WVM2006-37
Dec 11 NOTES
Dec 18 AGENDA
Calendar to Dec 3
by
Carolanne Reynolds, Editor
www.WestVan.org
1-- YES, INDEED! EVELYN DRIVE DEVT BYLAW
on DEC 18 AGENDA for ALL THREE READINGS. Amendments
at second reading!
As of Sunday night (from Thursday night), no power at MHall and
website still not up Sunday night (17th) if you want to try to get
info on Ev Dr (staff reports, etc), but see recommended motion
below.
2 -- GOOD NEWS: Some sanity
prevails wrt Correspondence! Hope they go back and put up all
those they blocked.
3 -- Christmas greetings:
http://www.jacquielawson.com/viewcard.asp?code=1054233173705
[and for those fussing about christmas trees, get over it and
enjoy!
-- it's a pagan practice perhaps 8000 years old!]
*** THIS ISSUE:
= Main Items Dec 18: Hollyburn Ridge Cabin transfers
(without $ amts); Correspondence to Ccl unblocked/uncensored?;
proprietary transit shelters; EVELYN DRIVE BYLAWS; Ambleside
Town Ctr Strategy; Non-Enforcement of Noise Control in HBay;
TofRef for Finance/Audit, Cmnty Engagement, and Design Review cmtes;
2007 ccl mtg schedule; Cmnty Engagement apptmt (on-table!); fees and
charges bylaw
= Calendar to Dec 31st; Dec 11 NOTES (Old-Growth,
sewer/utility rates; why two DVP items on-table!); Ccl AGENDA Dec 18;
INFObits (Int'l Human Rights Day); Haiku from Jubilate!; Quotations
for our Library
*** HOLIDAY MUSIC
Click on the link below for a musical holiday
greeting!
http://www.lulliloodesign.com/figaro_tunes.htm
=== CALENDAR to Dec 31st
===
+++ ONGOING:
* Christmas Trees on sale by Scouts from Dec 1st at
Clyde and Marine Drive
*** Festival of Lights
*** to January 2 in Dundarave
Park - Beach House Restaurant
* Current Exhibit at GLH/WV Museum: Winston Elliott of
WV - past and paintings, retrospective
* FBG - GREAT STUFF! lots to choose from if you're
buying Christmas gifts
* AT THE WV
MEMORIAL LIBRARY In The
Gallery - December 1 - 31 --
The Art of Books and Printing
What better place to appreciate the beauty
of the book? This month we celebrate The Art of Books and
Printing with a special exhibition of works from local book
designers, binders, artists, and illustrators.
=== Tuesday Dec 19th
~ 10:30am - 12:30pm ~ In Peters Room at Library: Readers'
Cafe - Join Joe Ronsley for a reading and discussion of
James Joyce's "Ulysses". Please bring your own
copy of the book.
=== Thursday Dec 21st
~ 5 - 7pm ~ NSACDI mtg at CNV M Hall
ALSO at the KMC:
Aladdin - The Family Musical Panto -- Thursday, December
21 through Saturday, January 6
Laugh out loud here, split a gut until you shed a tear, cheer and
jeer, shout out things like "he went that way!" and
"watch out, there's a stranger behind you!" Groan and moan,
hiss and boo, too.
The excitement of attending a traditional British panto is a
unique wonder to experience, but this spectacle begins when you enter
the lobby! The Kay Meek Centre lobby will be transformed into a
timeless storybook miracle with many surprises to delight the young
(and young at heart) before the show begins. You will walk into the
story, and be entertained royally from the moment you arrive.
Kids six and under are just $10, which makes it a terrific annual
event for the whole family. Glorious, colourful, spectacular sets with
a big cast, music, special effects, and magic bring a unique
experience, which everyone - from tots to seniors - will
appreciate.
=== Friday Dec 22nd
~ 10:30am - 12:30pm ~ In the Peters room at the
Library: Philosopher's Cafe - What would you
give to the world? If you were in charge (a modern-day Santa)
how would you distribute almost 3 billion dollars a year?
~ M Hall closes at noon
=== Sunday Dec 31st: if as in past, DWV New
Year's celebration, Millennium Clock, foot of 15th?
....................NEXT CCL MTG -- JANUARY 8th
....................
=== CCL NOTES Dec 11th&nbs=
p;
===
1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
JF moved Amended adding: 8. add'l info water utility rates;
9.1 DVP Application 6068 Blink Bonnie for consideration, plus
correspondence; 9.2 DVP Application 4345 Rockridge for
consideration.
Sop seconded.
{Why? isn't this a departure from practice if not
requirements? I have never known a Devt Variance Permit
Application arriving 'on-table'! That means the public do not
know a variance has been applied for. Devts have regulations wrt
notification. Must find out the reason for this irregularity,
whether legal, a precedent, or to be repeated.}
2. ADOPTION OF MINUTES
2.1 November 20, 2006 Regular Council Meeting Minutes;
2.2 November 27, 2006 Committee of the Whole Minutes; and
2.3 November 27, 2006 Regular Council Meeting Minutes.
{Well, subject of another time but I defy anyone to deduce
what ppl say from the sparse notes.}
DELEGATIONS
3. Captain G.
Houston; L. Lindhal, Vice President Corporate Services; D. Wilson,
Manager Government Relations, and L. Strand, Communications Advisor -
Project Development Corporate Communications & Public Affairs,
Vancouver Port Authority, regarding "Toward a Sustainable
Port"
RECOMMENDED:... be received.
Mayor: plsed to have reps from Vancouver Port Authority
Capt: purpose high level overview; env'tal, economic, and social
sustainability; any of the three of us wd be happy to take your
call
Area up Indian Arm to border, two Fraser River ports
growing trade with Asia-Pacific
process of amalgamation
Governance, nine bd mbrs; policy bd; agent of the crown, at arm's
length; lease out -- we administer, not operate; pay prop tax, no
access to tax, reinvests
Mission to lead sustainable growth
Total
Economic Output -- $8.9B
Total
GDP -- $4.0B
Taxes
to Govts -- $763M
Property Taxes in GVRD -- $113M
An industry leader; 'going above and beyond', envtal
remediation
ballast water exchange prog prevents introduction of nonnative
species
reduce air emissions, reward ships that burn cleaner fuel
researching shore-based power for cruise ships
Social
Wages -- $3.0B
Jobs --
70,000
fully support prov Pacific Gateway port system
prop tax system giving certainty
education, cmnty, and envmt; committed to being part of cmnty,
support many charitable orgs
Laurie is a resident here; do not hesitate to contact
meet mutual port and cmnty needs
Sop: many ships, do they pay us?
