WVM2008-23
NOTES July 21
AGENDAS July 28
Calendar to Aug 5th+
by
Carolanne Reynolds, Editor
www.WestVan.org
RoyalTea-by-the-Sea
Saturday August 2nd
in Dundarave Park 2 - 4pm
Bring memorabilia; sip
tea to the music of the pipes; Reservations 922 4400; See
www.royaltea.ca
IN THIS ISSUE:
NB: Thursday night and Friday morning, I'd got the agendas
from the DWV website but there were no links; after that I was too
busy to complete the agendas let alone the newsletter.
MAIN ITEMS July 28th: Rodgers Crk PH and then to third reading
during ccl mtg that follows (bet there'll be another mtg to adopt if
the PH is closed!); NB: calculation re Uplift and CBs rather
controversial -- who believes that one unit is worth the same as two
units even if same sq ftg???; Amb as well as 445 13th Bylaws for
adoption; Wetmore site possibilities, according to Planning Dept;
Motions aka workplan for Finance Cmte; lots of
Correspondence........
= Vive le Canada; from the EDITOR'S DESK; FOODWATCH;
THEATREWATCH; UPDATES; WEBWATCH; NEWSWATCH
= CALENDAR to August 5th and a bit later (check for
changes and updates)
= Ccl NOTES July 21st: PUBLIC HEARINGS: 445-13th
7pm; Ambleside Town Ctr 7:30pm [Hearings closed]; Ccl Mtg:
Amb Town Ctr; DVP 6460 Rosebery; Cmnty Sport WG Interim Report; HBay
Firehall Site; Park Exchange Caulfeild Plateau (Martin Corp) -- you
have to write to object!; Cmnty Ctr Loan
Authorization (info supplied only at
mtg); Fees and Charges for Fire and
Rescue Permits and Services; Bylaws for Adoption (Solid Waste
Utility; Election; Voting; Water Utility Loan
Authorization; Road Closure (nbr buys M land for
$200K); Ambulance Stn 1542 Fulton; Correspondence (Traffic
Safety; see letter 5 re sale of M land figs; Ambleside;
Spirit Trail)
= Ccl AGENDA July 28th
= Haiku; Quotations; look for RoyalTea-by-the-Sea (attached
or separate)
=== Vive le Canada ===
July 27 marks the 55th anniversary of the Korean War Armistice.
Canadian troops were part of the UN force.
.... from the EDITOR'S DESK
...the old order changeth yielding place to new, and God fulfils
himself in many ways.....
ah, yes, cdn't help thinking of Tennyson writing about King
Arthur....
An exciting time for WV -- A new Dir/Planning, Bob Sokol, in
March; a new CAO, Grant McRadu in May; the Fire Chief, Jeff Oates,
leaves the end of July; Rick Beauchamp, Dir/Admin Services leaves in
August; and Kevin Pike, Dir/Parks, at end of year -- not to mention an
election in November.
=== FOODWATCH
===
A Catalonian chef, Ferran Adia, is considered the world's or
Europe's best chef and now is challenged:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7523963.stm
...one dish ... is a gently
liquefied tea soup, with tiny jasmine and eucalyptus flowers floating
on it, like water lilies. {-- but rice krispies
paella???}
=== THEATREWATCH
=== Shakespeare -- who else in the
summer???
+ From the NYT, here's a review of Jess Winfield's book
called, Will I am (publishing date July 27).
http://theater2.nytimes.com/2008/07/27/books/review/Schillinger-t.html?pagewanted=1
An excerpt:
What a piece of work!
But there's no need to strain the quality of mercy: as one of
Willie's acquaintances proclaims, "iamb what iamb!" There's a
word for this sort of relentless horseplay, and Winfield has coined
it: "irritainment".
Reading the review led me to watch Hamlet (done in under a
minute, clickable in the article
http://papercuts.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/07/25/a-midsummer-days-dream/)
and from there I watched R & J in thirty seconds, Othello
done in Rap, and all 16 of Shakespeare's comedies done as one on an
IKEA ferry.
Bardheads -- Enjoy!
+ Speaking of the Bard, tix to Bard on the Beach going
fast. C's potted guide: The Tempest tops b/c of creativity,
acting, and original composition (Tempest Trio, live on stage);
Twelfth Night nudging Tempest b/c v funny; the rarely performed
Titus Andronicus for those not afraid of gore lifted from total
depression; and then King Lear for an unusual interpretation.
=== UPDATES
===
o Ambleside Concession
A Reader enquired about the uncertain status of the Ambleside
concession. The Director of Parks has indicated that
complications related to the transition from the previous
concessionaire to an interim operator pending future plans for the
Ambleside concession/restaurant facility unfortunately delayed the
opening. Parks says it is now open.
o
Request for Proposal for Engineering/Consulting Services for Hugo Ray
Park
For the design of an artificial turf field for Hugo Ray Park
in West Vancouver
o
Artist Brian Romer Displays Works at Municipal Hall
o
Update on Fisherman's Cove Fuel Distribution Float
o Forest Fire Danger Rating: The warmer weather is moving
the Forest Fire Danger Rating to High
o DWV's Parks Dept's Plant/Garden Nursery
makes a profit:
http://www.westvancouver.ca/article.asp?a=5799&c=677
o Marine Drive Gateway Project: Paving Marine Drive by Park
Royal July 23 - 27, and more
=== WEBWATCH
===
** US man charged for shooting mower ** A man in the US
state of Wisconsin is arrested after shooting his lawn mower because
it would not start.
<http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/em/fr/-/2/hi/americas/7526628.stm
>
{Your Editor wonders how long his computer will
last.}
=== NEWSWATCH
===
+ NASA's 50th anniversary July 27 + Zimbabwe's
inflation over 2.2M%? +
===
CALENDAR to Aug 5th+ === [at Hall
unless otherwise noted; pls confirm to make sure no
changes]
Farmers' Markets: Dundarave Sat, Ambleside
Sun; Concerts by the Sea Sunday evenings, Ambleside
Landing
***
HARMONY ARTS FESTIVAL AUG 1 - 10 ***
http://www.harmonyarts.ca/ongoing_events.htm
~ RoyalTea-by-the-Sea Dundarave Park Sat
2pm Aug 2nd ~
www.royaltea.ca
+++ WV MEMORIAL LIBRARY
+++ The Library is closed
Sundays July through Labour Day.
Gallery at the Library presents... June 2 to July
31
Photographs: Recent work by Rob Will, Laura Clark, Michelle
Demers, and Roman Kralovic.
Thursday
August 7 --
Movie Night at the Library
The
Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants. {Cdn spelling is Travelling}Based on
the novel by Ann Brashares. 6 pm, details.
Fridays -- 10:30 - noon -- English
Corner -- Practise
English conversation. Every Friday, from now until August 30.
Elizabeth Musto Room. For info call: Fariba Rocker, 604 506
6616.
+++
FERRY BUILDING GALLERY +++
Harmony Showcase Exhibition
-- August 1 - 17 -- Mixed Media Exhibition; 30
artists
OPENING NIGHT: Friday August 1st from 6 to
8pm
+++ SILK PURSE +++ (1570
Argyle) www.silkpurse.ca
August 1 - 10,
2008 "Harmony Arts
Festival"
A mixed multi-media exhibit
throughout the ten-day Harmony Arts Festival featuring two and three dimensional mixed-media art
by local North Shore Artists.
Opening Reception: FRIDAY -- August 1st from 5 to
9pm
+++ WV MUSEUM
+++ Visit:
http://www.westvanmuseum.blogspot.com/
Selwyn
Pullan -- Position the New
-- Photographs from 1945
-1975 [CLOSES Sept 20]
This retrospective demonstrates the
photographer's intimate connection to the development of modernism on
the West Coast of Canada and highlights the social, economic, and
cultural forces that changed the face of Vancouver and the region
during the post-war boom.
+++ Don't forget to check
out www.kaymeekcentre.com +++
You now can book online and pay by credit
card!
+++ BC MUSEUM OF MINING EVENTS in
AUGUST +++
= BUDDHA'S EYE - ART
EXHIBIT
Fiona Spalding-Smith presents in the BC Museum of Mining's
Machine Shop an art exhibit called Buddha's Eye -- Reflections on
the Rocks of Hornby Island. This is a collection of 31 abstract
photographs of the coastal rocks of British Columbia. Fiona says
"I've always thought of rocks as ancient architecture of the
world. Natural structures have been here since time immemorial and as
our oldest witnesses they have a lot to say. Rock formations have
always fascinated me and since childhood I have been on an endless
quest to find new discoveries in stone.
= COPPER & FIRE AND THE MEN
OF THE DEEPS
Copper & Fire will "showcase dynamic treasures of the
earth" through interactive exhibits and art demonstrations such
as copper sculpting, glass shaping, pottery, jewellery making,
blacksmithing -- all activities that require fire or metal to create
fine treasures. Event sponsorship includes EPCOR, AMEBC and Northwest
Landscape and Stone Supply plus grant support from the SLRD and
Department of Canadian Heritage.
This year, The Men of the Deeps the world-renowned
choir of working and retired Cape Breton, Nova Scotia coal miners will
perform at the BC Museum of Mining in the historic Mill #3 building
after Copper and Fire. The concert is made possible through BC150 and
Teck Cominco.
"BC150 is about celebrating all of the things that set British
Columbia apart -- our cultural diversity, achievement and the
strength of our communities -- and this chorus of coal miners is a
fitting addition to BC150," said Tourism, Sport, and the Arts
Minister Stan Hagen. "From coal mines to copper mines, large-scale
operations to historical mining communities, British Columbia's
mining industry is an important part of our collective history and
deserves to be remembered and celebrated."
The Vancouver-based diversified mining company Teck Cominco is
matching the Province's $50,000 in funding for the Men of the Deeps
tour. Teck Cominco is also funding the production of a video,
Mining in British Columbia: Its History and Its Future, which
will precede each performance, offering audiences a glimpse into the
contributions the mining industry has made to British Columbia's
history and how the industry is moving forward in a community-focused,
sustainable manner.
For Tickets call 1-604-815-4073 or Toll Free 1-866-640-9881
Adults/Seniors $35.00; Students (16 and Under) $20.00; Tix are
available at the BC Museum of Mining Gift Shop
=== CCL PH/MTG
NOTES July 21st ===
{PLEASE NOTE: The mtg jumped between PH and ccl mtg back to
PH, then again to ccl mtg; there was applause after speakers but that
is not noted this time. Also, b/c of the jumping around and
incompleteness of my notes, timestamps are put in so you can watch
that part of the mtg to find out exactly what was said. Will
have to check the DWV minutes b/c I can't always see and without a
polled vote, can't always tell who voted against but know VV and Sop
did a few times.}
*** RECONVENED PUBLIC
HEARING/PUBLIC MEETING NOTES
7pm
(Adjourned from April 21, 2008 Public Hearing/Public
Meeting)
1. CALL TO
ORDER
2. RECONVENED PUBLIC
HEARING
OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN BYLAW NO. 4360, 2004,
AMENDMENT BYLAW NO. 4541, 2007; ZONING BYLAW NO. 2200, 1968, AMENDMENT
BYLAW NO. 4540, 2007; AND DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION NO. 07-027
(regarding 445-13th Street)
3.
