WVM2011-06
Mar 7 Ccl NOTES
Mar 21 AGENDA
Calendar to Apr 8
by
Carolanne Reynolds, Editor
www.WestVan.org
has
spring sprung?
MAIN ITEMS on Ccl AGENDA Mar 21st: Kiwanis Srs' Housing
Devt (21st St); Staff comments on DNV OCP (Lower Capilano-Marine Dr;
Curling Rd; Rugby area, Klee Wyck); NSh Adv Cmte on Disability
Issues Review/Budget; Non-owner-occupied stes Bylaw Adoption;
Apptmt of Amb Revit Commission (why four devprs/real estate, one biz,
and NO residents/ratepayer grps???); GCC Lease; Beach House
renos; NSEMO; Correspondence including: BC Heritage prog
(reminds me; no Ccl liaison for heritage or any heritage WG/Cmte in WV
now, first since 1988); PkR at-grade intersection
response; RGS; Wetmore site; NSh Cycling Map; (#16) detailed
answers to Library/LibFdn boards' misleading statements/claims; Feb 21
Agenda and Minutes don't match -- what happened?; Evelyn Drive going
into Receivership
= Vive le Canada (Commonwealth Day; Journee de la
Francophonie); from the EDITOR'S DESK; UPDATES/INFO (NSh Fire
and Rescue Recommendations); SUBSCRIBER HEADSUP (Mar 10, 15,
16)
= CALENDAR to Apr 8th; CULTUREWATCH (Theatre; Art;
Music; Opera); NATUREWATCH (YVR Gateway Landscape)
= Ccl Mtg NOTES Mar 7th: WVPD 2010
Crime Stats Update; 2317 Haywood DVP (staff to report back); DVP
2667 Haywood (denied); OCP Amendment for Wetmore site next
steps; MetroV RGS (debated); Fire Services Review; Non-owner
occupied homes with sec stes (debate); 21st & Gordon calming,
permeable parking; Non-owner-occupied homes with sec stes: Devt
Application Status Report; Correspondence Feb 14 to 25: MDr
overpass; Day of the Honey Bee (yay!); RGS
misinformation and response; Elliott Commons; Evelyn Drive (paid
deposit; sales ofc closed); Rabbits; Mtg minutes from Lib Bd, Grants
Cmte, Bd of Variance (Gene Quan, Chair; Variance allowed b/c of
undue hardships re garages???); Hynes Devt reply re Elliott
Commons (AOOGAH! accepting the cmnty amenity amt wch surely shd not be
finalized until AFTER calcs shown, public consulted, and THEN
decision!); GFOA Financial Reporting Award
= Ccl Mtg AGENDA Mar 21st
= ANIMALWATCH (Leafy Sea Dragons; Weedy Sea Dragons;
sand lances); INFObits (top ten earthquakes); OTTAWAWATCH (what's that
Oda?); HOUSINGWATCH (top ten $$$; 1M Empty in FL; 64M unsold in
China; BIZWATCH (Mining); PEACEWATCH (Iraq/Kurdistan -- White
Ribbon; Vancouver Peace Group); WOMENWATCH (Human Rights; Streets;
Childrenwatch); ROYALWATCH (Kate & Wills; St Andrew's 600th
Anniversary); HERITAGEWATCH (Tiki Night; Art Deco); LANGUAGEWATCH
(Senior Texting Code; Irish); HAIKU/HAIGA/MAIKU (Festival; Ginko walk;
even a contest and comics); QUOTATIONS/THOUGHTS/PUNS
Mar 14 Commonwealth Day
Prime Minister Stephen Harper issued the
following statement today to mark Commonwealth Day:
"Today, Canada celebrates a long and
rewarding history with our Commonwealth partners around the world. Her
Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, Queen of Canada -- the head of the
Organization -- remains a symbol of the free association of
independent countries. Together, we share mutual goals in the
areas of democracy, development, conflict prevention, and commerce, as
well as a strong record of collaborating to find solutions to global
challenges.
"More than 60 years after the rise of the
modern Commonwealth, the relationship among its members remains
strong. Canada is contributing in various ways -- sending observers
to partner countries to help monitor democratic elections; sponsoring
training to support conflict management, and media access and
transparency in hostile environments; and providing leadership at
Commonwealth summits aimed at developing a mutual understanding of
international issues.
"Our historic links and close Commonwealth
ties will again be evident during the upcoming tour of His Royal
Highness Prince William and Miss Catherine Middleton in July, and
during celebrations marking the 60th anniversary of the accession of
Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, Queen of Canada, in 2012. These
tours and celebrations highlight the important legacy of the
Commonwealth to Canada and Canadians -- providing inspiration to
continue a strong role in this valued relationship."
Mar 20 La Journee de la
Francophonie
PM Harper issued the following statement today to
mark the Journée internationale de la Francophonie:
"I am delighted to celebrate the Journée
internationale de la Francophonie with all Canadians, and with our
friends throughout La Francophonie.
"In Canada, the French language represents far
more than a means of communication. Spoken by more than 9.5 million
Canadians, French is an integral part of our history, our identity,
and our daily lives. It links us, not only to our fellow Canadians,
but to French-speaking countries around the world.
"Our Government is proud of our country's
bilingualism and cultural diversity, and is working hard to promote
French both at home and abroad. In Canada, our Government has
strengthened our Francophone identity by implementing the Roadmap for
Canada's Linguistic Duality.
"Overseas, we support a number of agencies,
such as the International Organization of La Francophonie, the TV5
worldwide television network, and the University Agency of La
Francophonie. We also support the great family of La Francophonie in
helping to rebuild Haiti.
"Today, as Canada celebrates our attachment to
the French language, I would like to extend my best wishes for a happy
Journée internationale de la Francophonie."
=== from the EDITOR'S DESK
===
Never enough time! This issue's not finished but want to
get it out before the ccl mtg; there'll be leftovers in the next
issue. Happy Nowruz. Spring is sprung but don't think the
grass is riz.
=== UPDATES AND INFO
===
Report on North
Shore Fire and Rescue Services Recommends Formal Shared Services
Agreement
http://www.westvancouver.ca/Residents/Level3.aspx?id=33024
=== SUBSCRIBER HEADSUP
--
>>> Update A -- 10:25 Mar
10
Meetings,
Money, Malt, Music, and Mirth!
= First, a change: MP Weston's Fisheries
Roundtable mtg (4pm Fri Mar 11) moved from the Library
to the Cmnty Ctr.
= Second: the Finance Cmte mtg 4pm Monday
Mar 14 appeared on the M website after WVM5 was finalized (and
then sent by email) but before printing, so it was snuck into the
distributed copies however there was no agenda. The agenda has
now appeared and it is appended below so now subscribers have the full
information.
Among the events (most free): Wed Mar 16 Doolin's hosts A Whisky*
Kiss, scotch-tasting with Jameson ambassador Rory Sheridan; the Cellar
hosts a Brewmaster's Dinner with a Molson Canada brewmaster to steer
you through a three-course lamb dinner featuring the right ale for
each course; and AfroCeltic Dance Party Fri Mar 19 with Toddish McWong
on the bagpipes; and a parade on Sunday Mar 20
[* for the
linguistically curious, Ireland and the US spell it whiskey
(both rebels after all), while the UK and Canadians, United Empire
Loyalists spell it whisky. Vive la
difference!
Gaelic saying at
bottom.]
= Fourth:
The next update will have more missing items, however to get you
a headsup asap:
- Thursday Mar 17
Natural History talk on YVR's gateway landscape (David Cook;
Coordinator, Botany Section, 924
0147)
- Sunday Mar 20:
o CYCLE4:Juvenile Diabetes
(Rockridge; for info Francesca McDowell,
francesca.mcdowell@gmail.com and cell: 778.686.4124;
o An evening of Opera with an
Asian Twist!
Vancouver Opera brings Asian and western cultures together in
Voices of the Pacific Rim, a recital of popular opera selections
combined with traditional Asian songs.
= Fifth: MUSIC
btw, Rodrigo's Concierto de Aranjuez is one of my
favourite pieces of music and it will be performed by the VSO at
8pm Sat Mar 12 at the Orpheum and Monday at the Centennial Theatre
in NV. Also like de Falla's Three-Cornered Hat and
Chabrier's Espana included in the programme.
= :-) You deserve a smile, and I cdn't wait until the
next WVM to send it, so that's at the end:
Senior Texting Code
===========================================================
FINANCE
COMMITTEE
MONDAY MARCH 14, 2011
-- 4:00 PM IN MUNICIPAL HALL, MAIN FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM
1. CALL
TO ORDER
2.
CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA
3.
ADOPTION OF MINUTES (November 22, 2010)
4.
REPORTS
4.1
2011 Finance Committee Agenda Items
4.2
Legislative Calendar
4.3
Meeting Times and Locations
4.4
Finance Committee Terms of Reference
4.5
Director of Financial Services Annual Workplan
4.6
Policies for Review in 2011
4.7
Integration/Coordination of Functions
4.8
Community Survey
5.
PUBLIC QUESTION PERIOD
6. NEXT
MEETING
7.
RESOLUTION RE EXCLUSION OF PUBLIC, s.90 of THE COMMUNITY CHARTER
(if required)
8.
ADJOURNMENT Queries: please contact Kristi
Merilees 925 7008
========================================================================================
IRISH TRIVIA QUIZ @
2:30pm Sat Mar 19 at Tom Lee
Music
{ both moved to end of this newsletter }
========================================================================================
>>> Update B -- 13:43 Mar
15
= CANCELLED: Tonight's Parks Master Plan WG mtg (Mar
15)
= ADDED:
- Ambleside Biz Assn
says welcome to their mtg tonight (Mar 15):
Community Events Committee
Meeting, Chair Christine Baracos - The
Mensroom
Tuesday, March 15 at 5pm.
300-1455 Bellevue Avenue
- Tomorrow, 9am Wed
Mar 16th Cmnty Grants Subcmte,
Community Centre - Vista Room
(Also added after WVM5 came out was their
mtg 9am Friday Mar 11)
- at the Legion: March 17th -- ST. PATRICK'S DAY
Irish dancers, Irish Stew ($5 per
bowl); Music by
'TIPPERARY'
>>> Update C -- 10:25 Mar
10
Subject: Evelyn Drive Going into Receivership
{Just back from
seeing the Quebec film "Incendies" nominated for an Oscar at
KMC -- fantastic, highly recommend the film. It is at a
couple of cinemas in Vancouver.}
Of more moment, however, is this news after many rumours, and a
letter in the last ccl mtg's correspondence (as I noted) was a letter
from a WV resident asking for information since the sales ofc was
closed and she cdn't get through by telephone.
Details on the current status can be found on the District's
website; click on the link given below. Millennium assures, says
deposits are secure.
To:
<EditorWVM@WestVan.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011
17:16:35
The District of West Vancouver has learned, through a B.C.
Supreme Court decision, that the Evelyn Drive project will be going
into receivership. In 2007, West Vancouver's Council approved a site
master plan based on extensive community consultation.
Read More: http://www.westvancouver.ca/Level3.aspx?id=33178
======= CALENDAR to Apr
8th =======
All mtgs are at M Hall
unless indicated otherwise. NOTE: shown are mtgs known at
this date; often there are additions, changes, cancellations after WVM
goes out. Check the DWV Calendar:
http://www.westvancouver.ca/Calendar.aspx .
Notices/mtgs/changes too late for an issue or too early for the next
are sent to subscribers as updates. They then appear in the next
newsletter.
== Monday Mar 21
Donations accepted - with thanks - March 21 -
31
Please drop off your donations at the 22nd St entrance of the
Arena
Spring
Cleaning? We'll
happily take items in good/saleable condition that you don't
need. We're looking for:
clothing, antiques, collectables,* artwork, kitchenware, jewellery,
furniture, toys, books, odds & ends
Need Pick
Up? If you have
larger items and unable to drop off your donations, pls call 925 7280
to arrange for pick up.
*
collectible is the usual American spelling
== Tuesday Mar 22 -- World Water Day --
the theme this year is water for cities
~ 8am~
Arts and Culture Grants Subcmte at Cmnty Ctr - Vista Room
== Wednesday Mar 23
~ 5pm ~ ABA: Business Devt Cmte
mtg; 300 - 1455 Bellevue
== Friday Mar 25
~ 3:15 - 4pm ~ Kwantlen
Polytechnic University Percussion Ensemble directed by Bob
Caldwell
The WV Community
Centre and Pacific Arbour Retirement Communities presents the
Community Concert Series in the Atrium of the WVCC. The monthly
performances feature musicians from around MetroV. All concerts in
this series are free and open to the public.
See full
schedule of performances in Community Concert
Series.
== Tuesday Mar 29 ~ 7pm ~ Parks Master Plan WG
== Wednesday Mar 30
~
6pm ~ Pacific Arbour Public Information mtg - Wetmore Motors site,
at Srs' Ctr
== Thursday Mar 31
~
4:30pm ~ Design Review Cmte
~
5pm ~ NSh Adv Cmte on Disability Issues at DNV M Hall
~ 6:30pm ~ Jim Carter, President of the WV Historical
Society
Talk on 99 years of West Vancouver with Power Point display
APRIL
== Saturday Apr 2nd from
10am to 1pm and Sunday Apr 3rd from 1 to 3pm at Cmnty Ctr
==
1300 Block of Marine Drive IDEAS
FAIR
Please join us in a visioning exercise on
the future devt of the 1300 Block of Marine Drive -- one of the
region's extraordinary waterfront sites. The District's OCP and
AmblesideNOW initiative identify the 1300 Block as a special site for
redevt in Ambleside Village. Revitalization can bring an array of
community benefits including new life for Ambleside Village and a new
post-disaster public safety facility. The Ideas Fair is an
artist-facilitated group discussion on uses, experiences, and
character desired for the redevt.
Space is limited. Pls contact
Julia Reimer: 731 9053 x101; jreimer@brookpooni.com to confirm your
registration; www.amblesidewaterfront.com for
details
== Sunday Apr 3 ~ 9am to 3pm ~
The Flea
Market at the WV Arena.
Flea Market
leftovers are all recycled -- clothes, shoes, housewares, linens,
kids' stuff, and furniture are all picked up by agencies such as Big
Brothers and Developmental Disability Association. Electronics
are taken to electronic recyclers and books to the Reading Tree.
When it's all over, relatively little goes to the landfill. Now
that's sustainable!
== Tuesday Apr 5
~ 7pm ~ North Shore Sport
Awards at Park Royal North
A one-of-a-kind
celebration of sport achievement. This unique event salutes those who
excel in all levels of sport and fosters pride in our North Shore
sport community. The purpose of the Sport Awards is to raise the
profile of the best of community sport. The stories that emerge from
categories such as the Comeback Award and the Fair Play Award are a
real testimony to the benefits of sport.
With the support of
our founding sponsor, the North Shore News, the Sport Awards enjoys
tremendous profile on the North Shore. The nomination process is
extensively advertised in the North Shore News and throughout North &
West Vancouver.
How to Get
Involved:
If you want to be a part of this exciting and entertaining community
celebration, contact us to find out about volunteer
opportunities. For more info about the sport awards pls
visit: North
Shore Sport Awards
~~~ Wednesday April
6th -- Vancouver's 125th Anniversary!
~~~
+ Good news: Mobile device users can now find books,
CDs and DVDs, place holds, check their accounts, renew items, browse
library event listings, and contact their Library directly from their
mobile device. The new mobile catalogue works with the Android,
BlackBerry, iPad, iPhone, iPod Touch, and any mobile phone with a web
browser.
Find out more...
+ Use your smartphone as your Library Card! Make
your iPhone, iPod touch, Android, or Blackberry smartphone your
library card with CardStar. The CardStar app allows you to
consolidate your reward and membership cards from libraries, grocery
stores and others onto your smartphone. It's FREE and can be
setup in minutes! Find out more
here.
+ Wednesday 7:30
- 9pm Mar 23 ~ AUTHORS IN OUR COMMUNITY: MARGREET DIETZ
Running Shoes Are a
Girl's Best Friend author
Margreet Dietz shares stories and experiences that will inspire
anyone. She's a 3:07 marathoner, five-time Ironman triathlon
finisher and recently ran 50-mile and 100-mile races.
+ Friday Mar 25
--
ENGLISH CORNER ~
10 - 11:30am, Welsh Hall
Come and practise English
conversation at the Library. English Corner is facilitated by the
Baha'i Cmnty of WV in partnership with the Library. Requirement:
able to read English. For info call Fariba Rocker, 604 506
6616
+ Monday Mar
28 ~
10:30am ~ KAY MEEK CENTRE
OFFSTAGE: TALKING BACH
An illustrated discussion about Bach's violin sonatas with Marc
Destrubé.
+ Wednesday Mar
30 ~ 7:30pm
~ AUTHORS IN
OUR COMMUNITY: M. J. MILNE
Strategies to
create your world, your way! Milne's book, The 12 Golden
Keys, is a
powerful toolbox for tackling the challenges of a world in transition
and a catalyst to re-ignite your spiritual quest.