Capt: assume you mean waiting out in the harbour? they pay
us to come into the harbour, harbour dues; no charge to anchor, so
free anchorage
90% of emissions are kept on board; air emissions (smoke stacks)
the work we're doing on fuel additives
Sop: why so many?
Capt: some days nine, some zero; mostly grain, occasionally
coal
There are 43 diff grades of grain, have to assemble them into
20K- and 40K-ton parcels, takes some time; terminal only holds about
5000 tons
Sop: are in leading edge, in world, re clean air and water within
harbour; costly, serious
Capt: v expensive, right; we're leader in NAm, trying to get area
as SECA (sulphur emissions control area)
additive to reduce noxious emissions by about 50%
Sop: when?
Capt: ships is a UN issue, moves with glacial rapidity
working to have an additive to fuel works well, and working re
bio-fuel
you won't find a port in NAm as advanced in envtal technology as
ours
Sop: you put a roof over in NV, still appears sulphur blowing; is
that safe?
Capt: sulphur looks like powder but it isn't, doesn't create
dust, dust is what ignites
sulphur is Vancouver Wharves, not us; perfectly safe
Sop: question that but won't
JF: your map showed the different port authorities
Capt: diff but coop, working together on merging into one
entity
terminals compete but ports cooperate
envts the same but we're well beyond standard of other two
North Fraser v small, only has six employees, doesn't have
resources; we give them the info, work closely
and Fraser port too, interested in protecting fish
VV: Min Falcon mentions the competitive advantage Vancouver has
to ports in US, b/c geog, closer to China
curious looking at the map in your annual report, logic suggests
Prince Rupert wd be even shorter journey from China
Capt: For my sins, I used to be the harbour master in Pr Rupert
so worked out distance, it's closer to northern China, we're closer to
southern ports; a bit of spin
VV: isn't Pr Rupert experiencing rapid growth?
Capt: they are, coal again through Ridley Terminal and more grain
than used to (terminal used to be open only three months)
they're building a container terminal; that market will be for
Chicago and the midwest
95% of Canada's containers come through Vancouver
JC: wrt cmnty benefits, thx re cooperation re fireworks Canada
Day
Capt: know you're working with Canada Place Corp on that, they're
a subsidiary of ours
JC: we have the other two Ms on NSh on board plus City of
Vancouver
[Both pleased]
7:23
REPORTS
4. Old
Growth Conservancy - Update on Society ... be received
for information.
Corinne Ambor, (Park Planner) staff: draft constitution and
bylaws
mtgs over summer and fall; cooperation remarkable
conservationists, mtn bikers; exchange interesting
informative
Herb Storm (sp?), Allan Bardsley (sp?), Bruce McArthur, and K
Steig did the hard work
Sop: going through draft, v positive about Society
protection long-needed
No. 2 A, B, C, D gives a pretty wide scope -- within recommended
strategy or go beyond?
CA: group clear wanted to stay within the boundaries but wanted
to keep in mind future planning for Upper Lands, wanted strategy to be
kept in mind
Sop: page 26: corporate mbr be entitled to vote; are you planning
to expand?
CA: have to get back to you
Sop: appreciate that; we depend on lay people
corp support financially then want something in return? work that
out
says a mbr of Ccl may be on board, shd be 'shall be'; important
reporting
item 30, p 48
Mayor: not really in discussion yet; questions then put motion
and debate
JF: non-profit assn so can apply for grants -- who administers
those grants?
CA: there are a variety through local biz and fdns
if they apply, society administers; if we grant then we wd
JF: are grants av from other levels of govt as well?
CA: think there is one
Sop: if decision by Society that requires M to move in and
improve, like moving trails, etc as we're doing now
CA: question raised and we're looking at an agreement
Sop: more prudent to look at this letter as gospel rather than
Societies Act
want to start off on right foot
...few lines? mission statement
want it protected but Society needs guidance as well
they might come up against something beyond their mandate -- what
are they going to do?
MS: why mbrship wd not be open to all; have to have mbrship
approved by directors?
CA: my understanding bylaws were written to be open to
anyone
specific clause concerns you?
MS: ....... a person may apply for mbrship and upon acceptance by
directors may
CA: $10
Man: anyone who has $10 to contribute
MS: but that's not what it says
[VV made motion]
JF: want to thank, have put bylaws together, lot of work; want to
commend you
Sop: process -- where's this going? discussed tonight, come back
to Ccl?
CA: in January
Mayor: I see this as a v exciting independent non-profit
society
the letter describing the relationship will be forthcoming and
that will help Ccl how we work with it
long time in coming; v heartening
in 1990, when put to cmnty, support has only grown
this is a model and we thank you v much.
not sure, Cclr Sop, it's within our purview to change the draft
but changes can be offered for consideration
RD: think this is wonderful; constitution a lot of work; shows
how citizens have worked over the years; almost disappeared with the
golf course controversy; trees 5-600 years old
mtn bike area too
best way to protect is the citizens who care
great pleasure to see this working forward and want to thank all
those who have worked so hard
Sop: sustainability first and foremost among many
my vision, done right from the getgo
asking you to look at, in your draft, A, B, C, D -- broad
statement
communication; supportive
watched Katherine Steig, a great champion
CARRIED
Mayor: congratulations; a good beginning
7:39
5.
Reconsideration of Alteration Permit 06?025 (4769 The Highway)
(File: 1010?20?05?026)
RECOMMENDED: THAT the Municipal Clerk give notice that
Alteration Permit Application No. 05?026 (4769 The Highway -
Revised), which would provide for a new single-family home with
variances to minimum and combined Side Yard for the detached garage,
will be re-considered at the meeting of Council on Monday,
January 08, 2007.
Mayor: this is only to set a date so keep your comments
brief
Man: uncertain; understand receiving report and if more
appropriate to speak Jan 8; be prepared to wait
Mayor: that wd be ideal if you'll be av Jan 8
Mark Thompson: we are, as owners, extremely concerned and wanted
to make sure opp to speak; if not required, later; just v
concerned
Stan XXX?: thank you for giving us a practice run
introduce myself as one of the shareholders
v concerned that we are heard; haven't made a conscious effort to
come up and speak to Ccl in this forum here; approp we do as we come
up to the first anniversary
you've seen correspondence from me; I've tried really hard to
work with cmnty in Lower Caulfeild
last few months I've spent quite a bit of time down at The Hwy,
to win over the residents opposed -- think it will be
I'm new, new resident to WV, been here about 18 mos; my
understanding we have an inalienable right to improve our prop
we're complied with those bylaws and restrictions and made ev
effort to engage with those residents
can't say we haven't tried or that we haven't complied
want a fair hearing
been proactive engaging with the local cmnty
GDanvy (sp?): will come Jan 8
7:44
6. Yard
Waste and Mixed Wood Waste Recycling Services Contract
Amendment RECOMMENDED: THAT:
1. Council endorse
amendment of the municipal cost sharing formula in the Yard Waste and
Mixed Wood Waste Recycling Services Contract between the three North
Shore municipalities and the Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage
District (GVS&DD) as described in this report.