RECONVENED PUBLIC MEETING
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION NO. 07-027
(re 445-13th Street)
Planning Staff will describe the subject
application with respect to the proposed bylaws and development permit
application as listed above:
Applicant: Irca Enterprises
Ltd.
Subject Lands: 445 - 13th Street
(Lot A, Block 15, District Lot 237, Plan 7625)
Purpose: To provide for [four]
two-storey townhouse units, with [eight] parking spaces under the
building. The parking would be accessed from 13th
Street.
Proposed Official Community Plan Amendment:
To amend Policy LE 2 to enable consideration of a rezoning of
this mixed commercial-residential zoned property to allow a
residential-only use.
Proposed Zoning Bylaw Amendment: To
rezone the subject lands from C2 (Commercial Zone) to a new R.M.L. 20
(Multiple Dwelling Zone (Low Density)).
Proposed Development Permit: To
regulate the form and character of development to build upon the Town
Centre character of Ambleside.
4.
RECONVENED PUBLIC HEARING/PUBLIC MEETING PROCEDURE
5.
REPORTS/CORRESPONDENCE
1)
Reports to Council received up to July 17, 2008:
S. Mikicich, Sr. Community Planner:
March 7, 2008, March 17, 2008
S. Mikicich, Sr. Community Planner:
April 18, 2008, April 21, 2008
2)
Correspondence received up to July 17, 2008:
J. Robertson, V. Johnson, R & C Ash
(one letter); E.D. Harper; K. Parker; R. Wilson; J. Rothwell; J.
Derham-Reid
The Public Hearing/Public Meeting was held
on April 21, 2008 and adjourned to July 21, 2008.
6.
APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION
7.
PUBLIC INPUT -- Mayor Goldsmith-Jones will call for Public
Input.
Mayor: no one on sign-up list; anyone in gallery wishing to
speak? [Called three times; no one]
{MS deferred; Mayor said you're the one who wants to move
things along and then asked Cclr Clark to move closure}
Sop: adjourn?
Mayor: thought to close...
Sop: wd seem prudent to adjourn on basis of
Amb, go ahead or not; other info to listen to; wd think not right to
close it at this time
Mayor: okay, thank you
VV: I agree with Cclr Soprovich; public
have drawn to our attention that we shdn't really hold PHs in July and
August when so many are away, so if we open at this time of year, we
shd offer courtesy and leave it open till Labour Day so time to
consider it. Adjourn rather than close.
MS: we've had two PHs on this; no one
stepping forward with new; applicant anxious to close and go ahead
with another project so I agree with Cclr Clark's motion to
close.
Mayor: anything further?
Sop: whatever direction we end up with in
Amb; this concept has had an interplay with what we do in Amb; if it
is a devt going ahead of the Amb devt; we can close it off but then we
can receive not further info, it's a dead issue. Residents after
seeing what we're doing in Amb might, will say, I want to renew my
emphasis on this particular structure or others. If you close it
off you can't receive any further information from
anybody.
RD: we've had considerable public input on
this already; it's farily small; wd still fit in with modified Amb
plan; think we shd close
Mayor: debate after closing
PH.
6.
CLOSURE OF PUBLIC HEARING
[CARRIES with VV and Sop opposed; 7:11]
Mayor (b/c next PH won't start until 7:30): we've got 20 minutes
before the next PH; let's move to the ccl mtg
{Go to Ccl Mtg, Items 1 - 3, 12 - 16}
7:11
*** REGULAR COUNCIL MTG
NOTES
FOLLOWING THE RECONVENED PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING PROPOSED
AMBLESIDE BYLAWS
1. APPROVAL OF
AGENDA
RD: adding to 4 and 5, and 6; item 10 LoanAuth Bylaw; new item
11.1; item 13, 19.1 to Corresp List
2. ADOPTION OF MINUTES: July 7, 2008
Regular Council Meeting; and July 7, 2008
Public Hearing.
DELEGATIONS
3. Dr. K. McLeod & M. Naruki-van Velzen,
regarding Healthy Living Program
(File: 0120-01)
Dr K McL:... info about this program; NV, want to bring to
WV
as a doctor saw 30 patients wrt heart over weekend
ppl count on medication but need to improve fitness; fat doesn't
mean not fit
link with rec ctrs; hope funding neutral
NV hired kinesiologist for $50K but recouped $45K so cost was
about $2500 each for CNV and DNV; and we cd get that down
not asking for a specific dollar; if support this sort of
programming, if DWV staff receptive as other Ms, wd be support to do
that
want to get some Ccl mbrs to come through for their own
assessmts.
[VV moved thanks]
Mayor: refer to Mr Pike's staff
JF: and to new Cmnty Ctr
Mayor: move to Item 12
7:25
BYLAWS for Adoption
12. Solid Waste Utility Bylaw No. 4118, 1998, Amendment
Bylaw No. 4511, 2008 DONE
13. General Local Elections Regulations Bylaw No. 4447,
2005, Amendment Bylaw No. 4571, 2008
RD: move this be rescinded; move further amended according to report July 18
xxxx
then third reading of amended
bylaw
14. Automated Vote Counting System Authorization and
Procedure Bylaw No. 4139, 1999, Amendment Bylaw No. 4572, 2008
DONE
15. Water Utility Loan Authorization Bylaw No. 4570,
2008 DONE
16. Road Closure and Removal of Highway Dedication Bylaw
No. 4548, 2008
Add'l Information Report: Road
Closure/Removal of Highway Dedication Bylaw -- 3580 Westmount
Court
VV: moved adoption
Mayor: adjourn ccl mtg to be reconvened after PH on Amb
7:28
{THOSE CCL ITEMS COMPLETED, NOW TO
RECONVENED PH}
*** RECONVENED PUBLIC
HEARING
7:30pm (Adjourned from July 7, 2008 Public
Hearing)
The
Council Meeting will commence immediately following the Public
Hearing.
1.
CALL TO ORDER
7:30: Cclr Clark withdrew b/c of perceived conflict of
interest
2.
RECONVENED PUBLIC HEARING
Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 4360, 2004,
Amendment Bylaw No. 4543, 2008; and Zoning Bylaw No. 2200, 1968,
Amendment Bylaw No. 4544, 2008
(File: 1610-20-4543/4544)
Planning Staff will describe the proposed bylaws.
The District of West Vancouver initiated
the Ambleside Town Centre Strategy project following the adoption of
the Official Community Plan (OCP) in 2004. The District is now
proposing to update the Official Community Plan and Zoning Bylaw in
accordance with the policy direction arrived at through the Ambleside
Town Centre Strategy project discussions and debates.
3.
RECONVENED PUBLIC HEARING PROCEDURE
4.
REPORTS/CORRESPONDENCE
1)
Reports to Council received up to July 17, 2008:
S. Nicholls, Associate Director of
Major Projects: May 16, 2008, May 26,
2008
B. Sokol, Director of Planning,
Lands and Permits: June 5, 2008, June 16,
2008
B. Sokol, Director of Planning,
Lands and Permits: June 27, 2008, July 7,
2008
C. Parsons, Urban Design
Planner: July 11, 2008, July 21,
2008
2)
Correspondence received up to July 17, 2008: [long list including from
ADRA]
The Public Hearing was held on July 7, 2008 and adjourned to
July 21, 2008.
Sokol: Ccl requested further information[slide with nine points];
hand over to Colette Parsons
CP: 14th and Clyde parking lot
Village Sq: retain parking lot to ensure continuous parking for
VSq.
Masonic is CU4 zone now, can be cmnty use, daycare, etc; one to
west is a 12-storey tower, and across, a power station. Real
challenge. Felt Ccl might consider five storeys; at Ccl's
discretion cd accept or reject when time came asking for rezoning;
recommend a view analysis.
ppl spoke from Wedgewood Terrace on Duchess and there's quite a
grade drop, 35ft, so cd be 55ft so cd accommodate; proposed we
reconfirm BFC4.10 and view analysis.
Town Square in first concept but through discussions and with
adjacent nbrs, withdrew it.
The proposed OCP bylaws read in June did not include any mention
of a town square
Ccl reaffirm that a town square not be included at 14th and
Marine
Parking was brought up [slide v hard to read]; did some work with
Bunt & Assoc as to what we need for the area; wanted to ensure in
street design, items specific to parking. This is BFC4.8 last
three bullets (but they don't come out v clearly).
Special Sites -- will turn over to Bob
Sokol: three; confusion about these
chosen for three reasons: 60Ksf or larger; strategic positions;
under one ownership or one xxx
80Ksf is C2Commercial CR2Commercial -- former gas stn, police
stn
60Ksf, C2Comm larger the Village Sq
1600block 60Ksf, zoned C2 Comm -- existing Safeway store; zoning
will remain until someone comes forward; anyone who came forward wd hv
to go through a DP process; staff is not aware of any plans for these
sites; BFC4 process -- have to come forward wrt 1.75 being proposed
for Amb.
what is proposed, amenities, parking; gallery space; Ccl wd
decide whether or not to move forward.
xxx in sync with public receiving
public amenities wd be negotiated
take up to a year to complete; public notice min of 100 metres;
public input
CP: 1590 Bellevue; owner requested a change from Comm to AC2 zone
wch allows for greater residential, in fact all residential.
When considering this we fell back on our old OCP policies. One
was to strengthen the connections between waterfront and comm; keep
comm on xxx that we don't have enough of
John Lawson Park to west, then Silk Purse and Music Box
Staff saw opp for commercial xxx; reaffirm
Height: some concern expressed July 7
where is four-storey possible? limited situations; we have
certain criteria 120ft wide front 14400sf or greater and a grade
change from front to back, min of 8ft
looked at all sites and cd only find one that fitted[sic] that
description
currently only one that fits; aware cd consolidate to meet that
criteria
small sites with a lot of small owners; not nec consolidate
quickly but anticipate some
2004 when OCP brought fwd, concern about providing certainty to
cmnty; biz and prop owners
some came out of Hollyburn Med Bldg
looking at updating regulations; providing certainty for
residents and owner
Design: we're looking for great bldgs in Amb, last into
future, so felt some flexibility in height
open terraced bldgs, open decks; by allowing a little bit more
height, step them back, privacy and view issues; more slender bldgs
rather than squat shallower bldgs; allows more variability in
design.