+ Friends of the Library Book Sale!
- Friday April 8 & Saturday April 9 ~ 10am
- 5pm
- PRE-SALE for Friends of the Library members,
Thursday April 7 ~ 6:30 - 8:30pm
-
Admission with current card. Mbrships also available at the door:
Adults $10, Youth $5.
Hardcovers, Paperbacks, Trade Paperbacks, "Red Dot
Books", Videos, CDs, Cassettes, Puzzles, Kids Books.
BIG IDEAS:
Responding to Public Art -- March 8 -- March 26 (on
website)
BIG IDEAS is a West
Vancouver (Grade 10 - 12) student art exhibition showcasing their
conceptual responses to the Vancouver Biennale's public art
installations. BIG IDEAS explores current topics inspired by the
Vancouver Biennale art installations. This school outreach
program challenged students to use public art as a stimulus for
creating and learning in other curriculum areas.
BIG
IDEAS: Responding to Public Art -- March 8 -- March 27 (on
poster)
>>> Body and Soul ~~ March 29 -
April 17
Mario Armitano - sculpture; Georgina Farah - oil on
canvas
Opening reception: Tuesday March 29 from 6 -
8pm
Artists' Talk Saturday April 2 from
2-3pm
BIG
IDEAS: Responding to Public Art -- March 8 -- March 26
"Elemental Reflections" -- March 22 - April
3
Acrylic and watercolour images of the land, the sea, and the sky
by artist Lauraine Russell.
Opening reception: Tuesday March 22 from 6 -
8pm
"A Textile Translation" -- April 5
-17
works by the fibreEssence Textile Group. FibreEssence is a
Vancouver collective of 14 textile artists. This show , in conjunction
with the Vancouver Cherry Blossom Festival, will feature works made in
a range of techniques from indigo to sashiko dyeing to fusing real
blossom petals to quilted and painted surfaces. This third cherry
blossom exhibition promises to delight with entries from BC, Alberta,
and Japan. There is a Japanese legend that the cherry blossom
generates positive energy. Come and experience the positive vibe at
the Silk Purse.
Opening reception: Tuesday April 5th from 6 -
8pm
+++ KAY MEEK CENTRE
+++
Complete list of events: http://kaymeekcentre.com/on_stage/events_calendar
Electronic newsletter: http://kaymeekcentre.weebly.com
Simplest way to get on email list, call
913 3634 (also for tix) or email
tickets@kaymeekcentre.com
+ Masterclass with Martin Helmchen --
Thursday, March 24 at 7pm
Discover first-hand the inspiring thoughts and hard
work behind the performer. Vancouver Recital Society guest pianist
Martin Helmchen offers a masterclass with talented young performers.
This is a FREE event taking place in the Main Theatre.
OFFSTAGE:
TALKING BACH: AN ILLUSTRATED DISCUSSION...
Monday, March 28 ~ 10:30am -- Free
Event at the Library
OffStage with Marc Destrube -- Hear it from the master: Marc
discusses and illustrates the exquisite Violin Sonatas by JS Bach.
This FREE event takes place at the West Vancouver Memorial
Library.
MOVIES AT THE
MEEK: I AM LOVE
Tuesday, March 29 ~
7:30pm
MUSICALLY
SPEAKING: BOREALIS STRING QUARTET
Friday, April
1 ~ 1:30pm
-- Music, Talks, Tea, and Treats
"I'M STILL HERE" FILM SCREENING AND Q AND
A...
Saturday, April 2, 2011 10am
EARLY MUSIC IN
THE SALON: MARC DESTRUBÉ AND FRIENDS 3
Sunday, April 3 ~ 3pm ~ Pre-performance talk at
2:15pm
+++ ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION BRANCH 60, West
Vancouver +++
"Where Volunteers make the difference."
Chartered November 17th, 1926
The Winter Issue
of "The Torch" is now available
To view
the newsletter, just click the following link for direct
access:
MARCH CALENDAR OF EVENTS
FUN DARTS -- Thursday, March 10th
Drop in -- This fun night is for Branch
members and guests
March 20,
24, April 7, 21, May 5, 19, June 2, 16 & 30. Info - call Kelvin Andrew -
604-921-9665.
INTRODUCTORY BINGO
Sunday,
March 13th, 2:00 pm in the Lounge
!!!!! PRIZES !!!!!
March 17th -- ST. PATRICK'S DAY
Irish
dancers, Irish Stew ($5 per bowl)
Music by 'TIPPERARY'
March 25th -- In the Lounge with
Music
March 27th -- Veterans' Afternoon - 2pm
Chamber Breakfast
Club
Tuesday, March 29
Cafe TrafiQ 1860 Marine Drive West
Vancouver, BC
Come to the next Breakfast Club on
Tuesday, March 29th to discuss everything from the local economy
to real estate and to network with your business community.
Establish key contacts! The Breakfast Club will meet every other
Tuesday. Free for members.
Cafe TrafiQ offers a fine selection of continental breakfast
choices for purchase.
For more information, contact
facilitator and Board Director Mark Ballard,
mark@markballard.ca
=== CULTUREWATCH
===
*
THEATRE
+ Arts Club (687
1644) www.artsclub.com
- Stanley Industrial
Alliance
The Philanderer by
George Bernard Shaw, in previews, opens Mar 23, on till Apr
17
Leonard will do anything to avoid
commitment -- even get married! Drawing room satire. Quest
to escape to happily ever after.
- Revue Stage on Granville
Island
Another Home
Invasion by Joan MacLeod; Mar 31st to Apr 23; one-woman
performance, facing life's challenges with humour and dignity.
Tarragon Theatre
+ Vancouver
Playhouse (873
3311)
The
Trespassers by Morris Panych, Mar 26 - Apr 16; Portrait of life, death, love, and
family.
+ Jericho Arts
Centre (1675
Discovery) 224 8007
Rosmersholm by Henrik Ibsen;
Apr 1 - 24
+ Metro Theatre 266
7191 -- 42nd
Street by Michael Stewart and Mark Bramble; Apr 2 -
30
+ The Cultch 251
1363
A new multimedia adaptation of Orwell's 1984; Mar 24 to Apr
3
+ Presentation House
Theatre
A
Beautiful View by Daniel MacIvor; Apr 5 - 9; two women on a
serial comic trek. 990 3474
+ Deep Cove Shaw Theatre
929 3200
Biloxi
Blues by Neil Simon; second of his semi-autobiographical
trilogy. April 1 - 16
* ART
+ VANCOUVER ART
GALLERY
~ VAG PUBLIC PROGRAMS
-- All Programs free for Members.
~ Out
for Lunch -- Eine
Kleine Lunch Musik Select Fridays, 12:10 -
1pm
~ For more information on the
Gallery's relocation campaign, visit the new relocation website at
www.newvanartgallery.com. You can also join the discussion on the
Facebook page.
* MUSIC
Breaking
News
If you're
in Vancouver and would like to support the Vancouver Opera Guild,
circle Monday, March 28th on your calendar for Pasta & Puccini, an
evening of outstanding cuisine, opera and great prizes.
You'll be
thrilled by performances by the opera stars of tomorrow, all from the
renowned UBC Opera program under the direction of Nancy Hermiston.
Your support will sponsor VO productions, provide awards and bursaries
to young singers, and encourage student participation through programs
like Vancouver Opera in the Schools and the Guild Adopts a School
.
Pasta &
Puccini -- Monday, March 28th
Don Francesco Ristorante , 860 Burrard Street. The
evening starts at 6pm, for dinner at 7pm.
$160 per person. Limited seating! Contact Susan Mair at
732 6931 or by
email.
+ Vancouver Symphony
Orchestra
Russian
Classics
Sat Mar
26 / Sun Mar 27 / Mon Mar 28 -- Masterworks Silver, Symphony Sundays, Orpheum Theatre
Sarah Chang
With The VSO!
Sat Apr 2
/ Mon Apr 4 -- Masterworks Gold, Orpheum Theatre
Angela
Gheorghiu With The VSO!
Sunday,
April 3rd, 7:30pm, Orpheum.
Hailed as one of
history's greatest singing actresses, the extraordinary Angela
Gheorghiu makes her long-awaited Vancouver debut, performing with
Bramwell Tovey and the Vancouver Symphony Orchestra. Don't miss this
once-in-a lifetime evening with the VSO and one of the world's
greatest sopranos.
+
Sinfonia Preview - Lecture and Music Excerpts ~ 1:30 - 3pm
Monday, March 28
Come and
listen to Clyde Mitchell's lecture about Mozart's last composition.
Clyde will play excerpts on CD and discuss aspects
of "Mozart's Requiem".
Seniors' Activity Centre, Audio Visual room Drop-In:
$2.25 Everyone Welcome
Celebrate Bach's
Birthday with:
JS Bach: "The St. John
Passion"
Monday evening,
March 21 at 8pm; No Pre-Concert Introduction
Chan Centre for the
Performing Arts at UBC, 6265 Crescent Road
J.S. Bach's two surviving settings
of the Passion story are pillars of Western art music. The emotional
intensity and directness of Bach's setting of St. John the
Evangelist's text has been the subject of much musicological
discussion in recent years. As she did for her Grammy-nominated
recording of Bach's Orchestral Suites, Monica Huggett will
re-examine the original, more intimate scoring of this work, dating
from 1724. [Sponsored in part by CBC.]
GF Handel: "Acis and Galatea"
The acclaimed Boston
Early Music Festival staged production of Handel's pastoral
opera
Sunday matinée,
March 27 at 3pm; No Pre-Concert Introduction
Chan Centre for the
Performing Arts at UBC
The Boston Early Music
Festival's stunning period productions of baroque operas have
become a must-see event for opera lovers from around the world. For
its first appearance in Canada as part of the Early Music at the
Chan series, the Festival presents the original 1718 chamber
version of Handel's beloved pastoral opera Acis and
Galatea.
Rush Seats for
Students with valid ID on sale
for $10, at the door only, from an hour before the concert (subject to
availability).
Buy tickets for both concerts and
save! Series Tickets, at $115,
$85, and $58 (students & seniors $108, $80, and $52) are available
in person at the Chan Centre Ticket Office, or from Early
Music Vancouver at www.earlymusic.bc.ca or
604-732-1610.
These concerts are included in
our "Bring a Youth for Free"
programme.
+ CULTURAL FESTIVAL
ADALA IS PLEASED TO INVITE YOU TO OUR
SECOND ARAB CULTURAL FESTIVAL
SATURDAY, MARCH 26 -- 11am to
5pm Enjoy the traditional music, dance, culture, and
food
H.R.
MacMillan Space Centre, 1100 Chestnut Street, Vancouver (Right
below Burrard St. Bridge)
COME OUT TO ENJOY A BEAUTIFUL EVENT
EXPLORING THE DIFFERENT FEATURES OF THE CULTURE.
For questions and ticket sales, please
contact us at info@adala.ca
PROGRAM:
Live performances by Sirwan; Ibrahim
Hanna, Bashar& Firas Najm; Ishtar Folklore Dance Group Salma &
Kurdu; and more Arabic Dancing. Also, a Fashion Show by a local
Moroccan designer, Salwa.
TIX*: ADULTS (Over 19 yrs): $20;
STUDENTS (13 - 19 yrs): $10; CHILDREN (7 =F1 12 yrs):
$5**
* Ticket price does not include food
cost; there will be a Mediterranean vendor on site
** Please note: children WILL NOT be
allowed to attend some activities in the theatre
Adala -- Canadian Arab Justice
Committee is a Vancouver-based advocacy organization working to build
the capacity of interested Canadians to better respond to the media
and policy makers and to promote fair coverage and balanced
decision-making. Adala is a member organization of the Canadian Arab
Federation.
=== NATUREWATCH
===
Please note the following talk for the
Botany Section of Nature Vancouver (also known as the Vancouver
Natural History Society) -- David
Cook, Coordinator, Botany
Section, 924 0147
Speaker: Mike Enns Location: Unity Church,
5840 Oak St., Vancouver
This powerpoint presentation will discuss
the challenges and successes of major landscape enhancement works at
Vancouver International Airport (YVR) over the last five years. The
talk will focus on how sustainable building practices, ecological
site design, and wildlife management all played a role in the
transformation of an area on Sea Island, Richmond that covers over
3000 acres. The project was awarded a CSLA National Honour Award
for Excellence in Landscape Architecture under Landscape Management in
2010.
Mike Enns received his Master's in
Landscape Architecture at UBC. He has worked all over BC and the
Pacific Northwest on projects ranging from urban and regional
planning, to collaborative community parks, to detailed architectural
design. He is the project manager for the YVR Landscape Master Plan
and Enhancements.
=== CCL MTG NOTES March
7th ===
Note: At 6pm the reg Ccl Mtg will commence in
open session (in the MFCR)), and will be immediately followed by a
motion to exclude the public in order to hold a closed session.
At 7pm the open session will reconvene (in the Ccl
Chamber).
6:00 PM
1. CALL TO ORDER OPEN SESSION
2. EXCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC
RECOMMENDED: THAT in the public interest, members
of the public be excluded from part of the March 7, 2011 regular
Council Meeting on the basis of matters to be considered under the
following section of the Community Charter:
90. (1) A part of a council meeting may be closed
to the public if the subject matter being considered relates to or is
one or more of the following:
a) personal information about an
identifiable individual who holds or is being considered for a
position as an officer, employee, or agent of the municipality or
another position appointed by the municipality;
c) labour relations or other employee
relations;
e) the acquisition, disposition, or
expropriation of land or improvements, if the council considers that
disclosure could reasonably be expected to harm the interests of the
municipality;
f) law enforcement, if the council
considers that disclosure could reasonably be expected to harm the
conduct of an investigation under or enforcement of an
enactment;
i) the receipt of advice that is subject to
solicitor-client privilege, including communications necessary for
that purpose; and
k) negotiations and related discussions
respecting the proposed provision of a municipal service that are at
their preliminary stages and that, in the view of the council, could
reasonably be expected to harm the interests of the municipality if
they were held in public.
3. ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION
7:00 PM
Following
conclusion of the closed session, the following items will be
considered:
4. RECONVENE OPEN SESSION
[7:10] Mayor: sorry, little late; announcements:
it's social work week; asked to mention that b/c of how connected
our cmnty is to one another
great pleasure to present to the Dir/Finance the Cdn award for
reporting achievement; fifth year in a row, ev year I've been
mayor.
hope next for the budget award
tribute to Allan Williams, [said] commit our lives to our
families and our cmnty
to Cclr Sop about working with Mr Wms
Sop: avocation for preservation of this cmnty
two levels of govt and still come back to this cmnty
chairman of Rec Fac Master Plan -- referee;
one of best dealt with; gruff exterior but gentle; came by my
store ....
5. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
RECOMMENDED:
THAT the March 7, 2011 Regular Council meeting agenda be amended
by:
*
adding to Item 8 six written submissions dated February 23 - March
6, 2011;
*
adding to Item 9 two written submissions dated February 28 - March
3, 2011;
AND THAT the
agenda be approved as amended
DONE
6. ADOPTION OF MINUTES
Feb 21 Public Hearing; and Feb 21 Regular Ccl
Mtg adopted as circulated
REPORTS [7:18]
7. West Vancouver Police 2010 Crime Stats Update
(File: 2900-01)
Presentation to be provided. To be received for
information.
Chief Peter Lepine: success measured not by crime rates but by
absence
SLIDE
Michelle Brander gave presentation:
property, violent, drug, collisions; decrease of...
property mischief, shoplifting, theft
GRAPH -- all categories except shoplifting below
five-year average, up ...
Chief: low rates not by chance
UFV conduct a research project on our crime model
this cmnty is facing a number of pressures; court disclosure is
one; paperwork growing
seeing an increase in violent crime -- down last year from 2009
but up by 18% so far this year, trend upward; assault up 33%
gang upswing not in violence but in their presence; activities in
other locations
electronic crime -- use of social media; frauds threats
....
ppl scanning MLS so pick house they want to steal from
good news in terms of prop crime; so able to reallocate
resources
Sop: how will you look at ever-increasing traffic through our
cmnty
seen gridlock -- how do you get out? or is it a problem at all in
your eyes?
Chief: ev two weeks get to see our hot-spot report
Mayor: b/c of our compstat system, police out in front; see WVPD
cars downtown, b/c trailing ppl
think the integration you've done has helped us a lot.
TYVM [7:35]
Media Release::
http://www.westvancouver.ca/Level3.aspx?id=32990
Full 2010 Report:
https://wvpd.ca/images/stories/file/CompStat%202011/2010%20CompStat%20Year%20End%20Report_FINAL.pdf
8. Further Information on Proposed Development Variance
Permit Application No. 10-055 (2317 Haywood Avenue)
(File: 1010-20-10-055)
At the Jan 24 regular meeting Council received
the report dated Jan 12 1 regarding the DVP and set the date for
consideration for Feb 21. At the Feb 21 reg mtg Ccl received the
report dated Feb 10 and public input, and requested a further
report.
