Academy, The CM Singers and
performers from: Mulgrave and Collingwood Schools. All
proceeds from the show will be donated to UNICEF and the Family
Services of the North Shore Christmas Bureau. "We are proud
to announce that last year's show raised more than $8,000 for our
beneficiaries. Help us surpass that goal this year! The Magic of
Christmas is a production of Creber Music Corporation."
=== Dec 12 and 14 Winter Harp at Cap College
=== Wednesday Dec 13th
~ 7pm - 9pm ~ Library Bd mtg in Peters Room, WVML
=== Friday Dec 15th
Chamber Christmas
Party
at Capilano Golf and Country Club
Your sophisticated festive evening will include a
sumptuous festive buffet, a glass of white or red wine with dinner,
live entertainment with dancing, and a Silent Auction with partial
proceeds going to the Chamber's Capilano College scholarship. A few
items will be packaged and offered "live". Santa and
Mrs. Claus are also making an appearance at this merry annual
event.
Why not make this festive and elegant evening at
the Capilano Golf Club your staff Christmas party?
Dress attire is elegant holiday/semi-formal/or
your best business attire. If you want to dress to the nines....go
right ahead....there isn't a better place or time of year to celebrate
in style!
Please RSVP by Noon Tuesday, Dec
12th. Our host, Capilano Golf and Country Club, requires advance
numbers for set up and food preparation. Cancellations are accepted
until Noon Tuesday, Dec 12th in order to receive full
credit. Please call the office 926 6614
or email kathleen@westvanchamber.com.
>>> EXHIBIT at GLH/WV Museum: Winston Elliott
of WV - past and paintings, retrospective.
===&nbs=
p;
CMTE of the WHOLE & CCL MTG NOTES Nov 27th
===
* CMTE of the WHOLE
1.
Approval of November 27, 2006 Committee of the Whole
Agenda
REPORTS
2. Fiscal
Sustainability Task Force
(File: 0115?20?FSTF1)
Mayor: thanks to cmte and Cclrs Sop, Smith, Clark; owe a debt of
gratitude.
Roff Johannson, Chair
RJ: propose an overview, not a synopsis.
Presenting options; started in June
WV is not facing a fiscal crisis; if we want to keep taxation at
present level, or at sustainable level [must address some
things]
ppl live here love this place
the ppl who work here also live this place, pride and
caring
Ccl shd be more aware of setting goals; cmnty wants to be more
aware of the finances of the District
budget system of transparency
review of subsidies (not against them)
elephants not there, cd emerge; this will help face coming
challenges
[introduced Task Force in Chamber to applause]
Sop: also want to express thanks, saw citizens incredible
input
what steps now to make it future policy
RJ: want Ccl to be comfortable with policy
with more time wd hv bn smoother reading
now subject to more enquiries
Sop: did you see as a document to public for discussion?
RJ: hope so
user fees rooted in reality, we don't presently publicize the
cost
what does it cost to provide 30 minutes of swimming time at the
Aq Ctr?
at a starting point, we ought to recognize the costs, don't
necessarily have to cover 100%, that's this body's choice.
We perceived a shortage of info on what costs are.
David Roach: well, if we have an hour and a half
there is an annex (B) where we discuss notion of subsidies, how
to recognize them, in terms of user pay, whether an appropriate market
rate, willingness to pay
became apparent fees not charged and shd be charged in our view,
not covering enough to maintain for example, the fields (eg natural
turf), Aq Ctr when overcrowding and can't handle the demand
drop-in fee of $5.50, at a certain point in the day a large
number of users and if adjust fee might be able to shift demand to
when utilization rather low
may wish to raise fees to shift ppl from drop-in basis to prepay
basis
in terms of subsidies, if we're going to undertake a prog, an art
colony or art studio on Argyle, how do we determine what a subsidy
is?
if look at marginal cost, we wd say, diff between that and fee,
capital amt and expense
District has to look at where it's spending its money; ppl
willing to pay market rate
if raise fees to what they're willing to pay rather than a
discount or subsidy then we cd lower the rate of taxation on the
entire tax base or cd shift funds to Police or Parks where they can't
charge fees
look for subsidies; find where you can raise user fees so they're
paying to support those facilities
Mayor: huge things
one is transparency and the other is revenue streams
Sop: some will require a lot of study on our part, Ccl's, to make
part of budget process
intensity shows us need study sessions
my concern is that this Ccl be well-briefed, sit and study this
together; and that one or two of the Task Force be there to help,
before going to public with it,
don't think we can get into this tonight
six or seven hours and I know Cclr Clark wants to
MS: add thx to TF; I was on two subcmtes, and as you heard
tonight he's a man of v few words
want to make sure open and transparent
so public knows where spending its money, how and rationale
nothing wrong with subsidizing a prog as long as biz case, openly
debated, ev understands why there
openly identify, openly transparent, there for all to see
ev citizen in WV knows where its money is spent
opportunity here
hope money well spent; challenge lies ahead
one recommendation is that some of the mbrs of the TF be on the
Finance and Audit Cmte
VV: having been the only who voted against
had feared a cmte wd be afraid to get the tough answers and wd be
able to obfuscate and procrastinate
want to thank, quality of ppl on the cmte and who presented to
cmte; v pleased
some questions I was asking
I want to know how much per person per hour on a spreadsheet
wherever (field use, etc.)
we've been on Ccl for about a year, 100 pages, what I realize now
again that we have a recommendation and to forward this to another
cmte
over the next two years will we get the numbers we want and
need
two years left of our mandate
it's possible can do that without one answer
wd like to refer to recommendation: strike a cmte in Feb 2008 to
report no later than Sept 2008
I'd like that to be changed to 2007 b/c the mandate's finished in
2008 so we can do something
Mayor: in our Cmnty Engagement cmte this afternoon we put
milestones
think that's the way to drive this
JF: my thx as well
don't know if you had time for anything else! no music and
muffins in the morning?
recommendations on hold
I too focused on D3, we'll need time to implement but did want to
suggest no later than Sept 2008, staff's report
Ccl may not want to do ev, but public wd like to know what
implemented, what changed, what not implemented -- staff cd give us a
greater sense with a report
talked with the Chair and while this looks at fiscal
sustainability but there's social and env'tal sustainability legs to
the stool
RD: v gd report, thx
only a few months to do it; valuable; struck by how
well-balanced
how important our services are to us; good, sound; sure we'll
pursue it and implement where possible
Mayor: we had meeting with FT last week
{and no notice? not public b/c mtg with Ccl???}
Exec team met wrt kind of conversations
CAO: took some of the suggestions staff and cmnty had made
some major policy discussions, need support of cmnty
other recommendations we can and shd implement in 2007
way to involve the Finance and Audit cmte
ask to take a look at concurrently 2007 and 2008 and prioritize
what we shd be looking at
finite resources, make sure Ccl and cmnty comfortable moving
ahead with
change Tof Ref of Fin and Audit Cmte so can implement some
Sop: this is the ppl's doc; my fear is in front of cmte mbrs and
three cclrs and then three cclrs another cmte; you, Mayor have not had
time to see it until tonight
the way I see it, this Ccl shd meet with TF and go through it
point by point so prepared to go forward
these specifics shd go to Ccl to public
let ppl dictate terms, what they want to see happen
courage of our convictions to make it policy in future
Mayor: Ccl did spend all of Wed morning, you weren't there, with
all FSTF
so we do know
Sop: some recommendations more meaningful
we'll all read this, one person had to look up a word in the
dictionary
Mayor: seem you're talking about process
MS: I'm a little confused. Is Cclr Sop suggesting the three
on the TF don't understand
Sop: three weren't
MS: can't we explain to the others?