Our existing OCP zoning allows for two-storey bldgs with a
provision for three; we're talking about incremental change -- three
with possibility for four, criteria to be met
[7:50pm] two conditions: typical two to three storey
(slides showing side view)
even if bldgs meet criteria still need to meet parking
requirements
Overhead Wires: concern; clarified with gentleman who made
comment
really along rlwy track; in 1988 with beautification most were
underground, some initial work by Engg wrt cost. It's about
$1000 a metre to underground, it's really a transmission line, 3/4km
so that's $750K
consider a modification to the policy C 4.8 add a bullet ensure
that future devts consider the issue of undergrounding as part of a
benefit package. That wd be a change
Lastly, the 1800block
kind of unique street; sgl fam resid abut immediately across the
lane
even-numbered houses on south side of Duchess; main floor 3 or
4ft above lane level except at eastern end where it's 8ft
views are already impacted by waterfront resid towers part of the
high rise area; they get peekaboo views; they were requesting some
things from Ccl
This [slide] is of the area; alternative proposal to setback from
lane
add'l setback of 4ft; when residents came in they requested 10ft
at the land first and 20ft at the second storey; staff is supportive
of that
modify the rear setback, to 10ft at first storey and 20ft at
second -- so staff recommends that
There's a minor error -- slide shows corrected to four storeys
on Marine and three storeys on the lane
Sop: why not concession in the 13, 14, 15, 1600 blocks -- those
are residents, why not same consideration of reduction
Sokol: in general ground floor living space, in multifam lobby,
parking
Sop: that's debatable
Mayor: but not with staff
JF: wrt increase in setbacks, but that doesn't change FAR?
CP: yes, stays same; when looking at concept brought fwd by
residents, one concern b/c density not changing, someone might try to
maximize density on lane frontage; under zoning cd build zero lot line
to zero lot line, cd; so felt better to push mass a bit higher, then
deal with view issues
5.
PUBLIC INPUT [8:03]
Rob Harrington (owner of West Van Florist): am going to read my
submission
a little bit of misinformation -- mentioned that WVF is for sale,
it is not.
still in a little shock that after all the input, WG, reports,
studies, still have to defend to Ccl.
mandates to create sustainable nbrhds
WV Ccl does not... look out
urban sprawl is out, sustainability is in
balance between nature, ppl, and the economy; can't be sustained
without all these three
hoping for a new beginning; four-storey bldgs an absolute
minimum
need for far more density; yet July 7 xxxxxx
not a time to play politics, need to .... best for cmnty
little change for decades; plan... need a home....
ppl are the cornerstone of .....
Amb shd have it all but it doesn't; b/c it lacks customers
49500sf the north side is .... road to revit; homes and
amenities for
urge Ccl to vote yes; any result downzoning vehemently
opposed
> Randy Wong of Vancouver: {biz} 1849 Marine
need high quality ...tenants not just PkR; Amb on Pk R; old tired
and worn out....
ev currently leaves, for shopping, noise,.... pollution air noise
congestion 8:10
walk increase health, better cmnty see each other more
join 21st century; needs quality stuck back in I love Lucy, .....
and My Favourite Martian
if views, nothing wd be built, including homes
M Hall built here affected the view of nbring residents
apts complain but they block others' views so not reasonable for
them to complain
revit core, create a sense of cmnty; self-sustaining; is Amb?
No
don't provide quality and depth of goods Amb required
current 1950s quality .... financially unattractive, revit won't
happen
1300 to 1800 do not serve Amb fully so downsizing to 1500/1700
serve them less
ask AC2 zoning for 1800 block be passed unchanged
> David Thomas: live at Monteverdi; four storeys where
appropriate like my friend Randy, some props from Perry Mason
[puts lumber on table in centre of horseshoe and looks/speaks
toward gallery as audience]
Mayor: you're addressing Ccl actually
DT, laying out 2 by 4s, varying lengths: this is the ground floor
-- a wood bldg by the way, this is the second floor
one bldg on one side, and one on the other
Mayor: excuse me, you're addressing Ccl
DT: pardon me. [Thud, bump, thud. Moving wood pieces]
So you have a three-storey bldg, lane to lane [more bldg blocks,
stepping up]
instead of have gardens here and here and view corridors, so bldg
looks better; light and private space
Cclr Sop asked if effect on view and shadowing and if I cd point
out -- on this slide you can see 12-storey bldg, this is on Google
earth, shadow on lane, and this four-storey bldg hardly seen crosses
the lane
get a better looking bldg and virtually little shadowing or
view
> Alan Shapiro: realtor, here wrt Hollyburn Funeral
Home
expressing objections; it's a downzoning of their prop and even
though not looking to redevt wd affect relocating; North side of 1800
shd not be treated differently from
> Linda Sherwood: live on Duchess; presentation on behalf of
myself and two nbrs
feel uncomfortable responding on this on behalf of
nbrs.....
am requesting this portion of the agenda be postponed to Sept so
nbrs can comment
we are in support of revit of Amb
consideration of surrounding residents as well
app the time and flexibility Ccl and staff have shown in
consideration of Duchess and XXXX nbrhd
pleased wrt setback N side of MDrive as requested
refers to Hollyburn Medical xxx ; wd hv bn
unacceptable
secondly accept analysis wrt FAR and sloping sites, box-like wd
not be tolerable to us nor wd it be aesthetically plsing to rest of
cmnty
pg 8 of see [C?] section A
to assure .... whether superior design been achieved.... views
strategic views
we have been assured today by DWV staff that xxx
assume Option 2 will include a reference to .... criteria,
BFC4.1
our main concern: light and privacy not dealt with in xxx shd be
included in the evaluation criterion
further we want to be included.... in future design mtgs wrt
1800, landscaping on lane, structures on roof, etc
> Peter Morley: live on Duchess; speak in support of Linda's
request delay until rest of residents have heard, why four wd be
better than three for residents
loss of privacy and looming bldgs
a number of ppl were away and I was away until 4pm this
afternoon; another resident is in France an back next week; delay
until at least Colette Parsons cd meet, not particularly against but
wd like to understand it
> Mary Sherrett: live on Fulton; wd like to summarize my
letter
wd like to adjourn to Sept; shd WV shut down b/c ppl go away in
summer?
info available for some time
completely nec to postpone all biz b/c summer; thank you
for
interested in opinions last Monday
value character and charm -- look at my 1940s home to
to maintain need to xxxx
sometimes a fresh start needed; not a Rodeo Drive
in current state has failed to reach potential; clear improvement
on existing bylaws
> Keith Pople: Director of ADRA and PWV but the comments
tonight are my own.
Amb Village a key component of our cmnty; low profile bldgs,
[sunlit] streets, proximity to waterfront; distinguishes it from rest
of GVRD.
favoured location for many civic events; bldgs showing their age
and something shd be done to revit the area; remember we've got
something v special, shd be done with grt deal of care
The OCP recommendations are approp; reduce vacancy rates, etc
however rezoning recommendations appear to permit zoning wch wd
radically alter sunlight, low profile of the village' these cd allow
even larger than those across from Cap Mall; visualize these lining
both sides of street from 13th to 18th
ADRA's mbrship survey; had many mtgs; conclusion, bldg height shd
be limited to two storeys on S side and three on N (not three on S and
four on N as allowed in proposed amendments).
Many successful biz areas with these limitations, such as
Cornwall, Robson, Edgemont av one and a half). Openness and
sunlight. Monster bldgs like monster houses are
inhospitable.
One, two, and occasional three in above areas, surely we don't
need four in Amb.
Zoning amendment shd be amended to two on S and three on N; and
make sure adeq parking for add'l residential anticipated.
> Dr Rob Scott: need for a multidisciplinary ctr n WV
and we're looking for a location.
Romanow Commission recommendation pooling resources of medical
talent in one location.
BC Ministry of Health went further, IHNs -- Integrated Health
Networks
A group of us as family doctors have interest in a WV Medical
Ctr, all family doctors and wd include specialists, a men's health
clinic, a women's health clinic, a skin care clinic; a PET-scan group
interested; a private MRI interested; maybe an OR; problem trying to
address, getting together to deal with chronic disease mgmt.
> CR: Editor, West Van Matters
{Chairs blocked way} Difficult to get up here; will try to read
my notes.
Mayor: address?
CR (of WVM): Ste 300, 1497 Marine Dr
Please accept my request for more information
What I'd like more clarification on please, is it a blanket
rezoning, an FAR increase.
Will it be fair? -- IOW so that it isn't the case that those
with larger properties or those who can assemble properties will be
allowed more FAR, more density, or whatever; and I'd like that
clarified pls
{but they don't}
wrt the policy of cmnty benefits and amenities, will this
always be applied, even if they have that blanket upzoning from the
base?
It wd be appreciated if there cd be a clear and complete
presentation on how this policy wd promote village character,
encourage keeping our small shops, be pedestrian-friendly, faciliate
views and pathways to the waterfront.
{No answer to this either}
Will there always be public input for every redevt as we have
now? I don't think we want to lose that.
{No answer to this either}
WRT the south side of Bellevue, in the 1500 block, some years
ago -- and Cclr Day will remember this -- that property along there
was purchased from BCR specifically for public parking, so if you're
going to change it now you might want to look into what arrangement
was made and under what condition that land was released from
BCR.
On the Safeway site, if I heard correctly from Colette
Parsons, it said what they have to do above 1.75, and that's what made
me think about... are they already going to be given this higher FAR
and then it's only cmnty benefits above that? or do we ask for some
sort of cmnty benefits/amenities to go from what they are now, up to
this 1.75? hence the importance of asking about the blanket rezoning
and that. We want to encourage the small businesses and shops,
but we also want to have some CBs from that.
The other thing is, I really do join and agree with everybody
who wishes this cd hv bn over by now. It is long overdue, and it
is unfortunate that govts, by their v nature move slowly, and I know
that we all wish that the revitalization wd hv bn finished by now, but
that's just one of those things.
When somebody mentions there've been lots of reports... Yes,
there have, but the nature of public business is, that many ppl, many
residents, are only now with the PH, starting to be aware of what's
going on and the possibilities. So whereas the information and
opportunities hv bn there for a long time, many ppl really haven't
availed themselves of that until now, and it's b/c of that although I
do agree that we want this to move as quickly as possible, I do agree
with those who want it adjourned to September for more time and more
ideas, and addressing these things.
Thank you v much for your consideration.
> Frank Rutter [text supplied]:
Thank you, Madam Mayor, members of Council, Ladies &
Gentlemen. I am Frank Rutter of 740 Burley Drive. And I am
disappointed with the report from staff we have tonight. I believe
staff have not properly considered major concerns expressed on July 7
and certainly not acted on them. The changes proposed in the report
-- there are really only two -- are minuscule tinkering. No
major change is suggested. The two big concerns in Ambleside in my
opinion are height of buildings and traffic management.