Reports received up to March 3,
2011:
NAME / DATE /
FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION:
DVP Application /
January 12, 2011 / January 24, 2011
DVP Application /
February 10, 2011 / February 21, 2011
Further Information on Proposed DVP
/ February 23, 2011 / March 7, 2011
Written Submissions received up to March 3,
2011:
NAME / DATE /
FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION:
E. Jones & S. Ordonez /
February 9, 2011 / February 21, 2011
A. Mees / February 18,
2011 / February 21, 2011
GB: issues that have arisen, from props on north side of the
street and how view wd be altered
driveways 5.5m have reduced from 6m
SLIDE of view; SLIDE showing all the variances; driveway grade at
5%
Mayor: we've received some further submissions
CALL FOR PUBLIC INPUT -- No one
MS: MOVED all written and verbal submissions
received for information.
THAT the revised proposed DVP attached to the report dated
Feb 23, to allow a new dwelling with attached garage to be
constructed, be approved.
owners tried hard to accommodate; good; shd move on
[7:40]
9. Development Variance Permit Application No. 10-053 (2667
Haywood Avenue) (File: 1010-20-10-053)
Feb 7 Council received the report dated Jan 25 and set the
date for consideration for March 7.
Reports received up to March 3,
2011:
NAME / DATE / FOR
COUNCIL CONSIDERATION:
DVP (2667 Haywood Avenue /
January 25, 2011 / February 7, 2011
DVP (2667 Haywood Avenue) /
March 2, 2011 / March 7, 2011
Written Submissions received up to March 3,
2011:
NAME / DATE
/ FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION:
E. & D. Bodie /
February 27, 2011 / March 7, 2011
H. & F. Stegemann /
March 1, 2011 / March 7, 2011
GB: looks a lot alike
SLIDE of variances (sideyard and rearyard)
bylaw requires 30 ft and proposing 25 and 20
one nbr raised concerns about the height of the house and the
owners have lowered
Sop: house appears large for the site
GB: quite a few variances; b/c of grade allowed to be
exempt
ste wd hv light
SW: why is this house coming to us instead of Bd of
V?
GB: BoV deals with ? or hardship; isn't actually
hardship
SW: feel it's inappropriate for that nbrhd
Ev: I'd go one further and say this is the worst of the
worst
acceding to these variances; no sensitivity at all for
character
two-storey on one side and three-storey on other
by agreeing to these variances we're not doing as much as we shd
or cd to come up with a proposal that bears some relationship or
sensitivity
the landscape plans, for example, are inaccurate
two things: lawn and plants -- and that's not a plan
only indicated 10ft landscaped, not consistent
the blvd bylaw requires input from nbrs and not done
see a lot of flaws and some errors
prefer the owners go back and try to do something more
sensitive to the District
TP: granted a BoV in 199x -- is that usual? [7:47]
they've had one shot at this
GB: this is new; that Variance to that building not new
Mayor: in prev Ccl we tightened up BoV, some going that shdn't
have
Sop: if we reject this proposal, what are we looking for and what
is the owner to do?
Mayor: it is up to this Ccl to change the bylaw wrt that ground
floor (third) storey; not easy reopening that one
if not prepared to grant variance
don't have character guidelines -- keeps coming up, difficult to
do
GB: a variance is discretionary and you have quite wide
you've pointed to some issues xxxx
better sensitivity and we've tried to deal
haven't dealt with size from south face
wd be reasonable for you to suggest owner consider nbrd
character
SW: move be denied; reconsider design of the home wrt
xxx
Sop: this goes from one street to the other
saw a unique house not far
two locations joined by walkway; good, place for nanny
maybe applicant take a look
GB: we will sit down with the applicant and talk about nbrhd
character [7:52]
Mayor: apology
debating, motion on floor; yet two names for public input so go
there now
apology, my mistake
Michael Kraftsman (?): as a prop owner who will be affected
make my concerns known ... xxxx
hardship and public good
living for over 30 years on the south side -- clearly visible
from my living room
builder will probably begin by clear-cutting the lot
xxx quasi hotel-like structure; planned garden is xxx
stripped by ... pave over remaining
ground
further shattering the visual character of the nbrhd to say
nothing of the ecological impact
seven xxx ... gigantism xxx ... to say nothing of
[7:55]
violates our nbrhd's public good
re hardship: believe the owner knew what he was buying, and he
knew it wd be difficult
rather than build on a larger lot; willfulness rather than
hardship
opposed..... as well as... wall
..... preferably by removing the third storey
no objection to sec ste; don't impose my landscape xxx
Ed Lee: my remarks pre-empted by remarks of Cclr Ev
50 years we've lived in WV, variances we've xxx
sold as a tear-down house on a small lot
small variance, a family and that's why priced
seem to build as large a house as they cd talk you into
.... covered by concrete pavers and wall
not much to absorb the rain; upset the water table and we
already have that on our street
the sec ste is a cave; a well and little help for
escape.
couple look like empty nesters
xxx flip
don't look as if they want to join our Irwin Park; they
don't look like [7:59]
reduce the excavation; front forward, crawl space
have garage floor raised from 9ft to 8ft
pls disallow the iron gates
R Blomfeldt: nbr to west of this prop
second many comments from Mr Lee particularly size and
excavation
size of the structure; other devts in nbrhd large but this goes
beyond
PRESENTATION BY APPLICANT
CALL FOR PUBLIC INPUT
TP moved: THAT the Building Plans (date stamped Mar 2) attached
to the report dated Mar 2 replace the plans previously attached to the
proposed DVP in the report dated Jan 25.
THAT all written and verbal submissions regarding
DVP Application for 2667 Haywood up to and including the Ccl Mtg held
on March 7, 2011 be received for information.
Mayor: to Cclr Walker ... think be denied
Sop: may I ask a Q
Mayor: yes
Sop: are the drawings part of the permit?
if sec ste, cd they walk away?
Mayor: stick to the motion
Sop: it is pertinent xxxxx
in light of that, is it their ab of Devt Permit to walk away and
sgl-fam home
GB: yes
Sop: cd put xxxxx
Mayor: really want to focus on the motion in front of us
then applicant can go from there
all those in favour of denial
motion carries unanimously [8:04]
THAT DVP, to allow a new two-storey dwelling with
basement and a secondary suite to be constructed, be
DENIED.
10. Pacific Arbour Retirement Communities' proposal for
development at the northwest corner of Marine Drive and 22nd Street -
Miscellaneous Parks Dedication Bylaw No. 1091, 1945, Amendment Bylaw
No. 4670, 2010 repealing the park dedication of John Richardson
Park (File: 1610-20-4670)
This bylaw received first, second, and
third readings at the Dec 13 Ccl Mtg and received elector approval on
Feb 11,.
Mayor: do have one wishing to speak
Bruce McArthur: just requesting info, rather than debate
been led to believe park dedication is highest we have and
concerned how easy this appears to be to change/withdraw
Seems a transfer, zoned RS5 -- applicable to whole area
or??
Mayor: still park.
GB will be ... done by bylaw [8:06]
alternative process -- Clerk said less than 1% of voters said
don't proceed
BMcA: all?
GB: the extension; bylaws for parks allowed anywhere
xxx can't do until Ccl passes this bylaw
Ev moved: THAT Miscellaneous Parks Dedication, Amendment Bylaw
No. 4670, 2010 be adopted.
[8:08]
11. Official Community Plan Amendment, Rezoning, and Design/development Approval for land, at the
northwest corner of Marine Drive and 22nd Street, known as the Wetmore
site (2203 Marine Drive and 787, 793 and 815 22nd
Street)
(File: 1010-20-10-040/1610-20-4676/1610-20-4677)
Presentation to be provided.
GB: SLIDE showing boundaries
CD46 zone; proposal, area in green park; main part of If Ccl xxxx
Park is zoned RS5
re OCP, highest level; prov requires consultation; possible
redevt site
brief summary of the consultations that have gone up
Feb 2004 Planning Adv Cmte; Feb 2010 some public mtgs
Sept of this year [sic] at Srs' Ctr; early input; mtgs held with
indiv owners (Tudor Gdns and Stratford Court)
then Alternative Approval Process Feb 2011
contingent liabilities; only few returns; held public info mtg in
January; late Jan went back to Design Rev Cmte
Design Devt Package, using our authority as landowner.
Today OCP Amendment -- If Ccl proceeds, public hearing Apr
4
Mayor: understand we have a brief presentation by Peter Gaskill
and Ross Curtis
Peter Gaskill: thank you Ccl and thank staff for their hard work
this year; made it better
we have two others, one in NV and one in Bby; third is xxx,
fourth is xxx; we are a local company
our bldgs are like hotels; provide meals, transportation,
cleaning
we don't provide care but they can contract with; like to think
of ourselves as good nbrs
quite a need here, well-known
5300 residents in WV aged 75 and older; strong demand (had survey
done)
in 2016, number of seniors in WV will rise rapidly
Walter Frankl architects; PWL landscape architects
fit on site and leave green space, be respectful to our
nbrs
proposed to put retail on MDr; a cafe and an elder college
campus
130 stes, mix of studios to two-bedroom and dens; studios so
element of affordability
32 FTE jobs
traffic consultant study; this will create less traffic than prev
on site
naturally occurring retirement cmnty; worth considering adding
density
[SLIDE with list of mtgs]
height so stepped back the top two storeys so as appearance of
four and to take back feeling of ht
parking, not on street; put college there and some
landscaping
California laurel, a rare tree we learned was there so we altered
so we cd keep it
had 52 public parking spots/spaces; proposing 40,
under
{loss of 12!!! however DWV put spots there b/c empty lot; now need 40
for residents?}
blocked park so what we've done is to make it
pedestrian-friendly
kitchen smells so built exhaust so doesn't
view from Aquatic Ctr
PUBLIC INPUT
Ross Curtis: currently prez of Tudor Gardens
most of what I was going to say Peter has said
a couple of months ago; had mtgs with X, Y, etc and your own
staff, nothing but co-op with ev
all transparent and private to suggest you recommend Pacific
Arbour
you'll see a lot of changes; Tudor Gardens proud of its gardens
and won awards
hadn't been happy with hedge now able to speak with their
landscaping ppl and we're delighted with what they've come up
with
new hedging, parkways, new landscaping; whole thing going to look
v good
we're v pleased; sev of us interested in what's going on there
b/c might be applying
Mayor: Andrew Pottinger
Maggie Pappas (Ch of Commerce): unfortunately Andrew has not
arrived yet but I've had mtgs so think I can speak on this
increase of local biz; arrival of new corp citizen, track record
of benefiting local
no increase in parking
mtg re further density and height; learned they're providing 40
new parking spaces
{she hadn't arrived or has
forgotten that in his presentation he said there had been 52 parking
spaces so with 40, 12 hv bn lost. What a slant/spin to instead
say devpr is providing 40 NEW parking spaces! OTOH parking put
when Wetmore demolished. Is there a parking space for each unit?
what's the formula? any for guests?}
as former chair of KMC
long standing support, xxx of Harmony Arts Festival
Elder College; may be some new, participating residents
Chamber wd continue to support; you'll receive a letter shortly
to that end.
Mayor: shd these each be moved individually?
MClk: yes
SW moved:
THAT opportunities for consultation on a proposed Official
Community Plan amendment, with persons, organizations, and
authorities, as outlined in the report from the Manager of
Community Planning dated Feb 24, be endorsed as sufficient
consultation for the purposes of Section 879 of the Local
Government Act.
THAT OCP Amendment Bylaw as attached to the report from
the Mgr, Cmnty Planning dated Feb 24 be read a first
time.
THAT OCP Amendment Bylaw as attached to the report from
the Mgr, Cmnty Planning dated Feb 24, has been considered [sic]* in
conjunction with the District's most recent financial plan and the
regional waste management plan.
THAT Zoning Amendment Bylaw for property located at the
northwest corner of Marine and 22nd, as attached to the report from
the Mgr, Cmnty Planning dated Feb 24, be read a first
time.
THAT DWV, as owners of the lands proposed for rezoning to
CD46 under Zoning Amendment Bylaw consents [sic]** to the use of the
property proposed for rezoning to CD46 for special needs housing, as
required under Section 904(3) of the LGA.
THAT the M Clerk be directed to give statutory notice that
a Public Hearing re "OCP Amendment Bylaw"; and "Zoning
Amendment Bylaw" is scheduled for 7pm Mon April
4.
THAT the proposed design devt package attached to the
report from the Mgr, Cmnty Planning dated Feb 24 be considered
concurrent with the OCP and Zoning Amendment Bylaws.
THAT the public be given an opportunity to provide comment
on the proposed design devt package attached to the report from the
Mgr, Cmnty Planning dated Feb 24, at the Public Hearing.
GRAMMAR NOTE: [sic]
put b/c incorrect tense after 'recommended' and the result is
confusion, lack of clarity (concurrent or
beforehand?):
* does it mean be
considered? or will have been
considered?
** shd be consent (cf Item
12, all correct tense)
{over half left Chamber}
[8:33]
12. Report on Metro Vancouver Regional Growth
Strategy (File: 0185-01)
RECOMMENDED: THAT
1. Council accept the new MetroV RGS
entitled Metro Vancouver 2040 - Shaping our Future (Regional Growth
Strategy Bylaw No. 1136, 2010);
2. Council request that the Metro Board
amend the strategy to expand the Conservation recreation designation
to ensure that the entire Old Growth Conservancy be designated as
conservation/recreation; and
3. Council request that the special
study area be expanded to include all lands above the 1200-foot
contour line designated as general urban.
Mayor: several wishing to speak to this, but presentation
first.
Sokol gave background: Richmond also accepting report and
requesting exceptions.
{gave timeline, dates, MetroV ratify by July 29}
Mayor: thank you for that added piece; so this can be executed
within a few months. Several to speak. Begin with John
Anderson -- not here? well he can when he comes back
Bruce McArthur: I talked to MetroV this morning regarding these
two requests.
They informed me not a clear procedure within the RGS to allow
for these amendments after acceptance.
The reason for the uncertainty, take 3 wch is the strongest,
where Ccl requests a Special Study Area to be expanded, within the
RGS "not to be expanded or new areas
created"
I pointed this out and they admitted there was an anomaly in
their document and cdn't advise me of a way around it. Special
Areas prior to adoption. I see that as a problem.
The other problem I saw was the request to put the entire OGC
into the designation as conservation and recreation.
Another problem created that wasn't considered by the person I
talked to in Metro was that that required a boundary change wch was a
Type 2 minor amendment. I don't know that that is what the
expectation is the way this worded. Type 2 minor amendment
requires a public hearing, of course.
I'm a little perturbed about the way this is presented right at
the moment. I think that there's some lacking in consultation
for proposed changes above the 1200ft limit. The OCP says that
there shd be cmnty discussion of possible benefits for some devt above
the 1200ft limit -- cmnty discussion of the advantages and
disadvantages. Even our new Cmnty Strategic Plan says that we
shd complete plans for future devt of Upper Lands.
I think the planning for Upper Lands and these devt proposals
the way they're put together here are not adequate. I think we
shd reject this or request an extension until we get it
right.
tyvm
{Notes supplied:
Watching
the RGS and OCP
West
Vancouver's Official Community Plan describes "Upper
Lands"? as the forested areas above the Upper Levels Highway
up to the Cypress Park Boundary. These lands comprise of 1,760 acres
that are below the 1,200-foot Elevation and 4,500 acres that are
above. The OCP states that the lands above 1,200-ft will be
"preserved as Limited Use and Recreation."? These lands are a
mix of public and private?. Over 50% of the private holdings are above the
1,200-ft line. The Eagle Lake, Nelson Creek watersheds and the Old
Growth Park are 2 Natural Areas? in the Upper Lands that have extra
significance.
The
Regional Growth Strategy has assigned new land use designations
(General Urban and Conservation and Recreation) for West Vancouver. An
Urban Containment Boundary? divides these designations. This
re-defining has now moved the Urban Boundary up another 1,000 feet in
elevation to the 2,200-ft level and there is a loss of 2,500 acres
from the Limited Use and Recreation designation that is stated in the
OCP. The remaining 2,000 acres above the Boundary now have a
Conservation and Recreation designation but there are portions of the
Eagle Lake, Larson Creek watersheds and the Old Growth Park that are
not included in this designation.
This
has created a discrepancy between the OCP and the RGS so Council has
opted to have the Upper Lands designated as a Special Study
Area.? The Special Study Area is where a municipality
intends to alter the existing land use. The new Community Strategic
Plan also confirms that development is planned in the Upper
Lands.?
The Local
Government Act required that Municipalities review the RGS in context
with the current OCP before 3rd reading? and the OCP says
that the existing land use will not be considered without public
discussion.?
? OCP UPPER LANDS
Policy Section 7 - page 95
? Upper Lands Report -
Map - Land Ownership
? OCP Natural
Environment Resources - page 87
? RGS D Regional Land
Use Designations and Overlays
? RGS
6.10.1 Special Study areas are depicted prior to
adoption.