2. Council authorize
the Mayor and Clerk to sign and seal the attached Amending Agreement
between the District of West Vancouver and the GVS&DD.
EBarth, Dir/Engg: straightforward matter
been having problems with congestion; seemed simple to base on
cost-sharing
RD: take it can drive in without checkpoint, verify NSh
EB: yes verify NSh; still have to weigh
some delay was:
'where are you from?' North Van
District or City? -- then have to explain the boundaries
Sop: $65 a ton and WV will pay 14% instead of charging
residents
EB: not really changing the program, just how allocated
from measuring exactly to how it has been historically b/c it
hasn't changed
...under 100kilos free drop off
anything above that, pay -- it's for one trip
this is just an administrative change
Sop: suppose you have over, you pay for it, don't you?
EB: correct
Sop: so not free entirely, but a curbside taken away free of
charge
EB: correct
Sop: GVS&DD charges $65 a ton for tipping fees
EB: Ms pay a bit less; we in turn charge back through our annual
bill
Sop: based on tri-M; what is the saving to WV?
EB: not a figure I have at hand; can provide
Sop: benefit
EB: I believe it is b/c yard waste wch was previously going into
the garbage stream
JF: was going into road ends, benefit
maybe mention this in Tidings asap; had some phone calls from ppl
-- storms and pickup is finished for the season
remind ppl they can go to the station; ppl want to do right
thing; need to know the place
EB: good suggestion; will follow up.
CARRIED
7:51
7. Sewer
Utility Rates for 2007 - Sewer and Drainage Utility Fee Bylaw
No. 3749, 1992, Amendment Bylaw No. 4494, 2006
RECOMMENDED: THAT
1. Sewerage and
Drainage rates for the year 2007 be increased by eleven [per cent]
(11%) to all categories of users, applied with rounding to the net of
discount amount;
2. "Sewer and
Drainage Utility Fee Bylaw No. 3749, 1992, Amendment Bylaw No. 4494,
2006" be introduced and read a first, second and third time;
and
3. Residents be
encouraged to comment on the rates proposed in the bylaw prior to its
adoption on December 18, 2006.
JF: read motion
EB: will defer to Mr Laing who authored the report
RL: we're actually interchangeable
user rates for 2007 and we've updated our five-year financial
plan, emphasizes our pay-as-you-go
11% up from 10%
$41 on sgl fam $413;
2008 - 11, amts higher than priorly est'd; GVRD
universal metering 2007, the flat rate one more year for sewer;
will be based on historic
Sop: Schedule A p107 administration charges over $400K to
GVRD
RL: admin charge $125K to gen rev fund to compensate that fund
that my staff do, billing, computer costs, etc
Sop: within the Sewer Facilities Fund rather than out of gen rev,
comes out as half a million dollars?
RL: admin b/c Sewer Utility hasn't fund and my staff do that
($125K)
Sop: we don't charge for repair on pumps?
if phone up, we fix it for free, don't we?
EB: M's own; trying to deal with not enough grade; this is
maintaining our own pumps
Sop: we do not charge a resident
EB: we don't charge residents for any one thing on the list but
that's what the utility rate
Sop: work done by operators within that budget
efficiency not sought within the dept -- they shd be a user-pay
basis
Mayor:
CAO: think Cclr Sop's referring to grinder pumps
for a number of reasons, not installed
devpr
if Ccl wants to examine a user fee for those grinder pumps; we cd
do analysis and report
EB: grinder pumps on props owned by WV
Sop: we embarked on a replacement program; cd you tell me if
we're looking at $60M, what percentage of replacement done to
date?
EB: cdn't give you that, a detail
as we replace, new come along that need to be replaced
condition assessment prog in our budget; so we can give better
numbers
Sop: 2007 2011 we'll spend $600,000 to tell us we're doing
something right
if we embarked some years ago, I want to see some
improvement
I'm talking from a sustainability POV
EB: infrastructure continues to degrade, never have a point done
all
replacement prog is ongoing
making sure we're targeting the areas most needed
Mayor: seems like a lot but straight out of the Task Force
recommendation
whole point is we've got the funds, target them in a refined
manner
CAO: really about striking a fine balance so not incurring cost
from breakages
feel we're putting the money into the utility
Sop: does it cost $600K to analyze a system? put in pipes to last
years
EB: running cameras through the pipes; not sitting in a
room
VV: we're replacing at 1% a year so we're falling
behind
we're not going to have an improvement -- we have to move at a
faster pace to replace our piping systems
MS: instead of spending this $600K, can we send someone out to
ask these pipes?
EB: assume Cclr Smith doesn't want an answer to that
CARRIED
8:05
8. Water
Utility Rates for 2007 - Waterworks Regulation Bylaw No. 4490,
2006 RECOMMENDED: THAT
1. Water user rates
for the year 2007 be on a fully metered user-pay basis, and that the
former flat rate regime be terminated;
2. Water user rates
for 2007 be approved at amounts set out in the schedules to Waterworks
Regulation Bylaw No. 4490, 2006 as attached;
3. "Waterworks
Regulation Bylaw No. 4490, 2006" be introduced and read a first,
second and third time; and
4. Residents be
encouraged to comment on the rates proposed in the bylaw prior to its
adoption on December 18, 2006.
David Roach: usually you have a staff member speak, introduce but
if you want me to go first, I will
Mayor: doing it this way, focused
DR: can we get the projector up; I've got three slides
wd like to focus on user fees
taken resid sgl fam fees and per-unit [see slide; gave
explanations of how households A, B, and C are charged as well as
flat-rate customer; households can be next to each other and pay
different amounts; ten cents a cubic meter more]
Mr Laing says there'll be a transition period of five years
will be charged if this passes
[another slide; a graph] universal metered customer, base rate
charge $33.70 per qtr; lower curve is existing metered customer and
his quarterly charges are lower by [approx $26] per quarter
you'll find existing meter customer pays $33.70 and that's what
the universally metered customer pays base rate without volume
whatsoever.
asking you to consider tonight that you equalize base rates;
believe wd pose no [problem]
transition over first year, 2007, not over five years
the third slide -- comparison of sgl fam resid category
lower curve universal meter customer, these are marginal rates,
existing --- compared to multifamily-crossover point
base rates substantially different
sgl fam is paying more for each cu meter consumed
might include duplex units on a sgl meter, the multifam cost
will be split between two households whatever they decide on
crossover of 252 cu meters
suggesting perhaps need to address that particular issue as
well
multifam, between zero and 60 their marginal rate is 49 cents
per cu m, sgl fam 41 cents per cu m. Schedule A--
Mayor: can I ask you to conclude quickly pls?