Neither is adequately addressed. There remain three select sites plus
the Masonic Hall excluded from general zoning provisions. There remain
loopholes big enough to drive a five-storey building through - maybe
even much bigger. The only suggestion - not a recommendation -
from staff is that maybe a 4-storey allowance be removed from the
zoning bylaw and put in the OCP - that's worse! - even
more flexible, meaning potentially even more exceptions. Staff
assert they know of no proposals to consolidate building sites - but
there jolly well soon will be I can assure you and I know of one.
As for traffic in my opinion there should be a moratorium on any major
development until there is a sensible, comprehensive and
environmentally sound traffic plan. I also believe that it
would be better to have a single zone with fully defined rules
that will not be altered to suit any applicant for redevelopment or
any site for nonconformity. We must have a coherent, friendly,
community core where people come first and history and heritage are
preserved. Thank you.
> Elaine Fonseca: overflowing crowd at
last Hearing; more than 40 speakers; care and passionate abou
cmnty
those speakers concerned most height,
density, and disappearing village atmosphere
heard we must grow, we must change -- says
who? devprs? architects who do biz,
want more density, that's
who
Amb is not dead; it's a myth; I'm in the
village most days
Tools and Techniques was mentioned going
out of biz, hinted b/c of less traffic
owner told me she has been there for 25
years at same location,25 years is a success story
same, Chez Michel, Carmelo's 25 years,
full house most nights; Flight Ctr there b/c of all the foot
traffic
coffee shops busy, so are veggie stores, so
are banks
good stores/biz stay and the not-so-good
ones go
and for those who need a bit more action in
the evening, go across town; or the Silk Purse on Argyle has wonderful
concerts, local talent most Tues or Thurs evenings; Saltaire has jazz
as does the Ocean by the Black Tower
Amb is not dead -- maybe a bit sleepy,
but it's not dead, and maybe that's the way we want
it.
>Sarah Baker: came into this late
b/c
lived here for six years in 1990s, on Bowen
came back as many do when chn go to high school
v involved Ferry Bldg, Harmony
Arts
in NSNews, nothing mentioned in amenity
package about diversity .....
[on Bowen] I started an affordable
housing.... we were becoming West Van Lite, wch is not looked well
upon; social diversity
when these sites get developed,
new
was convinced, persuaded that three and
four storeys way to go but add density; increase density if
you're going to go up
amenity of affordable housing, not social,
more affordable ...
diversity
not healthy
social sustainability, all ages, all
incomes, all ....; make room for everyone
of all incomes
> Karen Schuler: representing Millennium
Devts; own three properties on MDr
more flexibility sust socially and
environmentally; help revitalize the corridor
> Andrew Pottinger [~8:50]: representing
WV Chamber of Commerce in 1800 block MDr
dedicated to enhancing biz, with 300
mbrs, leading; promote healthy
climate
view of the directors
critical.....
[On WG] Chamber was represented; well
thought out mix
town ctr not performing as it
shd; will lose more biz if more not done
without ....
past useful life; unsuitable for many .... biz; growing prob of relevance
looking forward, like the plans as an
asset; pedestrian-friendly links
add'l foot traffic; multifaceted biz
experience
wrt BIA proposal, good track record
therefore support this as long as biz agree to support
ongoing to support renewal; upgrade and improve street fronts
planning guidelines .... risk
....
clear from number of ..... there are
impediments
limit to three and four storeys with
offices on second and residences on third and fourth ..... improve
viability of customer base
one of our directors.... financially
feasible; many businesses will be start-up
wrt larger scale devt on larger sites, new
focal points
height not nec a bad thing; carefully....; views never
guaranteed; seems quite sensitive
to
Chamber supports capturing
CBs
these calculations shd be carefully
...
asking and hoping ..... taking
risks
approach conservative, approp to slower
economic times as well as
real parallel with Clyde east of TW had
deteriorated; Ccl wisely decided to xxx
as a result, this area is transforming; v
high quality businesses
socially envmtally, ...
urge endorse plan and more forward -- plan
July 7, have not had time to consider recommendations from
staff
Mayor: no one further on the list; anyone
wishing to speak; can't see down hallway.
NO ONE
Mayor: Cclr F
JF: [mumble mumble]
Mayor: wd you speak into the microphone, I
can't hear you.
JF moved submissions be received and
hearing closed
Mayor: wd be approp to have questions now
b/c if closed
Sop: OCP and Zoning amendments; starting
with recommendations that are parts of
Mayor: debating whether to close and then
discuss in reg
Sop:
Mayor: close wdn't say that
Sop:...
Mayor: ask Dir/Planning ....
Sokol: ask yourselves if sufficient info to
close, report or answer questions now?
Mayor: not sure ....
RD: as one of the speakers said, statement
of fact, if this plan goes ahead be like area around Capilano Mall;
hunch is you'll say can't b/c 1.75
Sokol: not 100% familiar with area, but max
wd be 1.75, some four if sloping site
RD: most cases three-storey bldgs and
you're okay with that
Sokol: yes consistent with over years and
WG
RD: four
Sokol: sites with over 120ft of
frontage
CP: 14,400sf
Sokol: only one site close; bldgs not four
storeys without a lot of props aggregating
sure it wd not happen to ev
parcel
RD: with land assembled, higher than four
storeys
Sokol: up to four storeys
RD: if land assembled and apply for four
stores, considerable public inout?
Sokol: public input, devt
permit
VV: wrt parking study by Bunt &
Assoc 2005; wd cost ~ $1M to
....
is that the amt of money that wd be
involved? am I correct no such money in our budget?
CP: I looked for clarification on it; went
back to document and did word search
there was no money associated with the Bunt
report
not a number we're familiar with; can't
verify where amt came from; never worked
with any numbers; worked with Engg
Dept
{Perhaps a better use of staff time, and wd take less time,
simply to call Bunt & Assoc and ask if they put a figure to their
traffic study. And if not, why didn't Ccl (or staff) ask for one
at the time. A report without costing might be regarded as
incomplete, no?}
VV: focusing on reorganizing the parking
already there
shd be a multistorey parking
structure
just confirming in a situation no study
really done or sum set aside
rather like a report, not been
done
wait for a new bldg to come and then follow
the formula; all just sort of biz as
usual with no strategy; just want to be
clear that's where we are
Mayor: further questions for
staff?
Sop: looking at smaller sites, setback from
lane
if want to go up two storeys, give
ability to have space for parking?
CP: it is a requirement -- must meet
parking requirements on site
have provided for some of the smaller
able to increase a nominal amt say 10% ...
if have to have it at grade, have to
make work within site
Sop: if within present zoning wd hv to make
application to rezone; wd have to have public hearing and a
process; what are they allowed to build
on those sites today?
Sokol: depends
CP: under current zoning for C2, two
storeys with possibility of three storeys ... parking stalls ...
Mayor: given one example where four storeys
possible; state three have to ...
you'd have to .... [9:08] give that suggestion
Sokol: specific changes to bylaw
amendments; change to xxxx
changing language -- if good
design
wd have to be in OCP fourth storey if good
design
Mayor: can we?
Sokol: as Ccl...... you cd ask, density wd
stay same as 1.75
{No one cd speak after Ccl
started debating but I cdn't help wondering and
may ask: good design in whose opinion? will there be a process
or cmte for that???}
6.
CLOSURE OR ADJOURNMENT OF RECONVENED PUBLIC HEARING
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED 9:09
*** (BACK TO) REGULAR
COUNCIL AGENDA -- 9:09
(after PH closed)
REPORTS
4. Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 4360, 2004,
Amendment Bylaw No. 4543, 2008 - Ambleside Town Centre
Information to be provided.
JF: you'd like us to deal with each of
these separately?
I move that [RECOMMENDATIONS ON SCREEN]
Mayor: on floor, one at a time
JF: it has been a long time; been planning
thinking for many years
cmnty has been involved ev step of the way
and public has been heard
bylaws before us excellent; great deal of
support throughout the cmnty
from an environmental POV, green
bldgs
improved financial impact once proposal
come to light
WVites need to know and understand; tax
base; most borne by residential
enormous amt to strengthen cmnty, social
interaction
kinds of expectations from design
guidelines; what wd accommodate
views
imp to keep in mind wrt height it's only
2ft higher than present 35ft, will be 37ft
more positive
doesn't answer ev single aspect wrt
parking....
allow cmnty interaction expect ..... bode
well for kind of acceptance and support will bring
will support and encourage others to do the
same
RD: do support recommendations; in cases
where you might go to four storeys, wd like to put under item 7,
Design Panel; we have now from 2 to 3 then from 3 to 4
Sokol: bylaw to 4 with design
RD: CIBC 1.75, one-storey bldg but flat,
slopes you might consider a fourth storey
not going to be huge like Cap
Mall
considering like Hollyburn Medical Ctr,
IGA; good design, xxx
if you like HMC you'll like what we're
doing here
smaller lots will remain two to three and
can do that today
we do have Devt Permits; each will be
adequately reviewed by the public; continue to have public
input
in terms of 18th St lot, have a lot of
sympathy with the residents there
I have no objections to three storeys on N
side
.... wd allow for better views
personally go to three storeys fine with me
four xxx
like thing Mem Park, get away from
lane; a lot of discussion, input,
......xxx
funky Amb, my wife and I have enjoyed it
for 42 years
don't think you'll see a lot of
change; wd not like to do anything to
damage Amb, I love Amb v much
that's what I have in mind
VV: tried to follow logic of what ev
presented
efforts to revit been going on for a long
time; what does it mean? more ppl, more
cars?
well, more foot ... [9:20]... can't
get more on sidewalk if can't park
anyone.... when I approach ...
don't need to know how much
xxx
depends on how attractive and availability
of .... and .... prices
rents higher, so potential value for money
won't be as good
see a lot of disconnect from
objectives
and methods
mbrs of public in signif numbers not happy
with opposition of WG and said so on many occasions
reside only ...
lose the chance, a medical
complex
haven't got a location for an art gallery
or museum, but closing the door b/c xxx
interested in what Chamber says, and
xxx
well, going to have residences on top so
more.... shop till they
drop
thousands already there -- ten, 20 or 50
more won't make a signif diff
wd like to see Amb revitalized, but I don't
see what's in front of me is going to accomplish that
think it's too bad we're not doing
things .....; think worth achieving
Mayor: Cclr Sop
Sop: well I wanted to be last
MS: you're never last at
anything
Sop: if we go ahead with some of these
progs
see an instant recall of new bldgs and
reconstituted seven or eight block area
one wonders why biz owners haven't come
forward to date 9:24
and not my concern owner can't make money
off his bldg
my daily routine as a shopper
to have an ambiance, streetscape, plentiful
we refer to Dund
.... installed new lights, hanging baskets,
many things over the years
b/c of the smaller bldgs and there are many
of them
one storey, a lot of character
who owns these bldgs? will they ever do
anything?