6.12.4 The areas for Special Study Areas...are not to be
expanded nor are new areas to be created.
A Type 3 minor amendment...is only permitted to delete Special
Study Areas & may occur after the Regional Growth Strategy has
been amended to change the regional land use designation of the
Special Study Area or when a municipality
extinguishes a Special Study Area.
? COMMUNITY STRATEGIC
PLAN (BALANCED SCORECARD) - 1.2.5b 2011 Commence plan preparation for
future of Upper Lands 2012 Complete plan for future development of
Upper Lands
? LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT
- 857
Acceptance by affected local governments
required,
3) before 3rd reading the Board must submit to the Council of
each Municipality
4) After receiving (Council's) review in context of OCP (both
current and in preparation)
? OCP - Policy UL3
Variation in the 1,200-foot limit on development
"Provide for community discussion of the possible benefits
of some development above the 1,200-foot limit..."
"...community discussion of the advantages and disadvantages
of development above the 1,200' level."}
Mayor: Liz Byrd? She phoned me to say she was coming from
her book club. Only in West Vancouver. Next is Alan
Bardsley.
AB: came to support Ccl passing RGS conditional on the amendments
to extend the Sp Study Area down to 1200ft, and to congratulate Ccl on
the possibility of protection of the mountainside, while keeping open
the option to allow devt in exchange for better protection of the
mtnside as a whole.
I've since found out about Item 6.12.4 wch raises doubt on the
ab to expand the Sp Study Area. Learning about this I wd
urge Ccl to only pass the RGS once we're confident we're keeping
open the option of long-term protection of the lands above 1200ft and
the recreation and conservation land use designation within the
RGS.
Knowing that little in life is assured, esp in MetroV, WV needs
support from other Ms for amendments, I wd be interested in knowing
who on Ccl will be shepherding this through the Metro Board. Who
will be reaching out to the other Ms for support for amendments, and
what, if any, are the options for public input in the process.
Mayor: Elizabeth Murphy
EM: 1826 Blanca in Vancouver; I agree with WV resident Bruce
McArthur as to passing this as proposed.
concerned it's not consistent with WV's OCP and will not result
in protection of the Upper Lands -- objectives of Ccl and the
public.
Pls consider striking and replacing the staff recommendations
with the following changes:
1 - Ccl not accept the RGS and to request an extension under
Section 857 of 4b of Pt 25 of the LGA.
This wd allow the proposed changes to be made before
acceptance.
consistent with WV OCP, that MetroV Bd amend the RGS to expand
the recreation and conservation designation to all lands above the
1200ft level, to be designated conservation and rec.
v concerned about urban being above the 1200ft; that
underlying designation will take precedence.
also that the Urban Containment Boundary be lowered to at
least the 1200ft line, and lower around the watershed after
speaking to some residents, Paul Hundal, Bruce McA -- those lands
wanting to be preserved so have UCB below it not above.
Also that Ccl request that the Study Area be removed altogether
b/c it weakens the protection.
Might be a misunderstanding of what these Studies are b/c they
allow lands to be taken out for devt easier
Paul Hundal: Will my letter today be tabled?
Mayor: I have my copy.
PH: terrific. Hope you've all seen Section 6.12.4 of the
RGS clearly says you cannot enlarge the Sp Study Area therefore the
suggestion by Metro staff that item 3 is an option simply to approve
and the expand the area after is simply not possible b/c that wd
be a major amendment to the document, not minor.
I have a copy for you.
For that reason, the motion by staff doesn't make any sense,
and I'm v concerned that staff themselves have not brought this
section to your attention and answered those concerns directly before
the public.
explained in my letter the proper process of what is being
presented, and that is to reject the RGS plan and that wd trigger a
dispute resolution process, and that is the proper place for
determining the changes that you want to make to the bylaw.
There are two options.
If a resoln can't be found, the Metro Bd has the option of
letting WV opt out.(853.2)
BUT if you approve this now, with the hope it'll be changed
later, you lose all the bargaining leverage -- you're totally
dependent on the Bd to say yes or no.
and they can say, no, you can't expand the Study area b/c the
doc doesn't allow you to.
The staff can't promise or guarantee what the Bd votes; they
can set up the mtg but they cannot guarantee your vote
so if you have a concern, and I hope you do, and it sounds
like some of you recognize the concerns, asking for the expansion of
the St area, that the proper process is to reject the RGS bylaw
and trigger that dispute resoln process
The suggestion by MetroV is not the right approach and I'm
concerned that the Metro staff are leading you down a road where
really they'll end up preserving the right to develop the Upper Lands,
not allow you to preserve the UL.
Opting out option will only be available if you reject the RGS
strategy b/c if you approve it you don't have that option after opting
out. You can only have that option if you reject.
hope you looked at Whyte Lake area comments; shd be included,
underlying designation rec/cons, at the v least the M land shd be
included in that b/c hope you wd all recognize a high conservation
area.
Ppl treat it like a park right now -- two major trails:
Baden-Powell and TransCanada, plus connector trail built by WV staff;
tremendous asset to the cmnty
{TEXT SUPPLIED (not read):
Re: Regional Growth Strategy
I would like to state my opposition to the proposed Motion to
approve the Regional Growth Strategy (RGS). As stated during my oral
submissions on February 21, 2011, legally the RGS is the highest level
management plan governing development under the Local Government Act
and expresses a 30 year plan for the region. The Official Community
Plan (OCP), which is the middle level management plan, must be made
generally consistent with the RGS over time, in other words you can
not make changes to the OCP over time that are in direct conflict with
the RGS. Zoning, which is the ground level of planning must be
consistent with the OCP.
My concern is that the RGS does not reflect the vision of this
community for the Upper Lands, and I don't believe this statement is
in dispute by anyone except maybe the planning department. Urban
development right up the mountain to the old Growth Conservancy does
not reflect the 30 year vision for this community so why on earth
would you approve it. The suggestion by Metro Vancouver staff that you
approve it now and apply to change it in July is not the right way to
deal with this plan if you do not agree with it. There may be legal
implications from private owners who may not like the change back.
Also Metro staff can not promise or guarantee a positive vote by the
Metro Board. They could rightly say that this plan was approved after
a long process and it would be inappropriate to revisit it so soon. If
you disagree with the plan, which I hope you do, then you should be
following the process laid out by legislation as governed by s.857 (4)
and (7) shown below (please see my bolded italics):
857 (4) After receiving a proposed regional growth strategy under
subsection (3), each affected local government must
(a) review the regional growth strategy in the context of any
official community plans and regional growth strategies for its
jurisdiction, both those that are current and those that are in
preparation, and in the context of any other matters that affect its
jurisdiction, and
(b) subject to an extension under section 858 (3), within 60 days
of receipt either
(i) accept the regional growth strategy, or
(ii) respond, by resolution, to the proposing board
indicating that the local government refuses to accept the regional
growth strategy.
(5) An acceptance under subsection (4) (b) becomes
effective
(a) when all affected local governments have accepted the
regional growth strategy, or
(b) at the end of the period for acceptance or refusal under that
subsection if, at the end of that period, all affected local
governments have not accepted the regional growth strategy.
(6) If an affected local government fails to act under subsection
(4) (b) within the period for acceptance or refusal, the local
government is deemed to have accepted the regional growth
strategy.
(7) In the resolution under subsection (4) (b) (ii), the
affected local government must indicate
(a) each provision to which it objects,
(b) the reasons for its objection, and
(c) whether it is willing that a provision to which it
objects be included in the regional growth strategy on the basis that
the provision will not apply to its jurisdiction, as referred to in
section 853 (2).
(7.1) An affected local government is deemed to have accepted any
provision of the regional growth strategy to which it does not
indicate an objection under subsection (7).
(8) All affected local governments are entitled to participate in
any non-binding resolution processes used to resolve an objection or
anticipated objection by an affected local government.
Please note that an option also exists under 853(2) to opt out of
provisions in the plan for our jurisdiction, which may be appropriate
in West Vancouver since the fate of the Upper Lands is yet to be
decided so we are not in a position to commit to a 30-year vision. The
section is shown below:
853 (2) As an exception to subsection (1) (c), a regional growth
strategy may be adopted without acceptance in relation to a specific
provision if
(a) the provision is included on the basis that it is not
binding on the jurisdiction of a local government that has refused to
accept it, and
(b) the board considers that it is not essential to the regional
growth strategy that the provision apply to that jurisdiction.
I would like to express concern at this point about the failure
on the part of the planning reports to adequately advise you of your
options. Some people have been told that if West Vancouver refuses to
accept the RGS then the whole thing fails which as you can see in the
legislation above is not true. You have the option under s. 857 (7)(c)
to object on the basis that the provisions do not apply to West
Vancouver. Having said that my overall concern is that in spite of
statements by the mayor and others that they support preserving the
Upper Lands, this plan is instead all about preserving the right to
develop the Upper Lands.
I therefore ask Mayor and Council to reject the RGS on the basis
that the designation for the lands above the 1200' elevation and
Nelson Creek/Eagle Creek watershed (referred to below), be designated
as Recreation Conservation lands and the area above the 1200" shown
on the OCP as being considered for possible development be instead
shown as a Special Study area as well as all the privately owned lands
within the Nelson Creek/Eagle Creek watershed. I ask that the Urban
Containment Line run along the 1200 ft elevation until you reach
municipally owned lands within the Nelson Creek/Eagle Creek watershed
and then be drawn to exclude all municipally owned land to the Upper
Levels Highway within the Nelson Creek Eagle Creek drainage.
NELSON CREEK/ WHYTE LAKE AREA
Two years ago I wrote to Mayor and Council asking to make a
delegation presentation about setting aside the Nelson Creek/Eagle
Creek watershed area including Whyte Lake as recreation/conservation
lands. My request for a delegation was refused and I see now that this
plan designates the whole area as General Urban which is defined as
being primarily residential subdivision. I am sure this Council knows
that this is a high value conservation and recreation area with two
major trails (Baden Powell and TransCanada Trail) and the recently
built connecting trail to Whyte Lake that joins the two major trails.
There should be no doubt whatsoever that the municipally owned lands
that cover this area and connect up as a corridor to Cypress
Provincial park should have been outside the Urban Containment Line
but it isn't. When I asked the Director of Planning two weeks ago
about this at a meeting in his office, he said he has received no
direction from Council to do this. That unfortunately is the crux of
the problem. There has been a complete lack of leadership to preserve
these lands. Right now these lands are both zoned for housing and are
shown on the OCP as residential subdivision. If this Council has any
interest in changing this then the right thing to do would be to show
that on the RGS as recreation land which as I said at the beginning is
the highest level management plan. Then over time the OCP can be
changed from housing to recreation designation to be consistent with
the RGS as provided for by legislation and zoning changes can follow.
The private lands adjacent to the municipal land within the
Nelson/Creek Eagle Creek watershed could be traded through density
transfers to preserve the remaining high conservation value lands. If
you support moving in this direction then you must show it in the
Regional Growth Strategy as part of the 30-year plan. If you do not
support this change then it becomes a political issue for the next
election because I am convinced that the community of West Vancouver
either already thinks that Whyte Lake and the Nelson Creek watershed
area is a park or that it should be. At the very least the Nelson
Creek/Eagle Creek watershed area including Whyte Lake should be
included in the Special Study area with an underlying designation of
Recreation Conservation.
SUMMARY
I ask that you vote by resolution to reject the RGS on the
basis that the Urban Containment Line and land designations for lands
above the 1200' elevation and the Nelson Creek/Eagle Creek
watersheds are not consistent with the vision of the community.
I ask that you commence a non-binding resolution process under
s.852(8) to determine what would be an appropriate plan in
consultation with the community or ask that the land designations and
Urban Containment Line in the RGS not apply to West Vancouver pursuant
to s.853(2) of the Local Government Act.}
Mayor: thank you. Next, saved by the bell, Liz Byrd
LB: ... go back to discussing the 1200ft level in this room
there was a double lot at the top of the properties; somebody
built a wall slightly over the 1200ft level and it was enough to make
Cclr Wms explode and they had to take the wall down.
says how important the 1200ft level is
Here on behalf of the WRA, mtg on Sat, to tell you we don't
want any devt above the 1200ft level.
beautiful city, dependent on tourism, imp mtns and view are, and
seeing wonderful wilderness attached to a city, this is an enormous
mistake
don't know what you can do to persuade the planners at Metro to
change their minds, but I wish you a lot of luck; we'll do anything to
help you if that's what it takes.
Mayor: we know you will
Question for Mr Sokol. Did you pursue with Metro what if we
reject this?
Sokol: no, I haven't
{!!! er, um... shdn't staff have
prepared info not just about what wd happen if passed but also if
rejected, thus providing more complete information to help Ccl make a
decision??? Even if assuming it wd pass, cd hv anticipated
someone wd ask about ramifications of no, not just
yes...}
that isn't the direction Ccl was, ah; Ccl discussion indicated
receiving the report and the MetroV staff came forth with the
recommendation of accepting, requesting changes, and that's the avenue
I pursued. I have had some v lengthy discussions with MetroV
staff today, as this section 6.12.4 came to light and where they
directed me, was to Section 6.3.4 wch talks about minor amendments to
the RGS, and they referred me to sections C, G, I, and J, particularly
J, wch specifies that all other amendments not identified in the other
sections are minor amendments, wch only require a simple weighted
majority vote, no regional Public Hearing. That is what is being
proposed here, and I do certainly agree with Mr Hundal that Metro
staff cannot guarantee what the process will be, they can only
guarantee that these items will be in front of the Bd and Metro Bd
will consider them, and potentially vote on them, according to a
certain schedule.
Mayor: this is tricky; there are ppl who are suspicious of
MetroV's motives in ways that don't even apply to us, that have to do
with the region as a whole, and so, we try to act in good faith with
our partners, but we ultimately are really only accountable to WV
residents, and getting this right and doing the sophisticated job
we have done in the past few years anyway wrt the mountain.
Cclr Lewis, we'll agree to put the motion on the floor and we'll
see where the debate takes us.
ML: can I modify the motion?
Mayor: certainly
ML: can we do this one at a time?
Mayor: yes, you're the mover
ML: I move that Ccl reject.....
This came up once before. The question is not whether or
not devt above the 1200ft level, the discussion is who decides -- the
citizens of WV decide!
talked about this last time; I was vocal, hv not changed my mind
and do not see assurance forthcoming from MetroV re queries we asked
Mr Sokol to make
re comfort we control our own destiny; I think it absolutely
critical that we do
Sop: don't think we shd put the destiny of our lands in anybody
else's hands but ours. Period.
If we were to reject and then resoln process; ....
want to remove ourselves completely so that it wdn't apply to WV
at all
we then wd not have to concern ourselves with any of the lines;
cd go through our own Study Areas and determine, as we have done in
the past; with our private lands as well
work can be done on our own lands
not a need if we reject this and say to Metro we want opting out,
no need to further consider
if we pass this motion, I don't want to be in that position
beautiful and we've kept green for years, old-growth forest
urban containment, wetlands for our water so ppl stay away
RGS for further up the valley
we have built out, we have one owner and will have devt in
future
do not need Metro to tell us how to develop our lands, so just
opt out.
MS: I must be confused. Maybe Mr Sokol can help me. Is
there any way that anybody outside the Ccl of WV can force us to issue
a bldg permit for anything above the 1200ft line?
Mayor: or anywhere?
Sokol: no; the RGSes as the designation stand now give WV control
as to what happens in the entire area above 1200ft.
MS: having heard that I'd vote against
we live in a region, agriculture, etc ppl need to have jobs; no
one suggesting we have any devt above the 1200ft level, so we want
to be good regional citizens, and I think we need to have enough faith
and reassurance we got from staff that passing the recommended motion
wd place the cmnty in any kind of jeopardy
{it is, however, prudent to
verify some recommendations, esp when complicated and there are other
interpretations, sometimes different or
conflicting}
TP: ask if I'm looking at above the 1200ft line and it goes into
Urban Containment, is there a restriction on how large a park we cd
have in that designation?
Sokol: above 1200ft line now in Strategy it is designated in
the draft strategy as General Urban. The DWV still controls
what the zoning is in that area, can make determinations what happens
in that area: park space, low levels of devt, or urban
devt.
Up to DWV Ccl to make those determinations
TP: I know great cmnty desire for 1200ft to be rigid, but I'm
actually supportive of some kind of possible 1200 variation that is in
the OCP for flexibility, b/c if we think about it if we're hard and
fast on that 1200ft line below, we're dealing with BPP and there is
zoning all the way out to Horseshoe Bay.
{"flexibility" rang alarm bells --
heralds losing it -- so spoke about the probable result at
PQP}
So we have some serious issues in front of us and I want to get
going....
also important to know in the past in the Sp Study Area that
hasn't changed; we've been slow to put
those in a conservation zone. In fact the Envmtal WG
recommended in 2007 we look at that and we haven't done that
having it in Sp Study gets it on the table
the limited use, rec area, doesn't mean that's zoned for Park at
the moment, an that is owned by other ppl than the M
If we were to put that into a rec/cons zoning rather than urban
containment, that wd be the implications be to the landowners
complicated; we don't own it as a cmnty; has to be some sort of
compensation
imp to know we don't own that land; doesn't mean it's zoned to
stay that way
{toe in tent or thin edge of
wedge}
Sokol: correct; what is important to note, devt rights are not a
given from the RGS, devt rights are from the zoning that is applied by
the M. If we were to take land for devt and convert it to a park
there wd be some issues we'd have to address with that prop
owner.