Mayor: we didn't get sense of priorities
MS: reiterate, the doc is a common sense doc, a blueprint for how
things shd operate in the District
prob'ly shd hv bn implemented before
one thing Mr Stuart brought up
tremendous, refreshing attitude of staff to embrace positive
change
looking forward to the change
ppl ready for positive change, staff is, cmnty is looking forward
to a more open and accountable way of doing business
looking forward to rolling up our sleeves for most of these
recommendations
CAO: my closing comments
no questions this v helpful balancing economic, env'tal, and
fiscal
work in progress, a catalyst for discussion
two on TF and on Fin and Audit Cmte that we utilize them to do
work TF wd hv done had they had more time.
policy discussion with the cmnty; others operational that can be
implemented fairly quickly
cost of programs can be done easily
next is draft budget; we've been waiting for this report
VV: this Sustainability TF had strength to look in all closets
and found skeletons
I learned quite a lot
user fees contains the word 'fairness', we've perhaps been
avoiding antagonizing some groups and wider cmnty pays
as for pay-as-you-go does mean we don't borrow to build, not that
we're saving so when need replacement we have money
all these questions I and maybe public had, actually will be got
at
if we do as Cclr Sop said, go through item by item, better idea
and can start to implement
I am reassured all skeletons out of closet and we can deal with
them
Mayor: Ccl shd exercise greater discipline
help to prioritize, keep taxes in line
difficult to do ev Monday night
CAO: re pay-as-you-go, example to get some direction
if not saving and not borrowing don't know how you're going to
get these facilities
TF said clarity needed
Mayor: thank each of you bring yourselves for this and bringing
us hope
on right track, hope to push, help us
Keith Pople: used part of the cold afternoon to read the
report
does identify a number of issues that shd be tracked
user fees, pleased unrealistic to recover 100% of services -- use
of beaches, green spaces, cultural facilities, and others
p 13, D3, think that's important; Ccl to review and report
back
a couple of questions:
pp 7 and 8, charts show expenditures per capita, one PCS
chart no 1: what operating costs be?
{PCS stands for Parks and Cmnty Services Dept}
CAO: expenditure for function, may involve contribution toward
capital legislated to treat differently; labour, overhead, vehicle
costs
KP, Dir/Parks: planning? maintenance staff?
CAO: depends on dept
for example a major project, the actual costs for a major
project
KP: p13 proper inventory of District land and assets
hope that wd include an evaluation of the inventory
wd hope that wd be included -- good information for use in the
cmnty
Mayor: Goal 1 in our plan -- waterfront, Wetmore, etc
we're seeing TF and biz plan anticipated and informed one
another
CAO: TF and staff worked separately though staff provided
info
just finished report on assets
a lot of this work has been done
matter of looking at ways of making it easier for the taxpayer to
see
KP: compliment ppl who worked on this.
JC: didn't want to interrupt Cclr Sop earlier but wd like to add
my kudos and thx; is excellent; commend them for the thought
know on their minds night and day; frankly hope we wd implement
this with the same speed and diligence they had putting this
together
so we shd
small gaps in the report, not a recommendation, certain areas
where the cmte was reluctant to make a recommendation, rightly for
Ccl; think that's sound.
MOVE forwarded to Finance & Audit Cmte
Sop: implementing?
Mayor: don't understand
CAO: to Fin/Audit recommendation then to Ccl -- decide to public?
timelines? intent to bring it back to Ccl asap.
Sop: no prob with the intelligence on the Cmte; spent eight
months, now to new ppl
my position is that what is lost in the wash?
if these are recommendations from an indepth study, who's to say
take A, or A1, etc -- where's A9, etc -- has to be a process for Ccl
to choose the priorities
Mayor: on p9, rec is to go to Fin/Aud cmte, had lots of ppl
interested in TF; that is how the TF recommended these recommendations
come to fruition; see a great role for the Fin/Aud cmte
Sop: don't get me wrong; no way reflecting on cmte, wd it not be
better for Ccl as a whole?
CAO: some of these recommendations will take years and others may
take hours and a rec brought back to Ccl
if you go into the appendices there are hundreds of recs
sometimes 12 different things about a recommendation
this is a way, to Fin/Aud, with some of the TF, a way of
prioritizing
MS: not realistic to think we can implement these overnight
some quickly, many far longer, many prob'ly chasing around five
years from now
in the short run, intent of motion as I understand it, take to
Fin/Aud cmte to take the most relevant into the 2007 budget process,
that's where we want to go
need from CAO who's going to sit on this Fin/Aud Cmte
CAO: working with the Chair of the Fin/Aud Cmte, come back with
recommendations Dec 11; can't see it wd take more than one or two
meetings to rec priorities for 2007 Budget
some we might engage public in the dialogue
need good understanding and where cmnty wants us to go
VV: quite intrigued by Cclr Smith's uncharacteristic
patience
sympathy with Cclr Sop
an amendment that to Ccl with six months to do...
Sop: want Ccl to take next steps and with proper feedback
if we're going to be transparent and meaningful
three as Ccl aren't familiar with this, feel shd meet as Ccl with
TF, look at in depth
here's format and from there out to public
don't want this to get lost or misinterpreted; sometimes these
things have a way of getting lost
MS: thank Cclr V that I've developed a very well-developed,
well-needed sense of patience
we're sending it to Fin/Aud to get something done asap.
JC: I agree with Cclr Sop that we shd be kept up to date
those two things can be done concurrently (while Fin/Aud cmte
working on it)
Mayor: certainly Dec 11 is our next ccl mtg, we can build in that
all of ccl is part of this
CAO: if Ccl desirous of completing budget by end of January, will
have to get on with this.
[Then it was moved:
1. The Fiscal
Sustainability Task Force's Report to Council be forwarded to the
Finance and Audit Committee for the Committee's recommendations on
2007/2008 fiscal sustainability priorities, and
2. That the Terms of
Reference for the Finance and Audit Committee be revised to reflect
their consideration of and involvement with the implementation of the
Fiscal Sustainability Task Force's recommendations.
Appendix A
- Trends and Issues Subcommittee Report
Appendix B
- Economics - Revenues, Expenditures, Service Levels
Subcommittee Report, and Annexes
Appendix C
- Best Practices and Benchmarking Subcommittee Report and
Annexes
Appendix D
- Other Matters
Appendix E
- Public Responses/Info Provided to Public
Appendix F
- Task Force - Terms of Reference
Appendix G
- Report on Task Force Expenditures
Appendix H
- Prior Council Reports re the Fiscal Sustainability Task
Force
Appendix I
- Working Papers Prepared for/by the Best Practices
and Economics Subcommittees
PASSED UNANIMOUSLY
8:07
3. 2007
Preliminary Draft Base Budget (File: 0860-01)
RECOMMENDED: THAT the report dated November
23 from the Director of Finance be received.
CAO: working on this in time with FT
not nec starting point; we'll continue to get more info and take
to Ccl
now that we have TF recommendations, can
Sop: facts facing today, probably 4.5%, based on labour rates
2007 and CPI.