... wd that invigorate them?
are we going to provide......
parking? will we truly do
that?
with a 30ft setback, you do have sunny and
parking areas; concerned about going up too high, it's the massing
that does it
get to the back your 4ft, and
xxx
if you continue all down the street wd it
block the sunlight
have looked from 16th down to Police Stn
and most of the bldgs, there's an evenness out there, some height
lower but not v much
some bldgs have gone ahead of late,
processes, built and appreciated xxx
...what's before us
a couple of other things, any amenities
owner have to acquire, whether all uplift or %age of construction
cost, he's going to [shove? throw?] that through to the renter, going
to be passed on; to the ppl renting the premises
as Cclr V said, are we going to bring magic
to this area....
area I have concern with 15th and Bellevue,
14th and Marine -- Walker bldg, I 've appreciated design; some living
upstairs
I'm a realist and I don't see any of these
accommodations as inexpensive
high-priced real estate, that's okay, I
don't have any prob with that
I don't want to see more than three
storeys on N side so I'm not going to support
that
S side, see some sameness in bldgs now
three storeys
right, preserve your commercial space now
and forever more
won't support resid to bottom
floor; couple of storeys on
top...
process now PH ... nothing wrong with
that
go ahead with AC2; going to be an
acceptance locked in place
go by way of a Devt Permit -- come to Ccl
and already said and done; nothing to discuss?
only formal process on those three
sites; can't go that route
MS: my family moved to WV in 1955 an at
that time Pk Royal S didn't exist and PkR N was a strip
mall....
Amb was the village; theatre.....;
had paper route, coffee shops,... ; village was alive, heart of the cmnty
don't know whether just sleepy, certainly
no life there in the evening
go to cmnty ctr for a workout, walk to the
village.... they'd go all the way to Pk R [9:33]
demographic trends; there are more bedrooms than xxx ; no
chn; popn ageing, demand smaller place
they can lock up; close to shopping,
library, srs' ctr; tremendous need for that xxx
ideally in Amb
I must admit I sort of changed my mind 15
times, like Keith Pople; don't want concrete bunkers in Amb and height
was a real concern to me
listening to the WG, sitting through
hearings and listening to prof staff
really don't have ...
my real limitations, see Mr Karl
Gustavson; better design bldgs or better
if Mike Smith did it
have to defer to ppl more
xxx
as to height, in Appendix A, fourth storey
only if superior design
as Cclrs Day and Sop, wd be attracted by
option of three storeys, makes no sense to enshrine three storeys when
the guidelines are clear fourth wd have to be superior and
xxx... so why limit to three
storeys?
in a rambling way I've come full circle
three times; time WG and planning staff
so I'm going to support these changes
JF: response to some of the comments made
by some of my colleagues; understand
difficult to comprehend
how going to work, sure? we can't; except for
Cclr Clark none of us involved in commercial in Amb; that's why we
hired professionals
go up and down streets talk to residents,
biz
genesis; minor
critic; but those were xxx
in order to have a viable
industry
and some of them were residents and all of
them got up at the last mtg and spoke in support
those who work and build on a daily
basis
wd it be successful? wd it motivate to
update?
fine line between ht and
motivating; feel we came down on
conservative side
know 1800 block don't understand ......
than if these proposals didn't go through
confident planning staff will spend time
with those residents
sure what we've asked for,
landscapes; paying for improvements to
streets
this ccl and subsequent ccls will ensure
done; things like this happen
slowly
saw Spamalot the other night, slowly -- he
said, not dead yet but by the end of the song he was b/c someone
whacked him on the head; time to whack this on the head
VV: props were changing hands at prices
higher than renters cd pay
said bldgs rundown ... yet props changing at higher
the only way buying his way is that Ccl wd
give them a capital gain upzoning
aren't we generating an incentive all over
the world
being old isn't a problem, it's how it's
maintained; shdn't reward them
with capital gains; keep up rather than
run down
beneficial to resist the ....
upzoning
recogn they have to have rents
reasonable
no reason to rebuild just to have a
xxx
Mayor: status quo got us
nowhere
consensus; ppl
support; over three and four
storeys
that while the HMBldg now a model, it was a
disaster as a process
when I got onto Ccl, was over
then...
local architect [involved] left WV; lost one of our
best planners
Cclr Smith, glad you talked about
xxx
a proper village is where you have to get
out of your car; happily walk a couple of
blocks
of course about building as.....
a modest proposal; take courage, lots of courage,......do
better
wd like to congratulate Ccl wherever you are
part of plan; tasked .....
without putting pressure on sgl fam
good article in Globe in Mail last year, is it even possible
an???? more to have Village
still wd like to know about 1800block; garden entrance; eastern
end; signalling that you're here
sure you've spent a lot of time
Fred Kent said Amb functioning about 40% but privately he said
20% but didn't want to hurt anyone's feelings
calls re litter; not up to xxx; this is toned down
two zones instead of 13; organizes us and focuses on design
will be a response but not a flood of calls
thank the staff for a lot of work on that
when No 7 will ask about four storeys don't want destabilizing
force b/c all about stability.
Mayor: 1 re parking PASSED
2 BF-4.10 PASSED
3 no TSq at 14th and Marine PASSED
4
VV can I add amendment; parking addressed but not
adequately
CP: was not overlooked; we do have a parking strategy
Mayor: if we were to highlight; how wd Ccl ...?
Sokol: as we go into budget process that Ccl set aside some money
or implement more intensive strategies
CARRIES
5 BF-C4 CARRIES
6 AC1 zone for AC1 Zone for 1590
Sop opposed
7 wrt height
CARRIES
JF: read a second time
Mayor: an amendment can go to second reading
JF: amended by modifying along Bellevue consider issue
undergrounding
CARRIES
Mayor: agree friendly amendment so -- oh, this is where I call
for debate; so seeing none, question on second reading
Sop opposed
JF: OCP Amendment third time
CARRIES, Sop opposed [9:53]
5. Zoning Bylaw No. 2200, 1968, Amendment Bylaw
No. 4544, 2008 - Ambleside Town Centre
Information to be provided
Mayor: setbacks in 1800
JF: moved with amendments
MS: again want to reiterate that if you read right from the doc,
fourth storey only if superior design
wrt your reference to the west entrance to Amb
can't be stated any more succinctly than that; wd have to
demonstrate benefit to cmnty
has to be something that's an asset to the cmnty otherwise three
storeys
Mayor: residence
Sokol: merit design
MS: when superior design
CP: that kind of language is in OCP and what we're talking about
right now is zoning
but you've just passed second and third reading in OCP
JF: also in the design guidelines
CP: OCP does incorporate design guidelines
Sop: whether ....
always been great desire to have good design; to just
assume just do that to get another storey; that's taking
place
so to think left with third storey, xxx
Mayor: we're on the --
Sop: digress like Cclr Smith
Mayor: so as amended; Cclr F, consider a friendly amendmt; Cclr
Sop, this is the
RD: move mtg to conclusion of biz
VV: staff; shdn't have an indefinite extension; check ev half
hour
{if not to end of biz as done in past, then perhaps
prioritize the items left, but no, not done; virtual guarantee mtg wd
not complete all on agenda. WRT Staff, they shd start later on Mondays
if that's a concern, or start later on Tues to make up.}
Sokol: on large sites can have four sites [storeys?], the
ones over 120ft, 8ft grade change
Mayor: report
Sokol: on [those?] four storeys wd allow as a right, not based
on good design, but wd have to xxx
Sop: may I have my say now? that's why I'm not supporting...
manoeuvring
massing down the street, going to destroy the ambiance of
Amb
there are bldgs now three storeys TWO???? residents like living
there
proper size of store; five gas stns take up corners, four banks;
some have 30yr leases
are you going to change? pressure's going to come down to
little stores, and demand on the N side
we had a fight, lot of input when we did 17th and Marine; [then]
the air conditioning and [added] on top
learned a few things over the years; look at the bldg where going
to be; sensible, well-designed
think we're going to ... I don't see that
MS: I'm v sensitive to height too; key is this 1.75; probably can
meet it in two storeys, certainly three
only reason for fourth, is to come up with a superior bldg
still max at the back, not a complete four-storey bldg; if not
for fact 1.75 enshrined; will support height restriction; also long as
don't
RD: saying same thing; 37ft limit and at present 35, so not
much
among the biz ppl favouring this legislation; success not
failure, sudden influx of
WVF progressive ppl in Amb
Mayor: zoning as amended
CARRIES with Sop opposed
Third Reading carries too
10:05 Cclr Clark returns
6. Development Variance Permit Application 08-019
(6460 Rosebery Avenue)
At the July 7, 2008 meeting, Council
received the report dated June 27, 2008 from the Planning
Dept
CALL FOR PUBLIC INPUT
If Council wishes a further staff report,
then RECOMMENDED: THAT Staff report back to Council
OR
THAT DVP Application No. 08-019 which would
allow for a variance on the Height of Building requirements be
approved.
{how much is the height variance???
usually what's asked for is given in the motion!!!}
Sokol: Cclr V's concern wrt Bd of Variance, discussed with
solicitor and Ccl can
VV: I brought my ..... says it can't; don't know how
Sokol: apologize said similar; it's lower than the 9 inches that
was at the Bd of Variance
VV: had legal advice on this; not in writing
anyone at Bd of Variance change by an inch or two, can come back;
not a good precedence
Mayor: have similar question; understand vote was 2 -2 and two
felt it shd go to Ccl
Sokol: I wasn't at the mtg
SSch: application was xxx
Mayor: we wdn't be operating in contravention of our legal
advice
GBoyle: Bd of V has very limited
must be ...... and hardship; Ccl doesn't
this is a separate application not an appeal
certainly a Bd's decision is final and you cannot appeal it;
this is separate
{this wd be of interest to some residents out in Caulfeild
when a few years ago the BofV, most agreed, made a decision thought
not qualified/permitted to do; they were told they had to go to court
to overturn the approval so decided not to spend the
money.}
Mayor: Mr Sokol introduce this?