Again, the designations as they stand in the draft RGS give us
the flexibility to determine how those lands develop and give us the
ab to work with the prop owners in those areas to do things like
transfer density or transfer devt to desirable areas in order to
protect other areas.
Ev: two questions
what wd the consequences be if we reject this?
secondly, unclear -- within the RGS, we have two years to put our
plan together; how is that approved or not approved by MetroV?
are they bound to accept our plan?
Sokol: when we complete our Sp Area Plan, wd be submitted to the
Metro Bd as part of our regional context statement. The Regnl
Context Stmt (RCS) gets reviewed by the Bd for general consistency
with the RGS. The normal standard is consistency; it's actually
been reduced to general consistency and then it needs to be approved
by a majority vote, 50% of the other mbr Ms.
Again, even if they don't accept the RCStmt, we still end up with
the designations that are in the plan now, and we still have ultimate
flexibility as to how those lands develop.
Again going back, even tho it says general urban in the RGS, does
not mean we have to devp those lands for urban.
Ev: consequences?
Sokol: not ratifying or not accepting wd mean the entire RGS wd
not get adopted and that wd hv implications throughout the region,
perhaps not so much in WV as in other places where there are some Ms
trying to devp agricultural lands and not necly doing things
consistently with what all the ms wd like throughout the
region.
Mayor: what about the dispute resoln process? If we don't
vote for it, that's it.
Sokol: if we, or any M, do not accept the strategy, the strategy
does not get adopted. It then goes through a dispute resoln
process wch wd take time to resolve through and then the Bd wd hv to
go back, amend the plan, and hv to go through the same 60-day process
of all the Ms' acceptance, v lengthy process.
Sop: fail to see where we'd have any notion to follow this
strategy, Ccl Smith.
under LGA we can reject it; if we reject it, we can say we don't
want anything to do with your plan
To Cclr Panz, it says we won't go above the 1200ft; we have those
powers
A little blip there some years ago that we wd allow a little bit
above for benefit further west
the 2600ha hv bn held tightly by us......
if our desire, why need to go along with a regional strategy that
will face other Ms
?already built out....
are we going to obligate to go above..... urban destination {think he means
designation}? No.
Are we going to protect our lands? Yes, we are.
Why be part of a plan that calls for something different?
basic common sense
if we have to go resoln then do that.
Mr McRadu, does that make any sense to you?
why came forth to WV? wdn't be able to increase/extend Sp
Area?
the underlay is the issue; got to solve that
not going to sell out the land above to someone else.
Period.
SW: one question, need defined; all so confusing
ultimately do we have final control of our lands if we
agree?
who had control?
Sokol: with the designations shown in the draft RGS, we have the
ultimate control as to what gets developed in our Upper Lands.
If, conversely, all was cons/rec, and we wanted to take advantage
of our 1200ft variation, we wd not have control, we wd hv to go to the
Region to get that option of implementing that component of our
OCP.
as I said, give us control to determine the future of our Upper
Lands
TP: to respond to Cclr Sop, paramount for me that we do the best
job in those UL and that's why we have a Parks WG, and looking at an
UL Study.
those are important pieces......
we follow on Cclr Sm, we are part of a larger region and we can't
forget that.
a lot of what happens outside of WV does impact the whole lower
Mainland
I think we need to consider that
to contain urban devt is imp
look at how those UCBs hv worked around City of Toronto, hv bn
successful
do need to have a conversation about the UL, this is an opp
I'm supporting the RGS b/c we do need a bit of flexibility in
that 1200ft line, in order to do the best job for the mtnside in the
future
{another
toe?}
Ev: can agree with some of the points Cclr Sop has covered
Equally imp is to app the process, have to understand
re consequences re rejecting, I interpret Mr Sokol that Metro wd
come back a second time, have to go through a second time, and if that
failed, reading between the lines, wd come back a third time until we
get it right.
Mayor: think about this; think we're actually all agreeing; all
saying we'll step up to do the right thing based on our OCP and
BSC
after Parks WG finished, we turn to above the 1200ft
we know we have sophisticated process and an ethic; willing to
make pragmatic changes with private landowners who are also willing to
work with us to be flexible
{thin edge now a bit
thicker}
think the RGS is a bit of a blunt instrument
Bd of Directors recognizes WV wants to do a better job re context
stmt
shd be aware there are agendas out there just to sink the
RGS
we might not get what we think we're going to get by rejecting
this
wd like to ask Mr Sokol, you've been speaking to the Sr Planner
at Metro, if you feel she will be able to expedite these amendments
b/c I will obviously shepherd this through the Bd of Dir and they
completely support WV's approach so far, and they don't look-- they
look to us as a cmnty that never changes.
They're not thinking this is where growth is going to
happen.
Sokol: I have a commitment from Metro staff that they will do
it,
{on agenda not enough;
aren't MetroV decision made by the politicians on the Bd, not by
staff?}
it is obvious something that to guarantee it..... I think
there wd need to be pressure from our elected officials and our CAO to
Sr Metro staff to ensure it moves forward
Rmd is going through a similar two-step process of accepting the
plan and requesting Metro make some amendments after that.
They'll also be asking move expeditiously through this process.
There may be a few others
perhaps critical Rmd to consider these add'l amendments.
Mayor: vote to reject? opposed?
[FAILS with ML and Sop in favour]
vote as written?
1. Council accept the new MetroV RGS entitled Metro
Vancouver 2040 - Shaping our Future (Regional Growth Strategy Bylaw
No. 1136, 2010);
Sop: polled vote
[DONE with ML and Sop opposed to acceptance]
ML: move
2. Council request that the Metro Board amend the strategy to
expand the Conservation recreation designation to ensure that the
entire Old Growth Conservancy be designated as
conservation/recreation; and
3. Council request that the special study area be expanded to
include all lands above the 1200-foot contour line designated as
general urban.
Mayor: that reflects what's in our BSC
[BOTH CARRIED]
tyvm
The fourth one, oh yes, thank you, Mr Sokol, is the next
immediate steps to get agreement we want from Metro. Wd
you like to read it?
Sokol: Ccl request that the MetroV Bd consider the above asap
after adoption of the RGS and ideally according to the following
schedule:
- Strategy adoption by Bd Apr 29
- amendments to Regional Planning Cmte May 20
- MetroV Bd prepare bylaw for amendments May 27
- MetroV consider and ratify add'l amendments by July
29
ML: clarification -- at the beginning is asking if they wd do
it; can we be more definitive around our expectations?
Maybe: require?
ML: yes
Mayor: sure, that's good
Sop: what do you think they're going to tell us? about our
lands?
that we haven't done already?
I find this an incredible way to go, when we know what we've been
doing all long
we have the right to give a Devt Permit, know the private
landowner has a certain amt of work to do in future as we do....
why asking a body of bureaucrat how we can run and do on our own
lands
can you answer Cclr Sm?
Mayor: why not?
MS: everybody in this room buys groceries, located on industrial
land
city has to ave a variety of uses
agric, urban, cons, regional planning body
just b/c agreeing to a strategy doesn't mean we're surrendering
our right to deal with our land in our own M
it's scare tactics by some
Mayor: I'll tell you what will happen
first, it's good that we've pointed out our commitment to the
OGC.....
second, we're saying, and we're fortunate, we're going to take
two years and our regional context stmt is going to be exactly
expressing the values expressed tonight, and here's what it looks like
and we're not accepting generalities
not ev cmnty is choosing to take another two yrs
already in our workplan...
this gives us more focus and I'll report back after the next bd
mtg
word changed to 'require'
[MOTION CARRIES]
13. Fire Services Review (File: 2700-00)
RECOMMENDED: THAT
1. The "Report on North Shore Fire/Rescue Service
Cooperation" by Dugal Smith and Associates dated October 2010 be
received; and
2. Ccl direct Staff to report back by no later than July
30 wrt the recommendations.
{what about the public?}
Chief Cook: all agree essential to seek opps deliver services
residents need, at lowest cost; balance risks..... not looking at
amalgamation... Terms of Ref
{see the press release:
... The Chief
notes that recommendations will be thoroughly discussed with members
and the union prior to implementation.
... The
review recognizes that a great deal of cooperation among north shore
fire departments already exists, and seeks to build on that success by
formalizing it.
... Collective
savings for the three departments are estimated to be achievable in
the amount of $513,000....
The three municipalities should continue to align bylaws,
policies, and programs
Trucks should be dispatched on a "closest truck goes"
basis
Each department should provide agreed-upon specialty services
on a north-shore-wide basis
Large trucks such as aerial vehicles should be managed on a
north-shore-wide basis
Education and prevention services should be consolidated over
time to be north-shore-wide
entire:
http://www.westvancouver.ca/Residents/Level3.aspx?id=33024 }
Already high degree of cooperation; will bring back a report in
July
Ev: Commend for work for integrating some of the benefits and
working together
one question, a study item: if minor health issue, both ambulance
and Fire attend medical calls wch are 50% and -- find unbelievable --
these calls make it difficult to keep to training schedules and other
essential services.
can you give me some idea?
Chief: training is paramount to ev dept and takes signif amt of
time and resources for ppl to get what they need. Interruptions,
and as you say, over 50% medical calls. Hv to take a crew out
for training.
The report says consider making training priority over minor
medical calls.
TP: other Fire Depts doing this kind of work?
Chief: we're doing more than others in this region. Some on
Island, nbr cmnties volunteer
CAO to look further. All three Ms said go away and be
cooperative.
as a large grp more effective than three small
Mayor: motion on floor?
Sop: move received and report back no later than July 30
MS: I'm a little disappointed; read from Mr McRadu's report.
$513K split between three Ms so less thn 1% and spread over some
years.
moving to higher levels of co-op essential
no one is leading for co-op change; no clear champion for
increased co-operation.
chestnut we've been chasing for five years
receiving a report and another end of July.
Politicians and bureaucrats lagging behind
Firemen tell me, put three together, same number as Bby
right now we have three chiefs and three complete
bureaucracies
CNV has chief and bureaucracy for one Hall.
City of Vancouver as if 20 Fire Chiefs, one for Pt Grey
etc.
Not in best interest of taxpayers
Central command.... same training dept
Need to take decisive action; election coming up in Nov;
ourselves vote for it, challenge NV, put it as a referendum question
on the ballot: Do you favour an integrated Fire and Rescue service
across he NSh, with undoubted better service levels and signif cost
savings?
let the voters have their say b/c it's the only way it's going to
happen
this makes no sense
can't argue that anyone wd lose autonomy. Each M can decide
how many halls, trucks, etc
but the point is that the efficiencies wd be undoubted from
having one org; think we shd do it
if I have to serve notice of motion then that's fine
put on the ballot and say to NV; voter shd have a say; has
to be addressed
even the firefighters realize cuts are coming and no bottomless
pit of money
best efficiencies is one central bureaucracy
Sop: what do you put first -- efficiency or safety?
no guarantees combine going to be safety
let Chief and others have a good look at it and report back
daresay you won't find as many efficiencies as you think you're
going to find
you're advocating amalgamation? of everything? ...
get there quickly, want that
SW: in response to Cclr Smith's, was going to say diatribe, but
not uh Chief, the Chief in CNV asked specifically not to consider
amalgamation or consolidation wrt this study?
too broad of a question at this time?
did you try to put it on the table?
Chief: it was initially put on the table and I won't answer for
CNV why opposed; removed from report
CAO: there needs to be the three incorporated M on the NSh
wanted to report steps
the three CAOs are taking this report, want to see demonstrated
efficiencies
three political units -- if Ccl wants to discuss with two other
Ms, then they shd
at this point we hv achieved a great deal...
we were afraid if went too far, wdn't get anywhere
we will be able to demonstrate greater shared services
ML: Cclr Smith is absolutely correct; efficiencies and
effectiveness from amalgamation evident; CAO's advice is sound
we shd pursue that at a political level with CNV/DNV
going to have to be forced even for fundamental analysis
MS: philosophically I can agree
I sat through a horrific experience of the MetroV Labour Bd
Thursday morning. We thought we were going to hear--
Mayor: --not sure if that was in camera--
MS: I'm not talking about what happened
you know, I think I can at least say that what we were
expecting to happen did not happen b/c the politicians and the
bureaucrats circle the wagons and block any kind of sensible
change.
Clearly happens in ev case.
We can sit down with CNV and DNV and we can maybe get a fair
hearing with the District, but does anyone think anything is going to
happen with the City?
NOT
need to take it out of politicians' hands and go to the
voters.
the facts are clear -- save a lot of money and hv a better Fire
and Rescue Service, all trained the same way, all with common
equipment,
as obvious as the nose on your face.....
think voters will
never going to happen unless pushed by the others
sat here for five yrs chairing? this around and even the
firefighters are ready for change
let's start a diff approach
Mayor: I think some firefighters are ready for change, I can
think of some that are not
some already railing against one prevention ofc wch makes eminent
sense and cd probably execute quickly
difficult to generalize
from my POV we hv gotten somewhere; ameliorate some.....
Cclr Smith you have led on this and been clear but not sure we
shd not pass this
[else] much more work in cmnty [first] xxx... obvious to some; be
aware of dislocation...
feedback keep going; not dramatic change; maybe just disagreeing
on approach
MS: so everybody's clear; you're approving a report that says
$513K savings achievement in CAO's report attached says a long-term
possibility -- how can you approve a report with that kind of
stmt?
Mayor: receiving and asking come back in July
major cultural shift we're trying to initiate.
Ev: maybe I cd suggest between now speak to our cclrs in the
District; maybe there is sentiment a Cclr Sm
Mayor: nothing precludes you coming forward with your own.
PASSED
14. 21st Street Traffic Calming Project and Gordon Avenue
Parking Area (File: 1785-00)
RECOMMENDED:
THAT Council include the conversion of the gravel parking
area on Gordon Avenue to permeable paving stones in the 2011 budget
for the 21st Street Traffic Calming Project.
P Stott from the strata ccl: authorized to express deep
appreciation; hope solution before you will be approved.
Thankful to Dir/Engg, Mr Fung and his staff, for their patience....
for his cooperation in finding a creative soln wch we hope will be
implemented before long.
Mayor: thank you and thank you for bringing forward the concerns
of your nbrs.
MS moved motion gravel to permeable.
Ev: this motion simply for that area outside tennis courts or
Arena as well?
RF: budget only for area in front of tennis courts
PASSED
15. Zoning Bylaw No. 4662, 2010, Amendment Bylaw No. 4672,
2011 (Non-Owner Occupied Secondary Suites)
(File: 1610-20-4672)
This bylaw received first reading at the Feb 7 Ccl Mtg and was
the subject of a PH closed on Feb 21. Council is not permitted to
receive any further submissions on this bylaw.
TS moved: be read a second time.
MS: presentation from ADRA Prez that made a lot of sense to
me.
originally was to allow a homeowner to live in house and if no
longer needed entire area he cd hv a sec ste.
Couples or sgls to hold on to their principal residence
Big step to go from that to changing the nature of the
nbrhd.
If living in Upper Dund where I live and the house beside me came
on the market and somebody bought it and, reconfigured the house into
two suites, rented both out, then the homeowner on the other side of
me said, well, that looks like a good biz opp and I'm going to do the
same, and sold it....
suddenly I'm living in a diff nbrhd
I feel wdn't like that to happen to my house; have to have
respect for others who might feel the same way, so I'm a supporter of
sec stes for ppl who live in the home, who stay, but having a
non-owner occupied ste is not the way to go and it's going to change
the nbrhd, and not in keeping the reason we started down the path for
sec stes in the first place
SW: an interesting point, has some merit, but when you go to that
next level and someone else brought up the point last week, are we
going to start licensing sgl-fam homes that are being rented out, b/c
there are numerous sgl-fam homes in our nbrhds that are being rented
out
sometimes owned by the ppl down the street and sometimes across
town
a fine line
if problems, met through the good nbr bylaw
hope nbrs will come forward and we can deal with it that
way
Ev: will speak in favour; we don't exercise control over sgl-fam
houses
can exercise more control by the bylaw; we can close the sec stes
down
easier to exercise control than over a sgl-fam house
ML: Mr Sokol, what other fees and charges?
basically this has evolved into a biz: I buy a house and rent
out stes
is there a reqmt to have a biz licence?
Sokol: need to register the stes; in this instance $450 a
year
ML: that's it? no other approp charge
they're running a biz -- shd they have a biz
licence?