Guess this is why this report is coming through
with TF report, easier to pare this down
meeting all the demands, difficulties?
take a, b, c, look at diff way -- this is how we did in
past?
CAO: in existing labour market quite hot; shifting subsidies,
user fees can shift reliance on general taxation; we're responsible
for less and less of the property taxation our residents have to
pay
certainly in 2007, can look at and affect that bottom line
no question challenging; figures include 2006 commitments wrt
Fire and Police involvement in E-Comm.
JC: before running around like chickens....see NSNews here and
wdn't want to see headline of 4.5% tax increase; lots we don' t
have control of
Mayor: 11 managerial procedure changes and four??? for Ccl
try to steer the ship of state in a little diff course
Sop: we cd say 4.5% tax increase is not acceptable
Mayor: you're right about that; Ccl want to reduce it
responsibly
CAO: this just on our current estimates
RD: looking for ways to pare this down...
4. ADJOURNMENT
8:14
* REGULAR COUNCIL
1.
Approval of November 27, 2006 Regular Council
Agenda
adding daycare, cmte, req for deleg re NSh Spirit of 2010
Mayor: wd like to ask Mr Barth about snow removal
EB: we do need to target our efforts
no 1 is transit and emergency routes so can be emergency
response
then to priority 2 wch is school access
then roads that don't serve as connections
up till today dealing with priority no 1; snow this year had to
deal with something not in past, branches falling trees coming
down
if there's someone in an emergency on a road not cleared, we'd
clear
snowfall supposed to taper off today and sunshine tomorrow
wd caution ppl; expecting temperatures of -10 so be careful
Mayor: phones ringing off the hook...
2. ADOPTION OF MINUTES
=B7 November 06, 2006 Regular Council
Meeting Minutes; and
=B7 November 14, 2006 Regular Council
Meeting Minutes.
{more on the Ev Dr mtg (Nov 14) minutes wch had NONE of the
comments made by speakers, just that they 'commented on'
aspects}
Mayor: one addition: p207 of package -- Item 8: important to list
City of Vancouver participated in mtg
8:19
3. NOVEMBER 27, 2006 COMMITTEE OF THE
WHOLE MEETING
RECOMMENDED: THAT the recommendations from
the Nov 27 Committee of the Whole meeting be
ratified.
REPORTS
4. Eagle
Lake Membrane Filtration Facility Contract Execution
(File: 1815?35)
RECOMMENDED: THAT authorization be given
for the District to execute an agreement for construction of the Eagle
Lake Membrane Filtration Facility with Nason Contracting Group
Ltd.
EB, Dir/Engg: staff hv bn working on this
for some time
the cornerstone of our plan to utilize that
lake
deliver water; need for current
standards
medical health officer on understanding
we're proceeding on this -- he planned to be here but unable to so
I'll read: essential move forward so that WV residents will be
receiving water as free from bacterial, etc as
possible
we're proceeding in step with GVRD,
understanding having something to go in 2008
non-compliance struggling with what's going
on when we rejected tenders, wanted to be sure getting value for
money. If we were to spend $16M we'd still be getting benefit,
trying to get something so we can go ahead and will be affordable.
Innovative partnership, taking some of the risks to keep costs down,
change to design (were trying for LEED now to prefabricated bldg).
One of the way reducing costs, removing some work and doing with
District staff (even with cmnty ctr). This contract in order of
$10M. Had looked at taking out standby generator $300K for pH
adjustment and $200K for generator. With windstorm generator
really important.
works well with water model
originally looking at staging this, now do
maximum of treated water
JC: what effect will this have on
turbidity?
EB: fortunate in that our water source been
able to continue to deliver but just luck; this plant eliminates
that
MS: $10M is that fixed price?
EB: yes
MS: you feel $200K [contingency] on a
$15.5M project is enough?
EB: part of reason comfortable b/c some
being done by staff
been working almost as a partnership so
much higher level of comfort
shd that $200K challenged we still have
the option of pulling out some options rather than asking for more
money
Sop: blasting in July $550K and Xenon
$3.5M?
you're seeking $11.5m and that was
part?
EB: contract with Nason--
Sop: grant of $3M why not
include?
EB: perhaps better to say cost to District
is $12.5
Sop: $15.5, the $15.97 excluding the grant
so down to $12m so is that what we're approving
EB: yes, cost directly to Dist is $15M
minus 3M so $12.5M
actually what the biz case said we cd spend
without the grant
doesn't mean that's affordable so trying to
keep down
Sop: so is price fixed with
construction?
EB: upset price, so $9.985M
Sop: so what are you asking for
tonight? that and up to
$12.5
EB: looking for approval to go into
contract $9.985; really thought Ccl shd
see full price
Sop: why doesn't it state that?
$9.985M then you want permission for rest
want to know why
CAO: bids came in high; telling you
cost
biz case points out we cd spend a lot
more
normally the Dir/Engg wd have right to go
into more contracts
saying this is the big one, can go
forward
Sop: so you're asking us to approve $15.5M
and ~10M with Nason; presume you'll reduce that $3M
somewhere
CAO: asking you to approve entering into
contract with Nason
Sop: difficult thing; costs going
up
believe we shd do it all at once; doesn't
spell out the cost to Nason; then says grant not here
Mayor: so add to motion
$9.985M
EB: but pH and generator also in
$10.040M
Sop: so that's what you're asking
for
Mayor: want that flexibility to reduce if
we can
JC: motion $10.040m
MS: don't think it's a proper motion,
includes generator that Mr Barth says he might take out
Mr Barth just wants $9.985M
Sop: what we're doing
Mayor: What wd Mr Barth
prefer?
EB: as in report
JC: I will remove $10.040M
Sop: you leaving out the pH and generator
for fear contingency not high enough so flexibility but in reality
they're extremely important to this cmnty
have been complaints of watertanks blowing
out b/c of acidity and in our pipes
why not lay it on line, ask for proper amt
of money?
CAO: not suggesting we're going to leave it
out, just flexibility
Sop: --
EB: not that we don't desire to do it, just
shd we run into problems
cautious, trying to build a bit of
room
don't want to keep coming to ccl increasing
prices
rather than project creep trying to manage
that
Mayor: how to handle motion
SSch, MClk: if mover withdraws motions and
new seconder
JC: can't I remove the five
words?
MClk: has a seconder
Sop: I can too?
Mayor: mover withdraws, for original
motion
Sop: it's not that I don't want this
project to go ahead; know probs, dramatic increase in
costs
let's put it all out there
[JC then made original motion]
Sop: going to put a price?
Mayor: no
CARRIED
8:40
5. Group
Daycare Report (File: 1605?08)
Additional Information for
consideration:
(a) Petition with 72 signatures,
undated, regarding Evergreen Daycare at 707 Anderson Cr and Proposed
Daycare at 712 Anderson Cr
(b) D. Cardwell, October 16, 2006,
regarding [same]
(c) A. Wu, P. Wu & A. Wu,
October 16, 2006, regarding [same]
(d) D. Foote, November 20, 2006
regarding proposed group daycares in residential neighbourhoods in
general and at 2879 Marine Drive
{and you can click on these letters to read them on the
website!!!}
RECOMMENDED: THAT
1. The Director of
Planning, Lands and Permits be instructed to commence the preparation
of a zoning amendment bylaw that would enact regulations for Group
Daycare facilities in single and two family residential zones on the
following basis:
* Reduce the
maximum number of children permitted in each Group Daycare to 15
(currently 20);
* Require the
applicant to reside in the dwelling unit where the Group Daycare is
being operated;
* Require the
minimum distance between any two daycares to be 1,500 feet radius;
and
* Require staff
and visitor parking and drop off areas to be onsite.