Sokol: in doc and applicant's here
Mayor: then there'll be public input
Applicant (didn't catch name): wrt Bd of V; never had any
intention of going to Bd of V
when two ppl said; had this dome two years ago; difficult for
anyone to ... topography and hardship
we wanted to do simple renovation and as little impact on
nbr and our family; unfort'ly that didn't occur
had we realized topography; lot nonconforming end of street
I'm a nurse; deferred to experts whether error in calculations;
turn it over to my husband
Man: thank you for giving us the opp to .... thank you in advance
for xxx
6460 lived there fore over 20 years, youngest 12, goes to
Gleneagles, live on same street as elementary school
great location, love our nbrhd and have fantastic nbrs; probably
have the best nbrs anyone can ask for
has really come out, process -- been a learning process -- at
BofV, in prep for that and it even goes back to planning, input from
nbrs, clear what we felt, our home needed
our house one of first built on street, fdn 45 years old, rebuilt
sev times; we had a flat roof, continual leakage
cd change, cd modify, decided to take on a renovation, first
doing so
Wife: may be our last
Husband: planned by seeking out advice from nbrs, done b/c like
our nbrs and like our nbrhd, done b/c plan to live there another 20
years
Cclr Smith made a point during ... Amb plan, feel appropriate to
us, and Maureen tried to make this point; we're not architects and
we're not builders
wanted to make changes to our home, went out and interviewed
architects on N Sh, chose one who has an ofc in Amb and put our trust
in our architect, builder, prof land surveyor
discovered this extra 5 and a half inches was never accounted for
in any plans for renovating, goes back to 1985 when second floor put
in
this whole situation has been a tremendous learning experience
for us; countless hours with all the stakeholders wd cd think of,
nbrs, staff, appreciate amt of time WV staff has put into this
Wife: add one more thing; had permit builder built roof, appeared
6" too tall, unknown to us to builder
5. inches done in 1985
Mayor: wd like to call for public input; 16 letters of support;
no one to speak?
RD: unfortunate this sort of thing happens to a nice family; have
a good night's sleep the first time in a number of years
move received for information
PASSED
VV: why did they go to BofV?
Wife: ppl of Building Dept said go to Bof V it will be
approved
[10:20]
{HM???????? This is the second case in about a
month in wch staff tell a builder or owner that something will be
approved when they are not in that position -- before it was Ccl's
decision and here it's not just second-guessing but telling owners
variances wd be approved!}
VV: ordinary ppl do perfectly normal things
just hope we cannot go through; if we know what went wrong;
RD: move be approved
Sop: curious, in Feb if this prob found out, framing
inspection; wd our staff say you're overheight and fix it
Sokol: said overheight, fix it
roof too flat then same prob as before; maybe tearing off
roof
therefore think that made most sense was to go to BofV
{b/c likely approval but in fact told owners wd be
approved however it wasn't!!!}
Applicants/Owners: THANK YOU SO MUCH; we are the Cleavers, Ward
and June
10:22
7. Community Sport Working Group - Interim
Report
(File: 0117-20-CS)
... dated July 8, 2008 from the
Manager of Park Programs ... received for
information.
XXX: Thank you for creating this WG; lots of headway working
together
concerns of the sports fields roups: fees, usage,
improvements
looked at other places; created a sports forum to hear
concerns
preliminary recommendations wch will go back to sports groups for
comments
Man: common theme: everybody wanted more opp for dialogue; among
sports groups and staff; promote collaboration in the District,
volunteers
one of the recommendations is to find some way to ingrain in
the culture a continuation of this collaboration
start small, field users, then expand to all cmnty sports
orgs
virtually all Ms in Lower Mainland seems to have 10:25
at our fact-finding forum; make sure get their input
finally, Sherry and I wd like to thank Corinne Ambor, Doug
Leavers; and Cclr F for some of the baked goods
JF: my appreciation; these are mostly working ppl and serving,
volunteering
want something done, ask busy ppl
don't know how cd squeeze something else in but the did
competitive nature but by halfway through, particularly at forum,
all started to hear what other groups' problems were; see empathy that
arose
capacity to do some sharing, facilities and equipment; been
positive outcome; Ccl shd take a look at continuing
Sop: always a task; from other WG's exp
looking at fees and charges and how xxx
will you consider area around parks as to impact in the future;
that wd be an asset to have in the report; know what I'm talking
about?
NO
Mayor: take that up
RD: move extend mtg to 11pm
PASSED
JF: Report received
10:30
8. Horseshoe Bay Fire Hall Site (File: 0510-18/0117-20-CDNCH)
RECOMMENDED: THAT the memo dated June 26,
2008 from C. Banham, Chair of the Community
Mayor: sorry, Bruce McArthur
BMcA: nbr and cochair of WRA
you are asked to receive a memo that
says... mbrs of the WRA continue to express concerns that the only
land use option currently under consideration for the site is
subdivision into sgl-fam lots. Only some. I'd like to
caution Ccl that at the present time this is not a consensus opinion
of the WRA, and that I think it is inappropriate for a WG to
imply that a request for changes to the existing character of a nbrhd
is being made by a local assn.
Mayor: thank you for the
clarification
MOTION: Dialogue on Neighbourhood Character
and Housing Working Group ... be received for
information.
Mayor: not sure if this is in the spirit of a memo
Sokol: a leaking underground storage tank discovered on site, oil
on site and bring prop so timeline putting this up for sale in fall
probably not going to happen
Ccl receive this report and during month of August staff wd
consider this and report in Sept
JC: works well for me, just don't want this left
Mayor: so staff will come back
CARRIES
10:33
9. Park Exchange (Martin Corporation -
Caulfield Plateau) Bylaw No. 4558, 2008 and Land Use Contract Approval
Bylaw No. 2745, 1978, Amendment Bylaw No. 4566, 2008
RECOMMENDED: THAT "Park Exchange
(Martin Corporation - Caulfield [sic] Plateau) Bylaw No. 4558, 2008"
(the "Park Exchange Bylaw") be read a first, second and third
time.
A
RECOMMENDED: THAT "Land Use Contract
Approval Bylaw... (the "LUC Amendment Bylaw") be read a first and
second time.
B
RECOMMENDED: THAT whereas section 27 of
the Community Charter stipulates that Council may only adopt the Park
Exchange Bylaw with the approval of the electors, be it further
resolved that:
(a)
Council authorizes and directs that an alternative approval process
shall be provided in relation to the Bylaw in accordance with section
86 of the Community Charter;
(b)
Elector responses shall be substantially in the form set out in
Appendix 5 to the Council Report dated July 10, 2008 entitled "Park
Exchange (Martin Corporation - [Caulfeild] Plateau) Bylaw No. 4558,
2008 and Land Use Contract Approval Bylaw No. 2745, 1978, Amendment
Bylaw No. 4566, 2008";
(c)
The deadline for the submission of elector response forms shall be
4:00 p.m. on September 3, 2008 (the
"Deadline");
(d) The
Municipal Clerk is authorized to prepare an Alternate Approval Process
Notice, which notice must be published once each week for two
consecutive weeks with the second publication being at least 30 days
before the Deadline;
(e) A
fair determination of the total number of electors of the District of
West Vancouver is 34,357.
C
RECOMMENDED: THAT whereas the amendments
contemplated in the LUC Amendment Bylaw are consistent with the
District's Official Community Plan, be it further resolved that
the holding of a public hearing on the LUC Amendment Bylaw is
waived.
D
RECOMMENDED: THAT notice be mailed to all
owners of property within 100 metres of the lands proposed to be
exchanged, with any correspondence received being provided to Council
prior to consideration of adoption of the bylaws.
E
RECOMMENDED: THAT the Municipal Clerk
certify the results of the alternative approval process and report
back to Council after the Deadline.
F
RECOMMENDED: THAT the Mayor and Clerk be
authorized to execute a Park Exchange Agreement in the form attached
as Appendix 6 (the "Park Exchange Agreement") after the required
statutory notice of disposition has been filed pursuant to section 26
of the Community Charter.
G
Sokol: staff to bring forward a bylaw so will be brief
MS: there's a page and a half here, read it all?
Mayor: as printed? Short ones you can read and long ones,
as printed
Sop: do understand what's taking place
bottom, take off a portion of nine lots to add to existing
park
portion we gave as park to devpr allowed the devpr to expand lots
from 9 to 16Ksf
Sokol: not sure of size; land being given exceeds land; generally
the lots are begging shallower and longer?
Sop: offset by ... an equality
Sokol: we're getting more park land
Sop: strip wide existing park vs a closed park -- no trees on
it
allowing that to go forward, even though removal from lots on top
side
fair to say allowing to be wider, probably the same assessment
value
Sokol: can't say one for one; arborist has looked and thinks
better land for park; trees more park value; also more valuable to the
District
Mayor: what's the value of the ....
NO ANSWER
Sop: always think there's a gain somewhere; to park if hadn't
then xxx
[MS moved A to G and all passed]
{This is a strange one. If you object you have to
write in by Sept 3; there's a form. If fewer than about 3300
eligible voters object then it goes through. This is the process
chosen rather than a public hearing/mtg. Hm. }
10:40
10. Community
Centre Loan Authorization Bylaw No. 4573, 2008
Information to be provided.
RL: think Mr Pike will want to talk
MS: we have a motion to 11 and I will not vote to go past 11 so
are there any things must be done tonight and do next week
Mayor to adopt; 11.1, and someone's been waiting a long
time
KP: an excellent project, VCHA
presentation tonight is what we're doing with Vancouver Coastal
Health and proud of that
Mr Laing?
RL: albeit not distributed to you until today, same as one on
July 14th
where that project stands today
two components: site servicing and underground; funded from
internal resources, and in Endowment fund
then third party spaces: Coastal health, band space, and
internal medicine
always that funded by borrowing
they'd make payments
$38.8M; challenging come in at 2.5% over budget
directly allocated to the VH space and that will be financed by
Coastal Health....
will be covered under Vanc Coastal Health....
will be wrt taxpayer
consistent from strategy of project in 2005
Mayor: thank you and thank you for your [neg?] with V Coastal
Health and what you've achieved
Sop moved: three readings
MS: wd like to ask Mr Laing, regarding the money over and above
this borrowed money
can we pay without violating threshold; if we don't sell the
Wetmore prop?
RL: resources from with reserve and endowment fund
and resources assume sale of HBay firehall site and Wetmore
site
if Ccl decides to make a different decision
I'll be asking for a different source where those funds
from
MS: where do we sit on the sale of the Wetmore prop?