DR: another slide, apologize stepping forward on Mr Laing's
territory
[points, shows base rates different for univ and existing
metering, and sgl vs multifam]
begs question, how are base rates derived and what are they based
on?
Mayor: thank you very much
v good questions transition, discrepancies, sgl, multifam, base
rates, existing and universally metered customers; how worked out;
taken time ; perhaps have Mr Barth speak to that.
[At this point I stood up b/c my name was on the speakers'
list and it didn't appear as if the Mayor was going to call for
further public input]
EB: happy to answer but Mr Laing had some opening comments
Mayor: just received I'd appreciate if you'd sign up when you
arrive, I'm sorry
CR, Yours Truly, a bit taken aback -- remember I have written
my name down in the past and not been called. Oh well, be that
as it may I just explained: Thank you. I'll explain why I
didn't. I have nothing to offer wrt to sewer and utility
rates but when I looked at the motion, the question that arose in my
mind, is that in the last item you moved first, second, and third
readings and in this one you're proposing to do the same.
Although you've asked for input until Dec 18, I understand you can
only make amendments at second reading, so what occurred to me wch is
why when I heard this, if you've moved three readings you can't make
any amendments based on what you've heard; so that's what came to my
attention when I heard this discussion [input from D
Roach].
Mayor: so comment for 7 and 8
CR: yes, b/c it's a process; it only occurred to me when I
heard things might [be] changed
CAO: perhaps the MClk can advise Ccl as to how they cd make
amendments after third reading
MClk: may; unusual but may be done
{see my request for clarification at PQP, b/c in fact
amendments cannot be made after second reading but there is a way to
go back.}
RL: where our costs are going.
2007 an important year; 2007 full on user-pay basis
under rate structure recommending to you, the majority will see
an increase in water bill either less than or equal to inflation
high users will see increase -- encourages conservation
base and volumetric charge
base charge being phased in for existing customers to bring in
line
can't guarantee perfect way but have spent a lot of time
examining existing customers
got a transition program
will adjust the rates as we go
don't have to wait a year to adjust rates, can do it in a
quarter
EB: back to Mr Roach's questions
we are phasing in the base charge for existing customers b/c
didn't represent true cost of water b/c little data on consumption;
turns out was far too low
if we were to give base rate, alarming increase; felt while some
merit to phasing in
even though they're going to be paying less as Mr Roach pointed
out; felt fair not to overwhelm them in first year, phase in
wanted to ensure not unduly new using customers; will be less
than 2% inflation
not undue burden on a portion of our cmnty
are phasing in a base charge for ev so all will see how usage
affecting them
sgl and fam; we have a block structure -- part of the way to
encourage them not to use water in summer, charge them more
block vs set price
we don't see high usage in multifamily so not likely to see that
crossover
MS made motion
no problem giving phase in
wd ask Mr Barth if we cd fast-track the equalization as Mr Roach
suggested
RL: take another look at it and see what cd be done
MS: see 2007 see a decrease projected presumably b/c
metering
Eagle Lake water cheaper, why we're spending $15M, rest from
GVRD
if we don't hit this target we'd have to buy more expensive water
from GVRD -- will this blow our budget?
EB: we may be overcharging
GVRD is moving to a seasonal rate; we're moving to be able to
adjust
when low seasonal rate, use GVRD and when they move to higher
rate, we'll use our rate
anticipate conservation behaviour
Sop: surplus of $1M and closing $1.4M projected; is this money
sitting somewhere?
RL: yes, sitting in bank
Sop: if surplus why a rate increase?
RL: what we shd carry at all times for contingencies
ability to manage on a smooth basis not spike and this surplus
allows us to absorb
Sop: see 2007 a rate increase of 2%, steady to 2011 5% --
consistent to 5% or less
RL: yes, I'd go out on a limb
Sop: so GVRD? trying to balance off going to be a benefit but
through all we're spending, $15M, and I approve that, when is payback
time????
shdn't be rising at a rapid rate when we're carrying
surpluses
RL: benefit from Eagle Lake reflected in today's rates, wd be
higher
sop: so we're not going to see big jumps; 5% above
inflation
why not reduce the rates?
RL: what's value
EB: when we factor in GVRD and hadn't metered, we'd hv bn looking
at cost increases at 9%
a 2% is quite an accomplishment and a reduction from what Mr
Laing had anticipated
Sop: we're going to be able to stay at 5% or lower over 15
years
EB: we were able to bring our rate in lower this year
this what we may be able to do with GVRD
Sop: in 2007 if 2% why not an inflation increase for next ten
years if all ducks in row
what method in place to maintain prop tax
CAO: we're looking at significant differences in GVRD
we're trying to keep down; if we can keep down 5%, 4%, and if
lower will, the $1M surplus is just prudent
MS: and $15M financing; commend all our staff they've maximized
with Eagle Lake and deliver better water
seems to be on top of matter; now as Mr Laing points out can look
at this quarterly and can adjust four times a year
Mayor: will you be reporting
EB: this will be an interesting year b/c we will be getting real
data
we'll start to get a handle and what can be done
JC: will we get answers to Mr Roach's
8:37
9.
Appointments to GVRD (File: 0120-04/0185-02)
Recommendation to be provided.
{why on table? what's the problem/delay with presenting the
names as part of the agenda???}
Mayor: last year all mayors: said any cclr, that will be in
January
Sop: and thank you for making that stmt
GVRD BOARD OF DIRECTORS -- Mayor Goldsmith-Jones,
Alternate: Councillor Clark
GVRD LABOUR RELATIONS BOARD -- Councillor Day, Alternate:
Councillor Soprovich
LOWER MAINLAND TREATY ADVISORY COMMITTEE -- Cclr Ferguson,
Alt: Cclr Day; Staff Rep: R. Beauchamp, Dir/Administrative
Services, Alt Staff Rep: D. Stuart, CAO
8:39
*ADDED ON-TABLE AGENDA ITEM 9.1 - Devt Variance Permit
Application 6068 Blink Bonnie
David Harper: owner of Blink Bonnie; worked closely with our
nbrs
our purpose was to attach it to house so not have to go outside
to get into house; also to provide room for offstreet parking
we and our nbrs feel a positive improvement from
streetscape
not aware of any opposition; worked closely with staff
Mayor: any further input?