AND
2.
The Manager of Bylaw and Licencing [sic] Services be instructed
to withhold receipt of any Group Daycare applications and report the
same to Council in accordance with the Local Government Act
pending the consideration of the above zoning bylaw amendments by
Council.
Lady: live next door; bylaw ofcr came
by
if section 31.10 unlawful then if daycare
approved under that, is it unlawful
Mgr's letter said 31.10 cannot be
enforced
then operating under a bylaw
unenforceable
is that reason why I still have a bldg
illegally next to my prop line for past two years
you can approve a bylaw but not enforce it,
can approve an unlawful bylaw?
zoning bylaw is not the only bylaw [lists
them]
went to Bd of V, approval on hardship
grounds -- approval still held pending; been on my prop line for two
and a half years!
cannot issue a biz licence for, and 707
[Anderson Cr] still is unable to comply and is currently violating the
biz licence!
states I understand I will comply with
all bylaws...
wd be an understatement [overstatement?] to
state that the biz owner has complied or complies now
challenge legality of the bylaws that
protect residents
causing this bylaw to be
amended
another report Sept 25 to be provided wrt
status of two props and currently no biz lic
a petition signed by 72 residents of
Sentinel Hill --
we support family daycares, we do not
support commercial group daycares
we plead with you option
3.2
residents of Sentinel Hill are not stupid
we need answers
APPLAUSE
under this current and void
bylaw; being penalized by bylaws to
protect
admit a mistake and correct
it, responsibly legally
fairly
APPLAUSE
Angela Wu: copy of my speech to the
Clerk
... temporary hold but wd not affect your
situation
applications already in process and
obligated to complete process
what is the process?
are we, the nbrs affected, not part of
the process?
illegal, unenforceable, what does it all
mean?
if the M cannot prevent commercial
enterprises in nbrhds, who can?
have we done anything
wrong?
why are we being punished when we
complied with the law?
distressing, not getting satisfactory
answers
if 712 Anderson daycare -- impact on my
parents and [me], noise, so many chn next door
I'm begging you, choose 3.2 in Ccl
Report tonight
Mayor: wonder if, since questions clear, we
shd get answers now and then go on to other speakers
RB, D/AS: this matter came to our attention
some weeks ago when this second applic came
mtg arranged with residents
one were what were requirements and
non-conformity (separate)
wrt validity of the bylaw, as noted, does
make mention to some illegal delegation of authority to staff and
Ccl
group daycares are allowed up to 20 chn,
current bylaw
other matters under
consideration
Mayor: when wd that hv taken
effect?
RB: refer to Dir/Planning when
incorporated
SJN: not aware when not
permitted
review some years ago and group daycare
revised
Mayor: when you say illegal delegation of
authority to staff and Ccl, something this Ccl can't do?
RB: under current wording, notification to
within 500ft, written approval of owners and occupiers, then
application back to Ccl
determination wrt applications
Zoning says up to 20 chn; under current
legislation, unable to delegate
we're recommending add'l
regulations
CAO: often bylaws are developed in
conjunction with solicitors with legislation of the
day
over time in this case the courts have
said Ccl can't have discretionary zoning -- you either allow it or you
don't.
how we allow is how we amend the bylaw
so clear what we can and can't do
this is time sensitive b/c a number of
other applications pending
Mayor: ?
CAO: applications must be dealt with
under existing
new under whatever's passed
tonight
Anne Hamilton: appreciate staff and Ccl and
Madam Mayor -- in my experience found you to be dedicated individuals
working re right and wrong
find that I am frustrated, ..... and angry
and that I don't have any rights in this issue
seek clarity for myself and nbrs, act
cooperatively find that they too have been betrayed
APPLAUSE
Permits and Licences have the ability if
not the responsibility for a reasonable number
nbr asked for my support, expressed concern
about noise, was assured five or six [chn]; considered the issue, the
need for daycare, being good nbr; enjoy sounds of chn, seven wd be
find and wd not object. Over the years the amt of screaming has
increased a lot. Even with windows and doors closed at the other
side of the house I can still hear.
don't know how many chn there.
now just learned of the expansion of the
house next door
no one came to discuss
increase
no notification from District, no
invitation to respond
appreciate need for a daycare, where
does daycare end and school begin
find yourself next to sounds of a school yard
initial permit then go from there
do I have any rights?
concerns about bylaw and process
know already expanded to 20 clients and plans to expand to
residence across street also of 20
appreciate not 20 or 40, a reasonable number between five and
seven
or at least reserve expansion approval pending proper public
process
thank you for hearing my voice
Linda Weizel: lived on Sentinel Hill for 20 years, our quiet
nbrhd next to amenities
know biz exists in nbrhds and don't.....
this has expanded beyond its initial... don't understand how this
happened
thought we had bylaws, why are they not being enforced
alarmed we don't seem to be protected by our bylaws
we have a right to enjoy a safe and peaceful nbrhd
you have the responsibility to protect us
shd not have group daycares except in areas of public
assembly
there may be a case for small daycares for five to seven chn
where specified measures are met
I'm sure you'll help.....
in wch we all take great pride
Sheila Dallimore: wd like to paint a picture
my husband and I bought the lot at Younette Dr, to build house,
raise family, and retire
judged it to have beautiful large trees, houses fairly
well-spaced apart
best in country
over the years found we'd made a good choice, good nbrs, quiet
and peaceful nbrhd, peaceful cmnty, nbrs respecting and helping each
other
now these ppl want to run a biz.
daily traffic jams, many cars parked on both sides of the street,
presence of great number of ppl, parents, deliveries -- peacefulness
destroyed
as we live above, the noise will travel; a constant daily
irritant
over the years, a few summer parties in houses next to proposed
daycare and can hear ppl laughing but that's only once in a
while.
nothing friendly or nbrly about a daycare
a biz space cd be rented for daycare
I used to take my grandchild to a building in NV, another is in
Cap Mall, another in Pk Royal
these ppl doing it for their own profit and they will destroy
the reason we bought into this nbrhd
the change caused by one property owner not a pretty picture, one
destroying for many
asking you to do something to remedy for all of us
Norm Weizel: lived there for 21 years, first time felt need to
address you and hope won't be back for another 21 years
live above but we do use Anderson for our access to TWay
that was my concern but only a few small chn thought we cd live
with that
then seen increase and learn 18 in the present let alone the 20
for across the street
traffic is a serious matter
dark rainy, visibility a prob -- drive up and they back down onto
Anderson Cr
less than 10ft from TWay; cars parked, coming going, no pickup
space, no turnaround facility
I hv witnessed drivers creeping down in frustration bail out and
go fast along Anderson Cr, why no accident don't know
two cars parked there all day now adding
when bylaw changes made: large daycare ctrs shd not be situated
in residential areas; small daycares five to seven provided not impact
negatively on cmnty
adequate space on the prop shd be on prop for pickup and turn
around
adequate also for staff; obvious biz has bn allowed to grow
without attention to safety.
situated where can grow, private residences do not
shd be where safe for residents and chn
Man: learned over week and a half
Citizens of Sentinel Hill slide presentation
discovered structures built on prop without permit
nbr adjacent received notice, no others within 500 ft
did
inadequate lighting in evening, no adequate signage in
drop-off area
all three surrounding [pointed out on map, photo; all here]
chart showing cars
congestion significant
cars are already doing u-turns in Anderson Cr and using nbrs
driveways for turnaround
one-hour break in morning and afternoon (noise)
areas poorly lit
do not want further expansion and do not another commercial
operation across the street
petition signed by 75 local residents wh do not want this
including three adjacent
cmnty has been informed daycare has questioned bylaw to be
unlawful
but owner has signed saying abide by bylaws and regulations
final analysis: do not allow daycares -- as in 3.2; public
assembly zone
if you pass this bylaw with all the uncertainties.....
do not want nbrhd ruined; want Ccl and staff empowered to enforce
bylaws
Mayor: anything further Mr Beauchamp wd like to add?