Sokol: staff will be coming to Ccl next week; request for
submittal
Mayor: confirmed three ..... in a row
and Endowment as a source of funding
VV: we're familiar with the theory of the borrowing
$10M, and that taxpayers wd not be paying, that $10M is still
written here but added to it is $2.97M
we're being asked to countenance this extra $3M
back in ..... I firmly believed budget without xxx
but we didn't balance our budget; wd like us to cut our costs; if
we don't...
real learning process
15 years Amb; Rodgers Crk since 1995
cut our processes by 50%
when we see we have a prob cutting expenditures
won't worry taxpayer; fiddle it so Coastal... ; we'd be xxx
not going to accept, support hit; support $10M not
$3M
Mayor: wd y like to comment on millions cut to be on budget
RL: don't know if Mr Pike wants to talk about
original talks about $10M to Coastal Health and ...
there was a contingency of $5M and knew it was going to be used
up, funded according to constituent part
the $13M ... asking for $970K of wch $320K always
been provided for
$650K can be accommodated within b/c of interest rates
never was $10M it was always $10M plus ancillary places plus what
Van Coastal
KPike: we've been building within the highest construct costs
in
had to cut the orig project by $5M; scrutinizing carefully b/c
knew in a difficult time
this has come in b/c allowed for contingency; construction
manager, v short pencils
MOTION CARRIES
10:53
*** ADDED ITEM TO AGENDA: 11.1
Darwin Construction [Exemption from] Noise bylaw
MS: reports says intends to close three out of four lanes on a
Friday
if Ccl allowing three out of four shd be on a Sunday, not on a
Friday night; does not make sense
one alternating lane of traffic for 15 hours
Karl Gustavson: Sunday other issues will come forward, wanting
quiet time
by putting the crane up shorten construction by a month
shortening ... 24th [10:56]; most adjacent nbrs in support
Mayor: nobody wants to support this but nobody wants to support
something worse
Sop: one lane of traffic
KG: fire, police, all looked at can't be done otherwise b/c of
height; stop and go traffic; signal
RD: down to Bellevue? detour sign?
KG: Traffic Mgmt Cmte has approved this; part of Emergency
Support Group
RD: suggest to Mr Fung; suggest detour signs; can easily
Mayor: in advance
RD: wd help a lot
KG: any flagging/signing to alleviate, fine
Mayor: at expense of devpr
KG: yes
Mayor: back to Item 11
10:59?
11. Fees and Charges Bylaw No. 4414, 2005, Amendment
Bylaw No. 4564, 2008 - Fire and Rescue Permits and Services
-- Read a first, second, and third
time.}
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
All deferred except letter 19 in Item 20 Correspondence:
(19) July 9, 2008, regarding Spirit
Trail
Lady: how dangerous that part of Keith Rd; speeding for young
drivers
sent letter about an accident that occurred July 2nd; not first
time gone that way; perhaps cd slow down that
nbrhd is v young; walk my son along ev day to Hollyburn; long way
from TWay down to 11th
nbrs cutting bushes but that doesn't slow them down
Mayor: will deal with at Police Bd mtg, refer to traffic.
Rest of agenda items deferred as knife/guillotine fell
ADJOURNMENT 11pm!
Mayor said PQP next time!
=== CCL AGENDAS
July 28th ===
The Council Meeting will commence
immediately following the Public Hearing.
1.
CALL TO ORDER
2.
PUBLIC HEARING
Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 4360, 2004, Amendment Bylaw No.
4567, 2008; Zoning Bylaw No. 2200, 1968, Amendment Bylaw No. 4568,
2008; and Phased Development Agreement Authorization Bylaw No. 4569
(Rodgers Creek Area), 2008
(File: 1610-20-4567/4568/4569)
Planning Staff will describe the proposed bylaws.
Applicant: British Pacific
Properties, for the owners.
Subject Lands: Rodgers Creek Area
of the Upper Lands.
Purpose: To revise the Official
Community Plan and Zoning Bylaw to allow for the development of the
Rodgers Creek Area consistent with Option B (maximum 1,875,600 sq. ft.
of residential building area consisting of 736 dwelling units) of the
proposed Rodgers Creek Area Development Plan, Overview Report dated
March 7, 2008 and to secure a variety of associated amenities and
development features through the Phased Development Agreement
mechanism of the Local Government Act, Section 905.1.
Proposed Official Community Plan (OCP)
Amendment: The proposed OCP amendment would revise the policies for
the Upper Lands:
1.
to allow the Rodgers Creek Area to be developed to a maximum 1,875,600
square feet of residential building area consisting of a maximum 736
dwelling units;
2.
by adding Rodgers Creek Area Development Policies and Development
Permit Guidelines; and
3.
by making consequential amendments to the OCP such as realigning the
1,000 foot connector so that it extends northwest from Chippendale
Road to connect to upper Cypress Bowl Road.
Proposed Zoning Bylaw Amendment: The
proposed zoning bylaw amendment would:
1.
create the Comprehensive Development Zone Three (CD3) which would
provide for development consistent with Option B of the proposed
Rodgers Creek Area Development Plan, Overview Report dated March 7,
2008; and
2.
rezone the specified lands:
from: R.S.7 Single Family Zone 7 and
R.S.8 Single Family Zone 8
to: Comprehensive Development Zone
Three (CD3).
Proposed Phased Development Agreement
(PDA): The proposed PDA secures a variety of amenities for West
Vancouver including:
=B7 the extension
of Chippendale Road to Cypress Bowl Road;
=B7 $500,000 for
restoration and enhancement of environmentally sensitive
areas;
=B7 various
public realm elements of the Rodgers Creek Area Development Plan set
out in the Overview Report, including mountain bike and hiking
trails;
=B7 the green
building and building accessibility standards set out in the Overview
Report;
=B7 integrated
storm water management plans for Pipe, Westmount and Cave Creeks
watersheds;
=B7 a wildland fire
management plan;
=B7 a serviced
site for District use in Area 6; and
=B7 a $7,940,000
cash contribution to a District reserve fund to be used for projects
determined by Council.
In exchange for these amenities and
features of the development, the land use and density provisions of
the proposed CD3 zone would not change for 10 years without the
owners' approval. In addition the applicant will provide
$250,000 for traffic improvements at 15th Street and Mathers Avenue
and on 21st Street (between Inglewood Avenue and Highway No. 1) prior
to adoption of the zoning amendment bylaw.
{without discussing at least three
different Uplift figures presented to Ccl, how many of the measures
above wd benefit the devt rather or more than the cmnty as a
whole?}
3.
PUBLIC HEARING PROCEDURE [Explained by Mayor]
4.
REPORTS/CORRESPONDENCE
1)
Reports received up to July 24, 2008:
TITLE [with date received or to be received omitted from this
list]
Rodgers Creek Proposed Bylaws -
Additional Component of the Proposed Community Benefits
Package [R-1]
Rodgers Creek Area: OCP, Zoning and
Phased Development Bylaws
[R-2]
Rodgers Creek Area Development Plan -
Additional Information
[R-3]
Rodgers Creek - Proposed Community
Benefits and Public Amenities
[R-4]
Rodgers Creek Area Development
Plan [R-5]
Rodgers Creek Truck Traffic Routing
Plan [R-6]
Rodgers Creek Area Plan Working Group
Report to Council [R-7]
Rodgers Creek Fiscal Impact
Report [R-8]
Environmental Setback
Summary [R-9]
Rodgers Creek Tailed Frog Survey Summary
Upper Lands, District of West Vancouver [R-10]
Rodgers Creek Area Development Plan -
Sustainability Review and Evaluation
[R-11]
Rodgers Creek Area Development Plan -
Overview Report [R-12]
Rodgers Creek Traffic Impact
Study [R-13]
2)
Correspondence [numbered 1 to 13] received up to July 24,
2008:
G. Ward Hall, Resident,
Resident, Resident, Resident, Resident, Resident, G. Pajari,
Resident, E. Fonseca, President, Ambleside Dundarave Ratepayers'
Association, R. Griffiths, D.
Baxter, J. and M. Hoyle
On July 7, 2008, Council set the date for
the Public Hearing. On July 11, 2008, 863 Notices were mailed to
owners/occupiers within the notification area specified in the map in
Appendix A attached to the report from the Manager, Community Planning
dated June 30, 2008. The statutory notice of Public Hearing
appeared in the North Shore News on Sunday, July 20, 2008 and
Wednesday, July 23, 2008. The Municipal Clerk will note written
submissions received for the July 28, 2008 Public
Hearing.
5.
PUBLIC INPUT -- Mayor Goldsmith-Jones will call for Public
Input.
6.
CLOSURE OR ADJOURNMENT OF PUBLIC HEARING
If there is no further public input and
Council does not wish to have a further staff report,
then:
RECOMMENDED:
THAT all written and verbal submissions ... be received and that the
Public Hearing be closed.
OR
If Council wishes a further staff report,
then: RECOMMENDED:
THAT staff report back to Council regarding the July 28, 2008 Public
Hearing ... and that the Public Hearing be adjourned
to__________________ at 7pm.
Members of Council are not permitted to
receive further submissions once the Public Hearing is
closed.
SPECIAL COUNCIL
AGENDA
1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
2. ADOPTION OF MINUTES
2.
Adoption of July 21, 2008 Reconvened Public Hearing Minutes and July
14, 2008 Special Council Minutes (To be provided
on-table)
RECOMMENDED: THAT the following Minutes be
adopted as circulated:
=B7 July 21, 2008
Reconvened Public Hearing Minutes (445 - 13th Street);
=B7 July 21, 2008
Reconvened Public Hearing Minutes (proposed Ambleside Bylaws);
and
=B7 July 14, 2008
Special Council Meeting.
REPORTS
3. Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 4360,
2004, Amendment Bylaw No. 4543, 2008 - Ambleside Town
Centre
This bylaw
received second and third readings at the July 21, 2008 Regular
Council meeting.
NOTE: Each reading of this bylaw must
receive an affirmative vote of a majority of all Council members (four
members) in order to proceed (Local Government Act, s.
882).
RECOMMENDED: ... be
adopted.
4. Zoning Bylaw No. 2200, 1968, Amendment
Bylaw No. 4544, 2008 - Ambleside Town Centre
This bylaw
received second and third readings at the July 21, 2008 Regular
Council meeting.
RECOMMENDED:... be
adopted.
5. Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 4360,
2004, Amendment Bylaw No. 4541, 2007 - 445 13th
Street
(File: 1610-20-4541)
This bylaw
received first reading at the March 17, 2008 Regular Council
meeting.
RECOMMENDED: ... be read a second and
third time.
6. Zoning Bylaw No. 2200, 1968, Amendment
Bylaw No. 4540, 2007 -
445 13th Street
This bylaw
received first reading at the March 17, 2008 Regular Council
meeting.
RECOMMENDED:.. be read a second and
third time.
7. Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 4360,
2004, Amendment Bylaw No. 4567, 2008 - Rodgers Creek
Area
This bylaw
received first reading at the July 7, 2008 Regular Council
meeting.
RECOMMENDED:.. be read a second and
third time.
8. Zoning Bylaw No. 2200, 1968, Amendment
Bylaw No. 4568, 2008 - Rodgers Creek Area
This bylaw
received first reading at the July 7, 2008 Regular Council
meeting.
RECOMMENDED: ... be read a second and
third time.
9. Phased Development Agreement Authorization
Bylaw No. 4569, 2008 - Rodgers Creek Area
This bylaw
received first reading at the July 7, 2008 Regular Council
meeting.
RECOMMENDED: ... be read a second and
third time.
10. Recommendations for Amendments to Zoning Bylaw
Regulations for Child Care
RECOMMENDED: THAT Staff bring forward
zoning bylaw amendments for child care uses based on recommendations
from the Child Care Services Working Group outlined in their memo of
July 7, 2008.