{not likely! who knew on agenda??? just added at
beginning of mtg!!!}
PASSED
*ADDED ON-TABLE AGENDA ITEM 9.2 - Devt Variance Permit
Application 4345 Rockridge Road
Judy Moss Laurie (sp?): 4345 Rockridge Rd; husband wanted to be
here tonight but at mercy of Air Canada
comment on staff report but before say a bit about myself and myu
family
In Sept 2005, DWV honoured my father Peter Stursberg, Award of
Distinction
He's 93 and mother 91 this month
original home, Alderfeild Place built 30 years ago; one of
original in Upper Caulfeild both in fairly good health, became
apparent needed more care
Rob and I decided wd hv to spend more time here and build a prop
to accommodate them
June 2005 and bought house on Rockridge
original plan to quickly spruce up the Rockridge home and have a
base to care for my parents
new paint, etc, then look for a larger prop suitable for my
family and my parents
plan changed after closed on the house we discovered the bldg
inspector had missed some crucial probs -- faulty fdn, structual
probs, and more
budgeted a small amount, became a reply of the Tom Hanks 1986
film The Money Pit, taken a year and more than 400% over budget,
mainly to correct fdn and framing
with 90-something parents really issue now is time
decided to try to make it larger with add'l space for my
family
this is effort to expand house rather than use a base find a
place bigger
first is to expand existing room over garage, expose an open
walkway making it a connecting hall; build small storage area
the variance issue has to do with a pre existing area near
garage
no increase in the ht of the structure; photos have been sent [to
staff]
second element is a little more complicated; involves adding
livable space in the area under the house, a new basement; requires a
variance b/c house already has two floors and an existing basement;
20ft above grade
existing basement finished and above grade, when we discovered
the 20ft columns with inadequate or missing footings, columns with no
steel rebars, separations with craft paper, tops of columns not in
contact, no cross bracing, missing.... dramatic drainage problems; had
to face immediate need $125K costs, considered putting this into add'l
living space under the building for my family, including my
parents
all within existing area of house
lower portion of the west elevation of the house where new space
will be located is totally obscured by trees; west elevation not
visible from any nbrs' residence, nbrs have all signed letters of
support of my solns
want to thank your team (staff) being so helpful, my nbrs'
support, all Cclrs who gave time to talk with me; and the honour
bestowed on my dad
next to his Order of Canada, your award of distinction has meant
so much to him
it does not change the envelope of the house at all
Bob Clarke: compliments of the season
you'd think I live just down the road from Judy, and I do,
80ft
not often you get an applic to add a storey below rather than
going up
she actually moved in last week; wd encourage you to approve
this
if I cd see this house, I can't; only change is a window in the
wall
wanted to come and support b/c usually you get
hard to believe Eagle Lake isn't overflowing
Sop: may I hear from Mr Nicholls?
SJN: good way to support this
MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED
{having DVPs on the agenda on-table is questionable; will
research. Public is to be notified of variances.}
8:50
10. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
MS: when talk about correspondence?
Mayor: next week
MClk: rec'd last piece of info this afternoon
REPORTS FOR CONSENT AGENDA
11. Development Variance
Permit Application 06?055 (1278 Chartwell Drive)
...received for consideration on Monday, January 8,
2007.
12. Development Variance
Permit Application 06?048 (2650 Nelson Avenue ...received
for consideration on Monday, January 8, 2007.
13. CORRESPONDENCE LIST FOR CONSENT AGENDA [complete
list in previous issue]
14. REPORTS FROM MAYOR/COUNCILLORS
RD: Peter Hall, Ian MacD, Hugh J; Elaine Graham
boat, house set up as a museum
met there to view situation, Lighthouse Park
get fed govt to pay attn to its own heritage site
working on this; seeking some solution
to ensure public has more access
Sop: two public functions
NSh Search and Rescue, awards
we spend 7th and 8th grade together in Ocean Falls
JC: congrats to Pk Royal Shopping Ctr
letter from Rick Amantea saying that the Village honoured, given
award by int'l design devt award
competing were places in Germany, Australia, Japan, US
thank Sq N and DWV for our success
on Sat I know you attended Rotary luncheon at Srs' Ctr
you, Madam Mayor, with all those things going on in your life I
don't know how you find time, kudos to you
15. PUBLIC QUESTIONS/COMMENTS
CR: excuse me, further to that question of process
if you passed all the three readings, this is interesting that
you now can pass amendments after three readings -- I didn't know that
was possible -- you must have certain conditions to be able to do
it.
So now you've passed all the three and so it doesn't matter
then what public input there is until Dec 18th, b/c you can't make any
amendments, now. You cd hv done it at third reading, is that
what you are saying?
Mayor: my understanding is that it wd not be the norm to make
any changes at fourth reading but it certainly is Ccl's
prerogative
CR: why did you say fourth? he said third.
Mayor: well, when we come to fourth reading on the
18th
JC: adoption
Mayor: adoption
CR, incredulous: ah, so you can make changes at
adoption?
Sop: third reading
CAO: we wd rescind third reading and make the
changes
CR: ah, okay, so you'd rescind third reading and--
Mayor: it isn't what we prefer to do
CR: I realize that--
Mayor: just trying to get this done by the end of the
year
CR: I understand so you'd have to rescind third reading, pass
third reading, and then adopt. Thank you.
Mayor: you're welcome
{hm. Now I can figure it out. Here's the
scoop. As previously said and understood, amendments cd
only be made at second reading. Furthermore, there has to be at
least a day between third reading and adoption. The rates have
to be passed by the end of the year. They've already added a mtg
on the 18th and don't want to have another mtg after that for
adoption, hence b/c coming to Ccl so late, have the three readings on
the 11th and adopt on the 18th. Ah, illusions or
prestidigitation. Pulling a fast one by making it look as if
public input until 18th but in fact can't amend if anything new worth
amending for between 11th when three readings passed -- however have
left themselves an out, an unusual one as the Mayor said, but it does
permit them to make some changes.
I chose not to query further, however if they want to amend
this bylaw to address the uneven pricing for residents that Dave Roach
revealed, they'll probably have to rescind not only third reading but
second as well to make the amendments then pass second and third
readings. They're passing first, second, and third tonight so no
problem passing second and third again after rescinding. It's
still not exactly clear. But here's the kicker. Even if
they pass all three readings Dec 18th, they can't adopt unless they
have another mtg -- earliest Wednesday 20th.
And how likely is that?
So some will pay more than others until they make
adjustments, whenever that will be.