Sokol: run into shd they also have a licence if renting out their
home
that's an item Ccl cd discuss and debate sep from this
issue
Sop: if we allow a house to be rented, we're not altering the
nature of the nbrhd
or the character of the nbrhd as a sgl-fam home
With sec ste looked at a way [for families, indiv upstairs
downstairs like a duplex], rent downstairs like duplex, now saying
owner doesn't have to live there, so that completely changes the
scenario that we originally stated and my good friend Cclr Smith
alluded to that
what happens in relnship, we have allowed home-based biz and not
had a problem
know there are many sec stes who have not come forward
ease, didn't require major construction .... like sep
doorways/entrances, etc., kid gloves....
now from one indiv who found herself in a jam
when the 6000 out there we don't know about -- down the road,
some years, will change the sgl-fam home into a duplex and I'm not
supporting the project, period.
Mayor: I'm going to support sec stes b/c I didn't support them to
force ppl out
We have long-term residents who have been living in a home that
has a sec ste, and now, we've said, fine, take formal responsibility,
let us know who you are, and let us know how to ensure the quality of
life in your nbrhd; and I don't like the suggestion that there's
something less good about ppl who are renting.
I don't usually talk about my personal life but we rented a
little tiny house in WV with little kids and sometimes the owner's
son, a student, was in the basement, and they lived across the street,
so I guess that wd be not allowed to some mbrs of this Ccl.
The criteria for being able to rent the house was that you had to
be involved in Student Ccl at West Van High. That was actually
the application.
That's the kind of attention we're trying to reinforce and
support in the cmnty.
and I think we're coming together on this, that this bylaw
anticipates.
Ppl deserve to be treated with respect and if we set the bar at
that level, we'll get that.
so I'm going to support this -- we didn't anticipate it but we're
open-minded
{sorry, I don't see that respect comes into this at all; no mention;
just assumed...}
and we're trying to improve the housing stock and the quality of
accountability in the cmnty
Sop: b/c one votes against this, it doesn't mean that we do not
support those ppl in the cmnty.
I think that's uncalled for, that b/c we go against something
that we're not supporting ppl.
We all did that, supporting sec stes
Mayor: support some but not others and that's fair but I'm
concerned about the ones it doesn't support
was MOVED:
THAT "Zoning Bylaw No. 4662,
2010, Amendment Bylaw No. 4672, 2011" be read a third time.
[BOTH READINGS PASSED]
16. Fees and Charges Bylaw No. 4414, 2005, Amendment Bylaw
No. 4673, 2011 (File: 1610-20-4673)
This bylaw received first reading at the February 7, 2011
Council Meeting.
RECOMMENDED: read a second and third time.
[PASSED]
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
17. Consent Agenda Items
17.1. Design Review Committee 2011 - Remaining
Appointments (File: 0116-20-DRC)
RECOMMENDED: THAT
Ccl adopt the revised Terms of Reference for the Design
Review Cmte as attached to the Feb 27 report from the Dir/Planning
entitled, "Design Review Committee 2011 - Remaining Appointments;"
and Council appoint Barbara Pettit and Cedric Burgers to the
Design Review Committee for the term ending January 31,
2012.
17.2. Development Application Status Report (to February
25, 2011) (File: 1010-01)
17.3. Correspondence List (see link on electronic agenda) --
received for information
February 14 - 18, 2011
Referred for Action
1. M. Shulz, February 5, 2011, re
Westerly Traffic Bridge over Marine Drive at Park
Royal
(Referred to
Director of Engineering and Transportation for consideration and
response)
2. C. S. Ekdahl, February 7, 2011,
regarding Day of the Honey Bee 2011
(Referred to
Municipal Clerk for response)
3. R. Helten, CityHallWatch, Feb 16, re
Request to Speak as a Delegation to Ccl Mtg, Feb 21, on
RGS
(Referred to
Municipal Clerk for response)
Received for Information
4. R. Helten, CityHallWatch, Feb 11, re Staff
Misinformation before Jan 14 Board Vote on MetroV RGS
5. M. Hynes, Multifaith Action Society, Feb
15, re Multifaith Event Invitation, Feb 22
6. M. Booth, Chair, WV Board of Education,
February 11, 2011, regarding Fraser Mustard Poster
7. D. Laglagaron, Acting Chief
Administrative Officer, Metro Vancouver, February 16, 2011, regarding
Response to recent concerns regarding the Metro Vancouver Regional
Growth Strategy
February 21 - 25, 2011
Referred for Action
1. B. and H. Thomson, February 4, re
Elliott Commons Proposed Devt, 370 Mathers
Ave
(Referred to
Director of Planning, Lands and Permits for consideration and
response)
2. S. Woods, Canadian Cancer Society,
British Columbia & Yukon, February 15, 2011, regarding Request for
Proclamation of Daffodil Day and Daffodil Month
(Referred to
Municipal Clerk for response)
3. K. Blane, February 11, 2011,
regarding Evelyn Drive Development
(Referred to
Director of Planning, Lands and Permits for consideration and
response)
4. C. Gooch, Rabbit Advocacy Group of BC,
Feb 11, re Pet Habitat brings in more rabbits
(Referred to
Director of Planning, Lands and Permits for consideration and
response)
Received for Information
5. Committee and Board Meeting
Minutes:
-
Community Grants Committee - January 14, 2011
- West
Vancouver Memorial Library Board - January 19, 2011
- Board of
Variance - January 19, 2011
6. Heart & Stroke Foundation of BC &
Yukon and The Lung Association of BC, Jan 20, regarding Smoke-Free
Outdoor Public Places
7. R. Wyckham, February 15, 2011,
regarding Ambleside Revitalization
8. R. Helten, CityHallWatch, Feb 21, re WV
Ccl, for 21-Feb-2011 (Regional Growth Strategy)
9. S. Hynes, Hynes Developments Inc.,
February 21, 2011, regarding Elliot Commons
{Method of Uplift Calculation shd be reviewed; in past they've
given an unbelievable zero}
10. R. Bayley, The Challenge Series, February 24,
2011, regarding Olympic Village One Year Anniversary: Challenge Series
2011
11. S. Gauthier, Govt Finance Officers Assn, Dec
30, 2010, regarding Canadian Award for Financial
Reporting
12. A. Marzara, Urban Devt Institute, February
21, 2011, re Urban Devt
(Attachments available for viewing in Legislative Services
Department)
Responses to Correspondence
13. A. Banks, Sr Mgr of Parks, Feb 21,
response to P. Scholefield re Tennis Practice Wall at Ambleside
Park
18. OTHER ITEMS -- None
19. REPORTS from MAYOR/CCLRS
MS: Focus Groups for the Youth Services Review started last week;
the first one at Gleneagles; going on this week, under the capable
leadership of Leanne Sexsmith and Director Anne Mooi and hope to have
some recommendations for Ccl by the end of April.
20. PUBLIC QUESTIONS/COMMENTS
CR: tyvm
three questions/comments here
one, of course, have to thank [you] for some support for
Heritage Week, and I love that 100 Years 100 Seconds [video] of WV;
it's just fantastic; it's heritage.
The first question I have is about [a recommended] motion [in
Item] 11 on the Ccl Agenda tonight, it says it "is recommended
that it has been considered" wch isn't, uh, can't
understand the English.
Are you [staff] recommending that it be
considered in conjunction?
or
are you asking [is staff recommending] that it will have
been considered in conjunction?
so I'd like an answer to that.
The second thing I was thinking about, some years ago when I
was president of ADRA, we sent out a questionnaire. It was
almost unanimous from the several hundred answers we got, not to touch
the 1200ft level, so I thought I'd tell you -- I know you know
that.
The NV height is 1000ft, so we're already 200 ft more
Mayor: in Seymour, it's 400
Sop: yup
{did some subsequent research on
this and they are referring to the limit being lower in the Seymour
area -- probably near Dam b/c of water supply.}
CR: we're quite up there anyway, but the, uh, when I heard the
word 'flexibility', I got nervous b/c we already know that British
Pacific Properties wants to swap some land above the 1200ft level and
give us some land below the 1200ft level that's steep and can't be
built on.... so when I heard the word 'flexibility' I got a little
nervous and a little more nervous when this [item] was over an
executive from BPP left so that's obviously what he was interested in
and here for.
The next thing I have a question about is that at the last ccl
mtg, Cclr Lewis -- and Cclr Lewis asked me to ask this tonight b/c he
didn't have his laptop in front of him to answer it -- when it came to
Approval of the Agenda, it [he] said "as written", and I had
picked up an agenda as I walked in, I had an agenda from the District
[web]site, and there were three, instead of amending the agenda, it
just said as written, and then there were three things that were
added. Today I looked at that and thought this is v strange.
The agenda was not amended and they're there, doesn't say who moved or
seconded. Then I went back and looked at the [Feb] 21st agenda
in the first place. Lo and behold, it was different from what
was put on the District's website on the Friday [Feb 18th]. It
had those three things that were added to the agenda.
Now this is extremely misleading. I have no
problem if you update an agenda and you say you added this to the
agenda, and you've got the date and all this, but have the agenda
there for Feb 21st implying that it's already been amended and it was
on the agenda when it wasn't, I find rather misleading. I'm sure
there's a way around it but, and I find it misleading to have an
amended agenda when it was not formally amended at the mtg.
You don't have to answer now. I just need to understand it cuz
it's v confusing, misleading.
Mayor: okay; I think I know what you're talking about.
I'm not sure what the three items are so it wd be helpful if you
cd give us the--
CR: I think one was Correspondence and something else, and the
other was 12.1, wch is strange b/c item 12 is Wetmore and 12.1 was
about the Library, so they weren't related, and if you're going put
them {NO, I mean it, just 12.1}
there, it wd hv made more sense in Other Items, wch is where I thought
you wd put it if you do that.
The thing is that the three items were not moved with the
Approval of the Agenda to be amended.
---
Mayor: and so, if you cd give me what the three items are, and
then we'll get back to you at the next ccl mtg.
CR: I've sent it to--
Mayor: okay, then I can get it from Ms Scholes, is that what
you're saying?
CR: right
Mayor: okay, good; tyvm
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
AGREED
-- CLARIFICATION
NEEDED
without know exactly the points being
made this is hard to follow and I get some pronouns mixed up, so wd be
helpful to give you a timeline.
a) The Feb 18th ccl mtg agenda goes up
on the DWV website and I put it in my newsletter (WVM4) that goes out
a few days later and is the same as the one for residents to pick up
as they enter the Chamber for the mtg Feb 21.
b) At "Approval of Agenda"
Cclr Lewis moves the Agenda be approved "as written",
seconded by Cclr Sop, and it passes.
c) Later in the mtg, after Item
12, on Wetmore, the Mayor suddenly announces Item 12.1 -- NOT on the
agenda and as pointed out above, the agenda was not amended, Cclr
Lewis simply said "as written". You can check and hear
that on the video of the ccl mtg on the District website.
d) When finalizing my transcript for
the next newsletter (WVM5), I looked at the Feb 21st ccl mtg minutes
on the Mar 7 ccl mtg agenda. To my amazement, under Approval of
Agenda, it has amendments and they weren't made. I then went to
the DWV website to see the Feb 21st Agenda -- but it wasn't the same
one that was there Feb 18th or in the lobby! Those same
amendments appear in the agenda so were added (but not noted as such)
to the Feb 21st minutes, ie revised after the fact and the revision is
something that was not said or moved.....
Has the website or Ccl gone into a
time machine?
It's totally confusing, and as I said,
misleading and misrepresents what happened.
Here are the
facts/details:
A
The agenda put up Feb 18th and in the
lobby Feb 21st (the original Feb 21st agenda):
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA
4. RECONVENE OPEN SESSION
5. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
6. ADOPTION OF MINUTES -- February 7, 2011
Regular Council Meeting.
Pls note there is nothing about any
amendments. Of course they are made at the actual mtg IF there
are any.
B/C
The minutes of the Feb 21st Ccl mtg
have, instead of moved as written, these amendments yet, if you
listen, and you can click next to Item 5 (the Q sign saying 'real
player') and you'll hear Cclr Lewis only say "move as written"
BUT it lists amendments!:
REGULAR COUNCIL
MINUTES
MUNICIPAL HALL
COUNCIL CHAMBER
MONDAY, FEBRUARY
21, 2011
...
APPROVAL OF
AGENDA
5. Approval of
February 21, 2011 Regular Council Meeting Agenda
MOVED by
Lewis, Seconded by Soprovich:
THAT
the February 21, 2011 Regular Council meeting agenda be amended
by:
*
adding to Item 8, a written submission dated February 18,
2011;
*
adding new Item 12.1 regarding Chief Administrative Officer's
Report
regarding West Vancouver Memorial
Library;
*
adding items 15.1 and 15.2 regarding correspondence to the Other Items
section;
AND THAT the
agenda be approved as amended.
CARRIED
---
BUT that didn't happen! that
wasn't said! Cclr Lewis only said "as written"! so why
is it in the minutes, and then since the agenda wasn't amended and
that wasn't said, why did Ccl approve the
minutes???
D
So, after seeing the minutes were not
what had happened, I went back to look at what was on the DWV website
for the Feb 21st Agenda
February 21,
2011 COUNCIL AGENDA
...
(At 7:00 pm the
Public Hearing regarding Zoning Bylaw No. 4662, 2010, Amendment Bylaw
No. 4672, 2011 will be held. The open session of the Council Meeting
will be reconvened immediately following the Public
Hearing.)
Following
conclusion of the Public Hearing, the following items will be
considered:
RECONVENE OPEN
SESSION
4. The open
session of the February 21, 2011 regular Council Meeting will be
reconvened.
APPROVAL OF
AGENDA
5. Approval
of February 21, 2011 Regular Council Meeting Agenda
RECOMMENDED:
THAT the February 21, 2011 Regular Council meeting agenda be amended
by:
*
adding to Item 8, a written submission dated February 18,
2011;
*
adding new Item 12.1 regarding Chief Administrative Officer's
Report
regarding West Vancouver Memorial
Library;
*
adding items 15.1 and 15.2 regarding correspondence to the Other Items
section;
AND THAT the
agenda be approved as amended.
ADOPTION OF
MINUTES
6. Adoption of
February 7, 2011 Regular Council Meeting Minutes
---
AMAZING! the Feb 21 agenda has
had those amendments added. Kind is updated rather than
doctored, but why has the agenda and these amendments added
retroactively?
THE ISSUE
The minutes are a legal
document.
At the very least, how can
amendments that were not made be listed as
amendments?
Changing the original agenda and
the one handed out at the ccl mtg is misleading.
These procedures must be
clarified and followed.
IN ADDITION
Although it says added to "Other
Items", if you check the video and the transcript, when it comes
to Other Items, listed on the agenda, the Mayor says
"none".
Residents ought to be able to depend on ccl mtg minutes as a true
record of what transpired. It's a matter of trust.
=== Ccl Mtg AGENDA March
21st ===
6pm in conference room; 7pm in ccl
chamber
Note: At 6pm the regular Cci Mtg will
commence in open session, followed by a closed session. At 7pm the
open session will reconvene for the scheduled agenda
items.
6:00 PM
1. Call to Order.
2. EXCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC
RECOMMENDED: THAT in the public interest, members
of the public be excluded from part of the March 21 regular Council
Meeting on the basis of matters to be considered under the following
section of the Community Charter:
90. (1) A part of a council meeting may be closed
to the public if the subject matter being considered relates to or is
one or more of the following:
a) personal information about an identifiable
individual who holds or is being considered for a position as an
officer, employee or agent of the municipality or another position
appointed by the municipality; and
e) the acquisition, disposition or expropriation
of land or improvements, if the council considers that disclosure
could reasonably be expected to harm the interests of the
municipality.
3. ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION
7:00 PM -- Following
conclusion of the closed session:
4. RECONVENE OPEN SESSION
5. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
6. ADOPTION OF MINUTES
RECOMMENDED: be adopted as
circulated: March 7, 2011 Regular Council Meeting.
REPORTS
7. Official Community Plan Amendment, Rezoning and
Development Permit Application 1010-20-11-005 for the 900 Block of
21st Street (Kiwanis Seniors' Housing Society of West
Vancouver) (File: 1010-20-11-005)
RECOMMENDED: THAT
1. Staff consult with the cmnty on the devt
proposal
2. Cmnty consultation take the form of a public mtg
with direct notification to the properties shown on the map attached
as Appendix "B" to the staff report dated March 10, 2011, with a
notice of the public mtg in the local newspapers and posted on the
District website, and preliminary review by the Design Review
Committee; and
3. Following the cmnty consultation on the devt
proposal, staff report back to Ccl with a report summarizing the
findings and the suitability of the devt proposal for further
consideration.
8. Staff Comments on District of North Vancouver's Draft
Official Community Plan (File: 0190-07)
RECOMMENDED: THAT
1. DNV) be commended for its efforts to develop a
new OCP as an Integrated Sustainable Community Plan, and thanked for
the opportunity to provide input on the Draft OCP; and
2. The comments outlined in this staff report be
submitted to the DNV for consideration during its community and
stakeholder consultation process.