RB: no
Mayor: wd like to deal with something not in motion -- what
about the illegal structure?
RB: the number of illegal structures identified are under
examination, owner wd hv options to remove or comply;
From audience: two years!
Mayor: motion on floor for discussion
RD: not sure wch
Mayor: cd receive report then other--
SJN: if Ccl is considering 3.2, to remove group daycare in sgl
fam, that wd retain fam daycare
APPLAUSE
Mayor: that cd be first clause
RD moved receipt
....
CAO: rather than craft wording......
RB: believe prov regulations cover fam daycare up to seven
Mayor: let's try this; open floor but have to be disciplined
about discussion
SJN: one is rec by MMgr and the other is 3.2 that wd
prohibit
applause
Sop:...20 years ago, did look at reasonable opinion it wd stand
for something
heard from a concerned group of ppl, more than not having a
daycare, but change of use within a nbrhd. This is
commercialization. Expanding in nbrhd. The very law, RS 3, 4, 5,
says only subject to 31.1.10, now saying unenforceable then the
original is unenforceable. Want a legal opinion.
the uncertainties have to be answered in a formal way at
least.
then follow 3.2 of the recommendation
I don't know we have to support a legal interpretation, Lidstone
Young
there has to be a way to stop change ...
go a long way if we outlaw -- let the other up to seven
APPLAUSE
VV: on the whole inclined to agree with Cclr Sop but wd like to
look at analysis -- it says 33 [daycares] in DWV
however two in nbrhd zones
not told about location or circumstances of other
presumably the other operating in a satisfactory manner
find a way to preserve the one operating satisfactorily so not
close it down
APPLAUSE
Mayor: with all due respect, pls refrain from expressions of
enthusiasm
JF: sympathy with nbrhd and ppl stressful finding place when
having to go back to work
from my years on sch bd, daycare v desirable in WV; intense
need
not unhappy with the concept of reducing the number
we do have a number of home-based businesses.....
if we disallow group daycares in residential nbrhds, do we accept
those presently in place, grandfathered?
SJN: we can report back to you
wd include preschool
the one existing is on Haywood across from school, commercial on
both sides
JF: what's the impact?
RB: current applications under current bylaw, ones received in
future
wrt 3.2, give authorization to bylaw officers to withhold
JF: that's future but present, as in Anderson
RB: told by solicitors, if all reqs met, the current application
wd stand
MS: I don't think any nbr has the right to negatively affect
the nbrhd -- 40 clients; excessive
am a bit confused, you take out a biz licence you
comply
but you don't have to comply
CAO: that's a good question, notwithstanding
grandfathering
if someone seeks to renew and no longer comply?
RB: that cd be different; stop for six months, lose
re declaration, haven't had legal opinion, must be lawful
sections and if 20 in zoning then that's a condition
rec by staff part has to be changed
CAO: you're suggesting once a company has received a biz
licence they can operate in perpetuity
RB:...
amend by removing
operating meeting all requirements
CAO: in perpetuity?
RB: yes
MS: struggle with concept makes no sense as long as you have a
biz licence you can continue to ignore them
Mayor: the challenge here
CAO: if Ccl intends to restrict to fam...
re withholding licence...
attempt to get a second opinion
MS: on M prop, commercial zone
SJN: permitted to continue
JC: will support whatever exerts most stringent
struggling have biz licences going out, no one knows if
conforming or not or cares?
RB: don't think that's the biz staff
if a biz licence is issued in error
if made under current local and prov bylaws then not able to
withhold
if change, can deal with and pull back
JC: have you not heard that the biz has been issued in
error?
RB:...not validated
JC: why not? it's been weeks
RB: b/c for 707 Anderson; 712 under consideration
JC: biz licence states that and agreed by holder; conform of
all bylaws of M and prov
RB: not sure of the wording
Sop: have it here
JC: anyway, looking for intent
if that's the case, if a nonconforming bldg, why not revoke
it?
RB: there's the prov [regulations?]
JC: a nonconforming licence, a nonconforming biz
why does that licence still exist?
RB: staff is for a period of time
Audience: it's been two years!
Mayor: will have to clear gallery; debate and doing their
best
JC: ?
RB: on calendar year
JC: have we identified the current licence at fault? if not,
why not?
RB: will have staff do that
Mayor: that's paramount
Sop: wd like to think these ppl pioneers
eliminate 712, still have 707? have in public assembly
zones
used to have in basements
do see need for need to remove 31.1.10
don't think we can leave here tonight -- until they know we'll
stop that second daycare
if we don't look and support them then have applicant go to
court
Mayor: clear by 3.2
RD: didn't want to make motion originally g/c wanted to hear
debate
unfortunate bylaws don't deal with change
agree daycare a good thing but two daycares too much; difficult
situation
stuck with bylaws not properly crafted for challenge at
hand
I MOVE prepare zoning bylaw to prohibit group daycare facilities
in [resid areas]
require applicant to reside in dwelling unit?
Sop: If doing away with no one
RD: withhold any daycare applics
.....
CAO: helpful when staff report back that they report on three
last items, if they apply to fam daycares as well
Mayor: compliance with all bylaws
JF: pt 3, staff report back to Ccl with recommendations wrt biz
licences
legality of section 31.1.10 and if enforceable
Mayor: better separate or three in one
MClk: sep
Mayor: first two points, then another mention
DONE
JF: third
Sop know what she said
MS: didn't catch; wd like at least to be told what we're voting
on
JF: legality when they come up for renewal
and legal opinion if 31.1.10 illegal, does that mean the rest of
the bylaw illegal?
MS: if ev biz licence complying in M onerous
RB: v clear
Mayor: to do with this applic
CAO: how biz licence cd be denied if contravening our
bylaws
Mayor:?
MS: if we want these ppl to leave with any comfort
staff shd visit and tell them Ccl ev opp to deny opening
second one
RD: I went and look at the two sites and struck with how
dangerous
TWay, and Anderson; disturbs me daycare where not
safe
CAO: talked about denying, add revoke as well
CARRIED unanimously
9:58
motion to extend
MS opposed
Mayor: then mtg ends
{to go past 10pm, a unanimous vote is required.}
Sop: if I promise not to talk
{extension to 10: 30?}
10:02?
6.
Correspondence to Council (File: 0120?24)
RECOMMENDED: THAT option #4.1 as described
in the November 23, 2006 report from the Municipal Clerk re
Correspondence to Council be implemented on a [six-month] trial
basis.
Mayor: I have one mbr of the public who
wishes to speak. Mr Pajari.