The unfairness/inequality is one thing, but another is to
find out why this came to Ccl so late it virtually left no real time
to make desired amendments......}
8:58 16. ADJOURNMENT
=== CCL A=
GENDA
Dec 18th ===
CALL TO ORDER
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
1. Approval of
December 18, 2006 Regular Council Agenda
ADOPTION OF MINUTES
2. Adoption of
December 04, 2006 Public Hearing Minutes.
DELEGATIONS
3. BC Hydro,
regarding Conservation Research Initiative
(File: 0120-24)
4. D.
Dhaliwal, Director, Sales and Marketing, North Shore News and D.
Smith, North Shore Credit Union regarding North Shore Spirit of 2010 -
Committee Progress and Potential Projects be received.
REPORTS
Bylaws are passed by a simple majority vote unless otherwise
noted. Each reading of an Official Community Plan bylaw or bylaw
amendment must receive an affirmative vote of a majority of all
council members (majority is 4 members) in order for the bylaw to
be adopted.
5. Hollyburn
Ridge Cabin Permit to Occupy Transfer/Assignment - #97
(File: 1145-04-97)
RECOMMENDED: THAT the non-family transfer/assignment of the
Permit to Occupy for Cabin #97 be approved as per the Hollyburn Ridge
Cabin Permit to Occupy, Clause 20(b).
{the administrative fee charged is $50, but that doesn't
even cover DWV's costs; furthermore, no mention of how much the
transfer was sold for -- have heard of amounts such as $30K, $50K, and
higher}
6. Hollyburn
Ridge Cabin Permit to Occupy Transfer/Assignment - #203
(File: 1145-04-203)
RECOMMENDED: THAT The non-family transfer/assignment of the
Permit to Occupy for Cabin #203 be approved as per the Hollyburn
Ridge Cabin Permit to Occupy, Clause 20(b).
{same as above!}
7.
Correspondence to Council (File: 0120?24)
RECOMMENDED: THAT
1. The Correspondence
Policy be revised as follows:
(a) When correspondence from
private citizens addressed to Council is received the author will be
contacted to query whether the author consents to the listing and
publication of the correspondence in the Council agenda package (hard
copy and electronic copy). Where action is required the correspondence
will be forwarded immediately to the appropriate director for
consideration and response, with a copy of the response to be provided
to Council.
(b) If consent is confirmed
the correspondence will be listed and published in the next Council
agenda with a hyperlink to the document and included in the agenda
package.
(c) If consent is not
confirmed the correspondence will not be listed or published.
(Regardless of consent Council will continue to receive all
correspondence addressed to Mayor and Council in weekly correspondence
packages.)
(d) Any correspondence that
is included in a report to Council must have the consent of the author
in order to be listed and published; otherwise the author of the
report must sever all personal information from the correspondence
before it can be included in the report.
(e) Minutes of board and
committee meetings will be listed and published on the agenda with a
hyperlink to the document and included in the agenda package.
(f) Correspondence
that is not from private citizens will be listed and published on the
agenda with a hyperlink to the document and included in the agenda
package (provided there are no other legal issues prohibiting
publication).
(g) Correspondence to
Council will be provided to Council in weekly correspondence
packages.
{Pleased but amazed! still appears a costly
cumbersome way to go but at least it's in the right direction back to
letting us know what ppl are writing about. Let's just inch them
forward a bit more. Perhaps those who shut the system down were
spooked by a letter worrying about privacy, but they weren't around
some years ago when a letter to the Hall or just addressed to Mayor or
just to Ccl did NOT become part of the public package and there were
complaints wanting to know what happened. I know personally of
many and had to explain the policy was that in order to become part of
the package residents had to address their letters to Mayor AND
Council. That was the rule that had been in place from the
1980s.
Several other Ms do it.
Anyway, the bottom line is that the CONTENT must be public
(unless libel of course), as well as the municipality of the resident
plus name (unless some extraordinary reason for it to be withheld).
Petitions always have to have whether someone lives in the District or
not to validate.
If there's no problem with letters wrt Public hearings (and
Devt Permits) being made public, then just make it PUBLIC
CORRESPONDENCE.
When this tempest in a teapot -- with the potential to
scald -- calms down, we might be well advised to examine how this
behind-closed-doors, barrier-raising, info-closing,
over-reaction/officious decision was made to avoid such retroactive
measures taken without public debate by Ccl in future.
What mentally blinkered mind refused to let us read letters
from MLAs, Minister Falcon and the GVRD as shown in Correspondence
below, not to mention blocking the minutes from cmtes wch cdn't by any
stretch of the imagination be deemed a privacy issue?
Disappointed Ccl just accepted it, but nice that Ccl at least asked
for a report, so now we have a reversal, but what a colossal waste of
time by some apparently zealous impatient over-active
staff.
It's so ridiculous b/c it wd have taken a lot of staff time
if requests had been made for every letter under FOI
legislation!
In any case, there are simpler and faster ways of dealing
with such an issue.
What a waste of time and effort.
Is there a lesson here?
An ounce of prevention
needed???}
8. Proprietary
Transit Shelter Service - [Lions'] Gate North Bridge Head
(File: 3295-01) RECOMMENDED: THAT
1. Council receive the
report from the Manager Roads and Transportation entitled Proprietary
Transit Shelter Service - [Lions'] Gate North Bridge Head.
2. Council direct
staff to execute the proposed contract with Pattison Outdoor
Advertising for the provision of a proprietary transit shelter service
at three locations in the area of the [Lions'] Gate North Bridge
Head.
9.
Comments at the December 4, 2006 Public Hearing on Evelyn Drive
Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 4360, 2004 Amendment Bylaw No. 4492,
2006 and Zoning Bylaw No. 2200, 1968 Amendment Bylaw No. 4493,
2006
The Public Hearing for these Bylaws closed on December 04, 2006
and Council is not permitted to receive any further verbal or written
submissions after the Hearing has closed.
RECOMMENDED: THAT the report from the Manager, Community Planning
dated December 12, 2006 regarding comments received at the December 4,
2006 Public Hearing
{if you have access to the Internet or this report, pls
read it and compare it with the transcript in the last WVM issue.
This is not at all to suggest that DWV ought to do a transcript but a
report that says X spoke relative to Y hardly lets you know what
suggestions/changes if any were made. You be da
judge.}
on Evelyn Drive Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 4360, 2004
Amendment Bylaw No. 4492, 2006 and Zoning Bylaw No. 2200, 1968
Amendment Bylaw No. 4493, 2006 be received.
RECOMMENDED:
THAT "Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 4360, 2004 Amendment Bylaw
No. 4492, 2006" be revised in Schedule C - Evelyn Drive
Development Permit Guidelines, by deleting 2.05.
RECOMMENDED:
THAT "Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 4360, 2004 Amendment Bylaw
No. 4492, 2006" as amended be read a second time and third
time.