9. North Shore Advisory Committee on Disability Issues
Review of 2010 Committee Work and 2011 Work Plan and Budget
(File: 0180-18-06)
RECOMMENDED: THAT
1. The NSh Adv Cmte on Disability Issues 2011 Work
Plan be approved; and
2. The budget request for a one third share ($4467)
of the total budget ($13,400) be approved utilizing existing funds
within the Grants in Aid budget.
10. District Presentations to North American
Conferences (File: 0145-01)
RECOMMENDED: THAT Council approve the [Mayor's] presenting at the
International City and County [Managers'] Association and Alliance for
Innovation Conference entitled: Making Magic - How BOLD Can
Government Be? Case Study: Taking Collaboration to New Levels - A
Paradigm Shift in Community Oversight and [Decision-Making] (West
Vancouver Community Centre Board) AND at The Sixth United [Nations']
Global Forum on Human Settlements whose theme is Building Low-Carbon
Cities: A Response to Climate Change (Eagle Island) at a cost of
$4000.00 to be charged to Business Unit #154, Engagement.
BYLAWS
11. Zoning Bylaw No. 4662, 2010, Amendment Bylaw No. 4672,
2011 (Non-Owner Occupied Secondary Suites)
(File: 1610-20-4672)
This bylaw received first reading Feb 7, was the subject of a
Public Hearing that was held and closed on Feb 21, and received second
and third readings at the Mar 7, Ccl Mtg. Council is not permitted to
receive any further submissions on this bylaw after the PH has closed
and before the bylaw is adopted.
RECOMMENDED: be
adopted.
12. Fees and Charges Bylaw No. 4414, 2005, Amendment Bylaw
No. 4673, 2011 (File: 1610-20-4673)
This bylaw received first reading Feb 7 and received second
and third readings at the Mar 7
RECOMMENDED: be adopted.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
13. Consent Agenda Items
13.1. Appointments to Ambleside Revitalization Commission
(File: 0115-20-ARC1)
RECOMMENDED: THAT the following appointments to
the Ambleside Revitalization Commission for a [one-year]
term be approved:
David Chard, Kirsty Farquharson, Joe Houssian, David Negrin,
Howard Nemtin, Mayor, Cclr Smith.
{hm, sans Ccl, four
devpr/real estate types -- one famous for TUB -- and a mbr of the
Library Board who denied the now-proven claims about expenditures?
Of course we need devprs on the Commission, no problem, but why no
resident or ratepayer voice?
DC = Chard Devts
(Hollyburn Medical, etc); KF = Lib Bd; JH = was Intrawest; DN =
Concord and/or Aquilini?; HN = real estate devpr,
TransLink}
What does this say about consulting
or listening to the residents and fiscal
prudence?}
13.2. Gleneagles Community Centre - Physiotherapy
Lease (File: 1145-02-GLENPHYS)
RECOMMENDED: THAT the report dated Feb 25 from the Land and
Property Agent and Community Recreation Manager be received for
information.
13.3. Beach House Restaurant - Modification Agreement and
Option to Renew (File: 1145-02-BEACH)
RECOMMENDED: THAT the report dated Feb 25 from the Land and
Property Agent be received for information.
13.4. North Shore Emergency Management Office (NSEMO)
Report regarding Summary of New Zealand Tsunami Exercise and
Christchurch Earthquake (File: 0180-16)
RECOMMENDED: THAT the report dated Feb 18 be received for
information.
13.5. Correspondence List (see link
on electronic agenda)
RECOMMENDED: THAT the correspondence list be received for
information
February 28 - March 4, 2011
Received for Information
(1) City of Burnaby, February 17, 2011, regarding British
Columbia's Heritage Program
{hope this
wakes DWV up; they have no heritage WG/Cmte and no Ccl liaison for
heritage -- the first time since 1988. Sad. Esp when
coming up to 100th anniversary.}
(2) City of Burnaby, February 22, 2011, regarding Correspondence
from Mr. Porter - Banning Smoking at Malls
(3) M. Enser, Urban Development Institute, Feb 25, re MetroV's
RGS
(Attachments available for viewing in Legislative Services
Department)
(4) Union of BC Municipalities, March 2, regarding Provincial
Mobilization Plan for Emergency Services
Responses to Correspondence
(5) R. Fung, Director of Engineering and Transportation, March 1,
2011, response to M. and R. Shulz regarding Proposed Park Royal
At-Grade Intersection with Marine Drive
March 7-11, 2011
Referred for Action
(1) D. Close, March 2, 2011, regarding Savings to Consider for
2011
(Referred to Municipal Clerk for response)
(2) B. McArthur, March 2, 2011, regarding Regional Growth
Strategy Interpretation Requested
(Referred to Director of Planning, Lands and Permits for
consideration and response)
Received for Information
(3) Committee and Board Meeting Minutes: Design Review Committee,
January 20, 2011
(4) M. Bottazzini, February 14, 2011, regarding Cascadia Tower
Proposed Monopine / Highway 1 and 15th Street, West Vancouver
(5) G. and E. Lee, February 26, 2011, regarding Foot of 27th
Street
(6) Three Submissions re Pacific Arbour Devt Proposal, dated
February 28 to March 3, 2011
(7) BC Hydro, March 2, 2011, regarding Earth Hour 2011, March 26,
2011
(8) D. Mussatto, Chair, Metro Vancouver Port Cities Committee,
March 2, 2011, regarding 2011 Municipal Appointment to Vancouver
Fraser Port Authority Board of Directors
(9) City of North Vancouver, March 3, 2011, regarding North Shore
Cycling Map
(10) BC Government and Service Employees' Union, March 4, 2011,
regarding Community Social Services Awareness Month
(11) R. Helten, MetroVanWatch.ca, March 6, 2011, regarding
Recommended Changes in Text Regarding Agenda Item for March 7 Council
Meeting Agenda #12. Report on MetroV RGS
(12) P. Hundal, March 7, 2011, regarding Regional Growth
Strategy
(13) Union of British Columbia Municipalities, March 9, 2011,
regarding National Public Works Week and Local Government Awareness
Week: May 15 - May 21, 2011
(14) Union of British Columbia Municipalities, March 10, 2011,
regarding Consideration of a Two-Phase Campfire Prohibition
(15) L. Byrd, March 10, 2011, regarding Safeway Site/Ambleside
Village
(16) G. Pajari, March 4, 2011, regarding Letter to Mayor and
Council, 24 January 2011 "Summary of Findings for Council regarding
Library Expenditures" from West Vancouver Memorial Library and West
Vancouver Memorial Library Foundation (Addition: March 14,
2011)
Update to March 15, 2011
Referred for Action
(1) E-Comm 911, March 8, 2011, regarding E-Comm Board of
Directors Designate - 2011/2012 Year
(Referred to Mayor and Council for consideration and
response)
(2) C. Reynolds, West Van Matters, March 11, 2011, regarding
Agenda and Minutes PQP Feb 21st
(Referred to Mayor and Council for consideration and
response)
{This is the
strange/misleading case of Ccl approving an agenda 'as written' and
then not only do the minutes list amendments made, but also the
original agenda put up Feb 18 retroactively changed with amendments
added to it!}
Received for Information
(3) 11 Submissions and one Petition regarding Safeway Site, dated
February 9 to March 15, 2011
(4) Premier G. Campbell, February 24, 2011, regarding Support
for Designating British Columbia's Wild Pacific Salmon as a
Provincial Symbol
(5) Five submissions regarding Pacific Arbour Development
Proposal, dated March 7-11, 2011
(Referred to Public Hearing, April 4, 2011)
(6) L. R. DeSpirt, March 9, 2011, regarding Temporary Restricted
Parking on Marine Drive
(7) March 10, 2011, regarding Giant Redwood Tree on Lawson
Avenue
(8) Multifaith Action Society, Mar 15, re Invitation to
Multifaith Prayer for Japan, Mar 17th at 6:30pm
(9) Union of British Columbia Municipalities, March 14, 2011,
regarding Appointment of Honourable Ida Chong as Minister of
Community, Sport and Cultural Development
(10) Millennium Group, March 15, 2011, regarding Evelyn -
Millennium News Release
{notice of receivership}
(11) K. Stephens, Partnership for Water Sustainability in British
Columbia, March 11, 2011, regarding Recognition of West Vancouver
District as a Water Balance Model Champion
14. OTHER ITEMS
Council has requested that the following correspondence be
brought forward for discussion, and may propose a motion if Council
considers that further action is required.
14.1 G. and E. Lee, February 26, 2011, regarding Foot of
27th Street (Received for information)
15. Reports from Mayor/Cclrs 16.
PQP/Comments 17. Adjournment
=== ANIMALWATCH === well,
sea life actually
VIDEOS of fantastic
creatures
o Leafy
Sea Dragons -- documentary, scuba diving in S Australia (one
leafy sea dragon couple together for six years; her name is
Susan):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DuI4ncViU4Y
o Weedy
Sea Dragons
(courtship dance):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CPbFsjuYrVA&feature=related
+++ Subject: RE: ( FYI ) - 2nd Squamish Herring
report -- Restricted video: Spawning Sand lance.
Part of the SODC shore design is to create
conditions on Nexen beach suitable for sand lance spawning.....which
would involve placing medium to coarse sands in the shallow
subtidal/intertidal zone.
I thought I'd share this link to an
interesting video of sand lance spawning at Whidbey Island last fall.
Now you have to be a bit of a fish spawning enthusiast to watch all 16
minutes ....minutes 4-10 are the most interesting --
Brian
narrated sand lance spawning video
- have not watched all but looked at intro + 4:30-6:30 --
Jack
http://forums.canadiancontent.net/science-environment/98210-sand-lance-spawning-video-interest.html
=== INFObits ===
Sendai is now in a three-way tie for fourth b/c they say it was
9.0.
The Ten
Largest Earthquakes Since 1900
Below is a list of the
largest earthquakes on record in the world. Magnitude, date, and
location are also given.
Location Date
Magnitude
1.
Chile May 22,
1960 9.5
2. Prince William Sound,
Alaska March 28,
1964 9.2
3. Andreanof Islands, Aleutian
Islands
March 9,
1957
9.1
4.
Kamchatka Nov. 4, 1952
9.0
5. Off western coast of Sumatra,
Indonesia Dec. 26,
2004 9.0
6. Off the coast of
Ecuador
Jan.
31, 1906
8.8
7. Offshore Maule,
Chile
Feb.
27, 2010
8.8
8. Rat Islands, Aleutian
Islands
Feb.
4, 1965
8.7
9. Northern Sumatra, Indonesia
March 28, 2005
8.7
10. India-China border
Aug.
15, 1950
8.6
Source:
National Earthquake Information Center, U.S. Geological
Survey.
Read more: The Ten Largest Earthquakes Since
1900 -
Infoplease.com
http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0763403.html#ixzz1GOeHTS9g
=== OTTAWAWATCH == the govt
has a bad Oda?
G&M/Walkom:
Bev Oda, free speech and Harper's fixation on
Israel
from
Globe and Mail; by Thomas Walkom National Affairs
Columnist
The Bev Oda affair is about two things. It is
about allegations that the International Cooperation Minister lied to
Parliament. That's what the opposition parties focus
on.
But it is also about the Conservative
government's insistence on being more Israeli than Israelis
themselves. That's what put this matter in motion.
Recall that this entire business began when
Immigration Minister Jason Kenney bragged in Jerusalem that his
government had cut off funding to the aid group Kairos for supporting
a boycott of Israel.
In fact, Kenney's allegation wasn't true.
But it was true that Kairos has supported Palestinian relief
organizations deemed to be critical of Israel. It has also questioned
Ottawa's decision to cut off aid to Hamas-led Gaza.
To the paranoid minds in Prime Minister
Stephen Harper's regime, all of this was sufficient reason to
overrule the government's official aid arm, the Canadian
International Development Agency, and abruptly terminate Kairos
funding.
Oda's problems came later when, after
realizing that the original justification wasn't plausible, she
tried to invent a new one. That's when the fibbing
occurred.
Read rest:
http://ijvcanada.org/il-pal/gmwalkom-bev-oda-free-speech-and-harper's-fixation-on-israel/
=== HOUSINGWATCH ==
PRICE: Vancouver not in top ten ~
$5,673 per sq m; Moscow $18,000; HK $78,200
http://www.vancouversun.com/most+expensive+streets+world+Vancouver+compares/4465848/story.html
EMPTY: 18% of houses in Florida
(over 1M homes)
UNSOLD: 64M apartments in China :
http://www.sbs.com.au/dateline/story/watch/id/601007/n/China-s-Ghost-Cities
=== BIZWATCH ===
Fraser Institute: Mining
~ 4:30pm ~ Tuesday Mar 29 ~ Fraser Institute at Four Seasons
Hotel
Global Mining Hot Spots: The Fraser Institute's Survey of Mining
Companies 2010/2011
Fred McMahon -- Where are the
best and worst places in the world for mining investment? How do
Canadian jurisdictions stack up in the view of the global mining
industry? The Fraser Institute's annual Survey of Mining
Companies has the answers, as international industry executives
offer their take on the exploration and development attractiveness of
nearly 80 mining jurisdictions worldwide.
Join Fred McMahon, Fraser Institute
vice-president of international policy research, as he presents
the results of the Fraser Institute's Survey of Mining Companies
2010/2011. McMahon's presentation will focus on key jurisdictions
in the global rankings, as well as industry reactions to the worldwide
economic turnaround.
Agenda: 4:30pm Registration & Reception; 5pm
Presentation; 5:45pm Q&A; 6pm Adjournment
FREE event made possible by HudBay
Minerals. Pre-registration is required 688 0221
=== PEACEWATCH ===
Iraq/Kurdistan & Local
>>> CPTnet -- 14 March 2011 -- IRAQ: The Great
Wall peace community by Allan Slater
A long white ribbon has been stretched from lamppost to
lamppost blocking off streets leading to the city centre here in
Suleimaniya. All along the ribbon stand people in white
sashes facing into the square where thousands have gathered to speak
publicly to their Kurdish Regional Government. The ribbon
and the people along it make up what one might call "the great
white wall of peace", white being the colour that symbolizes
peace in this culture. The wall has created a space of calm
between the protestors and the military further back on the
streets.
Rest at:
http://www.cpt.org/cptnet/2011/03/13/iraq-great-wall-peace-community
>>> Fundraiser for
Peace
Outlook -- Canada's
Progressive Jewish Magazine
~ 6pm ~
Sunday March 27 -- Ben Chud Auditorium, Peretz
Centre, 6184 Ash St.
Outlook:
Canada's Progressive Jewish Magazine has been publishing
continuously since 1962. It offers a distinctive selection of
political and cultural features, reflecting its distinct Jewish
humanist view of the world. It upholds the values of peace, social
justice, and democracy the world over.
For the intellect
.... Micheal Vonn, Policy Director of the BC Civil
Liberties Assn, will speak on "Threats to Civil Liberties and
Free Speech"
For the soul
...
Vancouver actor Stephen Aberle will perform the satirical
monologue, "At the Anarchists' Convention"
And for the
palate ... Our usual delicious Lasagna Supper! Cover charge $25
pp; pls indicate meat or vegetarian.
Free underground
parking. Reservations or info: 604 324 5101; cjoutlook@telus.net /
www.vcn.bc.ca/outlook
=== WOMENWATCH
===
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 14:02:24 +0200
Subject: [cpthebron] Palestine release: Palestinian women call
for justice on International Women's Day
This article was originally published on Waging Nonviolence,
written by Samuel Nichols.
<http://wagingnonviolence.org/2011/03/palestinian-woman-call-for-justice-on-international-womens-day/>
All across the occupied Palestinian territories,
women took to the streets on Tuesday [8th] in commemoration of the
100th anniversary of International Women's Day.
In Gaza city, an estimated 500 women marched
through the city centre calling for national unity and an end to the
rift between rival political factions, Fatah, which governs the West
Bank, and Hamas, which governs the Gaza Strip. Women called for a
unified Palestinian voice, while hoisting a 10-metre long Palestinian
flag, as a necessary step in resisting Israel's expanding settlement
project that includes the ongoing judaization of
Jerusalem.
Palestinian women also led protests across the
Israeli-occupied West Bank. In Beit Ummar, north of Hebron, dozens
of women blocked an Israeli bypass road -- a crucial piece of the
transportation infrastructure built to connect Israeli settlements, a
transportation system to which Palestinians have limited access --
in protest of Israel's vast system of roadblocks that limit
Palestinian movement.
At Qalandia checkpoint, a monstrosity of a
checkpoint between Ramallah and Jerusalem, 150 Palestinian women
demonstrators attempted to pass through to Jerusalem. Israeli border
guards formed a human wall to prevent the women from proceeding
through the checkpoint, demonstrating Israel's restriction of
Palestinians' movement, including the denial of access to areas
supposedly under Palestinian control such as East
Jerusalem.
In Hebron, a broad swath of women's civil
society, including representatives from non-governmental
organizations, schools, labor unions, and women's cooperatives
organized to distribute flowers to a large number of women across the
city.