11. Wetmore Site - Requests for
Proposals
(File: 0510-16)
RECOMMENDED: THAT Staff be authorized
to issue a Request for Proposals for the Wetmore Lands, as described
in the July 21, 2008 report of the Associate Director - Major
Projects.
12. Finance Committee - Activities Update and
Recommendations
RECOMMENDED: THAT Council instruct
staff to:
a)
Work towards qualifying for the GFOA budget award with the District
budget of 2010;
b)
Develop the 2009 budget using the best practices described in the
attached "District Budget Information";
c)
Hire, on an interim basis, the additional financial resources required
to assist with the necessary budgeting, accounting and reporting
system upgrades;
AND THAT Council include as part of its
direction to staff regarding the 2009 budget, the assumptions that
staff should make regarding issues as brought forward from the Finance
Committee in this report.
13.
WinterSong Festival
Information to be provided.
14.
Terasen Gas - Energy Efficiency and Conservation
Application
Information to be provided.
15. 4259 Rockbank Place - Excess Rock
Removal
RECOMMENDED:
{Assume that means approval? why? precedent?}
THAT the July 16, 2008 report "4259
Rockbank Place - Excess Rock Removal" from the Director of
Planning, Lands and Permits be received for information.
{Assume that means approval? why? precedent?}
BYLAWS
Bylaws are passed by a simple majority
affirmative vote unless otherwise noted.
16. Fees and Charges Bylaw No. 4414, 2005, Amendment
Bylaw No. 4564, 2008
This bylaw
received three readings at the July 21, 2008 Regular Council
Meeting.
RECOMMENDED:... be
adopted.
17. General Local Elections Regulations Bylaw No.
4447, 2005, Amendment Bylaw No. 4571, 2008
This bylaw
received third reading at the July 21, 2008 Regular Council
Meeting.
RECOMMENDED:... be
adopted.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
18. Consent
Agenda Items - Reports and Correspondence
The following Consent Agenda items may be
considered separately or in one recommendation.
RECOMMENDED: THAT the Consent Agenda items
as follows be approved:
=B7 Item 19 -
Ambulance Station at 1542 Fulton Avenue
=B7 Item 20 -
Development Applications Status List
=B7 Item 21 -
Local Government Infrastructure Planning Grant Program - Water
Infrastructure Asset Valuation and Water Infrastructure Capital
Renewal Plan
=B7 Item 22 -
Local Government Infrastructure Planning Grant Program - Options for
Greenhouse Gas Reduction Study
=B7 Item 23 -
Community Engagement Committee Report
=B7 Item 24 -
Appointment to Municipal Insurance Association
=B7 Item 25 -
Correspondence List.
REPORTS FOR CONSENT
AGENDA
19. Ambulance Station at 1542 Fulton
Avenue
(File: 1145-02)
This item was
deferred from the July 21, 2008 Regular Council Meeting.
RECOMMENDED: ... be received for
information.
20. Development Applications Status
List
(File: 1010-01)
This item was
deferred from the July 21, 2008 Regular Council Meeting.
RECOMMENDED: ... be received for
information.
21. Local Government Infrastructure Planning Grant
Program - Water Infrastructure Asset Valuation and Water
Infrastructure Capital Renewal Plan
RECOMMENDED: THAT Council
[authorize] submission of an application for the Water Infrastructure
Asset Valuation and the Water Infrastructure Capital Renewal Plan
projects under the Provincial Local Government Infrastructure Planning
Grant Program.
22. Local Government Infrastructure Planning Grant
Program - Options for Greenhouse Gas Reduction
Study
RECOMMENDED: THAT Council
[uthorize] submission of an application for the Options for Greenhouse
Gas Reduction Study project under the Provincial Local Government
Infrastructure Planning Grant Program.
23. Community Engagement Committee
Report
(File: 0116-20-CEC)
RECOMMENDED:
THAT the memorandum from Mayor
Goldsmith-Jones regarding Community Engagement Committee Report be
received for information;
AND THAT Council confirm the
Community Engagement Committee recommendation to establish a Climate
Action Working Group.
24.
Appointment to Municipal Insurance Association
RECOMMENDED: THAT G. McRadu, Chief
Administrative Officer, be appointed as the alternate District
representative for 2008 for the Municipal Insurance
Association.
CORRESPONDENCE LIST FOR CONSENT
AGENDA
25.
Correspondence List (File: 0120?24)
RECOMMENDED: THAT the Correspondence List be received for
information.
>> Correspondence received up to
July 21, 2008 (Deferred from July 21, 2008 Council
Meeting)
Requests for Delegation
-- No items presented.
Action Required
(1) J. R. Happer, 39 Combat Engineer Regiment, July
10, 2008, regarding Financial Support
Referred to Director of Parks and
Community Services for consideration and response.
(2) M. M. Nikpay, British Properties Area Homeowners
Association, July 7, 2008, regarding Traffic Safety around Chartwell
and Sentinel Schools
Referred to Director of
Engineering and Transportation for consideration and
response.
(3) Federation of Canadian Municipalities and The
Canadian Red Cross Society, undated, regarding the Auxiliary Role
Project
Referred to Mayor and Council for
consideration and response.
No Action Required (receipt
only)
(4) D. Lust, Hugo Ray Park Area Resident's Group,
July 11, 2008, regarding Hugo Ray Park
(5) July 10, 2008, regarding Road Closure and
Disposition of Municipal Land Bylaw No. 4548, 2008 and Community
Centre Expansion
*** Writer does the
calculations to show that this is a 'gift' b/c the assessed value of
the nbr's land is $1.87M, ie $98.73 per sq ft, and is paying $200K for
M land, ie $27.25 per sq ft.
Was Ccl asleep? Will they wake
up and rescind third reading to try to get something closer to the
real value???
(6) July 11, 2008, regarding Stop Sign Change at
Esquimalt Avenue and 14th Street
(7) July 11, 2008, regarding Slowing Down Drivers on
Keith Road (previously
dealt with during July 21 Regular Council meeting)
(8) July 14, 2008, regarding Proposed Ambleside
Bylaws (included in July
21, 2008 Reconvened Public Hearing correspondence)
(9) July 14, 2008, regarding Public Hearing and
Proposed Ambleside Bylaws
(included in July 21, 2008 Reconvened Public Hearing
correspondence)
(10) July 8, 2008, regarding Ambleside
Revitalization Plan and Recent Public Hearing (included in July 21, 2008 Reconvened
Public Hearing correspondence)
(11) P. Walton, Owners of Strata Plan VR
2440, July 4, 2008, regarding Spirit Trail
(12) G. W. Powell, Provincial Health
Services Authority, June 25, 2008, regarding Progress
Report
Attachments available for viewing
in Legislative Services Department.
(13) July 3, 2008, regarding Parking Bylaw
Notice
(14) K. A. Ray, Strata Corporation VR 1928,
July 7, 2008, regarding Letter with 30 Signatures in relation to
Spirit Trail
(15) July 4, 2008, regarding Spirit
Trail
(16) July 10, 2008, regarding Spirit
Trail
(17) July 10, 2008, regarding Spirit
Trail
(18) E. Fonseca, Ambleside and Dundarave
Ratepayers' Association, July 8, 2008, regarding Uplift and
Community Benefits
(included in July 21, 2008 Reconvened Public Hearing
correspondence)
(19) July 9, 2008, regarding Spirit
Trail
(19.1) Letter with 4 signatures, July 17, 2008, regarding
Request for an Order of Non-Enforcement of Noise Control Bylaw -
Construction Tower Crane at 2388 Marine Drive
Responses to Correspondence
-- No items presented.
Responses to Questions in Question
Period -- No items presented.
>> Correspondence received
up to July 21, 2008
Requests for Delegation
-- No items presented.
Action Required
(20) D.
Kerr, Metro Vancouver Homelessness Secretariat, July 16, 2008,
regarding Metro Vancouver's Third Homelessness Action
Week
Referred to the Municipal Clerk
for response.
(21) D.
Lemelin, Canadian Union of Postal Workers, June 2008, regarding Urgent
Request for Submissions to Save Universal, Public Postal
Services
Referred to Mayor and Council for
consideration and response.
No Action Required (receipt
only)
(22) C. Reynolds, WV Matters, July 18, 2008,
regarding Council Meeting Minutes
(23) July
15, 2008, regarding Rodgers Creek Public Hearing (included in July 21, 2008 Reconvened
Public Hearing correspondence)
(24)
Undated, Letter with 16 Signatures from the Owners and Residents of
2090 Argyle regarding Spirit Trail
(25) C. Ciok
and C. Ho, Smart Growth BC, July 16, 2008, regarding Annual Report and
Invitation to join 1,000 Friends of BC
Attachments available for viewing
in Legislative Services Department.
(26) C.
Neill, Edgewater, July 11, 2008, regarding Spirit
Trail
(27) K.
Stephens, Green Infrastructure Partnership Steering Committee, July
15, 2008, regarding New Chair of the Green Infrastructure
Partnership
(28) S. E.
Dowey, City of North Vancouver, July 10, 2008, regarding Community
Safety Initiative Grant Recommendation: RCMP Anti-Graffiti Conference
2008
(29) July 9,
2008, regarding Spirit Trail
Responses to Correspondence
-- No items presented.
Responses to Questions in Question
Period -- No items presented.
26. REPORTS from MAYOR/CCLRS
27. PUBLIC QUESTIONS/COMMENTS 28.
ADJOURNMENT
===
HAIKU ===
seen 2008 July 15 seen, written 16/17; former
staff visiting for fireworks pointed out this scene from balcony on
Beach Avenue; moon hung between two highrises
diffused sunset pink
then
mid swathe of mauve
sits
silvery white half-moon
=== QUOTATIONS
===
* Doug Larson, English racer (1902 -
1981):
o Instead of
giving a politician the keys to the city, it might be better to change
the locks.
o To err is human;
to admit it, superhuman.
* Thomas Berger, American writer (b 1924)
o The art and science of asking
questions is the source of all knowledge.
o No matter what side of the argument
you are on, you always find people on your side that you wish were on
the other.
o Why do writers write? Because it
isn't there.
* Mae West: I speak two languages, Body and English.
If the English language made any
sense,
o lackadaisical would have something to do
with a shortage of flowers.
o a catastrophe would be an apostrophe with
fur.
--
Doug Larson, English racer (1902 - 1981)
Words, like eyeglasses, obscure everything they do not make
clear.
--
Joseph Joubert, moralist and essayist (1754 - 1824)
So difficult it is to show the various meanings and imperfections
of words when we have nothing else but words to do it with.
--
John Locke (1632 - 1704)
Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.
--
Aldous Huxley (1894 - 1963)
The solution of every problem is another problem.
--
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
look for RoyalTea-by-the-Sea flyer wch follows
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~