[Your Editor started to come forward but
was disconcerted hearing another name.]
Are you wishing to address Ccl b/c we're
trying to move through the agenda here--
CR: I signed the list as I came in
[first]--
Mayor: I have you under
Correspondence [shuffle of papers]. Oh I see; this item of
Correspondence, thought you meant Correspondence agenda--
CR: Oh sorry. No.
b/c you're in a hurry, what I wd like to say, is if you are going
to reinstate the electronic, putting link on website to
Correspondence, then I will not speak
Mayor: we haven't had our discussion yet so it's difficult to
know
CR: cd I not speak until I get the idea whether or not it's worth
saying anything?
Mayor: No. The opportunity to address Ccl is before Ccl has its
discussion or at the end of the mtg as you know, at Public Comment
Period
So, I can give your three minutes right now, if you like
CR: okay. Then what I wd like to say, and this might not be
worth it b/c I'm sure a lot of you are v common sense ppl
it was distressing that this was cancelled and done behind
closed doors. The public--
Mayor: what was cancelled?
CR: having a link on the website for the letters and for the
minutes of cmte mtgs
{Dear Readers: see examples in Correspondence section item no
10 below}
anyone who comes to speak had to identify
It's been done for more than 20 years [letters made public, b/c
part of package in Library before Internet]. I think that
anybody/people who comes/come to speak to Ccl has to identify
themselves and there might be a compromise if there really is a
concern and it's not just a clash of cultures with ppl who aren't
accustomed to a situation in wch ppl are open and can disagree with
respect and not threats.
but the essential part is to have content, for example on
tonight's Ccl Agenda there are many letters about the
Clovelly/Caulfeild nbrhd. It's got all the names but we have no
idea whether in favour or against, no idea what issues are, so the
essential thing is that the content of the letters be there.
If you have a privacy issue, it doesn't matter what you do [re
identity], but the content is important for ppl to see.
If you have those concerns, another way of addressing it cd hv
bn, and if anybody wants to write to M&Ccl, we have a form to fill
out.
I know that groups are not allowed to write to M&Ccl unless
they identify the names, full address, b/c in the past year one of the
groups sent in something and they thought that the group was
registered and it wasn't, so that letter was held up for a couple of
weeks while the Clerk's Dept said they had to register their address.
I have no problem with that; it's just that we have to know. It
cd be a form. There are sev ways of approaching this.
Also if it's a question of saving time, one of the things that cd
be done is all the minutes of cmte mtgs and letters, cd be scanned at
once and put in so it's not a question of doing them
individually.
So I'm trying to address the items that were brought up in the
memo but what was missing from the staff report was that basically
this is information
I know most of you, if not all of you, campaigned on openness and
I think having what the public thinks is part of openness.
If you have to delete the names and addresses and I suppose if
it's about a certain item, you wd have to know if someone lives in WV,
b/c you wdn't want a whole bevy of ppl from Vancouver, delightful as
they are, saying they don't agree with something; but I mean you might
want to insist that you have to know if they're a resident of
WV
I really strongly urge that you continue, reinstate, having the
content of letters, so that we know what's being discussed, and esp
since one of the items is responses to Correspondence and [another]
responses to PQP, and they're blanked out so we can't see what staff
have replied to what someone has asked or written to M&Ccl.
[a fluttering clap from gallery]
thank you
Mayor: thank you
all right, moving to the issue then, Cclr Ferguson, wd you
like--
[this time she forgot that Mr Pajari had also signed up to
speak!]
oh, I'm sorry--
GP: I'll try to keep it v quick
I read the memo and I understand that staff is concerned about
possible liability and privacy issues.
I'm concerned in the rush to implement a policy that addresses
some of their concerns, they perhaps have not considered other options
that might reasonably address some concerns.
I also think that some assumptions in the memo might not stand
up to scrutiny if Ccl were to take some time to study the
issue.
The point is made that ppl who write to M&Ccl have a
reasonable expectation of privacy. I find that v hard to
believe, almost as hard to believe as ppl who write letters to the
editor have an expectation of privacy.
The memo says, you've received about 1500 letters a year, so
over last 10 - 20 years, you've received something in the order of
20-30K letters, and we have two or three complaints? By my math
that shows 99.98% of your correspondents have no expectation of
privacy. So it's unclear on what basis it is claimed ppl have an
expectation of privacy
And if privacy really is a concern, why are the letters that
were sent to the Dir of Bylaws {not even M&Ccl!} wrt
the previous agenda item in the public package and published with full
contents, names and addresses, if privacy truly is an issue?
There are inconsistencies here that I think need to be
considered.
Paper costs are brought up as an issue. By my math
that's $200 on a $60,000,000 budget.
It talks about labour costs, yet almost all of the options wd
incur almost the same costs b/c Ccl has to see the material.
So what I wd suggest without getting into the reasons b/c of the
time constraints, is [adding] an Option 4.5: publish the
Correspondence electronically not using paper, batch the
correspondence so there's less labour time, and in the notice that is
sent to every correspondent who writes in acknowledging their
correspondence, add an item wch says your item will be published
unless the Clerk hears from you within ten days.
Since you don't publish Correspondence that you have received in
this timeframe, that gives correspondents more than adequate time to
withdraw items but the default will be the existing policy.
So I wd suggest either withdrawing this item or deferring
it for a couple of weeks until we can consider it more fully, or
implementing Option 4.5 wch is notifying all correspondents that their
letters will be published unless they otherwise
indicate.
Thank you very much.
Mayor: thank you, Cclr F, wd you like to introduce this
motion?
JF: frankly, I struggled with this. I prob'ly agree with
the two speakers who have come before us this evening with their
comments, so I wd in fact be prepared to move that this item be
deferred until staff can report back on the options that hv bn
suggested
Mayor: all right
No discussion on a deferral motion, is that correct?
All those in favour of deferring until Dec 11, is that all
right?
MClk: We'll try Madam Mayor.
Mayor: She's drowning under all the paperwork for the
Correspondence
{Cry me a river. Can't believe the Mayor thinks this; is
she exaggerating for effect?}
That's fine. This is certainly really a delicate
balance
{yeah, right. 99.98% vs 0.02%, not to mention our
well-established, well-known practices}
between the expectations of privacy and the public expectation
that what comes to Ccl is part of the public domain. It's a bit
of an unknown, so we'll take our time with this decision.
{unknown? what about an educated guess when it's two
or three out of 20 to 30,000 letters? and no repercussions to
those couple who expressed some concern?}
All those in favour?
DONE; DEFERRED
{hm. At previous ccl mtgs cclrs have discussed
whether or not to defer, whether or not to vote on (for motion to pass
or fail), whether or not to choose an option presented or think up
another one. Why not in this case? Were previous comments
at ccl mtgs wrong when it came to deferral or was this wrong not to
allow any other cclr to speak?
How does a motion to defer differ from a tabling
motion?}
10:07
7. 543 -
9th Street - Offer to Purchase
(File: 0510?05)
RECOMMENDED: THAT authorization to proceed
with public statutory notification of the proposed sale of 543 - 9th
Street in accordance with the Nov 16 report of the Director of
Planning, Lands and Permits be confirmed. {SALE TO
MILLENNIUM}
Sop left [conflict of interest]
SJN: important that this info go to PH; same issue was published
prior to prev
10:08
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
8.