The Palestinian human rights organization, Al-Haq, released an
excellent video for International Women's Day
highlighting the ways that both the Palestinian Authority and
the Israeli occupation are responsible for the suppression of
Palestinian women's rights. Alongside the video, Al-Haq
released a statement reminding the world that the "struggle for the
fundamental human rights of Palestinian women" is severely
jeopardized by a "belligerent and unrelenting
occupation":
Throughout the OPT, women's access to
educational institutions, places of employment and healthcare clinics
is severely impeded by restrictions on Palestinians' right to
freedom of movement. While the repressive and discriminatory policies
exercised by Israel against the free movement of Palestinians have had
a devastating effect on the entire population, the disproportionate
impact on Palestinian women, who are denied the most basic economic
and social rights guaranteed to them by international law, cannot be
overstated.
Attending a protest in occupied East Jerusalem,
Fadwa Khader, women's activist and member of the Palestinian
People's Party, accentuated the point that women's rights are
routinely trampled by the unrelenting Israeli occupation:
Today is a celebration of International
Women's Day and the Palestinian women of Jerusalem are raising our
voices and calling on the world to show solidarity with us and help us
get rid of the Israeli occupation.
Part of the women's rights issue is the harm
caused by the Israeli occupation. Can you imagine women being woken up
and kicked out of their homes in the early morning so their homes can
be demolished to make way for settlements?
We are talking about human rights and women's
rights.
Too often we are quick to sound the alarm on the
plight of women in the Arab world, often citing (by default) the role
that Islamists play in the suppression of women's rights in the
Middle East. We routinely fail to listen to Arab women -- in this
case, Palestinian women -- who clearly identify the obstacles that
stand between them and their rights. On March 8, across Gaza and the
West Bank, Palestinian women identified the U.S.-supported Israeli
occupation of their land and livelihood as the biggest impediment to
the realization of their rights.
STREETWATCH
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 13:39:49 +0200
Subject: [cpthebron] Hebron: Palestinians demand the opening of
Shuhada Street (including video)
This article was published on Waging Nonviolence on 28
February 2011, written by Samuel Nichols.
<http://wagingnonviolence.org/2011/02/palestinians-demand-the-opening-of-shuhada-street/>
An estimated one thousand Palestinians, joined by
Israeli and international activists, took to the streets on Friday to
demand the opening of Shuhada (Martyrs) Street, a former thoroughfare
in the West Bank city of Hebron. Israeli occupying forces fired
foam-tipped bullets, tear gas, and sound grenades resulting in the
serious injury of nine protestors, in addition to the many who
suffered the adverse effects of tear gas inhalation.
Protestors attempted to reach Shuhada Street but
were intercepted by Israeli forces who formed human walls to
prevent Palestinians from reaching the street that formerly hosted the
city's main market. The protestors marched towards the line of
soldiers, holding signs and chanting, "We don't want the settlers
nor the occupation," and, "the people want Shuhada
Street."
Israeli forces used riot dispersal methods at
multiple locations when they were outnumbered by the protesters who
had gathered. The use of these weapons effectively segmented the crowd
that was forced to scatter to adjacent streets and alleys to avoid the
incapacitating tear gas and the disorienting sound grenades. A small
minority of Palestinian youth responded with stone-throwing only after
Israeli forces had violently suppressed the protesters' assertion of
their rights to free speech and freedom of movement. (I mention this
for the sake of refuting the misleading articles and headlines which
parroted the claims of Israeli military spokespersons, emphasizing the
injury of five Israeli Border Police while dismissing the history and
current political realities of Israel's colonization of
Hebron).
Friday's protest marked the 17th anniversary of
Baruch Goldstein's massacre of 29 Palestinians who were praying in
Hebron's Ibrahimi Mosque. Following the 1994 massacre, Shuhada
Street -- a main artery serving the Old City of Hebron as well as
the Ibrahimi Mosque -- was closed to Palestinian
traffic. No Palestinian cars, nor Palestinian themselves
are permitted on Shuhada Street; whereas, Israeli settlers are
permitted to travel freely while under the protection of the Israeli
military. Many Palestinians whose homes are located on Shuhada
Street are not able to use their front doors. Some residents of
Shuhada Street are forced to use ladders connected to neighboring
roofs in order to leave their homes.
As seen in in Hebron on Friday, the Israeli
government continues to suppress Palestinian popular resistance and
attempts to paint all Palestinians actively involved in the nonviolent
struggle as deviant and violent individuals. The Israeli media
predictably reported that stone-throwing troublemakers were seeking to
gain access to the "Jewish Quarter" of Hebron, while in fact, the
protestors were attempting to access a street, in the heart of an
Arab city, from which they have been barred based on ethnic
criteria. Contrary to Israeli hasbara (propaganda) claims, the
Palestinians in Hebron, and all across the West Bank, who are daily
struggling against Israeli's expanding colonial project are ordinary
people, they are people who have been pushed to the brink by
Israel's inhumane occupation.
CHILDRENWATCH
CPTnet
15 March 2011
AT-TUWANI: Traumatizing the children of the South Hebron
Hills by Sam Nichols
Since 2004, Christian Peacemaker Teams and
Operation Dove have documented more than 110 acts of settler
aggression against Palestinian schoolchildren from Tuba and Maghayir
al-Abeed villages in the South Hebron Hills [1]. The details of the
attacks may vary, but the crux of every incident is the same: the
Israeli military fails to arrive in order to escort the schoolchildren
past Ma'on settlement and Havat Ma'on outpost; the children are forced
to walk an indirect route without escort; settlers emerge from the
outpost and chase or assault the children.
As I sat with the kids on 7 February 2011, they
were becoming increasingly impatient. They ha
finished their two-week winter recess that
provided a reprieve from the daily uncertainty of whether their
journey home would be uneventful or dangerous. As the kids became
increasingly eager to take the long way home, instead of waiting for
the military escort, I became frustrated with their impatience -
even though I knew my frustration was misplaced.
I had called the military dispatch office four
times, encouraging them to send the escort. Twice they answered and
told me they would send the soldiers. On my third call, they hung up.
On the fourth call, the dispatcher informed me that the office had not
even called the soldiers because the soldiers had more important
duties to perform.
During the call, the kids were climbing on my
arms and legs, trying to get their ears closer to phone to hear what
the military personnel were saying. What did they say? Are the
soldiers coming? I could not bear to tell them the truth, that the
officers did not care what happened to them, so I lied. Yeah, they
are on their way here; just wait a few more minutes.
Finally, the kids' patience ran out, and they
set off on the longer path that skirts along the perimeter of Havat
Ma'on outpost. Mere minutes after setting out on the sixty-minute
journey over rough, rocky hills, the kids spotted a settler in the
trees that obscure the outpost. The kids scrambled in retreat while I
struggled to turn on my video camera as I ran backwards. After
getting a safe distance from the place where they saw the settler, the
older kids in the group discussed our options and decided we should
descend into the adjacent valley, to distance ourselves from the
outpost, and continue heading towards Tuba and Maghayir
Al-Abeed.
The older children were confident in their choice
- they have made important decisions like this countless times
before. The instant we started to head deeper into the valley, my
colleague, who was watching from a nearby hilltop, called to say three
settlers were moving down the valley in our direction. Before she
finished speaking, I yelled to the kids, "Come back here,
quickly, there are three settlers coming down the hill towards us;
they are masked!"
READ MORE:
http://www.cpt.org/cptnet/2011/03/13/tuwani-traumatizing-children-south-hebron-hills
=== ROYALWATCH ==
CTV EDMONTON
-- Prince
William, Kate visit birthplace of their love
Prince
William and Kate Middleton wave as they pass St. Salvator's halls,
during a visit to St Andrew's University. in St. Andrew's, Scotland,
on Friday, Feb. 25, 2011. (AP / Andrew Milligan)
Prince
William and his fiance Kate Middleton react following a naming
ceremony and Service dedication for the Royal National Lifeboat
Institution's new Atlantic 85 Lifeboat, at Trearddur Bay Lifeboat
Station in Anglesey, Wales, Thursday Feb. 24, 2011. (AP / Phil Noble,
Pool) Updated: Fri Feb. 25 2011 The Associated
Press
The couple, who
will be wed April 29 at Westminster Abbey, travelled to St.
Andrew's to help their alma mater kick off a two-year
celebration of its 600th anniversary.
... The couple will attend a reception in the
university quadrangle and view the Papal Bull, or decree, issued by
Pope Benedict XIII to found the university in
1413.
http://www.cp24.com/servlet/an/local/CTVNews/20110225/standrews-kate-william-110225?hub=EdmontonHome
=== HERITAGEWATCH ===
o An Evening of Tiki at the
Waldorf
Wednesday, March 23, 2011 | Doors open 6pm, Talk
6:30pm, Tour 7:00pm
The Waldorf Hotel, 1489 East Hastings Street,
Vancouver
Tix: Advance $25; Heritage Vancouver Mbrs $20; remaining
tix at the door for $30;
Price includes, tour, talk, and a complimentary Mai Tai;
Dinner may be purchased onsite
Polynesian splendour of the Tiki Rooms at the fabulous Waldorf
Hotel. An Evening of Tiki is your opportunity to experience the
tropical nostalgia of the 1950s, slip into your Hawaiian shirt, sip on
a Mai Tai, and listen to exotica music amid palm trees, bamboo and a
twinkling midnight sky.
The Waldorf, created at the very beginning of the Tiki craze of
the 1950s, is one of the oldest surviving Tiki bars in North
America, and one of the last original such establishments left
outside of the Hawaiian Islands. A post-war phenomenon, Tiki culture
was rooted partially in the nostalgic tropical memories of returned
soldiers but also in the forbidden fantasies of a middle class
fascinated by the exotic and the erotic. The Waldorf's fabulous
Polynesian-themed rooms reflect an era when Polynesian ephemera
adorned lounges, restaurants, hotels, and rumpus rooms. Exotica music
was all the rage, and from Broadway musicals to Hollywood movies North
Americans revelled in the allure of the South Pacific Isles. Return
with us to a simpler time, of tropical fantasies and strong rum
drinks.
Your nostalgic evening will begin in the Tiki room with a
fascinating presentation on Polynesian Pop Culture by renowned expert,
'Dr Tiki' - our own Donald Luxton. Following this
fun-filled exploration of the formative years of the Tiki movement and
its social, cultural, and architectural impacts on North America, we
will explore the newly renovated Tiki rooms on a guided tour. Your
tropical journey will end at the Tiki Bar, where you will while away
the evening sipping on a Mai Tai, enjoying music with a DJ and soaking
up the retro atmosphere.
o An Evening at the Art Deco Marine
Building Penthouse (1930)
Wednesday, March 30, 2011 | 5:30pm to 8:00pm Full
info Tickets
* Bulletins: Sign-up to receive, view previous:
www.heritagevancouver.org/bulletins.html
=== LANGUAGEWATCH === Senior
Texting Code
Since more and more seniors are texting and tweeting, there
appears to be a need for an STC (Senior Texting Code). So, here it is
- additions welcomed:
ATD: At The Doctor's
BFF: Best Friend
Fainted
BTW: Bring The
Wheelchair
BYOT: Bring Your Own
Teeth
CBM: Covered By Medicare
CUATSC: See You At The Seniors'
Centre
DWI: Driving While
Incontinent
FWB: Friend With Beta Blockers
FWIW: Forgot Where I Was
FYI: Found Your
Insulin
GGPBL: Gotta Go, Pacemaker
Battery Low!
GHA: Got Heartburn
Again
IMHO: Is My
Hearing-Aid On?
LMDO: Laughing My Dentures
Out
OMMR: On My Massage
Recliner
ROTFL... CGU: Rolling On The
Floor Laughing... And Can't Get Up
TTYL: Talk To You
Louder
WAITT: Who Am I
Talking To?
WTP: Where's The
Prunes?
WWNO: Walker
Wheels Need Oil
LMGA: Lost My Glasses Again
* SAYING from CelticFest
*
IRISH TRIVIA QUIZ
-- Sat Mar 19 from 2:30pm at
Tom Lee Music
The Irish language school Scoil
Gaeilge Vancouver challenges you to test your Gaelic. Maybe
you'll meet a sweetie --
Nil aon sean stoca nach bhfaigheann sean bhrog.
There is no old stocking that doesn't find an old boot.
=== HAIKUWATCH
===
+ VANCOUVER CHERRY BLOSSOM FESTIVAL
http://www.vcbf.ca/
Celebrate 125
Vancouver
-- March
26 to April 22
"The annual
Vancouver Cherry Blossom Festival is a popular tradition in our city,
bringing people of all ages and backgrounds together to celebrate the
quintessential symbol of spring. As we prepare for Vancouver's 125th
anniversary, please join me in congratulating the Vancouver Cherry
Blossom Festival on this year's celebration and the 3,000 new
flowering Birthday Blossom cherry trees being made available to
property owners throughout the city.These commemorative trees will
serve as a legacy for Vancouver's residents and visitors to enjoy for
the next 125 years." -- Vancouver Mayor Gregor
Robertson
o Haiku
Invitational 2011 -- Celebrate Vancouver 125 with your
new haiku!
o Buy your Birthday
Blossoms Cherry Tree by
March 29th for the Special
Offer savings. A cherry tree for everyone!
o Enjoy a
family-friendly Japanese Festival at VanDusen, April 2 & 3,
10am to 5pm.
o Celebrate
Spring! Thursday, March 31st, noon to 1:30pm, Burrard SkyTrain
Station.
o Like the
blossoms
VIOLINPOWER with Edmund Chung
will take your breath away -- April 9, 5pm, CBC Studio
700.
o Cherry Scouts send
in reports from the neighbourhoods on what's in bloom now. Check
out their photos from some great viewing
locations.
o Check out the
cherries in your neighbourhood!
o Learn about our
trees as you scout out our best viewing locations.
o Register now for a
chance to work with our amazing artists.
+ Ginko Walk
The Vancouver Haiku Group extends an invitation to all haiku
poets and enthusiasts to join us for a ginko walk Saturday,
March 26 starting at 10:30am.
The International Buddhist Temple, 9160 Steveston
(between No. 3 and No. 4 Roads), Richmond
$3 Donation (to be used towards services rendered to the
communities)
The group will meet in the parking lot at 10:30am near the
entrance to the Temple for a tour followed by a walk. Ginko walks
provide a wealth of inspiration and encourage people to embrace the
gift of experience through expression. Join us for this adventure that
will surely produce great and memorable poetry.
In addition to the above, a reservation will be made for
those who will be joining the group for lunch at Kisha Poppo
Restaurant in Richmond located in the Ironwood Plaza at 1060 - 11660
Steveston Highway. For further information on prices and menu
selections, preview the following website:
http://www.kishapopporestaurant.com/.
+ Old Pond
Comics :-)
In February 2011, Jessica Tremblay took part in NaHaiWriMo
(National Haiku Writing Month), a challenge created by Michael Dylan
Welch on Facebook consisting of writing one haiku a day for a month.
Jessica created 28 haiku-comics in 28 days!
Read the hilarious comics at
http://oldpond.voila.net/nahaiwrimo.html
Old Pond Comics features the adventures of Kaeru who becomes
the apprentice of Master Kawazu (the frog who inspired Basho's
famous haiku).
=== MAIKU ===
+ 2011 March 17
wave follows earthquake
Man,
trees, swept away
before the cherry blossoms
{last word can be noun or verb, so
two meanings}
+ 2011 March 19
thinking of budget and possible election; you may
wish to substitute your favourite funding/tax incentive/promise for
the first line:
stimulus package
takes Peter's money, pays Paul.
My
name is Peter.
=== QUOTATIONS/THOUGHTS
===
There is nothing like desire for preventing the things one says
from bearing any resemblance to what one has in one's mind.
-- Marcel
Proust, French novelist (1871-1922)
Idealism is what precedes experience; cynicism is what
follows.
-- David T. Wolf,
American (probably?) writer (b. 1943)
A bend in the road is not the end of the road...unless you
fail to make the turn.
-- Unknown
Our wretched species is so made that those who walk on the
well-trodden path always throw stones at those who are showing a new
road.
--
Voltaire, French writer, and historian, polemicist (1694 -1778)
It's much easier to suggest solutions when you don't know too
much about the problem.
-- Malcolm Forbes,
American, editor of Forbes Magazine (1919 - 1990)
Only a fool would choose war over peace -- for in peace sons bury
their fathers and in war fathers their sons.
--
Herodotus, Greek historian (c.?484 BC - c.?425 BC)
Most of the important things in the world have been
accomplished by people who have kept on trying when there seemed to be
no hope at all.
--
Dale Carnegie, American writer (1888 - 1955)
Angels fly because they take themselves lightly.
-- Jean
Cocteau, French
poet,
novelist,
dramatist,
artist, and
filmmaker (1889 -
1963)
=== PUNS ===
How Long is a Chinese
man.
People in Ireland are
walking on Eire.
The pharaohs of Egypt
worked out the first pyramid scheme.
Biscuits and speeches
are better when made with shortening.
Reassembling the
skeletons of prehistoric mammals can be a mammoth
undertaking.