RECOMMENDED:
THAT "Zoning Bylaw No. 2200, 1968 Amendment Bylaw No. 4493, 2006"
be amended in Schedule A by deleting subsection 103.03(2) and
replacing it with the following:
"(2) for Cluster Housing, the net
dwelling unit area excluding parking areas, open balconies, open
terraces, common hallways, exterior steps and similar areas;
and
(3) for Apartments, the net
dwelling unit area excluding parking areas, open balconies, open
terraces, a maximum 100 sq. ft. per Apartment units of enclosed
balcony, common hallways, exterior steps and similar
areas."
RECOMMENDED:
THAT "Zoning Bylaw No. 2200, 1968 Amendment Bylaw No. 4493, 2006"
as amended be read a second time and third time.
10. Ambleside Town
Centre Strategy Report Document
(File: 2515?21)
RECOMMENDED: THAT the Ambleside Town Centre Strategy Report
document be received and discussed at the January 15, 2007
Committee of the Whole.
11. Request for
Non-Enforcement of Noise Control Bylaw No. 4404, 2005 - Project 90433
Horseshoe Bay Berths 1 & 2 Reconstruction
(File: 1605?15)
RECOMMENDED: THAT Council approve the request from BC Ferries
Services Inc. to allow the prime contractor, Vancouver Pile Driving
Ltd. (VPDL) for the building site at the Horseshoe Bay Ferry terminal
for an Order of Non Enforcement of the Noise Control Bylaw No. 4404,
2005 Section 6.1.2(a)(iii) for a maximum of twenty-four (24) days
between December 18, 2006 and June 30, 2007 so that specific
construction works involving welding and concrete placing can be
carried out throughout the night and early morning depending upon
tidal changes.
12. Council
Advisory Committees (File: 0005?01)
RECOMMENDED: THAT the Terms of Reference for the Finance and
Audit, Community Engagement and Design Review Committees be
approved.
13. Appointments -
Acting Mayors for 2007 (File: 0120?01)
RECOMMENDED: THAT Acting Mayors for 2007/2008 be appointed as
follows:
February/March:
Councillor Ferguson
April/May:
Councillor Day
June/July:
Councillor Smith
August/September: Councillor
Clark
October/November: Councillor
Vaughan
December/January 2008: Councillor
Soprovich
14. 2007 Council
Meeting Schedule (File: 0120?01)
Draft Council Calendar
RECOMMENDED: THAT the 2007 Council Meeting Schedule as
attached to the report dated December 13, 2006 from the Municipal
Clerk be approved.
15. Appointment -
Community Engagement Committee -- To be provided on
table.
{What possible reason can there be that this cannot be in
the agenda and has to wait until the actual ccl mtg to find out or be
announced?????}
16. Fees and Charges
Bylaw 4414, 2005, Amendment Bylaw 4495, 2006
(File: 1610?20?4495)
RECOMMENDED: ... be read a first, second, and third time.
BYLAWS for ADOPTION
17. Sewer and Drainage
Utility Fee Bylaw No. 3749, 1992, Amendment Bylaw No. 4494,
2006 18. Waterworks
Regulation Bylaw No. 4490, 2006
(File: 1610?20?4490)
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
19. Consent Agenda Items -
Reports and Correspondence
=B7 Item 20 -
Development Applications Status List
=B7 Item 21 -
Correspondence List
REPORTS FOR CONSENT AGENDA
20. Development
Applications Status List (File: 1010?01)
RECOMMENDED: THAT the Development Applications Status List be
received.
CORRESPONDENCE LIST FOR CONSENT AGENDA
21. Correspondence List --
RECOMMENDED: THAT the Correspondence List be received.
Requests for Delegation
21.1
J. Young, Director, Western Canada Mountain Bike Tourism Association
(MBTA), November 30, 2006, regarding request for delegation to present
findings of 2006 North Shore Mountain Biking Economic Impact Study
(File: 0055?01)
Referred to
the Municipal Clerk for response regarding delegation
scheduling.
Action Required
21.2
M. Villeger, December 04, 2006, regarding power outage
Referred to
Director of Engineering and Transportation for consideration and
response.
21.3
T. Sullivan, December 12, 2006, regarding water utility rates for 2007
(File: 1815-19)
Referred to
Director of Finance for consideration and response.
No Action Required (receipt only)
21.4
F. Allardice, Publicity Director, undated, regarding North Shore
Artists' Guild Art Exhibition
21.5
K. Higgs, December 07, 2006, regarding Richmond water meter program
(File: 1815-06)
21.6
B. Sharpe, December 06, 2006, regarding Police Chief's severance
package
21.7
K. Glynn-Morris, Chair, The North Shore Family Court & Youth
Justice Committee, December 01, 2006 regarding Committee Membership
(File: 0115-20-NSFC1)
21.8
K. Falcon, Minister, BC Ministry of Transportation, November 28, 2006
regarding Gateway Program
21.9
K. Falcon, Minister, BC Ministry of Transportation, November 24, 2006,
regarding Union of British Columbia Municipalities Convention
2006
21.10 T.
Tuominen, Meeting Coordinator, City Clerk's Office, Public Access
and Council Services, City of Vancouver, November 30, 2006, regarding
Homelessness
21.11 L.
Kazakoff, Meeting Coordinator, City Clerk's Office, Public Access
and Council Services, City of Vancouver, December 04, 2006, regarding
Implementation of 311 service in Vancouver
21.12 R.
Barber, December 05, 2006, regarding water and sewage charges
(File: 1815-06)
21.13 B.
Poaps, December 06, 2006, regarding the West Vancouver Aquatic
Centre
21.14 R.
Coleman, Minister, BC Ministry of Forests and Range and Minister
Responsible for Housing, regarding BC Building Code and
geotechnical assessments of slope stability
21.15
Letter containing thirty-two signatures, December 6, 2006, regarding
Eagle Lake water supply
21.16 J.
Kwan, MLA, Official Opposition, Critic for Economic Development and C.
Wyse, MLA, Official Opposition, Critic for Local Govt, Nov 26,
regarding Trade, Investment and Labour Mobility Agreement
21.17
Greater Vancouver Regional District, undated, regarding Board in Brief
(GVRD Board of Directors actions on October 20, 2006)
21.18
Greater Vancouver Regional District, undated, regarding Board in Brief
(GVRD Board of Directors actions on November 03, 2006)
21.19 One
signature petition, October 27, regarding proposed Clovelly-Caulfeild
Nbrhd Plan
21.20 R.
Stilwell, undated, regarding laundry staining caused by Eagle Lake
water
21.21 S. E.
Dowey, City Clerk, City of North Vancouver, City Clerk's Department,
Nov 23, regarding NSh Sustainability Initiative
Responses to Correspondence /
21.22 No items
presented.