Consent Agenda Items - Reports and Correspondence
JC: remove 9 and 10
Mayor: some to speak to this
REPORTS FOR CONSENT
AGENDA
9. Development Variance Permit Application
06-047 (4345 Rockridge) ...for
consideration Mon, Dec 11.
Robt Laurie: put name on speaker list [before seeing] Dec
11
Mayor: yes
Mayor: see you then
MS: have we considered [moving PH from] Kay Meek? why not
here?
mtg to discuss Spaxman report half full
I'm just throwing that out
Mayor: if MClk has--
Ssch: [re notification legally required] 3400 ppl, two notices
[in NSN and Outlook]
Mayor: have followed up with Pam Best
JF: might be possible, Srs' Ctr bus run up to KMC
Mayor: ?
Ssch: I'll look into that
Sop: number of letters from Clovelly Walk; where are we with
those?
{yeah, great. He's read them but we have no idea if
in agreement with proposed guidelines or not b/c NOT ON
WEBSITE!!!}
SJN: not sure when av most likely early Jan
CORRESPONDENCE LIST FOR CONSENT
AGENDA
10.
Correspondence List (File: 0120?04)
...
{My comments giving this
list of "Correspondence" as an example. Please note
that cmte mtg minutes are included in Correspondence so it's somewhat
misleading. In this case it's the Bd of Variance but minutes of
other cmtes in the past few weeks have not been linked/here either --
and there can be NO expectation of their not being made public so
privacy doesn't even come into it. One might conclude that it's
some overactive staff with reactions of suppression/restriction when
faced with a choice, quite apart from not putting the item on an
agenda for Ccl to discuss/debate/announce. As I said, another
example of 'behind closed doors', not just removing access/information
from the public across the board. Even if done behind closed
doors, why oh why did Ccl agree to this across the board even though
some parts not privacy issues at all but presented under the cloak of
privacy??? In some matters it might appear Ccl is being led by
the nose by some staff. Why does it need members of the public
with spine to question? Residents shdn't have to do Ccl's job
especially when they pledged openness.}
Requests for Delegation
-- None.
Action Required
{Ask yourself: do these requests below to
speak to open Ccl, wch is televised, justify being withheld/blocked on
the basis of 'privacy'? Can you possibly imagine these
three wish their letters withheld?}
10.1
Mr. and Mrs. Fleming, November 19, 2006, regarding large tree on
municipal land
Referred to Director of
Parks & Community Services for consideration and
response.
10.2
P. Best, November 19, 2006 regarding Evelyn Drive Public
Meeting
Referred to
Mayor and Council for consideration and response.
10.3
L. Wilson, Chair, North Shore Sport Awards, Nov 10, regarding
North Shore Sports Walk of Fame
Referred to
Mayor and Council for consideration and response.
No Action Required (receipt
only)
{So, in minutes below, we have no idea what
variances were approved or rejected and the mtg is held in the Chamber
in public with public allowed to attend and
speak!!!}
10.4
Committee and Board Meeting Minutes
(a) Board of
Variance Minutes, October 18, 2006
(File: 2310?05)
[Letters wrt the proposed
Clovelly-Caulfeild Neighbourhood Plan: 10.5 - 10.16, 10.22 (petition),
and 10.23]
10.17  =
;
D. R. Corrigan, Mayor, City of Burnaby, regarding
homelessness
10.18  =
;
F. Leonard, Chair, Municipal Finance Authority of BC,
November 10, 2006, regarding Surplus Repayment Issue #45 - Term
20
10.19  =
;
D. Mussatto, Mayor, City of North Vancouver, November 10, 2006,
regarding invitation to presentation by David Hughes, Sunday, November
26, 2006
Previously
distributed due to timing of event.
{re letters
above:
how do we know if residents
approve, disapprove, make other suggestions wrt guidelines presented
at a cmnty mtg on their area?
More startlingly, by what
twisted logic can anyone possibly think any of the above need to be
removed b/c of privacy? the Mayor of Bby about homelessness is
writing privately??? the Chair of the MFA giving info about surplus?
(he cd write to the Dir/Fin if concerned) DNV's Mayor wishes no
one to know where the presentation is being held when it's an
invitation???}
10.20  =
;
B. Gautschi, Vice-President, BRAC Systems Inc., November 09,
2006, regarding greywater recycling
10.21 M.
Carter, November 07, 2006, regarding Police
Issue
10.24 Responses to
Correspondence - No
items presented.
10.25 Responses to Questions
in Question Period - No items
presented.
11. REPORTS FROM
MAYOR/COUNCILLORS;
Mayor: holding down fort with storm
crews doing a good job
12. PUBLIC QUESTIONS/COMMENTS
Resident: in response to Cclr F's
suggestion that if you don't hear from the cmnty there isn't a concern
or a prob
my own inadequacies, as the noise rising,
remained silent got louder and louder and still didn't come
forth
an illegal structure came up, we're looking
right at it
got a letter about a Variance mtg and
District has recognized structure shdn't be there and it didn't
happen
believe they're getting approval after the
fact
in my attempt to be a good nbr
I didn't come forward when I shd
hv
13. ADJOURNMENT ~ 10:25
=== PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA Dec 4th =
;
=== 7pm at Kay Meek Ctr
1. CALL TO
ORDER
2. PUBLIC
HEARING
OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN BYLAW NO. 4360, 2004, AMENDMENT BYLAW
NO. 4492, 2006; AND ZONING BYLAW
NO. 2200, 1968, AMENDMENT BYLAW NO. 4493, 2006
The Manager of Community Planning will
provide a presentation regarding the proposed bylaws.
OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN BYLAW NO.
4360, 2004, AMENDMENT BYLAW NO. 4492, 2006
Affected Lands:
Lands in the area bounded by Keith Road on
the North; Taylor Way on the East; Park Royal Shopping Centre (765
Marine Drive) on the South; and Park Royal Towers (935, 945 and 955
Marine Drive) on the Southwest.
Proposed Official Community Plan Bylaw
Amendment:
The proposed bylaw amendment would amend
Official Community Plan Policy H2 to permit redevelopment of the
neighbourhood to a variety of housing types, built form and dwelling
sizes, and designate the affected lands as the Evelyn Drive
Development Permit Area under subsections 919.1(1)(a), (b), (e) and
(f) of the Local Government Act, including by specifying the
objectives of the designation and the guidelines that will govern the
issuance of development permits for development in the
area.
ZONING BYLAW NO. 2200, 1968,
AMENDMENT BYLAW NO. 4493, 2006
Affected Lands:
710, 720, 728, 742, 750, 838, 846, 854,
862, 870, 876, 886, 910, 914, 928, 960, 970, 974 and 976 Keith Road,
710 to 895 Evelyn Drive and 525 and
543 9th Street.
Purpose:
To provide for redevelopment of the
affected lands to a mix of single-family, two-family, cluster housing
and apartment uses with a total maximum floor area of 508,000 sq. ft.
in a maximum of 349 dwelling units. Civic use and uses
customarily incidental to the permitted uses are
included.
Proposed Zoning Bylaw
Amendment:
To create the Comprehensive Development One
(CD1) Zone and rezone the Affected Lands (as defined above) from R.S.5
Single Family Zone 5 and M.U.3 Multiple Use Zone 3 to Comprehensive
Development One (CD1) Zone
...
Mayor Goldsmith-Jones will describe the
procedure for the Public Hearing.
...
The District has received documents,
which may be considered by Council. Those documents are available for
review and discussion. A list of documents, and copies of these
documents may be obtained from the Clerk during the Hearing.
Written submissions received during the course of these
proceedings will be added to these documents so that everyone may
examine new documents during the Hearing.
The following reports are
provided:
(a) Report from the Director of
Planning, Lands and Permits dated November 27, 2006 re Community
Benefits Associated with the Rezoning of Millennium Evelyn Drive
Planning Area Properties;
(b) Report from the Manager of
Community Planning dated November 13, 2006 re Evelyn Drive Official
Community Plan Bylaw No. 4360, 2004, Amendment Bylaw No. 4492, 2006
and Zoning Bylaw No. 2200, 1968, Amendment Bylaw No. 4493, 2006
(received by Council at its November 14, 2006 meeting);
(c) Report from the
Manager of Community Planning dated November 6, 2006 re Evelyn Drive
Area Official Community Plan and Zoning Amendment Bylaws (received by
Council at its November 6, 2006 meeting);
(d) Report from the Spaxman
Consulting Group dated June 16, 2006 re Evelyn Drive Area Plan Final
Report; and
(e) Correspondence.
The Municipal Clerk will note written
submissions received for the December 04, 2006 Public Hearing
with respect to the proposed bylaw amendments.
3. PUBLIC INPUT
4. CONCLUDING REMARKS BY RAY
SPAXMAN (Spaxman Consulting Group)
5. CLOSURE OR
ADJOURNMENT OF PUBLIC HEARING
If there is no further public input and
Council does not wish to have a further staff report,
then:
RECOMMENDED: THAT...the Public
Hearing be closed.
OR
If Council wishes a further staff report, then:
RECOMMENDED: THAT Staff report back ...
and that the Public Hearing be adjourned to
________________.
Members of Council are not permitted to
receive further submissions once the Public Hearing is
closed.
=== INFObits re UPLIFT and CMNTY
BENEFITS for Ev Dr ===
COUNCIL
INFORMATION REPORT for Public
Hearing
From: &n=
bsp;
S. J. Nicholls, Director of Planning, Lands and
Permits
Community
Benefits
Associated with the Rezoning of Millennium Evelyn Drive Planning Area
Properties
Purpose
To provide further
information on the Community Benefit components of the proposed Evelyn
Drive Planning area zoning amendments.
Analysis
The Evelyn Drive
plan is intended to provide for housing needs identified in the
Official Community Plan within an attractive new neighbourhood.
Within the proposed CD 1 bylaw itself, housing variety and community
amenity provisions are described. This aspect of community
benefit was arrived at based in part on Council's motion of
September 18th, 2006 to prepare implementing bylaws on the basis of
Option C (350 units) of the Spaxman Study, "with a community benefit
package focusing on housing choice and variety commensurate with the
density level stated in Option C."
Community benefits
within the zoning amendment were arrived at taking into account the
'uplift' in land value resulting from a change in land use
and an increase in density. 'Uplift' is the value of
the site at the base land use and density subtracted from the value of
the site, ready for construction, at the higher density. A
percentage of that 'uplift' is taken into consideration in
negotiation community benefit , with the percentage reflective of the
complexity of the approval process, the necessity of site assembly,
servicing costs and other factors outside of normal development
costs.
The 'uplift'
deals with the impact of rezoning on value. It does not deal
with the commercial value of the end project, as commercial value is
dependent on a host of variables that are Developer decisions - for
example, marketing, timing, building quality, amenities, equity, and
financing arrangements.
The base land
value of Millennium's Evelyn holdings is calculated on the current
single family zoning. It is estimated on an average lot
value as if the existing lots were sold as is, not on the higher
actual price paid by Millennium. The higher density (CD1
zone) value is based on an average value per buildable square footage
that a developer would be willing to pay for the land, rezoned and
fully serviced, the most common industry standard. This
takes into account the range of housing types proposed, the maximum
allowable square footage and the location. Using average
values, our calculations were:
Base Land Value
for 57 existing lots =
$46,000,000
Value as CD1
using average $125 per buildable square foot and 508,000 sq.ft. total
development = $63,500,000
Gross Increase
in value =
$17,500,000
Servicing and new
road access costs ($6 to 12 million, for an average of $9
million) =
$9,000,000
The 'Uplift'
or Net Increase in value
= $8,500,000
If 75% to
District = $
6,375,000
If 50% to
District = $
4,250,000
The community
benefits associated with the project are as follows:
Housing
=83 30 rental Apartment units
in one building in perpetuity (without rent control) - community
benefit value is the difference between rental versus strata ownership
value and is substantial ($1 - $2 Million).
=83
variety in housing: a minimum 10% of all Apartment units are to
be less than 750 sq. ft. in size; an average floor area requirement is
established for each unit type; and the Section 219 covenant that is
to be registered prior to zoning adoption would specify the minimum
housing mix recommended in the Spaxman Study (5% small lot single
family, 3% two family, 15% townhouse, and 60% Apartments)
=83
adaptable housing: all Apartment units are to have 'basic'
accessible features and 20% are to have Level Two features, fixtures
and finishes
Community
Amenities
=83
$2.5 million is to be provided to the District, over 3 years, for
community amenities primarily through a Millennium charitable
foundation
Infrastructure
=83
$350,000 to a reserve fund to be used for a traffic calming study and
measures in the neighbourhoods surrounding the Evelyn Drive
Planning Area
=83
$1 million for infrastructure upgrades adjacent to but outside the
Evelyn Drive Planning Area (the developer is also responsible for all
servicing costs and road construction within the Evelyn Drive Planning
Area and requirements imposed by the Ministry of
Transportation)
Environmental
Sustainability
=83
standards such as LEED or equivalent are to be used for the evaluation
of sustainability
=83
'green' buildings that reduce energy consumption, enhance
sustainability and create a healthy living environment are to be
used
In addition, while
not included in the bylaw amenity contribution package, the proposed
purchase of municipal land (543 9th Street at $1,845,000) is
considered to be part of the potential community benefit which would
not occur if the status quo is retained.
Because of the
length of approvals, difficulty of assembly, holding costs, planning
costs, and reduced densities, the percentage of "uplift" used in
consideration of community benefit is reduced.
Negotiations considered 50% of 'uplift' value to the District to
be a base and that is met with the $2.5 million cash contribution to
the District, 30 rental housing units, the adaptable housing and the
housing variety, particularly the average unit size.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your Editor comments at first
glance:
= back to
WV shd be two-thirds (rather than 50 or 75%); that's
about the minimum Vancouver gets
= public
shd be consulted as to do with the $2.5M
= can't see
how the $350K is a cmnty benefit, since it's mitigation for this
devt
= how is
infrastructure for their own devt seen as a cmnty
benefit?
*** If Cmnty Benefit shd
be $5M or more, this package is little more than
half.
Need more public input into what cmnty wants to see/have in
return.
=== HAIKU ===&n=
bsp;
2006 November 29
proud palms ~~ freak fierce winter storm
fronds covered, weighed down,
forced to bow to snow
=== QUOTATION ===
Power always has to be kept in check; power exercised in secret,
especially under the cloak of national security, is doubly
dangerous.
--
William Proxmire, US senator, reformer (1915-2005)
--
Yours thoughtfully,
Carolanne Reynolds
Editor, West Van Matters; tel 922 4400; www.westvan.org