Responses to Questions in Question Period /
21.23 No items
presented.
22. REPORTS FROM MAYOR AND COUNCILLORS
23. PUBLIC QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS // 24.
ADJOURNMENT
=== INFObits ===
* 3709 died in Iraq in October alone; about a 9/11 disaster
almost every month
* In the Afghan army, a soldier earns $70 a month
* Statement on Universal Human Rights Day
from CPT===
From: CPTnet.editor.guest.445947@MennoLink.org (CPTnet editor,
Rochester, NY)
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2006 14:08:25 CST
CPTnet
8 December 2006
UNITED KINGDOM: Statement by Norman Kember, James Loney,
and Harmeet Singh Sooden regarding the prosecution of their
kidnappers
[Note: Norman Kember, Harmeet Singh Sooden and CPTer James
Loney delivered the following statement at a press conference today in
London at 10:30 a.m. GMT]
We three, members of a
Christian Peacemaker Teams (CPT) delegation to Iraq, were kidnapped on
November 26, 2005 and held for 118 days before being freed by British
and American forces on March 23, 2006. Our friend and colleague,
Tom Fox, an American citizen and full-time member of the CPT team
working in Baghdad at the time, was kidnapped with us and murdered on
March 9, 2006. We are immensely sad that he is not sitting with
us here today.
On behalf of our families
and CPT, we thank you for attending this press conference today.
It was on this day a year
ago that our captors threatened to execute us unless their demands
were met. This ultimatum, unknown to us at the time, was a
source of extreme distress for our families, friends and
colleagues.
The deadline was extended by
two days to December 10, which is International Human Rights Day.
On this day, people all over the world will commemorate the adoption
of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights by the UN General
Assembly in 1948 by speaking out for all those whose human dignity is
being violated by torture, arbitrary imprisonment, poverty, racism,
oppression, or war.
We understand a number of
men alleged to be our captors have been apprehended, charged with
kidnapping, and are facing trial in the Central Criminal Court of
Iraq. We have been asked by the police in our respective
countries to testify in the trial. After much reflection upon
our traditions, both Sikh and Christian, we are issuing this statement
today.
We unconditionally forgive
our captors for abducting and holding us. We have no desire to
punish them. Punishment can never restore what was taken from
us.
What our captors did was wrong.
They caused us, our families and our friends great suffering.
Yet, we bear no malice towards them and have no wish for retribution.
Should those who have been charged with holding us hostage be brought
to trial and convicted, we ask that they be granted all
possible leniency. We categorically lay aside any rights we
may have over them.
In our view, the
catastrophic levels of violence and the lack of effective protection
of human rights in Iraq is inextricably linked to the US-led invasion
and occupation. As for many others, the actions of our
kidnappers were part of a cycle of violence they themselves
experienced. While this is no way justifies what the men charged
with our kidnapping are alleged to have done, we feel this must be
considered in any potential judgment.
Forgiveness is an essential
part of Sikh, Christian, and Muslim teaching. Guru Nanak Dev Ji,
the first of the Sikh Gurus said, "'Forgiveness' is my mother..."
and, "Where there is forgiveness, there is God." Jesus
said, "For if you forgive those who sin against you, your
heavenly Father will also forgive you." And of Prophet
Mohammed (Peace Be Upon Him) it is told that once, while preaching in
the city of Ta'if, he was abused, stoned and driven out of the city.
An angel appeared to him and offered to crush the city between the two
surrounding mountains if he ordered him to do so, whereupon the
prophet (or Mohammed PBUH) said, "No. Maybe from them
or their offspring will come good deeds."
Through the power of
forgiveness, it is our hope that good deeds will come from the lives
of our captors, and that we will all learn to reject the use of
violence. We believe those who use violence against others are
themselves harmed by the use of violence.
Kidnapping is a capital
offence in Iraq and we understand that some of our captors could be
sentenced to death. The death penalty is an irrevocable
judgment. It erases all possibility that those who have harmed
others, even seriously, can yet turn to good. We categorically
oppose the death penalty.
By this commitment to
forgiveness, we hope to plant a seed that one day will bear the fruits
of healing and reconciliation for us, our captors, the peoples of
Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, the United States, and most
of all, Iraq. We look forward to the day when the
Universal
Declaration of Human Rights is respected by all the world's
people.
~~~ Harmeet Singh Sooden, Norman Kember, James
Loney
Christian Peacemaker Teams (CPT) seeks to enlist the whole church
in organized, nonviolent alternatives to war and places teams of
trained peacemakers in regions of lethal conflict. Originally a
violence-reduction initiative of the historic peace churches
(Mennonite, Church of the Brethren
and Quaker), CPT now enjoys support and membership from a wide
range of Christian denominations.
To express concerns, criticisms or affirmations to CPT's Chicago
office send messages to peacemakers@cpt.org. To express concerns,
criticisms or affirmations to CPT's Canadian office, send messages to
guest.996427@MennoLink.org.
To receive news or discussion of CPT issues by e-mail, fill out
the form found on our WEB page at
http://www.cpt.org/subscribe.php
Donate to CPT on-line with your credit card! Go to
http://cpt.org/donate.php and click the DONATE button to make a
contribution through Network for Good, a secure way to help support
CPT.
=== HAIKU from Jubilate! Chamber Choir
performance ===
On
Dec 10, the Jubilate! Chamber Choir conducted by Scott Goble presented
"Joyeux Noel", a programme of French and French-Canadian
Christmas Music at the WV Presbyterian Church. Their remarkable
voices last year compelled me to attend again this year. Dr
Goble gave introductions, put the music in context, and made
comments. One was about the piece "Quelle est cette odeur
agreable?", wch cd be translated as what pleasant scent is this.
Now translate that into music! Here were my attempts in
haiku:
what is that fragrance
wafting toward us
on
the wings of sopranos
or, your choice, another third line:
carried on soprano wings
=== QUOTATIONS in honour of books at o=
ur
Library...... ===
These are not books, lumps of lifeless paper, but minds alive on
the shelves.
--
Gilbert Highet, writer (1906-1978)
Books are the bees which carry the quickening pollen from one to
another mind.
--
James Russell Lowell, American poet (1819 - 1891)
Theodor Fontane
(1819-1898) was a 19th-century German novelist and poet. Fontane was
born in Neuruppin into a Huguenot family. In 1839 he wrote his
first work.
German - B=FCcher haben
Ehrgef=FChl. Wenn man sie verleiht, kommen sie nicht mehr
zur=FCck
English - books have their pride too -
when they are lent out they don't return